MovieChat Forums > Star Trek: Discovery (2017) Discussion > Things you hate about Discovery?

Things you hate about Discovery?


I can't find enough time to write all the insults to Star Trek fans; I can't believe people who aren't fans and no nothing about Star Trek got put in charge and think pretending to be fans will work.
1) The com badges were introduced in TNG. Did these people even go back to the original? Don't make it a prequel then!!!
2) The ship, the uniform, the holographic emitters, OMG did anyone even try to hide ripping off TNG??? Wtf!!!
3) Don't get me started on the Klingons!
4) The story. It might have worked if it was after TNG. This new space travel tech, the war, all the advanced screens, ship design, the com badges etc...
5) it just sucks; no humour...

It's not Star Trek. It's a poor rip off. The Orville is more Star Trek.

reply

Everything. From the greasy turd Klingons, to, well, everything.

reply

greasy turd Klingons


nice! lol

reply

They do look like my turds after a big bbq at my uncle's.

reply

6. Ripped of Lobot from Star Wars. the dude with thing on his head.
7. lens flares
8. first officer that incapacitates the captain would be put in the brig and kicked out of star fleet.
9. tilting and panning camera shots, please stop imitating Jar Jar Abrams.
10. lens flares
11. captain that can trace a giant logo of the star fleet badge in the sand with no equipment, lame
12. how did the people on the ship see the outline? mega lame
13. asian captain that pilots a ship called Shenzhou, we call that pandering.
14. when a giant klingon lands in front you, you engage forward thrusters instead of reverse and somehow penetrate
klingon armor and kill him. wha?
15. instead of going forward in the timeline you reboot TOS just like Jar Jar Abrams did cause those movies made money
so apparently people want to see that.
16. had the same pinging sounds as TOS did.

reply

14. when a giant klingon lands in front you, you engage forward thrusters instead of reverse and somehow penetrate
klingon armor and kill him. wha? [/quote]

Yes, she saw the Klingon with his Bat'leth. She engaged forward thrusters and the Bat'leth went through the Klingon armor and he dies. Did you NOT see the wound?

[quote]15. instead of going forward in the timeline you reboot TOS just like Jar Jar Abrams did cause those movies made money so apparently people want to see that.


"Jar Jar" Abrams did not reboot Star Trek. The Abrams stories did not reset anything. It is set in an alternate universe for the expressed purpose that people would know that the original stories are still valid.

reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_(film)

"Star Trek is a 2009 American science fiction adventure film directed by J. J. Abrams and written by Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman. It is the eleventh film in the Star Trek film franchise, and is also a reboot that features the main characters of the original Star Trek television series portrayed by a new cast, as the first in the rebooted film series."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reboot_(fiction)

Film
"With reboots, filmmakers revamp and reinvigorate a film series in order to attract new fans and stimulate revenue.[2] A reboot can renew interest in a series that has grown stale, and can be met with positive, mixed, or negative results by both consumers and film critics.[citation needed] Reboots also act as a safe project for a studio, as a reboot with an established fan base is less risky (in terms of expected profit) than an entirely original work, while at the same time allowing the studio to explore new demographics.[4] Reboots also allow directors and producers to cast a new set of younger actors for the familiar roles of a film series in order to attract a younger audience.[citation needed] Unlike a remake, however, a reboot often presupposes a working familiarity on the part of the audience with the original work."



14. when a giant klingon lands in front you, you engage forward thrusters instead of reverse and somehow penetrate
klingon armor and kill him. wha? [/quote]

Yes, she saw the Klingon with his Bat'leth. She engaged forward thrusters and the Bat'leth went through the Klingon armor and he dies. Did you NOT see the wound?


Yes, I saw it and thought it was lame. If you see a lion on the Serengeti at 10 feet away, do you run forwards at it or backwards to climb a tree?


reply

From the same page you pointed to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reboot_(fiction)

In serial fiction, to reboot means to discard all continuity in an established series in order to recreate its characters, timeline and backstory from the beginning.[1][2] The term is used with respect to various different forms of fictional media such as comic books, television series, video games and films among others.[1]


So the Abrams Star Trek films do not discard all continuity because they have Spock prime in them. His existence establishes the original continuity still exists and could be explored in these films.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

As far as the giant Klingon thing, I was only addressing your "and somehow penetrate klingon armor and kill him." item. From how you wrote the item ("somehow penetrate") it sounded like you thought she penetrated the armor just with the suit.

Honestly, it looked more like she panicked and hit the wrong button on the suit.

Besides, it would not matter if I ran forwards at the lion or backwards to climb a tree because they can climb too. :)

reply

They had to create a conflict with the Klingons somehow otherwise there would be no plot. I just thought it was weird that a experienced EV suit pilot would "accidentally" go forwards instead of backwards. Oh well, I will wait 10 years or so until this is released on Super Mega Blu-4K Ultimate Extreme Disc.

reply

>>>If you see a lion on the Serengeti at 10 feet away, do you run forwards at it or backwards to climb a tree? <<<

Actually, I run toward it. You cannot outrun a lion. Running toward it, with or without a weapon, may startle it into retreating. Instinct is to run. Instinct would be wrong.

reply

Well... also, cause he was not a ST fan and then therefore did not have to write in an already existing universe.. aka.. lazy... just like the ending of Lost

reply

Correct, correct snd correct!!!!!

reply

"13. asian captain that pilots a ship called Shenzhou, we call that pandering."
- Yes, it is pandering and that's a shame. However, it scrapes through I think because Michelle Yeoh did a pretty good job in her role.

"15. instead of going forward in the timeline you reboot TOS just like Jar Jar Abrams did cause those movies made money
so apparently people want to see that. "
- Money is the bottom line here, yep.

"16. had the same pinging sounds as TOS did."
- This is actually a good feature. If this show is supposed to be set only a few years before TOS then very likely they will have similar technology. This is not a case of warp drive or starships being invented shortly before TOS - this technology has been in vogue for at least 100-200 years in the narrative.

reply

Apologies if some of these have already been stated, these are my annoyances with STD.

1. Insubordinate main character. Yeah that's not a good way to bring back Roddenberry's vision.
2. Inappropriate name for the main character. What was wrong with using Michelle or Micah?
3. Uniforms seem completely out of place in relation to that era.
4. Lens flares overdone. We need things crisp and clear.
5. Feels more like JJ's alternate universe than prime universe.
6. Overdone holographic technology does not fit this era of Star Trek.
7. Lasers and phasers don't seem right for prime universe. See TNG, DS9, and VOY on how to do it right.
8. Hard to relate to any of the characters or crew. I really don't like the lead, maybe that will change in time? (Did not like her in TWD at all.)
9. Klingons speak way too slowly to be convincing of a highly technological spacefaring species.
10. Klingon subtitles are too large and too few words per screen.

Compared to the opening few episodes of TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT, and TOS, this one is the weakest so far.

reply

All valid points. This is what happens when hackers hack.

reply

"Inappropriate name for the main character. What was wrong with using Michelle or Micah?"

"Micah"? That's a dude's name.

reply

1) Michael is acting like a robot instead of a Vulcan. Her speech and movements are so slow it feels lifeless and boring. Spock had animation in his performance.
2) Dark interiors. People working in this environment would be half-blind and seriously depressed.
3) Klingons are boring and unlikable. They had a culture. And I hate reading those subtitles.
4) Not fun to watch.
5) This is beyond a reboot already mentioned. It's reimagined. It has nothing to do with any established timeline. Hate it.
6) Characters die and I couldn't care less because they're so unlikable.
7) Dark, dreary, depressing.
8) Crew are rude and obnoxious
9) Took the best things about Star Trek and removed it.
10 ) Unoriginal.
11) No substance. No creativity. No good writing, nor acting, nor directing, nor music, nor sets.
12) Plain boring.

reply

I second point 12.

reply

We have to PAY for the blankety-blank thing!!!

reply

They have to pay me to watch more episodes.

reply

Im watching it on the free trial and hating it

reply

Only saw the first episode, but I agree it lacks humor and was too grim. Hated the camerawork. Too dark, weirdly framed shots with odd angles, lens flare, and shaky cam. Not my thing.

reply

The lens flares are killing me. And someone crack a joke. The writing is so boring.

reply

1) Strange technology.
a) Space Spores make for greate fuel for warp drives(WTF)
b) TardeGardes that eat said spores makes for a greate navigational computer(WTF)
c) A spinning saucer section when ever the warp drive is engaged.
2) A cold unlikeable protagonist that eclipses even Worf from TNG.
Its already episode 5 and she still hasen't warmed up to the crew and her room mate. Would she
prefer the company of prisoners or something?
3) Strange scientific methods that work in a contrived script
I can't get over that Micheal hypothises that the tardegard is emulating the behaviors
of the people around it. And poof opens the cage to prove it exposing the whole ship
to grave dangour considering the targegard killed so many on the glenn. Of course the script
ensures that Micheal is correct.
4) Strange crew behavior for
example A criminal that is allegedly responsible for starting a war with the klingons is suddenly inducted into weapons research by the
ships captain.
5) Annoying repetative crew conflicts: Why do they keep arguing and in such a disrespectful manner with each other.
5) Unplausible moral dilemmas:
Example are we really expected to choose the comfort of a tardegard over the lives of countless humans.
Micheal a usually non empathetic character yet seems to be real concerned about the tardegards well being.
6) Strange behavior by the cast to show their leftest political leaning:
The cast takes a knee to show unity with the NFS (WTF)

reply

Yup on many points

reply

Your WTF moments are killing me!!!

You are sooooo right!!!

reply

ummm... you do realise ST has always been left political leaning as all f*@k, from the start

reply

Don't kid yourself. Every one was against vietnam back in the day. Other then that I don't see to much left leaning agendas. And uhura and james kirck wasn't technicaly the first interracial kiss its just the one every one remembers. And we've pretty much all agree women are treated pretty lowly by the dominate male case.

"I ought to court marshall the man who assigned me a female yeoman".

reply

"Every one was against vietnam back in the day."

That's not true. The country was divided about the war. The anti-war movement started off small and grew with time. Many conservatives were for the war because there was a fear that there would be a domino effect if Vietnam became completely Communist allowing it to spread worldwide. Liberals were against the war. Flower power. Make love, not war. Peace symbol. Anti-war music.

"I don't see to much left leaning agendas."

It was very left leaning. Star Trek was one of the very few shows that had non-stereotyped black people. Not a big deal now, but major back then. Roddenberry had to fight to have a black person on the bridge.

Left leaning episode was "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield" (half black/half white men at war) was so controversial, that Southern states wouldn't air it. Obviously, that episode was about racism. "Patterns of Force" was about Nazism.

Star Trek had the first romantic interracial kiss between a black and white person in America.

The Utopian objectives in Star Trek were very Left Wing. Remember, 1960s America was going through major social upheaval. Fighting racism, sexism, Cold War, war on poverty, Vietnam War, Roddenberry said in his utopian future, there was no war, no racism, no ideologues/Cold War (reason for Russian Chekov on bridge), no poverty because money doesn't exist, the egalitarian and multi-racial crew (unheard of in 1960s).

What's normal now, wasn't back then. Classic Star Trek was ground-breaking and very Left- wing.

reply

The war was controversial because it was half assed. Instead of dominating the NVA the pentagon took a painful policy of only applying the amount of force the soviet backed NVA was capable of. It was a stalemate designed to contain communists while not pushing them out of the country which cost 60,000 american lives. Most of america correctly believed its not worth loosing american lives over a war that wasn't designed to have an exit solution. There fear was defeating the NVA head on would have escolated tensions with the soviets. Thats why every one was against the war including conservatives, The star trek episode "Private little war" does a good analogy of this.

Your mistaking social reform was a left leaning movement when pretty much most of america including the right were behind those efforts.

reply

Conservatives were for the war because of their "Better dead than red mentality". Liberals were against the war because they didn't believe that America had any business being in Vietnam. No one heard of Vietnam before it started. Also, wasn't technically a "war", but a conflict.

The reasons why it became more unpopular over time:

The Vietnam War was on the 6 o'clock news every night. Americans were being shown graphic images of American soldiers with missing limbs and dying. There was a daily casualty count. I was semi-traumatized turning the TV dial trying to get to my cartoons. Notice how graphic imagery of American soldiers at war aren't shown on U.S. TV now.

There was a draft. My older brother was scared to death that he was going to be drafted. (He wasn't.) Americans were fleeing to Canada. It was also common knowledge that the poor and working class were fighting this war while the rich (like Trump) got deferments.

Mass demonstrations and marches against the war. There was also an anti-war culture movement in music, art, movies, etc. I literally doodled daisies (flower power) and peace symbols during class repeatedly and listened to anti-war rock music on the radio.

American soldiers committing atrocities against Vietnam citizens. Soldiers were the bad guys and were held in contempt. I remember them being called "baby killers"
and "rapists".

Eventually, the war lost American support. The end was announced. A final act was trying to fly out over 100 babies on a plane which crashed killing all or most. I had nightmares for weeks.

"Pretty Little War" doesn't mention the division that the Vietnam War caused in American society. But, it addresses the proxy war caused by the Cold War perfectly.

"right were behind those efforts."
The Right was complaining about busing and integrating schools. They wanted to keep the status quo.

"social reform"
Marches, riots, protests, upheaval, in your face confrontations. That's Social Revolution.

reply

Conservatives were for the war because of their "Better dead than red mentality". Liberals were against the war because they didn't believe that America had any business being in Vietnam. No one heard of Vietnam before it started. Also, wasn't technically a "war", but a conflict.

Which is odd since democrats started vietnam while a republican ended the war.
black panther riots

There was a draft. My older brother was scared to death that he was going to be drafted. (He wasn't.) Americans were fleeing to Canada. It was also common knowledge that the poor and working class were fighting this war while the rich (like Trump) got deferments.
Yes people went to college to avoid the draft. And clinton went to oxford in england during the war.

"Marches, riots, protests, upheaval, in your face confrontations. That's Social Revolution."
I actually disagree with riots and upgeavel as social reform. Real social reform comes from either change in american culture or laws. Rioting only strengthens the oposition. Martin Luther king didn't riot he flat out boycotted the metro bus system. The bus company lost lots of money so they in turn lobbied to change the discrimination laws along with martin luther kings movement. And he is respected to this day for not rioting like the black panther group did.

"private litte war" has mcoy being the voice of reason mentioning that its madness just going for a balance of power. Wars are supposed to be faught to be won not cause a perpetual stalemate.

Conservatives were against the war but didn't like the hippie revolution as the hippies in the conservatists view were not just railling against vietname they were trampling on all of americas traditional culture, some of which did appear like communists in their eyes. Had the vietnam war been faught like a real war then believe me conservative hawks would be all in favor of it. Conservatives wanted to kick the NVAs ass via traditional means and rejected the idea that we sent poorly armed troops with little resources to get slaughtered.

reply

It was the French wanting to hold on to a colony and deny Vietnam independence that started the war. Eisenhower sent money and military advisors to support them. Eisenhower also warned about "the Domino Effect" which became the rallying cry for proxy wars with the former Soviet Union.

Trump's deferment was a bone spur, too. He's been disrespectful to McCain's war service and Gold Star families. Clinton was a conscientious objector.

The growing anti-Vietnam War sentiment ended the war. Don't discount the power of the people.

I'm curious. What is your source for believing that Conservatives were against the war?

"Black panter riots"

No such thing. There was a Civil Rights Movement with different groups using different methods with different goals. There was Dr King, SNCC, Black Panthers and Black Muslims to name the major ones.

Dr. King was considered a threat and disliked by most whites when he was alive. There was an assassination attempt on his life. Hoover considered him a communist, spied on him and tried to convince him to commit suicide. Only after he died did public opinion change.

Black Muslims believed that blacks should create their own businesses instead of trying to give money to white store owners who discriminated.

The Black Panther Party had programs to feed children. They carried rifles which scared the bejesus out of whites and cops. You'd think the NRA would like them.

Change comes from intense struggle. Those in power don't want to share it.

"hippie revolution"
No such thing. There was an anti-Establishment Movement. Many young people and hippies believed that older people (over 30) only cared about money and material goods aka "traditional American values". They wanted to make the world a better place by fighting against poverty, materialism, racism, inequality, sexual hangups (beginning of the sexual revolution) and promoting love, volunteering and the environment. Similar to Roddenberry's vision for Star Trek - very Left-wing.

continued...

reply

"conservatists view were not just railling against vietname they were trampling on all of americas traditional culture, some of which did appear like communists in their eyes."

I know. Conservatives have a very broad view of what a communist is like people fighting for equal rights and even countries like Norway and Sweden. Conservatives hated the longer hair that men wore (hair touching the back collar) but years later, conservatives would wear their hair that long too.

I notice that Conservatives will object at first, but then come around. for instance, rock music. Today country western sounds like rock. Bush II's Iraq War was supported, but now they know it was a mistake.

Re: "Private Little War" You're forgetting the Prime Directive. Winning a war was not Kirk's goal. The Klingons gave one side advanced weapons. Kirk didn't want the other side to be slaughtered because of Klingon interference.

reply

"Re: "Private Little War" You're forgetting the Prime Directive. Winning a war was not Kirk's goal. The Klingons gave one side advanced weapons. Kirk didn't want the other side to be slaughtered because of Klingon interference."

Thats exactly what vietname was only our own troops were invovled in the conflict.

reply

The American goal was to prevent the spread of communism and win the war. America doesn't follow the Prime Directive.

reply

Forget it keelia I stoped reading the moment you suggested the black panther part wasn't agitating riots.

reply

That's rather closed minded of you. You're making my point that conservatives were and are too rigid to hear different points of view, have tolerance and accept change and new ideas. You have the same exact attitude that blacks, women, gays, anti-war activists and young people/hippies were fighting against during the various movements (Civil Rights, Anti-war, Women Rights, etc.) in order to create social change.

reply




That stupid fucking dizzy ginger fuckwit, Tilly. She's so fucking annoying.

reply

I want to shoot her!

reply

She's the only character I really like so far.

reply

I do like me a red head.

Just wish it wasn't so obvious she's just Lt Barcaly from TNG. She even has the same lines.

reply

I didn't catch that but I guess I can see the connection. Barcly was shy and awkward he tended to withdraw from social gatherings. The red head seems to be pretty open but awkward. Micheals just a dick I don't like her character. I get the show wants a character with flaws so we as the audience can relate to her but she's just a cold ICE cube that seems to through a lot of little passive fits.

reply

Is she just mildly autistic? I figured she was just socially awkward but not a bad person or antisocial like micheal is.

reply

She is Lt Barclay from TNG. Lazy writing just to copy the cast.

reply