MovieChat Forums > Eternals (2021) Discussion > Too much for Chloé Zhao?

Too much for Chloé Zhao?


Seeing how the reviews are mediocre at best and talks of most of the show being long long expositions of the large cast, did she not understand the MCU as a whole? Did Disney jump the shark putting her at the helm of a high budget movie after only doing 4-5 small independent movies? Mind you, critic reviews aren't always synonymous with the audience.

reply

It’s possible. Some reviewers said this movie dives deep into the marvel lore but maybe it is too esoteric to translate for casual audiences?

reply

Big elephant in the room: Chloe Zhao is a diversity hire.

Why that matters so much? Disney has been using diversity hires to play main characters, but most directors used to be the usual disposable white males. That's changing, though: Shang Chi used an Asian director behind the cameras, Black Panther, a Black director (because, you know, God forbids some director dares to make a movie about some story if he doesn't belong to the Correct Race!).

That's a big problem for a formula-movie company like Disney. Previous directors had their hands tied by the company: it was Disney way or no way. Phil Lord, Chris Miller and Edgar Wright discovered it the hard way.

Now the big elephant in the room: if Chloe Zhao was doing some Indie Auteur boring movie, which producer would dare to take a step forward and treat Chloe Zhao the way they treated Wright or Lord/Miller?

Let me guess, not a single one.

The problem with diversity hires is that people are afraid of opposing them, and that includes producers and executives. When the staff who is allegedly in charge is afraid of disagreeing with an employee, your company is screwed.

reply

i am in the difficult position of not liking you personally while agreeing with most of the things you say.

i don't like that.

reply

As they say, the facts don't care about feelings, and here you have to acknowledge he's factually 100% correct.

reply

LMAO doesn't Ben Shapiro say that? Imagine quoting that dork you fucking dork

reply

i am in the difficult position of not liking you personally while agreeing with most of the things you say. i don't like that.

Hehe... I know what you mean. Just don't worry. That's actually a sane reaction 😎

One of my strong points is that I'm extraordinarily perceptive about people's motivations (I would have been a hell of a therapist. If I could go back in time to College, I'd be either a mathematician or a therapist). And one thing I've discovered is that, when it comes to political, religious or controversial issues in general, any perceptive and reasonable argument that attacks your core beliefs is gonna hurt real bad. People often use insults when they try to hurt, which is naive: it's truth what really hurts.

In real life, I'm the caring friendly type. Because of that, in real life I avoid politics or religion as hell. I can't handle seeing I'm hurting somebody. So... thank god there's Internet 😁

reply

YOU'RE REAL GOOD AT TALKING YOURSELF UP.

reply

personally, i don't think you do your position any favours by being so one note and combative.

because i actually quite agree with a lot of what you say. this is not a question of my core beliefs being attacked. i hate racial pandering. i hate the empty-headed intersectional demonization of all things white and male.

and yet the two of us have had at least one, maybe two pointless, silly fights. & if you're fighting with people whose positions overlap with yours, at least they do as far as i can tell, then i'd say you're likely not advancing your ideas.

maybe you're just looking for fights?

if you're not taking human nature into account when trying to forward an argument, then you're really not accomplishing anything, are you?

i mean, you might be able to annoy and prod and provoke some people to your side, but you're just as likely to repel more.

i say this because i think your ideas are a-ok for the most part, and i think people who put those things out there, if they're serious about them, should do a better job of being an advocate for good thinking.

my 2c, for you to dismiss or whatever.

reply

Wrong.

This is not the first "diversity hires" in Marvel: Black Panther (black), Captain Marvel (woman), Shang Chi (asian).

All three movies have rave reviews, would you call them the proofs that Marvel "afraid of opposing them?"

The really difference this time is OSCARS. A director won three biggest awards: best picture, best director, best actress. Who is Kevin Feige? What he won? Nothing, zero. How dare you opposing a director won three biggest movie awards!

reply

Wrong. This is not the first "diversity hires" in Marvel: Black Panther (black), Captain Marvel (woman), Shang Chi (asian).

Congrats. You have discovered the two previous director diversity hires... that I already mentioned in my comment. You must feel exhausted after such a research, don't you? 😂

Being a diversity hire doesn't mean you're necessarily a moron. You can a pro... or not. Picking somebody for other reason than his merits doesn't mean he's gonna lack merit. If just means that you better feel lucky, because you're gonna need some luck, specially if (as I said) your producers will be afraid of opposing that person.

It seems Disney ran out of luck when they diversity hired Chloe Zhao.

reply

Wrong.

Why you assume producers afraid opposing diversity director in Eternals, but not in Black Panther, Captain Marvel, Shang Chi?

Because they've "merit?" Do you even saw Black Panther and Captain Marvel? You want to talk about "merit" in them?

No, most likely reason is this: OSCARS. The first big director Marvel has ever hire.

reply

Why you assume producers afraid opposing diversity director in Eternals, but not in Black Panther, Captain Marvel, Shang Chi?

This is the second time you put words in my mouth I haven't said. Two times in two comments. Congrats.

First you suggested I said this was the first director diversity hire for Marvel, even though I had clearly mentioned Ry Coogler and Daniel Cretton in my previous comment. Now you say I assumed producers weren't afraid of opposing previous diversity hires, which I didn't say and which I didn't assume.

I think producers were probably afraid of opposing Ry Coogler too. However, he's probably a pro team-worker who followed the Marvel formula without pretentiousness. That would explain why Stallone picked him to direct the last Rocky movies too.

All you're doing is assigning to me words I haven't said. You're boring me. Bye.

reply

Wrong, wrong, and wrong.

1. I didn't say you said "this was the first director diversity hire for Marvel."

2. Your theory take a lot of assumptions: "merit," "pro team-worker," "lucky." How do you know they are?

3. I ask you again: Why you think Eternals get bad reviews because "producer afraid of opposing them?" Why don't you think Black Panther, Captain Marvel, Shang Chi, get good review because "producer afraid of opposing them?"

Big elephant in the room: Chloe Zhao is a Oscars winner.

reply

She won a fucking Best Director Oscar, and you still call her a "diversity hire"?

This is how it works. If a white man who's made some indies wins a Best Director Oscar, they're just a director to people like you. But if anyone who isn't a white straight male does anything remarkable, you dismiss them as a "diversity hire", because even though you undoubtedly believe that you're not racist or sexist, you reserve your right to be impressed by certain things for straight white men.

Not that any of that makes "The Eternals" a good movie. It is or it isn't, whoever directed it.

reply

Is it any more of a diversity hire than Ang Lee for the ordinal try at a Hulk movie? OK, Ang Lee did do Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon which had some fantastic and action elements. Still an odd and ultimately unsuccessful choice. I think picking Zhao for this one is more of a prestige hire than a diversity hire, although that probably didn't hurt her chances either. It could also just be a stupid, unneeded and unwanted super hero movie that failed to interest anyone.

The real elephant in the room: did she deserve to win for Nomadland? If you think yes than probably it was simply a bad career choice for her and a bad personnel choice for Marvel. If you think no and that she only won because she was Asian than it won't really matter anyway.

*She did dare to offend China without groveling and begging for forgiveness like faux tough guy John Cena, so she gets a good social credit score in my book.

reply

Couldn't it just be possible someone had a bad movie? Not every movie made by a director has to be amazing Oscar winners.

Even Oscar winning directors can make flops. And it is not some nefarious diversity agenda. While I begrudgingly have to agree with your parentheses comment :"because, you know, God forbids some director dares to make a movie about some story if he doesn't belong to the Correct Race!", I feel Disney took Chloe Zhao because they thought she'd do a good job.

The Eternals and most contemporary movies seem to have that checkbox for diversity and stricter rules - black people have to make black movies with black cast and so on etc. and a movie or tv show or heck even an ad must have people who are white,black,brown,yellow always etc. nonsense. but in this case, perhaps that wasn't the main crux but more that she is an accomplished director and could do well.

Maybe the movie is terrible, maybe it is not. The trailers made it look campy but fun so lets see. Personally I absolutely hated those Spider-Man movies of Tom Holland because they're really pretty bad and idiotic but many seemed to love them so could be people are beginning to dislike Marvel content more? Also, the premise is a bit off - where were these guys all along when Thanos was snapping away half the Universe?

reply

The thing is, the MCU often hires independent directors or even TV show directors. It often works but maybe Zhao is a bad fit.

reply

Okay, I will give you that, but did these independent directors have short a list of films done as Zhao's? I'm still hoping for its success since I already pre-ordered my tickets for it on the 5th.

reply

James Watts had a pretty short list. I think the directors of Captain Marvel did too. That one was directed alright but the script and acting were bad.

reply

It's not the first time this has happened, that an indie director landed a big movie that didn't quite work out. Also, this was to be part of a new wave of MCU movies where being different was the intention.

reply

Di$ney thought she could get them Oscars out of this. The only awards it might get now are token ones.

reply