Tucker in Moscow Subway: "No graffiti, no filth, no foul smell"
It appears those sanctions are having a devastating effect.
https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/1758264934356697187
> "No graffiti, no filth, no foul smell"
No Republicans.
lol. Well, ONE, ie Tucker.
But, it really does raise a real question. Why can some socieites...maintain civilization, and we have lost that ability?
You do realise that Russia pretty much puts all money into Moscow and St. Petersburg, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsDqCwDhYeo
Most other Russian cities are completely delapidated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIYOi4P8_Jg&t=650s He goes into it more. NFKRZ is from Chelyabinsk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-4mTccsKI&t=861s Another video where he responds to a propaganda channel comparing Moscow to various US cities.
The comments are hilarious.
As a German I can confirm, that our government broke into my house and took my washing machine as well as my racoon in order to replace Ukrainian losses.
As a person living in Germany I can confirm that Zelenskyy himself came to my house and took my pet fish to enlist it in the army. So sad.
And no Democrats. No blm. No antifa. Probably is a safer place to be than in America. At least Russian kids dont have to worry about gay trannies shooting up their school.
shareNo first Amendment either! MAGAs would LOVE that! LOL!
share1. I see no connection between lack of first amendment and maintaining civilized behavior.
2. No. Here in America it is the left that is all about taking away free speech. Your claim is silly. Why did you do that?
Really?
The printed word is controlled by the Russian government, which also regulates education and all means of communication—telephone, telegraph, and radio. News going out to foreign countries is subject to censorship.
Would you like to live there?
What are you even talking about?
The op is about how nice the subway was, with some implication that that indicates sanctions have failed.
What are you talking about?
I'm talking about the propaganda pundit Tucker Carlson making Russia sound like the garden of Eden.
Now what are you talking about?
A clean and safe subway equals GARDEN OF EDEN?
errr, ok....
I was discussing how some societies can maintain civilization and others, like us, seem to be losing that ability.
Because we allowed the liberal fascist cult to enforce and weaponize their hypocritical ideologies on the rest of normal society.
shareWell, no one else seems to ahve any ideas. so, you seem to win by default.
You think tvfan "wins by default?"
Daily reminder that TVFan is an actual fascist. Since you're such a demander for freedom, this should enrage you.
Irrelevant to the point.
Your failure to understand that is odd...
How is it you think Russia can "maintain" civilisation in a way that the USA supposedly cannot?
Why are you only outraged when liberals (or left-leaning people) on here advocate in some way against civil liberties?
1. As per the op. Don't waste my time playing retard.
2. You libs are teh ones in charge, successfully oppressing me and mine right now, quite harshly. That is far more serious than some guy on the internet saying some things. It is strange that you could not figure that out yourself. Is this more of you pretending to be retarded?
(1) The original post is from RT, the state-run media from Russia. It's now been deleted. Parts of Moscow are nice and shiny. So what? Pyongyang is also pretty pristine in many areas. Most of Russia is *not* nice and shiny. It's way more beaten down and downtrodden than the USA.
Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-4mTccsKI
>2. You libs are teh ones in charge, successfully oppressing me and mine right now, quite harshly. That is far more serious than some guy on the internet saying some things. It is strange that you could not figure that out yourself. Is this more of you pretending to be retarded?
How are you being oppressed right now?
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Why would you expect
Sanctions to create grafitti or filth in the Moscow subway
Whats the difference between the Russian Government controlling the news and the liberal democrat media controlling the news?
Nothing, they are the same.
There is no independent media in Russia. The equivalents of Fox News and Daily Wire in Russia have been shut down, and many journalists arrested.
You think it sucks being a conservative in the USA? Try being a liberal in Russia.
Try being a liberal in Russia.
You mean, a depraved, deviant and perverted liberal unable to indoctrinate and groom children or force your degenerate ideologies on the rest of society? cry me a river. share
So you are again back to your fascist rhetoric. "People I don't like should be persecuted".
Is it acceptable for the state to arrest and shut down liberal media?
The BBB Kult would love it too. They hate the 1st and 2nd Amendments. After 2020, no one is allowed to say elections are hijacked.
shareWho has been arrested just for saying it?
shareWho has been arrested?
shareYou said that no-one is "allowed" to say the 2020 elections are hijacked. How is that so? What is being done to stop people saying it?
shareNo one has been arrested to my knowledge.
shareSo clearly you are allowed to say it
shareOnly if you are a democrat. You can said the 2016 election was hijacked then you can say you are going to lose by chicanery and then you can say anyone who says the 2020 election was stolen is a election denier. As a democrat you have carte blanche on anything.
shareWhat Republicans have been arrested for saying the 2020 election was stolen?
shareWho said Republicans have been arrested?
shareIf they're not being arrested for saying the 2020 election was stolen, then it's "allowed" for Republicans to do so.
shareA federal judge is giving MyPillow founder and election denier Mike Lindell 30 days to pay a $5 million arbitration award for losing his “Prove Mike Wrong” 2020 election challenge.
After 2020, no one is allowed to say elections are hijacked.
>A federal judge is giving MyPillow founder and election denier Mike Lindell 30 days to pay a $5 million arbitration award for losing his “Prove Mike Wrong” 2020 election challenge.
He offered a legally binding reward, and now has to pay up (apparently). This has nothing to do with him just claiming that the election was stolen.
>After 2020, no one is allowed to say elections are hijacked.
So why is it you have not been arrested? You say it all the time.
Why hasn't Dinesh d'Souza been arrested?
Who has been arrested?
shareStop this stupid troll question. It's not cute. It's childish. You know what I'm getting at. You keep claiming that "no-one is allowed to say elections are hijacked". If this was true, then why hasn't the state arrested people for saying it?
Why hasn't Dinesh d'Souza, who literally released a movie on it, not been stopped? Why was he "allowed" to say it?
Stop this stupid troll question.
Ah, so you don’t like it when others question you, but its ok when you troll everyone with your imbecilic and trollish begging of evidence and proof.
Hypocrite. share
What are you on about? He can "question" me all he likes. He's asking a trollish loaded question because he can't back up his claim that it's "not allowed" to question the US 2020 election. I haven't claimed that anyone has been arrested. That's my point. It is allowed to question it. People question it all the time.
He keeps claiming that "no-one is allowed to say elections are hijacked". If this was true, then why hasn't the state arrested people for saying it?
Why hasn't Dinesh d'Souza, who literally released a movie on it, not been stopped? Why was he "allowed" to say it?
After 2020, no one is allowed to say elections are hijacked.
What the hell are you talking about? You people say it every goddamn day multiple times a day, y'all are utterly incapable of shutting the fuck up about it! share
Its called the Big Lie remember?
Did you finish season 5 yet?
Yup, finished it up awhile ago, overall definitely a worthwhile watch, thanks again... I deliberately saved the DVD commentaries to increase re-watch potential! I'd really like to see Season 6, but for some reason the disc is rare and expensive-(as in other seasons were $12-$15 each brand new while used 'acceptable' copies of S6 are in the neighborhood of sixty bucks!)
shareI am glad you enjoyed it. Did you like MeowMeowBeenz? lol I didn't like Season 5 at first but I have grown to enjoy it now. I haven't listened to the commentary in a long time but they are enjoyable. Also there are webisodes of Community on YouTube. Plus there is the fictional version of Community created by Abed on YouTube as well. Its a rabbit hole of episodes to watch.
I wonder why S6 is so expensive? I checked on eBay and its like 30 bucks. Not worth it IMO. I think there is only like 4 good episodes that season.
Oh yeah, I forgot about the webisodes, I'll have to check those out...I did enjoy the MeowMeowBeenz, that was some wacky shit! Hopefully they'll re-release S6 when and if the movie comes to fruition...
shareNo first Amendment either! MAGAs would LOVE that
That's actually a leftist fascist tactic...eg cancelling, deplatforming, censoring, etc. share
LOL!
FOX got sued and Trump got kicked off of Twitter for "free misinformation speech"
Typical MAGA fascist tactics
Yes, by "the leftist" establishment. Thanks for confirming it.
shareJan. 6 = Incitement to violence is illegal.
shareIncitement by 200+ federal assets.
shareProvide evidence for this claim.
And even if this was true. "I was tricked" is not a valid defence.
Those 200+ assets and capitol police incited and provoked the crowds with rubber ammunition and gas grenades.
The capitol police also removed the barricades and opened the giant magnetic doors to escort the protestors through the capitol.
All of it was a setup coordinated by the DNC, FBI, capitol police, elected officials, etc.
>Those 200+ assets and capitol police incited and provoked the crowds with rubber ammunition and gas grenades.
Evidence please.
>The capitol police also removed the barricades and opened the giant magnetic doors to escort the protestors through the capitol.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-january-6-jacob-chansley-tucker-carlson-193191103193
"CLAIM: Footage from the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol shows that Jacob Chansley, who participated in the riot sporting face paint, no shirt and a fur hat with horns, was “led through the Capitol by police the entire time he was in the building.”
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Court documents and video footage from the attack on the Capitol make clear that Chansley, who is widely known as the “QAnon Shaman” and is one of the most recognizable Jan. 6 rioters, entered the Capitol without permission, was repeatedly asked to leave the building and was not accompanied at all times.
THE FACTS: After Fox News host Tucker Carlson broadcast Jan. 6 security footage previously unseen by the public on his Monday night primetime show, social media users began sharing segments from his program that misrepresented Chansley’s involvement in the riot.
“BREAKING: Never before seen video of January 6 shows Jacob Chansley, the QAnon Shaman, being led through the Capitol by police the entire time that he was in the building,” reads a tweet that had received more than 189,000 likes and more than 65,000 shares as of Tuesday.
The tweet includes a clip from Carlson’s show in which Chansley can be seen calmly walking around the Capitol with officers in tow. Similar social media posts received hundreds of thousands of additional likes and shares."
>All of it was a setup coordinated by the DNC, FBI, capitol police, elected officials, etc.
Evidence please.
Fact Checkers = Misinformation and Disinformation
shareYou have provided no evidence for your claim that they are misinformation.
What is the misinformation, specifically, in that example?
Carlson's video clearly showed that he was peacefully escorted through the building and out of the building.
The video footage was irrefutable and the fact checker does not refute it in any way.
Use your brain and apply some common sense.
The video footage is completely out of context to the overall actions of Chansley, and other rioters:
"A statement prepared by the Department of Justice, which was signed by Chansley and his attorney, provides a timeline of the rioter’s movement in the Capitol."
"For example, the statement explains that Chansley entered the Capitol through a broken door as part of a crowd that “was not lawfully authorized to enter or remain in the building” and that he was one of the first 30 rioters inside. It goes on to note that although officers asked Chansley and others multiple times to leave the Capitol, he did not comply and actively riled up his fellow rioters. The statement describes Chansley’s interactions with officers, but also points out that he “entered the Gallery of the Senate alone.”
"Many of Chansley’s actions on Jan. 6 are documented in video footage from that day."
---
"Asked about claims that protesters were led through the building, a Capitol Police spokesperson pointed The Associated Press to an HBO documentary about the riot, “Four Hours at the Capitol,” in which an officer describes his encounter with Chansley, including how he asked the rioter and others to leave the Senate wing.
Footage from the interaction, which appears in the documentary at the approximately 47:30 mark, was filmed by New Yorker writer Luke Mogelson.
“Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?” the officer says as Chansley sits in the presiding officer’s chair on the Senate Dais. “I just want to let you guys know, this is like the sacredest place.”
"U.S. Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger lambasted Carlson’s segment on the Jan. 6 footage in an internal memo Tuesday. The Capitol Police spokesperson confirmed the memo’s authenticity to the AP.
“Last night an opinion program aired commentary that was filled with offensive and misleading conclusions about the January 6 attack,” Manger wrote. “The opinion program never reached out to the Department to provide accurate context. One false allegation is that our officers helped the rioters and acted as ‘tour guides.’ This is outrageous and false.”
There was nothing to take out of context, it was a video footage that showed irrefutable proof that the MSM never released until Tucker did and then the officials had a meltdown over it because the evidence was undeniable. Facts are Facts.
And it was because of this video footage that they released Chansley early.
The video footage is completely out of context to the overall actions of Chansley, and other rioters:
"A statement prepared by the Department of Justice, which was signed by Chansley and his attorney, provides a timeline of the rioter’s movement in the Capitol."
"For example, the statement explains that Chansley entered the Capitol through a broken door as part of a crowd that “was not lawfully authorized to enter or remain in the building” and that he was one of the first 30 rioters inside. It goes on to note that although officers asked Chansley and others multiple times to leave the Capitol, he did not comply and actively riled up his fellow rioters. The statement describes Chansley’s interactions with officers, but also points out that he “entered the Gallery of the Senate alone.”
"Many of Chansley’s actions on Jan. 6 are documented in video footage from that day."
---
"Asked about claims that protesters were led through the building, a Capitol Police spokesperson pointed The Associated Press to an HBO documentary about the riot, “Four Hours at the Capitol,” in which an officer describes his encounter with Chansley, including how he asked the rioter and others to leave the Senate wing.
Footage from the interaction, which appears in the documentary at the approximately 47:30 mark, was filmed by New Yorker writer Luke Mogelson.
“Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?” the officer says as Chansley sits in the presiding officer’s chair on the Senate Dais. “I just want to let you guys know, this is like the sacredest place.”
"U.S. Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger lambasted Carlson’s segment on the Jan. 6 footage in an internal memo Tuesday. The Capitol Police spokesperson confirmed the memo’s authenticity to the AP.
“Last night an opinion program aired commentary that was filled with offensive and misleading conclusions about the January 6 attack,” Manger wrote. “The opinion program never reached out to the Department to provide accurate context. One false allegation is that our officers helped the rioters and acted as ‘tour guides.’ This is outrageous and false.”
----
>And it was because of this video footage that they released Chansley early.
Evidence please.
And as usual, your claim is utterly bogus: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N36929Y/
"Jacob Chansley, also known as Jake Angeli or the “QAnon Shaman”, is due to be released early from prison in the U.S. due to a combination of factors including good behavior, according to his attorney. Posts online, however, are saying he was released early due to footage of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol showing he was wrongly sentenced or that the event itself was a hoax.
The caption in one post (here) reads, “BREAKING: QAnon Shaman Jacob Chansley has been released a year early from prison after Tucker Carlson’s J6 footage proved he was wrongly sentenced.” Another example can be seen (here) saying “BREAKING: Q Shaman has been RELEASED following video evidence showing that January 6 was a hoax & inside job!”"
As usual, another fact-checker that doesn't refute anything.
The "released on good behavior" was the excuse that was used since the establishment can't admit the real reason for his early release.
It was part of the agreement with Chansley's attorney.
Once again, use your brain and apply common sense.
>As usual, another fact-checker that doesn't refute anything.
There is no evidence whatsoever for the claim that they released him due to that video.
>The "released on good behavior" was the excused that was used since the establishment can't admit the real reason for his early release.
This is not evidence. This is a baseless claim made with no evidence.
>It was part of the agreement with Chansley's attorney.
Evidence please.
There is no evidence whatsoever for the claim that they released him due to that video.
Your lies and denials continue as usual.
It's called "circumstantial evidence", which you always rejected.
[–] Skavau (6969) 4 hours agoshare
I never rejected the concept of circumstantial evidence.
>It's called "circumstantial evidence", which you always rejected.
That's not circumstantial evidence. They just released him earlier for good behaviour and you assume "Oh it must have actually been because of the video".
It's baseless bullshit.
" According to court documents, Chansley was among the crowd that passed the police line at the West Front of the U.S. Capitol. He was shirtless, wearing a Viking hat with fur and horns, covered in red, white, and blue face paint, and carrying an American flag tied to a pole with a sharp object at the tip and a bullhorn. He and others in the crowd passed police lines and entered the scaffolding erected in advance of the Inauguration on top of the staircase heading up to the Lower West Terrace of the building. They then entered the Upper West Terrace at approximately 2:10 p.m., as the certification proceedings were still under way. Chansley continued into the building through a broken door at approximately 2:14 p.m. He kept moving, reaching the Gallery of the Senate and then the Senate floor. He then scaled the Senate dais, taking the seat that Vice President Mike Pence had occupied an hour earlier. Chansley proceeded to take pictures of himself on the dais and refused to vacate the seat when asked to do so by law enforcement. Instead, he stated that “Mike Pence is a f----ing traitor” and wrote a note on available paper on the dais, stating “It’s Only A Matter of Time. Justice Is Coming!” He further called other rioters up to the dais and led them in an incantation over his bullhorn. He was cleared from the Chamber at approximately 3:09 p.m."
The video does not change how he entered the building, or his other behaviour.
You just confirmed that you apply circumstantial evidence only when it suits your narrative.
The video shows irrefutable evidence that he was peacefully escorted through the building.
Why didn't the MSM release the footage long before Carlson?
Because it refutes and debunks their entire lying and deceptive narrative.
After that footage, they had no other choice but to release him early since the truth was incontrovertible.
No, I did not. I rejected your claim that your speculation constitutes circumstantial evidence.
>The video shows irrefutable evidence that he was peacefully escorted through the building.
Does the video somehow mean he didn't break and enter the building in the first place?
What do you make of this:
"U.S. Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger lambasted Carlson’s segment on the Jan. 6 footage in an internal memo Tuesday. The Capitol Police spokesperson confirmed the memo’s authenticity to the AP.
“Last night an opinion program aired commentary that was filled with offensive and misleading conclusions about the January 6 attack,” Manger wrote. “The opinion program never reached out to the Department to provide accurate context. One false allegation is that our officers helped the rioters and acted as ‘tour guides.’ This is outrageous and false.”
Why didn't the MSM release that footage?
Because it incriminated the establishment as liars and deceivers.
The proof was released and there was no denying it.
All the fact-checkers in the world can't deny the proof from that video.
They released him early because of that video and it had nothing to do with good behavior. That was the excuse that was used.
Connect the Dots and apply common sense.
>Why didn't the MSM release that footage?
"WASHINGTON — Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Monday released security video from the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, using footage provided exclusively to him by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to portray the riot as a peaceful gathering."
Because they apparently did not have access to said footage. Not that said footage justifies or contextualises any of the other actions taken on that day, either by Chansley or other rioters.
>Because it incriminated the establishment as liars and deceivers.
How? How did it somehow mean this didn't happen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iludfj6Pe7w&t=69s
>All the fact-checkers in the world can't deny the proof from that video.
They contextualise it, and break the false narrative alleged about what was actually happening.
>They released him early because of that video and it had nothing to do with good behavior. That was the excuse that was used.
No, this continues to be a completely baseless claim asserted by you.
Because they apparently did not have access to said footage.
hahaha, They didn't have a problem with any of the other footage since day one. Conveniently.
The only footage they didn't have access to was the one that exonerates the protesters and incriminates the establishment that setup and orchestrated the entire J6 bake sale. share
>hahaha, They didn't have a problem with any of the other footage since day one. Conveniently.
So Tucker didn't get it from Kevin McCarthy?
>The only footage they didn't have access to was the one that exonerates the protesters and incriminates the establishment that setup and orchestrated the entire J6 bake sale.
How does that footage exonerate all the rioters at all?
How did it somehow mean this didn't happen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iludfj6Pe7w&t=69s
The MSM already had access to any of the videos upon request since day one, but they were not going to release something to the public that incriminates the establishment and exonerates the protesters.
Even McCarthy was not aware of what Tucker was going to release, if he did, he would not have given him access to it.
That YT video is from the capitol police inciting and provoking the Maga protesters that was infiltrated with 200+ federal assets.
>The MSM already had access to any of the videos upon request since day one, but they were not going to release something to the public that incriminates the establishment and exonerates the protesters.
How does that footage exonerate all the rioters at all?
How did it somehow mean this didn't happen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iludfj6Pe7w&t=69s
>That YT video is from the capitol police inciting and provoking the Maga protesters that was infiltrated with 200+ federal assets.
You have provided no evidence that the police "incited" or "provoked" the protesters.
blm&antifa = incitement to violence is illegal.
shareRussians would love to worry about the 0,1% chance of a school shooting affecting them instead of using 50% of their wages on food.
Public transport stations can look really nice in dictatorships, There are some awesome train stations in North Korea too. Not sure what the point is supposed to be?
I don't either, except it sounds like disgraced Tucker Carlson wants to move there
shareMy interpretations of TC's point was that he is sad and disgusted by what has happened in America. As someone who remembers when American cities were nice, I agree with that sentiment.
Tucker's problem is that he either doesn't know, or the truth does not fit into his narrative about why that has been.
If there are nice public transport stations in a dictatorship then public transport stations should be a 1000 times better and safer in a capitalist society. But alas this is false.
Probably not much in the way of rights either, unfortunately. Russians certainly aren't born with their rights, not like in the US.
shareIt’s a softer and modern version of Communism without the tolerance of liberalism/wokeness and without the poverty and public filth.
shareModern Russia has nothing to do with communism. Also, modern Russia is much poorer than the USA across the board dude.
Moscow is just one city you know. It's also the only major city that gets any funding. It's Russias face to the world. Go look at some images of Chelyabinsk or Novokuznetsk or the many cities scattered across Siberia and Far-Eastern Russia.
And yes, I know you are recommending of revokation of civil liberties. I know you are in favour of a big fascist state.
"Softer and modern version of Communism "
Lol you are do naive it's almost funny.
Dear magas, stop simping to russia from your horrible woke cities. Just pack your things and move to russia. And burn your american passport so you would not have temptation to come back. russia will quickly grant you their passport and you will be happy in that anri-woke utopia.
I can remind you that iran, north korea and afganistan are also not woke. You can move there too.
Only the libs and leftoids should be sent to Russia or China so they can learn to appreciate the freedom they have in the USA and to get a taste of what their woke bullshit is causing on normal society.
shareYou really do walk into these things. You are the user on here who has praised Russias authoritarianism.
How would someone going to Russia, a famously reactionary anti-woke state get a taste of what "woke bullshit" could be?
You are way more pro-Russian and pro-PRC than any modern leftist who isn't a tankie. You are the anti-american fascist who hates freedom. You are for oppressive laws constructed by a big state.
Wokeness is the oppression caused by leftism in the USA; therefore, by sending their dumbasses to Russia/China (Authoritarian), they would get a taste of their own medicine and learn to appreciate the freedom and liberty from the USA instead of imposing their Wokeness on the rest of normal society.
share>Wokeness is the oppression caused by leftism in the USA;
Name some of this oppression please.
>by sending their dumbasses to Russia/China (Authoritarian), they would get a taste of their own medicine and learn to appreciate the freedom and liberty from the USA instead of imposing their Wokeness on the rest of normal society.
How is "wokeness" imposed on you?
And again: You are way more pro-Russian and pro-PRC than any modern leftist who isn't a tankie. You are the anti-american fascist who hates freedom. You are for oppressive laws constructed by a big state.
You have made many comments on here indicating you actually admire Russia. Fascist piece of shit.
Wokeness = Destruction
Wokeness = Oppression
Wokeness = Enslavement
Wokeness = Fascism 2.0
Wokeness = Communism 2.0
Wokeness = Hypocrisy
Wokeness = Deception
Wokeness = Totalitarianism
Wokeness = Authoritarianism
Wokeness = Satanic/Demonic
Wokeness = Evil
These are just buzzwords. How is "wokeness" fascism, communism, "destruction", totalitarianism, authoritarianism etc etc?
And again: You are way more pro-Russian and pro-PRC than any modern leftist who isn't a tankie. You are the anti-american fascist who hates freedom. You are for oppressive laws constructed by a big state.
You have made many comments on here indicating you actually admire Russia. Fascist piece of shit.
You have made many comments on here indicating you actually admire child groomers and pedos.
shareQuote me where I did that, fuckface.
Why are you such a lying, dishonest hateful piece of shit?
Why are you such a lying, dishonest hateful piece of shit?
shareI'm not. You clearly can't back up your libellous claims because on-top of being a bloodthirsty hateful fascist, you are a compulsive liar.
shareEvery time you defend the alphabet cult; it is proof that you admire, defend, support and endorse child groomers and pedos.
Myself and others have already called you out on numerous lies and deceptive games. Your coyness and playing dumb doesn't fool anyone.
>Every time you defend the alphabet cult; it is proof that you admire, defend, support and endorse child groomers and pedos.
No, it is not. LGBT people are not innately pedophiles or groomers. LGBT people have the right to exist publicly without fascists like you acting as morality police to suppress them.
>Myself and others have already called you out on numerous lies and deceptive games. Your coyness and playing dumb doesn't fool anyone.
Claiming I am lying does not actually mean I am lying.
You are way more pro-Russian and pro-PRC than any modern leftist who isn't a tankie. You are the anti-american fascist who hates freedom. You are for oppressive laws constructed by a big state.
You have made many comments on here indicating you actually admire Russia. Fascist piece of shit.
You just confirmed my entire previous statement, lol.
If you are a wokebot, paste and repeat the same nonsense. 👇
I did no such thing, shitbrains.
>Every time you defend the alphabet cult; it is proof that you admire, defend, support and endorse child groomers and pedos.
No, it is not. LGBT people are not innately pedophiles or groomers. LGBT people have the right to exist publicly without fascists like you acting as morality police to suppress them.
>Myself and others have already called you out on numerous lies and deceptive games. Your coyness and playing dumb doesn't fool anyone.
Claiming I am lying does not actually mean I am lying.
You are way more pro-Russian and pro-PRC than any modern leftist who isn't a tankie. You are the anti-american fascist who hates freedom. You are for oppressive laws constructed by a big state.
You have made many comments on here indicating you actually admire Russia. Fascist piece of shit.
Stop defending and supporting the child groomers and pedos.
shareI did no such thing, shitbrains.
>Every time you defend the alphabet cult; it is proof that you admire, defend, support and endorse child groomers and pedos.
No, it is not. LGBT people are not innately pedophiles or groomers. LGBT people have the right to exist publicly without fascists like you acting as morality police to suppress them.
>Myself and others have already called you out on numerous lies and deceptive games. Your coyness and playing dumb doesn't fool anyone.
Claiming I am lying does not actually mean I am lying.
You are way more pro-Russian and pro-PRC than any modern leftist who isn't a tankie. You are the anti-american fascist who hates freedom. You are for oppressive laws constructed by a big state.
You have made many comments on here indicating you actually admire Russia. Fascist piece of shit.
No diversity.
share