EDIT: CONFIRMED MUSLIM shooter at the chiefs victory parade... - Politics Discussion

[–] B1cKsurN (14888) 3 months ago

They are being fed hate propaganda 24/7, it was only a matter of time until they started popping off.

The ironic part is that the Democrats and media want the MAGA folks to and they simply wont...so much so, that they have to use Fed-Pot BS Fronts to keep reinforcing this false narrative that anyone that leans right is a bad person.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Where does this article say that the shooter was transgender?

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Hey, B1cKsurN - these are the posters now accusing all new shooters of being transgendered.

Are you going to be consistent and call them out for hurling utterly baseless accusations?

Need I remind you: https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/65caf55ac8f3b765a941cc66/Pastor-fired-over-predatory-texts-with-men-and-underage-teenager-Texas-church-says?reply=65cbfd1e6b2e3614a07b6822

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (14888) 3 months ago

I still can't find an instance of an "all" statement. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Remind me of what? That your a Euro that's utterly obsessed with the politics of a country you don't live in or are from?

I already know that.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

They're lying about this shooter being transgender (later updated to be muslim)

Is that acceptable behaviour?

>I still can't find an instance of an "all" statement. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

They made many repeated statements that most shootings in the USA are caused by transpeople. This is demonstrably untrue.

reply

[–] Kowalski (59141) 3 months ago

GROW UP.

reply

[–] BKB (6219) 3 months ago

See?? What is it with you that you have this fear of agreeing with someone on a subject you know is true?? This is a mental illness as much as you may cover your ears, close your eyes and scream LALALALALALA to drown this out.. In your world, if you go against popular sentiment, you think you're a Troll and that's just not the case

reply

[–] Kowalski (59141) 3 months ago

SHOOTER WAS NOT TRANS...GOOSEBOY IS COMPLETELY MAKING SHIT UP...HE NEEDS TO GROW UP...AS DO YOU BASED ON THAT CRAP YOU JUST SPEWED.

reply

[–] BKB (6219) 3 months ago

And you need to stop shouting at everyone when you post and no, he's not making it up

reply

[–] Kowalski (59141) 3 months ago

NOT SHOUTING...YES...HE MADE IT UP.

reply

[–] JoWilli (15303) 3 months ago

trannies and guns and democraps dont mix well...

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Where does this article say that the shooter was transgender?

reply

[–] JoWilli (15303) 3 months ago

it doesnt. its a general statement....

reply

[–] Kowalski (59141) 3 months ago

YOUR STATEMENT IS CALLED ASSUMPTION.

reply

[–] JoWilli (15303) 3 months ago

more than likely.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

The OP specifically claimed this was a trans-shooter. You think that's reasonable?

reply

[–] JoWilli (15303) 3 months ago

its the internet. people can say whatever they want even if its true or false or made up.

misleading news is the cornerstone of the internet.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

>its the internet. people can say whatever they want even if its true or false or made up.

I know. But you'd likely be quick to jump if someone on the left made shit up. Why the indifference to this?

reply

[–] JoWilli (15303) 3 months ago

because caring about what other people say is pointless. no matter what I say someone will disagree with me. and 99.9% of the time people will care less what I say. I realized years ago that trying to have a meaningful conversation on the internet is a fruitless endeavor.

reply

[–] Kowalski (59141) 3 months ago

YOU REALIZED THAT BASED ON WHO YOU ARE...YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF HAVING MEANINGFUL CONVERSATION VIA THE INTERNET.

reply

[–] JoWilli (15303) 3 months ago

says the oersoer whno tiyes in all dcaps.

reply

[–] Kowalski (59141) 3 months ago

[–] JoWilli (13918) 3 hours ago
says the oersoer whno tiyes in all dcaps.

YEAH...WHAT HE SAID.🫤

reply

[–] JoWilli (15303) 3 months ago

this is myhs stick now ifa m not spell cchekc anytyng I tipeu

reply

[–] christomacin (4532) 3 months ago

covfefe

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

[deleted]

[–] Galilguy (2332) 3 months ago

I think that mental illness has become the new victim status of the day.

If you are mentally incapacitated, you can do anything, and not suffer negative consequences. Up to and including, becoming President of the United States.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Where does this article say that the shooter was transgender?

reply

[–] blue1981 (6491) 3 months ago

I blame our culture of division and nihilism.

reply

[–] TrentnQuarantino (8563) 2 months ago

Then blame Republicans because back at the time of Reagan/Thatcher, they both eschewed the very idea of culture and society - anything public and the commons. You see, there is only the plutocrats who we should all worship because their benefits are supposed to trickle down to the rest of us. We can trust them not to contaminate our air, water, land and food.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

I see the OP is now openly pro-fascism, wanting literally use the state to round-up all transpeople.

And again, there's no mention of these shooters being transgendered.

reply

[–] Lord Rake (3829) 3 months ago

"I see the OP is now openly pro-fascism, wanting literally use the state to round-up all transpeople."

If they keep doing sick shit like this the state might have to for public safety.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

>If they keep doing sick shit like this the state might have to for public safety.

There's no evidence that they did this.

The OP just accused the shooters (there were 3?) of being trans on the back of no evidence.

Are you another user on here who is outright openly pro-fascist?

reply

[–] Lord Rake (3829) 3 months ago

Where is your evidence that they were not trans?

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Okay. Lets change the title. "Reported Christian shooter at the chiefs victory parade".

"Reported MAGA shooter at the chiefs victory parade".

Why should we assume they are trans? They could be Christian, or a MAGA supporter.

Are you suggesting that unless I can disprove that they are trans, we must therefore assume they are trans?

reply

[–] Lord Rake (3829) 3 months ago

That isn't evidence at all, just a bunch of unrelated questions.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

I don't have any evidence they weren't trans, anymore than I have any evidence that they weren't Christian or MAGA. What's your point?

Are you suggesting that unless I can disprove that they are trans, we must therefore assume they are trans?

reply

[–] Lord Rake (3829) 3 months ago

Ok you have no evidence, just wanted to get that on record.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

And you have no evidence that they are trans. Are you going to concede that?

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

And are you basing your assessment on the trans-community on the *assumption*, that you have no evidence for, that this shooting was done by transpeople?

reply

[–] blue1981 (6491) 3 months ago

I fully expect the assholes in charge will attack those of us in red states that love our guns so they can say they need a gun grab.

reply

[–] [deleted] 3 months ago

i'm watching the pressers and the talk is 99% gun grab. who knows what they will try and pull before november. they can't tell us that joe got 100 million votes this time and they're determined that trump wont be president...

reply

[–] robocat893 (13525) 3 months ago

Trump is facing 91 felony charges mostly for being a traitor. Do you believe most Americans will vote for that? Not a chance. What makes you think Trump will be president again?

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

Everyone knows that the charges are becasue he is a populist, not because of any "crimes".

So, your statement is a lie.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Would you say the OP is also a lie, or are you selective about when you challenge lies?

reply

[–] robocat893 (13525) 3 months ago

I'm lying about Trump facing 91 felony charges mostly for being a traitor? Those charges weren't just pulled from the air. These are very serious charges and you should be worried.

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

Yes, you are lying as to teh reason for the charges. It is clearly politically motivated and thus a violation of his civil rights and considering it is during the campaign, election interference.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

The charges long predate the campaign, or were building before he was running. By your logic, running for nomination is a get-out-of-jail-card as any pending cases suddenly become "election interference".

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

The motivation is clearly political. This is a abuse of power by leftards in office.

It is very close to the classic banana republic practice of simply arresting your political opponents so they cannot run for office. VERY CLOSE.

indeed, they are trying to get the leading opposition candidate removed from ballots, so that they can control the election.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

>The motivation is clearly political. This is a abuse of power by leftards in office.

No, that's your position and it isn't argued for. The cases predate the electoral campaign. I mean hell, US presidential electoral campaigns run for nearly 2 years anyway. Any thoughts on the OP lying about the incident here?

>indeed, they are trying to get the leading opposition candidate removed from ballots, so that they can control the election.

Two states did this. One on behalf, apparently, of a Republican claimant.

reply

[–] Lord Rake (3829) 3 months ago

Skavau will only believe your assertion if the people who are prosecuting Trump come out and say it is 100% political.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

I will only believe it if someone can present a detailed argument as to how the charges against Trump have no legal basis whatsoever.

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

Skavau already believes it to be political. He is just talking shit becuase he is fine with it being political.

He is willing to LIE to give political cover, in his own little simp way, to his political leaders.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

>Skavau already believes it to be political. He is just talking shit becuase he is fine with it being political.

I do not "believe it to be political"

Do not presume to dictate to me what I think, fuckface.

>He is willing to LIE to give political cover, in his own little simp way, to his political leaders.

You are not me. You get no say in what I think.

Is that clear?

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

Dude. You are clearly a lefty politcial troll. Here to push your lefty agenda, mostly by lying and trolling.

You SAY you don't believe it. But lefties talk shit all the time. It is your primary form of communication. to LIE.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

>Dude. You are clearly a lefty politcial troll. Here to push your lefty agenda, mostly by lying and trolling.

Do not presume to dictate to me what I think, fuckface.

What is my "lefty agenda"? What am I "lying" about?

>You SAY you don't believe it. But lefties talk shit all the time. It is your primary form of communication. to LIE.

You have no evidence whatsoever this. You are talking entirely our of your unchecked hatred because you are bigoted, nasty piece of shit.

You do realise the OP in this thread is lying, right? He's lying to push an agenda. You haven't addressed that. Or is that okay?

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

I'm not TELLING you what to think. I'm OBSERVING YOUR BEHAVIOR.

EVERYONE agrees with me on this. SOME of your fellow lefty troll bois might lie and say they don't, but it's just shit talk.

You know it, I know it, EVERYONE knows it.

The only question really is, what do you get out of this behavior?

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

>I'm not TELLING you what to think. I'm OBSERVING YOUR BEHAVIOR.

Your observations are completely wrong. You do not know me.

>EVERYONE agrees with me on this. SOME of your fellow lefty troll bois might lie and say they don't, but it's just shit talk.

So "everyone agrees with me on this except the people who say they don't who I've decided are liars". Real sound logic there, genius.

And you haven't answered my question: You do realise the OP in this thread is lying, right? He's lying to push an agenda. You haven't addressed that. Or is that okay?

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

I don't care about the op. I do know you and you have been an asshole to me for months.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

My point is that your objection to people supposedly "pushing an agenda" is a complete lie. The OP, account since deleted, openly lied about a current event in order to push an anti-trans (later updated to anti-muslim) agenda. Why do you only object to when liberals supposedly (you think) do this?

Why the obvious hypocrisy?

And I don't care that I'm an asshole to you. I think you're a hypocritical piece of shit and feel no need to ever be polite to you about anything.

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

You are also a coward for only being like this onlline.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

My point is that your objection to people supposedly "pushing an agenda" is a complete lie. The OP, account since deleted, openly lied about a current event in order to push an anti-trans (later updated to anti-muslim) agenda. Why do you only object to when liberals supposedly (you think) do this?

Why the obvious hypocrisy?

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

It is absurd that you pretend to think that my problem with you is limited to "push an agenda".

I have been very clear, for a very long time about my views on your behavior and character.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Quoting you:

"But lefties talk shit all the time. It is your primary form of communication. to LIE."

What's the OP of this thread doing?

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

I have described a forest, you want to focus on a tree at a time and pretend to be challenging me.

That is you being a complete asshole.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Answer the question.

The OP, account since deleted, openly lied about a current event in order to push an anti-trans (later updated to anti-muslim) agenda. Why do you only object to when liberals supposedly (you think) do this?

And the OP is far from the only right-wing liar on here.

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

i see your tree and raise you a forest.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Answer the question.

The OP, account since deleted, openly lied about a current event in order to push an anti-trans (later updated to anti-muslim) agenda. Why do you only object to when liberals supposedly (you think) do this?

And the OP is far from the only right-wing liar on here. I have no reason to believe left-wingers are more inherently dishonest.

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

i see your tree and raise you a forest.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Answer the question.

The OP, account since deleted, openly lied about a current event in order to push an anti-trans (later updated to anti-muslim) agenda. Why do you only object to when liberals supposedly (you think) do this?

And the OP is far from the only right-wing liar on here. I have no reason to believe left-wingers are more inherently dishonest.

reply

[–] Lord Rake (3829) 3 months ago

He is afraid if Trump gets in the welfare might dry up and he'll have to get a job.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

I'm not American

reply

[–] Lord Rake (3829) 3 months ago

I bet.

reply

[–] robocat893 (13525) 3 months ago

*yawn* As usual you're full of shit!

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

LOL. EVERYONE KNOWS that this is about you people getting more and more blatant with your abuse of power and oppression of your enemies.

reply

[–] Kowalski (59141) 3 months ago

🤣

reply

[–] chilidoggg (13109) 3 months ago

WTF is "election interference?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_interference

Election interference generally refers to efforts to change the outcome of a election. Kinds of election interference may include:

Electoral fraud, illegal interference with the process of an election

Vote buying, when a political party or candidate distributes money to a voter with the expectation that they will vote for them

I don't think there's any place in the USA that goes a full year without some sort of election. There are always elections and campaigns going on.

Voter impersonation, when an eligible voter votes more than once or a non-eligible voter votes under the name of an eligible one

Foreign electoral intervention, attempts by governments to influence elections in another country

See also

Election audit, a review conducted to determine whether votes were counted accurately or whether proper procedures were followed

Election security, the protection of elections and voting infrastructure from cyberattack or cyber threat

Election subversion

reply

[–] Corbell (8413) 3 months ago

The purpose of the investigations is to interfer in the election, though various impacts.

1. the propaganda uses of the charges.

2. the drain on time and money.

3. the fear put into public people, conform or be arrested.

4. The possibility of actually putting him in prison, thus depriving him of the ability to campaign or operate freely.

5. ect.

reply

[–] [deleted] 3 months ago

one of your community shoots up a school, but again, "trump trump trump trump trump trump"

robotcat is so obsessed i'm worried what he could do if the election doesnt go his way. he/she/they/it could pull another shooting.

time to cage these people.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

>one of your community shoots up a school, but again, "trump trump trump trump trump trump"

Are you referring to the trans-shooter from last year? Yes, that happened. So? What do you want people to do? There have been many more incel and islamist and white supremacist mass shootings in the USA.

>time to cage these people.

Back to your continued endorsement of fascism, I see.

reply

[–] blue1981 (6491) 3 months ago

I'm waiting to see the identity of the shooters. If the shooters were white it'll give the left an excuse to be even more racist.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Apparently the OP doesn't need any excuse to blame this on transpeople. Any comments on that?

reply

[–] [deleted] 3 months ago

if they were white we would have known about it last week, rumors at the start were it was trannys.

the longer we have to wait to know, if we're ever told, it will be more likely a couple of members of some angry "community"

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

This literally happened today.

reply

[–] Kowalski (59141) 3 months ago

🤣

reply

[–] Rorikon (16442) 3 months ago

https://youtu.be/vkReHxJiC70?t=38

There is no info on the suspects, yet. 1 dead, 22 injured, 3 in custody, that's it.

reply

[–] Gd5150 (11050) 3 months ago

Clearly it’s just those log cabin tranny Maga county agents of chaos.

At this point there is no one mentally stable left in the Democrat rectum.

reply

[–] Skavau (9450) 3 months ago

Where does this article say that the shooter was transgender?

reply

[–] Kowalski (59141) 3 months ago

ODD HOW FIVE HOURS LATER NOT ONE PERSON HAS ANSWERED YOUR OFT REPEATED QUESTION...ODD INDEED.🙂

reply