Why do Republicans oppose environmental laws? ?

Tackling climate change implies government intervention on a large scale to address it effectively and thus means more government regulations on big business. And that's what the Republicans are opposed to. Yet I'm sure they're fine with the SCOTUS dictating whether Americans could engage in anal sex or not.

Because it’s obvious that the DemoKKKrats who are pushing them don’t actually care about the environment, they are just using the environment as an excuse to enact their far left radical agenda.

I don't have a problem with electric or hybrid cars but the technology is still too expensive for a lot of people and you can't go to war on the fossil fuel industry the way dementia Joe has done when you are hurting the middle class and the poor.

I'd say they are indifferent to the health of our environment.

Profits are what they dig, so whatever cuts into that, they don't like much. They aren't really interested in long term effects of trashing the planet.

About 30 plus years ago a thank tank came up with a topic that could draw money and hopefully get the entire country and parts of the world on board.

It was called global warming, this think tank wanted to scare the world that the temperature was constantly rising and it would cause disaster.

So after 25 years of posting how much the earth increased in temperature, the data was minimal. There was no proof and how can measure a average global temperature that is millions of years old with just 30 years. It was retarded.

So about 10 years ago they made the decision to drop the global warming message and changed it to climate change, the think take said now when the temperature rises or falls, when there is a natural disaster we have something to blame.

The climate change people of the u.s. believe if they spend billions on green energy it will magically transform every other country and the enitre world will be clean.

It's a scam to get people to give money and work on a task that will always be changing. Keep people busy over nothing they can control.

well , what bunch of deflection and excuses

"Because it’s obvious that the DemoKKKrats who are pushing them don’t actually care about the environment "
"nor would they have private jets."
"the technology is still too expensive"
"It's a scam to get people to give money and work on a task that will always be changing. "
"(wont )magically transform every other country "
"people don't understand the power needed to feed a country of People."

Some of the above are true , nobody said it wasnt a big challenge, but thats not a reson not to do it , especailly as our futures depend on it

It's only a partisan issue because liberals use it as one. Count the dozens of ways they use it to denigrate conservatives.

1) We're opposed to radical, irrational change. Change should be carefully weighed and measured. It should be based on sound science, not emotion. It should be done according to the needs and wants of all, not just the loud, irrational minority.

2) Regulation should not be so extensive that it chokes industry or forces it to move overseas. If regulation pushes production to China where there is no EPA, aren't you defeating the purpose???

3) The US is not the world's biggest polluter. In the last 30yrs, huge strides have been made in fuel efficiency and the pollution created by automobiles. The liberal approach is drastic, immediate change that has an astronomical cost. We are going to bankrupt ourselves making these changes, while our enemies who ARE the biggest polluters, do nothing. The net result simply isn't worth it.

4) The proposed solutions are irrational. Nobody seems to want to take into account the environmental impact of the production of electric vehicles and their batteries. Not to mention the financial cost. If everyone is going electric, then gas/diesel vehicles are now worthless. There are TONS of people who cannot afford a new vehicle at all, let alone a more expensive electric now that you've made their old vehicle worthless. I know people who've never been able to afford a new vehicle their entire lives. Now they're supposed to buy a $40,000 electric? Then there is the effect on the power grid. We are simply not equipped for every household to have electric vehicles. Where does that electricity come from? Mostly from fossil fuels like goal and natural gas. Aren't you also attacking those too??? I'm sorry but we can't all run off solar power and float around in bubbles like the Jetsons.

In five minutes I've poked enough holes in liberal "thinking" so as to render the argument moot.

what did Carter do? nothing
what did Clinton do? nothing
what did Obama do? nothing
what is JoeTard doing? nothing

of course as always, its the Republicans fault.

Russia is destroying an ecosystem in Ukraine, but thats ok because we will send trillions to gird for the long war.

and lest we forget, Nancy blamed Trump for climate change in California.