MovieChat Forums > Everything's Gonna Be All White (2022) Discussion > "Whites are the problem" makes no sense

"Whites are the problem" makes no sense

posted 2 years ago by OvertonPendulum (4026)
23 replies | jump to latest

In the trailer, there is one Black guy who says that "We Blacks aren't your problem. You are." Implying that Whites are the problem of Whites. But if Whites are the problem, how come homogenous White places in the world are peaceful and prosperous, and Black homogenous places are violent and poor? If Whites are the problem of Blacks, how come Blacks who live among Whites are the richest Blacks, but Blacks that live away from Whites are the poorest? That makes absolutely no sense.

[–] JohnnyDoe (1740) 2 years ago

Whites keep non-whites from reaching their true potential.

[–] RogueDemonHunter (2656) 2 years ago

Correction. Democrats keep non whites from reaching their true potential. How else can you explain decades of disastrous policies aimed at keeping black people down? Democrats need them for their votes. Even after losing the Civil War, democrats still keep black people as slaves. Just not on plantations but inner city ghettos.

[–] RoboReCop (2882) 2 years ago

In addition to the Democrat Party losing their Jim Crow 'laws'.

[–] millsey72 (9757) 2 years ago

How so? Democrats along with the civil rights movement led by Al Sharpton have been helping black families for the last 60+ years

[–] RogueDemonHunter (2656) 2 years ago

Yeah. They're doing an excellent job. Thank goodness they've put so much effort into destroying the black nuclear family. That was really holding black people back.

[–] chilone (17400) 2 years ago

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

[–] RoboReCop (2882) 2 years ago

That's not exactly what President LBJ said.

[–] triplea (3577) 2 years ago

I guess that's why apparently it's worse now than ever.... LOL!

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

What? Have you even read the very original post, you're replying to??? I HAVE CLEARLY EXPLAINED HOW BLACKS IN MAJORITY WHITE AREAS DO MUCH BETTER THAN BLACKS WHO LIVE BY THEMSELVES. If Whites were keeping non-Whites down it would be the OPPOSITE.

And I bet there isn't a single social mechanism that you can point to by which Whites supposedly keep non-Whites down. On the other hand I can list several where the opposite is the case.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

And even if what you're saying were true (which it isn't) wouldn't the best solution then be RACIAL SEPARATION???

[–] CraigC (7386) 2 years ago

That is exactly true! White keep non-whites from reaching their true potential. More specifically, white liberals. They are the ones that benefit from keeping non-whites downtrodden and ignorant.

[–] triplea (3577) 2 years ago

Why is that? Are whites physically bigger or intellectually superior or something?

[–] seagal72 (1870) 2 years ago

I predict you'll be getting some 'slavery' or 'colonialism' bullshit fired at you, for asking such a rational question?

The former will conveniently omit who actually bought and sold their own (and continue to practice such actions today) whilst the latter will conveniently omit all the great advancements that we gave to these countries, that now without our patronage, have reverted back to the shit-hole shanty-towns we constantly have to send aid to.

Whilst defenders of this bullshit show, will clap a bunch of much richer, pampered malcontents, as they bemoan a country that no-one is forcing them to live in.
And it'll go on forever....because these people (and their enablers) are mentally ill (which is why they're trying to recruit others with bullshit shows like this one)

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

Exactly. Haiti, Liberia and Ethiopia have never been colonized and they are among the poorest Black countries, while South Africa and Nigeria have been the most heavily colonized are the richest.

[–] Satan2016 (23968) 2 years ago

Haiti was a French colony. Then came the revolution.

Saint-Domingue became known as the "Pearl of the Antilles" – the richest colony in the 18th century French empire.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

Yes, but it has never been a colony in 218 years since it's been independent.

[–] Dsx2006 (187) 2 years ago

That's not how the consequences of colonialism work xD It already happened, and just so you know, it was violent.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

Haiti's troubles have nothing to do with the fact that it was a French colony. Hong Kong was a British colony for a long time and now it's one of the most prosperous place in the world.

[–] Dsx2006 (187) 2 years ago

Wow, your first sentence is so misinformed. You have no idea.
About HK, I don't really know that much, to be honest, but remember, just because it is a capitalist jurisdiction it doesn't mean common people don't try to flee it whenever they get the chance. Hollywood has painted HK very favorably, sometimes it seems subtle, but is there. I think it's just politics, don't be fooled by Hollywood.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

How does Haiti's troubles in 2022 have anything to with what has happened more than 200 years ago. Excuses, excuses. Germany in the last 100 years lost 2 world wars and was almost levelled to the ground and half of it occupied by Communists for 50 years, yet nobody blames modern problems of Germany on that.

[–] triplea (3577) 2 years ago

They couldn't sort their shit out in 200+ years.... HAHAHA!!

[–] sokar (2098) 2 years ago

Keelai will be along shortly frothing at the mouth and calling you every ism available

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 2 years ago

This is just more far left woke propaganda designed to divide us along racial lines. Most of the people who spew out this bullshit are wealthy elites (predominately white if that matters) who only want to make themselves appear virtuous and caring so they can feel good while not having to actually do anything to help anyone. It’s just easier to blame society and white people. It’s also comically ironic that their premise is by definition racist.