MovieChat Forums > Ariana Grande Discussion > Progressive starving killed her sex appe...

Progressive starving killed her sex appeal

posted 3 years ago by holly61 (901)
25 replies | jump to latest

At 21 (2014) her career was on fire and men loved her. Her figure was petite and cute back then and she dressed like a sexy school girl (that was conveniently 21). As she continued to let her body waste away through dieting and got a series of facial plastic surgeries that did her no favors the sex appeal just collapsed.

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 3 years ago

I never thought she had any sex appeal. She looks like she stopped aging around age 14. And her music is pure crap.

[–] jk90us (5400) 6 months ago

No. She used to be hot as hell.

[–] AzureSeb (469) 4 months ago

She looks like her brother in a wig.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

Nah she looks better than ever.

[–] redban (5264) 3 years ago

Nah, she looked better before the tan, hair extensions, excess makeup etc

https://c8.alamy.com/comp/CA26H0/feb-8-2011-los-angeles-california-us-actress-ariana-grande-arrives-CA26H0.jpg

And now -

https://media.wonderlandmagazine.com/uploads/2020/10/Ek_iLHsX0AAnWAP.jpg

[–] DoctorThirteen (10443) 3 years ago

She definitely looks better in the first pic.

[–] Techto (1089) 3 years ago

Agreed. She’s becoming progressively more artificial looking.

[–] RipRoss (355) 4 months ago

I think she looks hotter in the second pic except for the tattoos.

[–] Techto (1089) 4 months ago

To each his own.

[–] beauq81 (1018) 3 years ago

I agree with trevorh321. She's a pedophile's wet dream.

[–] Cognoscente (2470) 3 years ago

Here's me thinking that it was the donut incident that killed her sex appeal.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

Pffff why would the "donut incident" do that? It didn't impact her negatively in any way.

[–] jonathan_k80 (6436) 3 years ago

Another celebrity who marred her body with trashy tattoos. Why do people do this?

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

Her tattoos are perfectly fine and go well with her style.

[–] jonathan_k80 (6436) 3 years ago

No. Tattoos are trashy. Her body was fine; there was no need to destroy it.

[–] Sandman3 (1450) 3 years ago

In that one picture someone posted she looks like Trump's wife. Just younger.

Have not seen her in awhile but she has some of the best legs ever!

https://hips.hearstapps.com/cos.h-cdn.co/assets/14/48/2048x2889/gallery_nrm_1417019633-459491078.jpg?resize=768:*

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

A man of culture.
Ariana's legs are underrated.

[–] stones78 (426) 3 years ago

Ms. Butera's just another wanna-be skank with no talent

[–] Hydracubus (747) 20 days ago

I noticed them too. They're my favorite part of her other than her lips.

[–] DoctorThirteen (10443) 3 years ago

Wow.

[–] Kowalski (59534) 3 years ago

*TATTOOS ARE TRASHY TO YOU.

I FIND THEM EXTREMELY HOT.

[–] Bercilak (300) 3 years ago

Only if her style is "perpetual recidivist".

I get that they are mainstream today, but I will always associate tattoos with convicts and biker gangs.

[–] TandyMan (10406) 3 years ago

She's completely unrecognizable in these new Voice promos.

[–] pepetoony (1540) 8 months ago

She was always a cute girl, but yea...things started to get creepy when she decided to go the 'sexy' route, seeing as how she still looked like a young girl at the time. It was completely unnecessary too--Ariana had true talent and therefore didn't need to stoop to using the whole 'sexy' gimmick that less talented female artists usually use to try and make up for their shortcomings. And any grown-ass men who "loved" "sexy" 21yo Ariana hot may want to check themselves. She looked like an 8th grader!

[–] Evoken (1172) 6 months ago

I think she looked amazing in the movie Don't Look up and she has always looked nice but I can't say I am a fan of her curren looks. She looks malnourished and like she is sick and the new hair style is not good.