Why haven't we seen any proof of Russia's meddling yet?

- No evidence...check
- Citing “consensus” as evidence of proof...check
- Constantly changing the charge to fit our needs, from collusion, to rigging, to meddling...check
- Acting shocked that countries try to influence each other which is as common as the changing weather...check.

We need a more vague title. Something that sounds important but is totally unmeasurable.

Let’s call it: Man made global political disruption.

Why does that sound so dishonest, that we are always being asked to trust people or worse professional liars like CIA? Lying is their job. I don't understand why liberals do this. Even on an issue like global warming where there is evidence they could make, they don't do that. They ask us to trust people instead. No! That's how I know you're lying.

Only Andrew Johnson and Clinton were impeached but were never forced out of office. Nixon resigned before he was impeached. What will Trump be impeached for?

Difference is this guy has been under investigation since his fourth month in office while other Presidents were in office a few years. A year and a half into his presidency and there is already 30 indictments and five guilty pleas? Never ever before has that happened so early on.

If that's the case then it kind of sounds like how Trump avoided releasing his tax returns just to stir the pot until Rachel Maddow had them leaked to her and then told the world how he pays them just like everyone else.

Mueller never said that. In their indictments, they never said that it influenced the election, but they didn't say the Russians had no influence either. They didn't take a side either way.

exactly

LOL!

Of course we meddle in foreign affairs, so what? But our country has 2 political parties and one of them has been compromised and the pres has been colluding with our enemy and verbally attacking our allies while millions of brainwashed rednecks, that pretend to be patriots, cheer him on.