MovieChat Forums > Brittney Griner Discussion > Deserves EVERYTHING she gets!

Deserves EVERYTHING she gets!


Apparently, this bimbo didn’t watch Midnight Express! You did the crime, now do the time.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/04/in-letter-brittney-griner-begs-biden-to-get-her-out-of-russia/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=pasteboard_app

reply

Have compassion! She's an oppressed victim of gross white privilege in America.

reply

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

reply

I knew some idiot was gonna go there.

reply

Go where -- speak the obvious truth thru amusing sarcasm?

reply

Have to admit I'm not really feeling any great sympathy for her.

reply

I agree

reply

Another "celebrity" athlete with trashy tattoos.

reply

I hate women with tattoos! When a woman gets a tattoo, I always ask myself why….unless they are hideous in the first place. Then, no questions asked.

reply

I've asked this question on multiple forums: "Why do people get tattoos?" I have yet to receive an answer, or at least one that is legitimate.

The only thing I can figure is these people must have awfully low self-esteem or possibly self-loathing to want to do permanent damage to their bodies.

reply

"because we want to" is a legitimate answer.

reply

No, it isn't. "Wanting to" permanently mar one's skin is sick and self-destructive. Why would anyone "want" to do such a thing?

reply

Because it pisses off their parents?

reply

Doing it to anger someone isn't a legitimate reason, either.

reply

Well then don't ask questions when all you do is dismiss the answers.

reply

sick and self destructive? LOL the 1920s called. they want their old out of date man yelling at the sky

reply

Permanently marring ones skin is destructive. It serves no purpose.

reply

it really does and pretty much every culture has it. its not "destructive". the aesthetic is changed but not "destroyed". anymore than painting a beautiful picture on a wall "destroys" and "is destructive" to the wall.

reply

Okay, what purpose does it serve?

It has no medicinal, nutritional or practical value. It involves injecting a foreign substance under the skin, which isn't healthy.

Comparing ones skin to a wall makes no sense. Walls are inanimate objects; they can be repainted. Trashy tattoos can be removed but there will be scar tissue.

If you wish to make comparisons, think of your body as a brand-new expensive sports car. Would take the keys and scuff the paint job?

reply

do you do everything in your life for such cold calculated logical reasons?

"I must not eat steak, i consume food purely for nutrients and the most efficient way to consume nutrients is in a past like substance"

"It involves injecting a foreign substance under the skin, which isn't healthy."

while there may be a risk of an initial infection, there's no evidence they are unhealthy. people do riskier things all the time.

"Comparing ones skin to a wall makes no sense. Walls are inanimate objects; they can be repainted. Trashy tattoos can be removed but there will be scar tissue."

Hence why I advocate only getting tattoos you want after a year and serious consideration.

"If you wish to make comparisons, think of your body as a brand-new expensive sports car. Would take the keys and scuff the paint job?"

you cant even do a good analogy man. No it'd be like getting a car, and being like, hmmm well id like to add unique paint job, change the rims and give it some cool underlighting. which people do ALL THE TIME. its yours to customize. people like to e unique, change things, make it custom to how they want. are you for certain rigid conservative clothing and hair styles too?? "all women should only have bangs! its the most practical for vision and utilitarian!"

instead its like you coming in with the car analogy

"It has no mechanical!performance or practical value. It involves changing the original factory parts model!! how dare you!!!"

reply

I LIKE YOU TODAY.🙂

reply

I dont even have a single tattoo but it seems like the least controversial issue ever. and extremely outdated thing my 85 year old grandparent would say

reply

JONJON SEEMS TO BE ABOUT 93 AND CONSTANTLY PISSED AT US WHIPPERSNAPPERS.

reply

even military people from his era had tattooes because it meant something significant to them

im not saying people now are getting them for reasons as good as remembering or being part of a military service unit from ww2, but those outside military culture have also been getting tattoos for over half a century.

reply

MY GRANDFATHER HAD A FEW MILITARY TATS...HE SERVED IN WWII...HE WAS A POW FOR OVER TWO YEARS AND RECEIVED THE PURPLE HEART FOR GETTING SHOT IN THE THIGH...ALSO STEVE MCQUEEN AND THAT BADASS BUTTERFLY TATTOO IN PAPILLON...I FEEL LIKE MY LIKING OF TATTOOS IS INFLUENCED BY LEGENDARY DUDES FROM MY CHILDHOOD.

reply

he posted again and somehow got even worse and more old man grouchy below.

reply

What is a "past like substance"...?

Customizing a car is one thing... permanently marring your skin is something totally different. If you get tired of the car, you can sell it. When you get a sleazy tattoo, you are stuck with it unless you want to go through the pain and expense of surgical removal which still leaves scars.

There have been ridiculous trends in the past, but for the most part they were harmless. Silly hairstyles could grow out and clownish clothing could be sent to the thrift store. Does anyone ever think about future consequences, like what is going to happen when the ink fades and skin starts sagging? These people may think they are "cool" now, but will be a laughingstock in a few years. It's like today when we look at photos from the 1960s or 1970s and find them amusing. Only this will not be a photo, it will be an actual person who permanently destroyed their skin.

I'm not going to waste my time with someone who likes to argue and hear himself talk. I'm not going to post any further because it is allowing Brittney Griner to trend on the home page. She doesn't deserve any mention.

reply

*paste like I meant.

its your assumption they are sleazy

"Does anyone ever think about future consequences, like what is going to happen when the ink fades and skin starts sagging? These people may think they are "cool" now, but will be a laughingstock in a few years."

When you are old and wrinkly and sagging, you dont exactly look like a super model anyways. why would they care? what are they going to say "my old wrinkly saggy fat and skin at 80 would look soooo beautiful if it weren't for these tattoos!"

or will they be happy they lived their life how they wanted and had tattoos they felt represented them. think about it for two seconds. Ive seen old people with tattoos, no one points and laughs.you are living in a fantasy land.

" it will be an actual person who permanently destroyed their skin."

Again what is destroyed?

""I'm not going to waste my time with someone who likes to argue and hear himself talk. I'm not going to post any further because it is allowing Brittney Griner to trend on the home page. She doesn't deserve any mention."

you are jsut a bitter old person not making sense.

reply

Think about what you're writing. Your personal opinion is that it is sick and self-destructive. Other people don't think so. Just because you dislike it doesn't make it wrong.

reply

Doesn't make him wrong either.

reply

The point is that he can't be right or wrong. He's expressing an aesthetic opinion.

reply

tattoos on girls get me horny

reply

permanently mar one's skin is sick and self-destructive

No it isn't

Why would anyone "want" to do such a thing?

Because they want to. Simple

I don't have any trashy tattoos. I have tattoos that I like from interests that I love.

You don't get a tattoo for other people to look at. You get it for yourself. What other people think is irrelevant just like you.

Tattoos have been around in one form or another for a millenia and they will continue for ever.

Get over it. No one cares about your outdated views.

reply

If you take that stance, then "why did you want to" is a legitimate follow up.

reply

And then "because I think it looks cool" is a legitimate answer to the follow up.

reply

While I don't share the sentiment, I'll agree that it's a reasonable answer.

reply

Its a form of personal expression and people simply like them...Is that a legitimate enough answer? I don't have any personally, but I don't understand why you have such a hard on against them. Live and let live!

Curious though, do you have the same problem with ear piercings? I mean, why would someone put an awful hole in their ear!? The insanity!!!

reply

Like I told Leodicaprio above, this will be my last response to this thread because every time we post something it allows Brittney Griner to trend on the home page. She doesn't deserve any recognition.

Its a form of personal expression and people simply like them...Is that a legitimate enough answer?
No. A person can express oneself without permanently destroying their bodies. It's sick to "like" injecting a foreign substance under the skin.

...but I don't understand why you have such a hard on against them.
Because this is destructive behavior. When celebrities and pro athletes do this to themselves it encourages people who can't think for themselves to emulate it, thinking they will be "cool" of they imitate [fill in celebrity name here]. Kids admire and want to be like their favorite sports heroes. Do these athletes ever stop and think about what sort of image they are presenting to children?

Live and let live!
So sit back and watch society regress and allow itself to go down the tubes?

Curious though, do you have the same problem with ear piercings?
I don't mind women with simple ear-piercings, although I don't understand why they go through the pain. The nose piercings cross the line, though. When someone punctures the mucous membranes, it can lead to a serious infection. The latest thing is the ring through the nose, like you would see on a pig. This is supposed to be attractive? https://c8.alamy.com/comp/DJ263X/pig-with-nose-ring-DJ263X.jpg

There are your answers. I'm not discussing this any further on this particular board for the reason above.


reply

loool You're obsessed and sound like a complete dork.

reply

Nope. I 100% agree with everything he says and he has good reasoning behind it, too.

If we had more people like him maybe places like America wouldn't be falling down the gutter at lightspeed.

reply

You're a dork too, then.

You think people having art on their body is contributing to America being in the gutter? That's quite laughable.

reply

Either they never grew up/matured, or it's a cultural thing like Buddhist Monks (although they are also divided on it)..

reply


Everyone who has them thinks that people can tell what they are. Without close scrutiny, they all pretty much look like some sort of injury from falling off a motorcycle or some kind of skin disease.

All they really accomplish is to make the person look like they're in perpetual need of a shower.

https://i.imgur.com/hCNlZu3.jpg

reply

Yes she picked a definite wrong time to do something dumb.Shit baby f nugget says he has no choice but to let her rot in jail over there.

reply

without the protection of my wife, family, friends, Olympic jersey, or any accomplishments


I didn't know that inanimate objects such as an Olympic jersey or accomplishments, could protect you.

reply

I have little empathy for Americans that go to other countries and pull these stunts.

It’s the same with the douche that went to North Korea and died as a result of bad jail conditions.

reply

I have to agree. While it's an unfortunate situation for her, it's one of her own making. I find it very hard to believe that she was ignorant of the laws, just entitled enough to ignore them.

reply

She should be glad she didn't visit Singapore and take the cannabis vape cartridges with her. People were all up in arms back when they caned Michael Fay back in '94 for spray-painting, and he was white. Could you imagine the outrage that would occur if the punishment handed down was to cane a Black woman like her?

reply

She happily voted for Biden and just recently wrote him a letter that she wants her freedom back. She's too dumb to realize that Biden is way too weak to help her

reply

We'll all be happy to welcome her home and laugh at your dumb ass.

reply

As long as Biden is president, she isn't coming home. Russia is laughing at this situation. Maybe they will allow her to write a letter every week to Biden asking for her release and how she happily voted for him

reply

You WANT the US to seem weak so pricks can take over and turn it into a russian iron-fisted gulag and you can align yourself with the judges, torturers and executioners to fulfill your sick desires.

reply

She refuses to stand for our national anthem. Now she wants her country to help her? I hope she rots in jail

reply

Russia: "You've heard of Midnight Express, yes Miss Griner?"
Mizz Grinda: "Ain't dat the coffee roast endorsed by the Black Panthers?"

reply

We? All 3 of your kind?

reply

It's up to Bidets handlers..

reply

She wants the very same country which she refused to honor during perfunctory national anthem ceremonies to rescue her and win back her freedom? She's a hypocritical fool. At the very least she should first apologize to the American people for her snotty rejection of their country's flag and national anthem. Then maybe she can justifiably plead and beg for the state department to have her crimes in Russia ignored.

reply

"Perfunctory" is right. A meaningless show where we are forced to agree with all the misery the US has brought to countless individuals. Either go along with the show or you become the enemy, right? So much for Freedom around here.

reply

""Perfunctory" is right. A meaningless show where we are forced to agree with all the misery the US has brought to countless individuals. Either go along with the show or you become the enemy, right? So much for Freedom around here."

I'd say you have a legitimate point worthy of debate, except with the people who take such a stance it's always a one-way street. For example, you better use preferred pronouns like "they" to describe a single person who wishes to be referred to that way, or else prepare to be ostracized as some-identity-or-other-phobe. Accept BLM as a righteous agent for necessary social change or be branded a racist. I could trot out numerous other examples. Because of this hypocritical asymmetry I reject your boilerplate leftist rhetoric. Besides, every country has good aspects about it, including the USA. One can always view the national anthem ritual as a grateful acknowledgment of the good rather than the bad. And what's Mizz Grinda doing taking money from those evil Russians, anyway? Or from evil Americans for that matter?

reply

Is Biden too weak, or not connected enough? Russia does happen to be currently invading a sovereign nation; an invasion that also happens to be supremely unpopular worldwide.

What would your course of action be? Maybe Tom Cruise and his Mission Impossible crew can miracle something? Maybe Biden can call Trump for a favor? 🤷🏻‍♂️

reply