MovieChat Forums > It's a Wonderful Life (1947) Discussion > You could buy a house for $5,000 back th...

You could buy a house for $5,000 back then


Now they're $500,000. Disgusting. Bring back mandatory 20% down payments and stop with the artificially low interest rates!

reply

Would that make prices come down?

reply

Lowering minimum wage.

reply

People who earn minimum wages arent buying houses, so no. They're renting, or living with family, in this state at least there's no way they're buying.

reply

I was more meaning the raise of minimum wage is why people can't get decent raises anymore. And why prices go up on things.

reply

Do look into the whole "living wage" movement, will you?

Because in a great many places, nobody can actually live on minimum wage as it is.

reply

Minimum wage is not a living wage! I am so sick of hearing that! And if you are a new employee at a restaurant or a store you are going to be getting very few hours anyway. Frankly I am upset that Politicians here in Illinois where I live have decided to raise minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2025 and I just got a substantial raise which is $5 above minimum wage. In 5 years I'll be lucky if I even still have a job at the Kroger store I work at! Or if I'm still getting 40 hours. Frankly you people on the left don't even think about farmers and how much they will have to pay their farm hands and how much more they'll be paying for fuel for their tractors if minimum wage is $15 an hour. The farmers here will have to raise their prices on their crops to make up the difference in pay they now have to pay their farmhands. A lot of non corporate businesses will go out because they won't be able to afford to pay their new workers $15 an hour and give fair raises to their longtime workers. But I wouldn't expect you or any liberal to understand that because you're incapable of thinking of the consequences of what you demand!

reply

GreenGoblinsOck8 dear, all employees need to earn enough to feed, clothe and house themselves. If a business owner can't pay a fair wage to allow that, then they shouldn't be in business!! Committing wage theft and worker exploitation in the pursuit of being a 'success' is both immoral and illegal.

reply

Minimum wage is the least you're allowed to legally make! It is not meant to be the end all of be all of how much one can make! Why can't you people on the left understand that!? You and everyone else on the left drive me nuts because it's like you're living in a fantasy world where you think every business can just give every employee 40 hours a week when they can't! People like you and Bernie Sanders will destroy the world as we know it and put us into an economic state worse than the great depression!

reply

Why can't 'you people' understand that an employee can't live on fresh air, and reside in a box on the street? FFS, just how stupid are you? The lowest wage still needs to cover food, shelter, utilities and travel costs in order to allow a person to survive, and perform their work duties. Not accumulate savings or assets, just survive!!

reply

If you actually think that every business can just make all their employees full time you are completely deluded. And raising minimum wage isn't going to change the fact that everyone new at a store or restaurant is going to get part time hours. I don't hate poor people by the way. I try to give as much as I can to Salvation army and other charities. They just decided to raise minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2025 here in Illinois and I firmly believe I will be losing my job at Kroger then. I just got a substantial wage of $13.55 an hour at the beginning of this year and I doubt they'll be giving me $20 an hour in 2025. Even then they'll probably not be giving me fulltime hours then either like they are now. And it's all thanks to people like you who are just going to make millions more poor with your $15 minimum wage.

reply

Would that make prices come down?


Yes.

reply

How so?

reply

Supply and demand.

If bank required a 20% down payment, buyers would need to come up (for instance) with $60 thousand in cash up front to buy a $300K home. That would reduce the amount of qualified buyers for homes in that market, and prices would fall.

When interest rates for mortgages were higher, a higher percentage of the mortgage payment would be for interest, not principle. So if a buyer could afford $2500 a month and that's it, the house they could afford would be cheaper to make up for the high interest penalty, and many potential buyers stayed out of the market when the interest rates were so high making mortgages too costly to take on.

This is what caused the housing bubble that caused many Americans to go bankrupt and damage the economy.

Do-gooders thought that everyone should own a home and not have to scrimp and save for it. So they set forth legislation that allowed (and even required) banks to offer little to no down payment or even income verification. With more people now "qualified" for a mortgage, there were now more buyers than property available, so housing prices skyrocketed. Once these "qualified" buyers started missing payments and going into foreclosure, the housing market became flooded with property, and prices plummeted leaving homeowners with far more money owed on the property than the property was worth.

But I'm not an economist, I'm an engineer, so I'm sure there are others who can speak more articulately about these things. But I believe I got the basics right.

reply

That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.

reply

Some of your comment is on target, but that is NOT what caused the housing bubble. The housing bubble was caused by banks making obviously bad loans. Part of that was fraud within the banks, as mortgage officers had incentives to close loans, and part of it was legislation started by Frank and Dodd which forced banks to make more bad loans.

An additional factor was localized inflation of real estate values. Real estate was high demand in parts of California, for example, but when demand dropped, the market could not sustain the inflated property values. Your discussion of supply and demand applies, but you applied it to an invalid context, rather than what really happened.

The housing bubble only negatively affected specific markets. Where I live, it only created a pause in the increase of value for existing homes, rather than causing a decrease in their value.

FYI, the mortgage market has returned to much more strict requirements than those which allowed the avalanche of bad mortgages that created the crisis.

reply

I just saw that part. It's pretty crazy. These days you couldn't even build a tiny house for $5000.

When I was a kid in the 80s my dad bought a decent house in a nice neighborhood for $80,000. Even that seems like a pipe dream now.

reply

These days 5000 dollars from 1946 is nearly 70k. Yeah, you won't buy a new house for that but the standards and code laws have also added to the cost of a new home. I live in a neighborhood where the average house cost isn't too far off the 70k mark.

Also consider that this is right around the time that the concepts of suburbs started taking off. Land costs were probably pretty low when you were buying acreage from a farmer or undeveloped land.

reply

Also, don't forget that the Bailey homes were "a couple of rooms and a bath" (meaning indoor plumbing!), hardly a castle. Probably 800sq feet tops, the size of an apartment really.

reply

My dad bought a new house for $5k in 1953. It was very small - two bedrooms. one bath, living room with an eat-in kitchen. We lived on a bus line and didn't have a car until 1959 when he bought a used 53 Chevy and drove that thing to death until 1969.

reply

In the early 70's my parents bought a really big house for 40,000 dollars. At that time the best houses in town(and I mean mansion-like) were around 100,000 dollars. People who made around 50,000 dollars were considered very very well off. Now people make so much more and we seem to struggle. Back then money(or lack of) never seemed a big issue. Also, back then you had car and health insurance where they paid everything on a claim. Now they pay less and less and even deny you medical care when they don't find it necessary. Also, back then people without insurance would be charged next to nothing if they needed a procedure or a doctor. Now the medical institutions tell patients to either pay or in some cases die. This country is screwed and it is only going to get worse for ALL of us. The people at the top are going to continue to take larger pieces of pie and leave us with less and less.

reply

In 1946:

Minimum Wage = $0.46
Average Annual Income = $2,600
Monthly Rent = $35
New Car = $1,125
First-Class U.S. Postage = $0.03
One-Year Tuition at Harvard = $420
Movie Ticket = $0.55
Gallon of Gasoline = $0.21
Gallon of Milk = $0.67

$1 in 1946 = $12.97 in 2018

Cost of living is killing us.
A house should be $65,000 and rent $455 with an average yearly wage $33,800 and minimum wage $5.98.

reply

You don't believe in cause and effect?

reply

Cause and effect of what?

reply

Time travel, then? You see this whole 'should' thing is flawed in that you can't change the past and we are currently living in the world with it's current prices because of all things that happened before. Now about tomorrow and what justice and fairness that will bring is up to debate.

reply

Cost of living is killing us.


The standard of living is much higher in 2018 than it was immediately after WWII.

Not only do most poor own one or more large TVs, they also have modern appliances and cell phones. Clothes and other personal or household items are cheaper now per wage than ever.

Most of the "cost of living" issues people today are experiencing are directly tied to our propensity if not willingness to live beyond our means.

reply

I agree with you up to a point. The standard of living is higher and the middle-class are notorious for living above their means. But, that still doesn't negate the cost of living going up especially on necessities like housing and healthcare and people financially struggling with basics like rent or medical care.

A private doctor's visit was $5 when I was a kid and my parents easily paid out of pocket. That was very affordable. My private school was $15 each month and most of the students were poor. How many poor people could personally pay for private school and a doctor's visit today?

reply

But, that still doesn't negate the cost of living going up especially on necessities like housing and healthcare


We can't forget that we live in a capitalistic society. The benefits far outweigh the disadvantages but with regard to housing, rents and home costs are directly tied to whatever people can afford. Back in the 1920s, most families consisted of a man who worked and a woman who didn't, plus children as they came along.

Once women started entering the workforce in large numbers and contributing money to the household, many families could now afford a home or move to a larger home in a better neighborhood. Prices on homes and rents climbed when women started working. Face it, if you could sell your house for 250K to a two income family or 125K to a single income family because one of them would stay home to raise a child, would you be the altruistic sort and sell it to the one income family for half of what the fair market will bring?

Medical costs are another subject, one that I have no answers for except some obvious observations. It's true that medical costs were much cheaper per wage dollar in the old days. The problem back then is that many people suffered more pain, less quality of life, and lived a shorter life because of the very basic health care available. The equipment and training in the old days couldn't match what we have today, and all that costs money.

Back in the 1920s, if George's mother became permanently ill and required round the clock care, the family would have provided it personally with maybe ol' Doc Williams stopping by once a week. People rarely do that today. Back then, there were no healthcare facilities for the aged with round the clock nurses on duty - nurses who deserve a living wage.

I have no doubt that there is a lot of waste and fraud in healthcare, but we still have the best and most cost-effective healthcare in the world right now.

reply

"Prices on homes and rents climbed when women started working."

I disagree with that. It's the other way around. Women needed to work because one salary was no longer enough to pay for the same lifestyle.

Factor in greed. People in the real estate industry buy cheap property in working class areas and then double, triple or quadruple the rent or build luxury buildings for profit. They price out the original inhabitants and new ones pay with a larger share of their salary or need to find roommates. After one area becomes unaffordable, they find a new area to "invest".

Same with healthcare. American medical costs are high because its very profit driven. Their lobbyists own the politicians. Other countries have more government regulation which keeps medical cost down.

"we still have the best and most cost-effective healthcare in the world right now."
No way. In most surveys, the U.S. doesn't rank anywhere near the top. World Health Org. ranks U.S. #37

http://thepatientfactor.com/canadian-health-care-information/world-health-organizations-ranking-of-the-worlds-health-systems/

reply

Women needed to work because one salary was no longer enough to pay for the same lifestyle.


You may disagree with that but you're wrong.

Home prices are predicated on supply and demand and it's always been that way, and always will be. Women weren't forced to work to buy a home. If a home is overpriced it won't sell. Did you learn nothing from the housing bubble collapse? Home sellers were forced to sell their homes for less than what they paid for it or abandon the home and face bankruptcy because there was more supply of homes than buyers who could afford them. You can't get blood out of a stone. If the house is priced over what a person or family can pay for it, it won't sell.



I've dealt with hundreds of execs from overseas companies in my career, and they've always said they wish their medical system was half as good as ours. Long waits for appointments, needing advocates for procedures, red tape, dying before a procedure could be scheduled..

Two years ago, my 92 year old mother fell (again) and broke her hip and her upper thigh bone (femur?). When they told me that, I assumed they'd assign her to a nursing home or hospice to wait out her time given her age. Instead, the doc matter of factly said surgery was scheduled for the next morning. They repaired the hip with several screws, and installed a metal rod inside her upper thigh. A week later she was in rehab. She's now home and walks without a cane at 94.

And really, anyone who believes anything the WHO says is doing themselves a favor.


reply

"If a home is overpriced it won't sell."

Overpriced for whom? Wealthy people exist. A home can become unaffordable for a working-class person but be affordable for a wealthy person. Neighborhoods become gentrified.

Same with rent. It's normal where I live for single people in their 30s and 40s to have roommates because they can't afford to live by themselves. That only encourages landlords to raise the rent more. If two isn't enough, they'll find three to share a one bedroom or studio.

I wrote that women worked in order to maintain their family's lifestyle. Let me put it a different way. The average salary for a 32 y.o. man is $39,416 gross. Today, could he easily afford to support a wife, two children, own a house (middle-class area), one car, dog and take a yearly family vacation? Doubtful. Especially in NY or California. In the 1940s, a husband’s making an average salary could.

"...housing bubble collapse?"

Normal supply and demand was tampered with by greedy bankers and dishonest politicians.

Subprime mortgages were given to people who had no way of repaying in order to continue the housing market boom. Banks didn't care if anyone repaid because the loans were secularized (pooled and sold to investors). Most were ARM loans so monthly mortgage payments went up when interest rates did eventually causing loan failures. Politicians wanted to continue the charade of a booming economy so they destroyed banking regulations which had previously prevented banks from selling loans.

I was criticizing health care being cost-effective in the U.S, not the quality. A friend of mine had an accident while overseas and ended up seeing a doctor. He had excellent care and was never billed. That’s cost effective! The U.S. is the only developed country without universal healthcare.

reply

People are in debt up to their eyeballs too. Back then, if you couldn't afford it, you just saved up until you could. Now it is you either buy it or feel as if you are not as good as the others who have that item. It is a sickness.

reply

If that's the case, the cost of housing has not risen proportionally to inflation. The coast of housing is still much more expensive now than it was back then.

reply

Exactly.

reply

The coast of housing is still much more expensive now than it was back then.


If you want a Bailey sized home , you can get them for the same equivalent money if you want an 800sq foot home with one bath, coal furnace, one electrical outlet per room, no central air, no central vac, single pane windows, little to no insulation in the walls, no garage, etc.

To the buyers of a Bailey home, it was a castle compared to Potter's slums, but hardly what buyers would want in a home nowadays.

reply

Not where I live. Homes like that still go for $300K+

reply

Where I live, they'd be half that and lower, and they still would have upgrades like modern windows, plumbing, heating, AC, insulation etc.

Depends on market, but I don't think Bailey Park was in Westchester County.

reply

Movie Ticket = $0.25

reply

Inflation is a lie. A child's bike cost 50 bucks now just like it did 50 years ago

reply

You're rather stubborn. You repeat your comment therefore I'll repeat mine.

You have to include the cost of living with inflation. The cost of living has went up while salaries went down.

In the 1950's, a husband's income was enough to support a family, in 1970s both spouses needed to work, and now both spouses need to work while using credit - yet they still struggle.

$1 in 1968 = $7.24 in 2018

In 1968:
average yearly salary = $6,844
average rent = $130
average house = $14,975

1968 prices adjusted for 2018 inflation:
average yearly salary = $49,551
average rent = $941
average house = $108,419

Current 2018 prices:
average yearly salary = $44,564
average rent = $1,412
average house = $305,372

The last figures show a lower salary and houses priced 3x what they should be. BTW, rent/houses in my state are much higher with the same income.

reply

Sometimes other factors cause homes to rise as well. Back in the 90's my grandfather sold a building in Hoboken, NJ for just about $40k. The chic people started coming in the early 2000's. That same building just sold for 1.5M.

reply

I'll bet Gramps is pissed

reply

He never saw it. He passed in the late nineties.

reply

Ouch.. even *my* butt hurts hearing that...

reply

$5,000 would be $93,000 in today's money. In a small town like that (Bum F*ck Egypt), you can purchase a house for that amount.

A town like being a small town which is not a suburb/bed room community for a large city

reply

So much has changed this then. I have seen pictures of my parents' first apartment in the 1950s. Very little furniture. No A/C, no dishwasher, no microwave. The black & white TV got 4 channels and then went off the air after 11PM. They had to burn their trash in an incinerator out back.

reply

My parents bought their first house in 1963 for $7500, and that was in the metropolitan NY area.

reply