MovieChat Forums > Skavau
Skavau (9691)
Posts
Ben Shapiro cries that Eurovision doesn't adhere to tradcon reactionary values
Rate this song on a scale between 1-10 (Nordic Folk)
Rate this song out of 10
My Top TV series of all time, ranked (mostly)
Looks like Korea going for Squid Game again
Trailer
Kansas governor passes law requiring ID to view acts of 'homosexuality' online, vetoes anti-LGBTQ+ bill
Is it morally acceptable to edit your posts and imply another user is a pedophile just because you dislike them?
Russian Police Raid ‘Anti-War LGBT Party’ – State TV
Russia puts Estonian prime minister Kaja Kallas on wanted list
View all posts >
Replies
I reserve the right to be hateful to scumbags who endorsed baseless claims about me being a pedophile and suggested I should kill myself.
Why the fuck I should I ever afford you any charity or tolerance again?
And I know you're slow on the uptake, but I am not /u/Martoto incase you confuse me with them.
1. You implied your experience on this is more than just one guy. I said in response: I really doubt you've read any arguments on drug legalisation and accessibility ever.
2. Don't care. I'll try again: I'll await an example of someone arrested for not using the right pronouns. What is the rape case you're referring to?
My point actually is that you're full of shit.
3. You "don't know the answer" but you do think that I should be restricted in some way. That's the point. You flirted with the idea of me being stopped by force.
1. I really doubt you've read any arguments on drug legalisation and accessibility ever.
2. Don't care. I'll try again: I'll await an example of someone arrested for not using the right pronouns. What is the rape case you're referring to?
3. So now people's rights should be taken away from them if we judge their speech isn't saying anything? That's not how free expression works at all. You are against free speech.
I'm anti-speech? Says the guy who wants to use the state to persecute me. You are the fascist here. I have as much right to talk as anyone else does. You suggesting I should be "controlled" indicates a contempt, from you, for civil liberties and specifically free speech. You are, as usual, a hypocritical piece of shit.
1. By one person? Free gun access has as much, or could be argued to have as much negative influence on society as unrestricted access to drugs. But you only consider one inalienable but not the other.
2. Don't care. I'll try again: I'll await an example of someone arrested for not using the right pronouns. What is the rape case you're referring to?
3. What, are you 10 years old? What a pathetic childish response. You are unable to provide a common ground definition of troll independent of just saying my username.
I repeat: The USA literally allows neo-nazis to speak and does nothing. That is what free speech means. I have as much right to talk as anyone else does. You suggesting I should be "controlled" indicates a contempt, from you, for civil liberties and specifically free speech. You are, as usual, a hypocritical piece of shit
>Trolls don't express anything. THey suppress discussion.
You are free to talk around me, to other people. You can just block me. No-one makes you reply to me. I suppress absolutely nothing. That you don't like what I say is not "suppression".
>This thread is supposed to be about Trump.
And it is, in the many other chains. Sorry the consequences of you being an authoritarian piece of shit have caught up with you but I will never drop it. This is blowback, as you say. I will always remind you of how much of an anti-american hypocritical vile piece of shit you are.
>You are anti-speech in that way.
That's not "anti-speech". You are anti-speech. You wish to restrict my civil liberties.
Because you are an authoritarian anti-western hateful piece of shit who hates civil liberties. You want to use the state to harm me.
Scumbag.
1. And given all the gun crime in the USA, the argument could equally be made there - that they are a problem in many ways for society.
2. Don't care. I'll try again: I'll await an example of someone arrested for not using the right pronouns. What is the rape case you're referring to?
3. "Troll". A word you have yet to even provide a common ground definition for. I repeat: The USA literally allows neo-nazis to speak and does nothing. That is what free speech means. I have as much right to talk as anyone else does. You suggesting I should be "controlled" indicates a contempt, from you, for civil liberties and specifically free speech. You are, as usual, a hypocritical piece of shit.
>Trolls don't express anything. THey suppress discussion.
You are free to talk around me, to other people. You can just block me. I suppress absolutely nothing. That you don't like what I say is not "suppression".
>This thread is supposed to be about Trump.
And it is, in the many other chains. Sorry the consequences of you being an authoritarian piece of shit have caught up with you but I will never drop it. This is blowback, as you say. I will always remind you of how much of an anti-american hypocritical vile piece of shit you are.
>You are anti-speech in that way.
That's not "anti-speech". You are anti-speech. You wish to restrict my civil liberties.
Because you are an authoritarian anti-western hateful piece of shit who hates civil liberties. You want to use the state to harm me.
Scumbag.
1. Why should the government control what drugs people may legally purchase? How is it any different in principle to restricting firearm access?
2. Don't care. I'll try again: I'll await an example of someone arrested for not using the right pronouns. What is the rape case you're referring to?
3. No. Me being unpleasant isn't valid grounds at all. The USA literally allows neo-nazis to speak and does nothing. That is what free speech means. I have as much right to talk as anyone else does. You suggesting I should be "controlled" indicates a contempt, from you, for civil liberties and specifically free speech. You are, as usual, a hypocritical piece of shit.
>4. I do have the right to express my opinion. Skavau is a piece of shit troll boit. Trolls are a problem that need a solution.
I forgot when you told me to kill myself.
So you don't support human rights. You think "trolls" (a term you haven't even provided a common ground definition for) should have a "solution". That is hostility to free expression.
You are a hypocritical, authoritarian piece of shit.
1. But you agree in principle that such a law could be so described as a violation of human rights.
2. I'll try again: I'll await an example of someone arrested for not using the right pronouns. What is the rape case you're referring to?
3. What even is the grounds for such a restriction? That I'm annoying? That my arguments are bad? It seems to me impossible to "control me" in a way that wouldn't violate my civil liberties. Which I thought was non-negotiable to you?
Apparently not.
View all replies >