MovieChat Forums > moviechatterer

moviechatterer (14033)


Kaspersky AV Why did Logan <spoiler>call the troops in</spoiler>? (spoilers) Morse in his early years as a police constable. Very unsympathetic character Similar premise to ... Further insights to what the actual crime was I am still unclear what Trumps crime is World leaders back Trump Everyone determined to hate it How does this game work ? View all posts >


again , you do not know what a loophole is. Its nothing about ambiguities in the law , or breaking the law . The essence , the purpose , the point , of those dealers requiring checks id that people have decide that to buy a gun you need a back ground check so they made those rules , the fact you can just go get one secondhand and bypass that check makes the law redundant due to that "loophole" i been and looked it up for you : <i>A loophole is an ambiguity or inadequacy in a system, such as a law or security, which can be used to circumvent or otherwise avoid the purpose, implied or explicitly stated, of the system. </i> In this case its an inadequacy not an ambiguity , and the "purpose, implied or explicitly stated" is that bit i was talking abnout where pwopl deciode background chcks should be a thing . then joe schmo says "well fk that , I'll just buy secondhand" Thats A loophole to avoid the background check requirement. "bkgd checks have only applied to dealers and never to private sales at the federal level. So why is this a loophole?" You yourself have put it as simple as possible , i dont know how you could end that sentence with So why is this a loophole? That IS the loophole If you can bypass a background check by going private sale - that is a loophole , how can you not see that? " the sale of firearms by private sellers, including those done at gun shows, that do not require the seller to conduct a federal background check of the buyer. This is also called the private sale exemption" ^^^ loophole ^^^ What was the problem with the movie? It only flopped because the press , before it was released and nobody had actually seen it , told everyone "Oh its no good because its overbudget and behind schedule" which to me sound like positive plus points! That could well be it! Well , more smokes & booze on the tanker - I'm in! the downside might be more dangerous work or employer abuse - but ... those folks on the atol had a pretty f'cked up justice / police system too! boom boom! He's one of the very rare people who would probably be less suitable than Trump yes white people need respecting, they dont usually have to fight as hard for it though I was only repsonding in kind to whatever the racebaiting asshole in the op was blathering about re "white guilt" View all replies >