1. It was a massively anti-American and racist speech. For those that did not understand it, he later clarified his message verbally to verify that indeed, he was attacking AMERICA as a whole, becuase of the supposed behavior of white people. It is also worth noting that such speech is by it's nature, very divisive.
2. A football game is not the same as a virtual communcation space. Treating similar behavior (controversial speech) in different places and different situations, differently, makes sense. Your pretense that time and place are irrelevant does not make sense. Football's purpose is to be a national pastime. Youtube is to be a virtual public square. Different responses make complete sense.
3. No. You found an excuse to be a dick. Because you were looking for one. That is you being a dick. I repeat, caring more about shit that impacts me and mine, is normal. It does NOT imply, as you assumed, that I thus care about no one else. You made tha leap because you like to think of yourself one way, but you wanted to act in a completely different way. So you needed an excuse for yourself. Standard lefty behavior.
4. Leftards protect their own, and go after their enemies with a fiery and retarded passion. Your denial of this is standard lefty behavior.
5. Common lefty troll boi behavior. YOu act in a very rude and disrespectful manner, and when I respond apropriately, you tell yourself that it came out of nowhere, and now you are justified in being a dick in response. Oh, and you cite the "anger" of the conservative as though that means there is something wrong with them. Since you didn't use any explict insults. I am not playing such retarded games. YOu act like an asshole, I will treat you accordingly. YOu act civil, I will be civil. Consider it a CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE GAME.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
Lol again you just gave your opinion and nothing more. In my book his actions were wonderful and were not disrespectful. I find you disrespectful for viewing it that way.
Nope it is the same. Youtube is technically their platform therefore they can silence who they want to. If you own the platform it is your call to make.
Oh I can tell that is your MO. You care only about you and your own. Which is standard right wing behavior. Since you want to demonize the left I will demonize the right. Turn about is fair play.
Again that was not part of the discussion. Your attempt to move the goal post is denied. We were talking about if a person gets away with something because of their political affiliation. I proved that when you have tons of money the legal system is more lenient on you regardless of political affiliation.
You insulted me first. So you have no moral high ground here. Since you want to be an asshole that is the way you will get treated like one. You are a scumbag.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. That was retarded when he first did it. Afterwards when he verbally clarifed that his message was against AMERICA as a whole because of white people, your denial is simiply you stonewalling like a good little troll boi. That yo are lying for him is just another form of you supporting his message, not his right to speech. That you support anti-americanism and don't have the balls to own it, is you being a pussy.
2. Note that you expressed your disagreement, but you did not explain it. Becuase your position that a football game and youtube are LITERALLY THE SAME, is clearlly wrong. You are just shit talking now, becaseue you will say anything to support his anti-American message.
3. Except that my generalizations are true, or at least made in good faith, and yours are shit talk. This btw, is a fine example of you being a rude asshole. Go fuck yourself.
4. We were disccussing about if a person gets away with something because of their poliitcal affilitaion. You bringing up that there are other ways that people can get away with shit, does not contradict my poitn about the left giving their own a pass. Please stop acting like you are retarded. It is disrespectful to retarded people.
5. And again, you ignore my truthful and clear explanation, to just stonewall and be an asshole. Thus you choose to have an uncivil disccussion instead of a civil one. Which is fine. Well, not really, but at least stone whining about it like a fag.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
Lol when he first did it people like yourself were not interested in the reasoning. So spare me that nonsense. Your side constantly talks about peacefully protesting. Whenever there is a riot and buildings are destroyed or looted you say they should do it by peaceful methods. Then when that is done that is not good enough either. Lets cut through the crap, you do not want the other side to say a word or protest by any means. You are pretending like you are mad at where it is done when in reality you are mad at is an opposing voice stating their belief.
I do not have to. You made generalizations which you did not support. Therefore I will do the same to you.
You said nothing to support them. What you can say without evidence I can dismiss without evidence. I can make claims as well without backing them up.
Which has nothing to do with mindset. That was you moving the goalpost and I denied it. You have not proven that a specific party gets away more with crimes than the other you again made a baseless claim. Either provide facts or shut your mouth. It is known that on average democrats are smarter than republicans.
You had no explanation. Also it is a well known fact that anyone who throws out the word fag as freely as you do is covering up something themselves. Are you gay? You projecting something?
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. We were responding to his message. We understood immediately his point. He was expressing his hatred and disloyalty to America. YOU people tried to gaslight that it was just about police wacism. But you were clearly wrong and then he verfied that you were wrong. YOur use of the word "Reasoning" made ZERO sense there. I was not explaining his reasoning or attacking it. I was discussing the end result, ie his message.
2. I actually often do support my generalizations, and if not, would he happy to if you ask or challenge it. The vast majorit of my generalizations are not only true, but common knowledge.
3. LOL. Whatever. YOur constant stonewalling is getting boring. Do you have any other tricks today?
4. lol. I LOVE it when leftards try to use homophobic slurs against. me. Imo, it is one of the purest forms of the lack of their self awareness and their complete corruption and soullessness.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
No I do not believe you. I think you did not like him protesting peacefully. You do not have to agree with the message or the reasoning. No one was harmed by him doing that. Only your feelings were hurt. If no one was hurt then you have no grounds to stand on.
Lol which is you admitting you did not support them here. A generalization is not a fact. That is something morons like yourself fail to understand. So since you did not support them here do not expect me to challenge them. Want me to challenge them you need to support them. Otherwise it is just nonsense.
So is yours. Anytime you punch down and boast about how conservatives are better than liberals I will return the favor.
What slur was used against you? I asked if you were gay. That is not a slur. You were the one who said the word fag. Are you honestly this stupid? Or are you just trolling now?
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. YOu don't believe that Americans were offended by a blatant display of anti-Americanism during a nationally televised National Anthem? LOL. Do you realize how fucking retarded you sound right now?
2. In a healthy society where people discussion issues were people and not bad faith lefty troll bois like yourself, such generalizations would help the discussion move forward nicely. You are just being a troll boi. Your post was nonsense.
3. LOL. i'M punching down? LOL!!!! OMG. Yeah, you guys just control the Government and big tech and big media and the cia and the fbi and have mayors who are willing to order cops to arrest people who defend themselves from violent mobs, but I'M the one with the power. Do you like the taste of the shit coming out of your mouth?
4. Your intent was clear. Fag.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
I feel as though they were more offended someone did a protest.
Lol in other words you want no on to challenge your generalizations even though you do not prove them. I do not operate off of generalizations I also operate off of facts.
You are speaking on them as a group and attempting to include me in that. Would you like it ands said you harassed the Sandy Hook victims because conservatives tend to listen to Alex Jones? Your attempt to paint me in the light of people who do that is denied. I can point out conservatives who are bigots and do tons of horrible stuff. I am judging you off of your behavior not another group.
Intent was not what you said. You said you love it when leftards try to use homophobic slurs against you. I did no such thing. You just used a slur again lol. You realize how stupid you looked on this right? Also my intent was not to use a slur which is why I did not use one.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. That is circular reasoning. You hate people, and assume the worst about them, and you see them do something, like complain about the Kneeling, and you FEEL that it was because of a bad, or even worst reason you can think of.
2. Not really. My generallizations are almost always right. If you truly think I made a mistake, and especially if you were correct, i would be fine with you challenging it. Hell, i might learn something. But simpy challenging it, because you don't want to admit it, because it is a problem for your position, not because you think it is wrong? That is you being a dishonest asshole.
3. A generalization is a generalization, not an universial statement. That you want to pretend to not know that, is a mechanism where as you manage to slow or stop discussions because you want to hide the truth. Becuase you know that what you believe or want, is false or bad. I want serious and honest discussions, because I belive that what I believe or want is true and good.
4 Yes. You did. YOu pretended to ask me a question, when in reality what you were doing was using the implied implication of homosexuality as a slur. That is hilarious. YOu are such a stupid fag.
And why would it look retarded for me to call you a fag? You are clearly acting in such a way as to justify it.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
No I feel it is quite accurate. It would not matter where he did the protest or when you guys would still complain about it.
No not true. If it were you would have provided facts to prove them. You did no such thing. I challenge a generalization of any kind because it is not iron clad. You only want to look at a generalization and nothing else. I get why people like you do it. It does the leg work for you and you don't have to think, you can operate off of laziness.
Then if it is not a universal statement you would not use a generalization as if it were. You like to cite any generalization that favors you. Funny thing is you will not cite one that goes against you even if it is true. You cherry pick and it is painfully obvious.
Nope I asked you a question because I feel you are projecting. Anybody who does that is usually trying to hide something which what I think is happening here.
Again you keep using the words and have no idea what they mean. You used a slur I did no such thing. I caught you in a lie.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. Well, I am not in control, nor responsible for your feelings. So, you are operating based solely on what you want to believe so... YOu know we are bad because you just feel it. Got it. I won't be making a similar argument against you. Or anyone, lol.
2. It is silly to "provide facts" to "prove" something that people generally know to be true. All that does is bog down discussions into meaningless back and forth bullshit. Especially when one side is composed almost exclusively of bad faith trolls.
3. Give me a generalization you think does not favor me.
4. No you didn't. You sentence was structured that way, but your actual intent was to snidely imply that I was gay. As an insult. That is you being homophobic. And that is funny. That you are stonewalling on it, is you being a fag.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
No I operate off of observations of your guys's behavior. You do not like when someone spouts a political opinion you disagree with. Lebron James got told to shut up and dribble by Laura Ingraham. Meanwhile Drew Breeze voiced his disapproval of kneeling. Which is fine but... Laura Ingraham did not tell him to shut up and play football now did she? See the double standard?
Lol coming from the guy that says the msm lies. That is common knowledge by now but you constantly bring that up the discussion. A generalization can only tell some of a story not the entire thing. It can be wrong in many scenarios. Many factors play into them.
The drug war generally causes more harm than good.
Nope you are going off what you feel my intent was. You have no idea what my intent was. You want that to be my intent to cover up the fact that you said the slur. You are projecting.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. I'm not getting your point. People that say shit we disagree with, we express our disagrement with them.
2. What do you mean "wrong in many scenarios"?
3. Is that even a generalization? You are talking about a policy, not a group .
4. Your intent was clear. And my pointing out that you used a slur in no way hides my use of the term fag, to call you a fag. That was stupid of you to claim. YOu fag.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
You do not stop at disagreement. If Kaepernick did that not in the NFL people would still say he is a bad person. It is that mentality of if you dare say one negative thing about America that you hate it.
Exactly what I mean. Stereotypes exist right? Generalization exist. There are exceptions to those things correct? People do not bother to ask why something is the way it is or the factors that lead to it. They look at the generalization and it stops there.
Conservatives generally are the people who support the drug war. So no incorrect.
Nope that was what you drew up. I never said a slur where as you did. Your attempt to conceal that did not work.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. You seem to be losing the thread. You were claiming that we do not respect his right to speech. Pointing out, correctly, that we think he is a bad person, is irrelevant to whether or not we support his right to speech. Thanks to hte NFL supporting his speech, thus giving him permission to "speak" during the national anthem, he has the right to do what he did. He said his message. I support the right of his employers to allow him to speak. And thus his right to speak. That does not mean that I cannot strongly disagree with him and say so, to the point of explaining why and how he is a vile piece of shit person.
2. Nonsense. Everyone knows that generalizations have exceptions and asking WHY something might be a certain way, is a completely reasonable step. I challenge you to give me an example of a policy or public action where the process you describe led to an issue.
3. I would be fine with that generalization. If you made it during a discussion, and...used that to build a point, I would almost certainly just address teh point you made, instead of demanding proof that conseervatives are generally the people that support the drug war.
4. And this is how trolls operate. You never "Said" an explict slur. YOu just snidely and cowardly implied that I was a fag, in order to insult me. Your intent and meaning where clear. You called me a fag to insult me, but you are too much of a coward to just do that.
What a fag you are.
I am not interested in such fag games, fag. You act that rude and disrepectful and I will treat you accordingly. YOu whine like a fag because I do so, and you then play this game in "defense" and all that does is make you look like even more of a fag.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
No the point I am making is you think he is a bad person because he disagrees with you. This is how typical right wing nutjobs are. No one is capable of disagreeing with them without being considered bad or evil. Second you guys say do not do it during the national anthem. When in reality if he did it anywhere public you wouldn't want him doing it anywhere regardless of where it was done.
If everyone knows they have exceptions why do they list the generalization as if it is a fact? Generalizations which led to issues? Did you seriously just ask me that? Black people are uneducated. Black people are thugs. All you have to do is comb through history to see how generalizations caused issues. Asking why is reasonable but often that is not what is done. Often times a generalization is used as a means of spreading hatred or justifying it.
Which you are not doing now. I can easily cite proof for you conservatives are generally for the drug war. If you asked I can easily provide it. I unlike you answer a question directly. I did not give my side opinion like how you did on Michelle Obama's looks. So we both excel in certain areas. You wanted a negative policy conservatives generally support and believe in and I provided it. Now address it.
I was implying you were gay. Since often times bigots who use that word are gay themselves and use that slur against other people as a means to make themselves feel better. They do that because they can't accept themselves. They think being gay is horrid so they use that slur. I was saying you were gay not a fag. So nope I still did not use the slur. Only bigots use that word.
Right back at you. You get rude with me and I will tell you to fuck right off. You are not scaring anybody on here.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. The world is full of leftards with similar anti-American and anti-white racist beliefs. I met one at a party a few years ago. She whined that hte party was too white. I pointed out that she was judging the people at the party based on their skin color and judging against them based on her skin color. She looked at me, like she did not have a brain in her head.
I disagreed with her. She expressed racist speech. She did not interupt a national televised unity ritual to make her divisive and racist speech. I do not hate her. I am fine with her saying waht she said. I consider her a racist and anti-America leftard bimbo. She very well might be a bad person.
You seem to be having trouble distinguishing between disagreeing with someone and considering them bad people. you can done one or the other. You can also to BOTH.
2. "Often times generalizattions are used as a means of spreading hate"?
Ironically, that is a generalization.
But I know what you meant. I am not going to nitpick. I am not going to demand a link or some such bullshit.
"Black people are uneducated".
Name the last time you can think of that that caused an issue in this country.
3. But I would not challenge a generalization like "conservativdes are generally the people that support the Drug War". Not unless I had a real reason to doubt the claim or a point to be made that challenged it.
I also would not bog the discussion down, in whinging about the use of a generalization.
4. But why did you do that? You did it to insult me. Your implied insult is based on the idea that being gay is bad. Thus you are a homophobe. That you did not use the word, "fag" is... that you focus on the word, instead of your homophobic intent, is just, classic leftard. Completetly missing the point.
Leftards. All the self awareness of a potted plant. If that potted plant was high. And dead.
5. Doesn't work. YOu are the leftard troll boit, being a troll boi. I'm not.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
Nice dancing around the subject. You do not think anyone can disagree with you without being a bad person as I originally said. You can do both but that is not what you do. Anytime you disagree with someone you think they are a bad person. You think all liberal people are bad.
I stated in history so that should have given you a time period I was discussing. Back in the MLK days those generalizations about black people caused harm.
Well that is you. I personally like to challenge it and for them to prove it to me. I have seen many claims people spew out that are utter nonsense and when I ask them to back it up they end up just spewing out insults.
I told you why I did it. You kept calling me a fag. You directly used a slur, I did not. One of my relatives is gay I have no issue with others so long as they do not harm other people. Often those who use that word are gay themselves and are ashamed of it. Nowhere did I say anything negative about gay people.
Conservatives do not like being called out on stupid claims it is their kryptonite.
Does not work you are the right wing troll boi and I am not.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. No, I don't. What happens is that your leaders set up situations where your side is defending bad people and tells you to lie and pretend to think shit that is simply not true. Such as, "Kneeling during a time when standing is do to show loyalty to America and your fellow Americans, is NOT anti-Americanism".
Your position is clearly nonsense. And you side collectively lies like the good totalitarian serfs that you are. Such behavior is very infuriating to normal people who are operating in good faith. Thus your behavior is extremely divisivie.
2. Fine, we can use it.
Sure, back then such a generalization was often claimed. It was often challenged too. As there were plenty of good counter examples. Thus a good faith discussion of the issues of racism. That led to the ending of legal systems of discrimination and oppression against ethnic minorities.
What part of thath bothers you?
3. My experiences is that when lefties challenge you for a link, they almost always don't really care. YOu provide it, and they drop the point and just launch their next attack. The problem is not generalizations. The problem is lefties not operating in good faith.
4. You didn't SAY it directly. But your intent was clear. Your meaning was clear. Your slur was far more homopobic than mine. YOur lack of self awareness would be funny, if it were not so widespread and dangerous.
Also, your understanding of "projection" is...new. Projection sometimes happens. It is not the norm. I have never heard someone actually claim it is the norm, as you are doing.
5. No, I am the one operating in good faith, and you are the leftard troll boi.
5.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
No what I said was true. You say to peacefully protest and when that is done you guys do not like it still. What matters to you is someone disagreeing not what is being said. You pretend that it is what is being said as a means to cover up what you are truly doing.
Because when you operate off of generalizations it can lead to bad things as it did in the past. You just admitted certain generalizations were challenged back then. Yes that is how racism towards black people got better. You now want people to accept a generalizations and not challenge it. I do not operate off of generalizations. I go by facts and I look intro why a generalization exists. You do not do that.
I could not care less what your experience is. You do not get to cast your past experiences onto me. I could use that same childish logic as a means to be rude to you. In my experience republicans do not care about facts they only care about what suits their agenda. This is where you will claim to not believe me. Bottom line I could not care less about your anecdotal experience.
No my intent was not what you want it to be. You are doing that as a means to cover up what you were calling me. I did not use the slur where as you did.
Oh in the case of conservatives it is the norm.
Nope I am operating in good faith you are a troll and a scumbag.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. I am completely happy to discuss how i disagree with his message. At great lenght. Your... weird take away that this is some kind of dodge is just senseless. As are nearly all conservatives.
2. THere is a difference between a challenge because one seriously believes that a generalization is incorrect, and one where the challenge is just a debating tactic. That you do not get this, is you being willfully stupid, as a form of stonewalling.
3. Correct. I do not believe you. My point standsd. Lefies make demands but don't really care about the shit they demand.
4. Bullshit. Your intent was to accuse me of being homosexual as an implied slur. You did not use the actual WORD, so you think that means your behavior was within some bounds. And I am happy to talk about the way I used the slur against you. You are after all, acting like a complete fag, as I explained multiple times. YOu are suppoirting homophobia.
5. Go fuck yourself re: conservatives norm bullshit.
6. LOL. You are clearly a leftard troll and everyone can see that. Even yourself, despite ydour leftard lack of self awareness.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
I do not believe you for a second. Yeah and I agree conservatives have no sense. You got one thing right for once.
There are generalizations you have made I think are incorrect. So no horse shit!
You get angry when I say I do not believe you then you turn around say you do not believe me. Turn about is fair play. My point stands conservatives tend to be closed minded idiots generally.
Nothing is wrong with being a homosexual. I was again pointing out those that use that word often hate that part of themselves and then proceed to project it onto others because they view it as negative. You do not even know the meaning of the word as you used it incorrectly.
The point stands conservatives do not like to be challenged. Deal with it.
Lol you are clearly a conservative troll and everyone can see that. Even despite your right wing lack of awareness.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. How can we test your conclusion?
2. Name the most important example.
3. No, turnabout is not fair play. You have been a dishonest troll boi, and I have not. You don't like that? Change your behavior.
4. You SAY that nothing is wrong with it, but your actions of using it as a slur, shows that you true feelings are otherwise.
Your belief that projection is that common is a new one. IMO, you are just shit talking to justify your slurs.
5. Your unsupported assertion is noted and dismissed.
6. I am the opposite of a troll. I am prepared to discuss issues seriously and honestly. YOu are shit talking.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
Tell me liberals/democrats that are good people.
You made the claim that liberals all ask for proof bas a way to stall the argument. That is a generalization you can not prove.
Nope turnabout is a fair play. You did it to me therefore I returned the favor. You casted plenty of your negative feelings about liberals onto me. So why can't I tie you in with every negative experience I have had with other conservatives.
I did not use it as a slur. I called out your projection learn the difference.
No it is actually not new. It is well known actually.
As are yours about liberals. If you can make a baseless assertion others are free to as well.
Nope you are a scumbag and I have heard from others on here you are trash as well.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. Bill Maher, Elon Musk, Jordan Peterson.
2. The most common response to me providing a link or evidence requested is to drop the point and move on to the next attack. Once or twice, the lib in question as seriously accepted the impact of the evidence in the discussion.
3. Because you are lying about youre experiences. And becasueu we are different people and different types of people.
4. To what end, if not to smear me as a fag?
5. Projection as being "often" is well known? I've never heard of it.
6. My assertions about you specifically and lefties in generaly are not baseless.
7. LOL. Other leftard trolls that don't like that I kicked their asses. Try being civil with me, if that is possible for one such as you. You might learn something.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
Liberals in name only. They are catering to supporting your candidate. Tell me ones who do not agree with you that are good people. You just furthered my point. They agree with you so you give it a pass.
Irrelevant I do not give a shit what your past experience was with other people. Remember when you asked me if Trump said White supremacists were good people? I said no. You then said most people say he said that. So you are casting past experiences onto me which is bullshit.
Lol nope. I have had bad experiences with conservatives on here. You saw them claiming Michelle Obama was a man right? I actually have links to prove that one. So no I am not lying.
To show you it is okay we will not judge.
Well you should have heard of it.
They are baseless wrong.
No I have seen you get owned several times on here. You would be a terrible debater in real life. Thank God you have no power and will only ever go as far as being on a message board.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. I agree with bill maher on almost nothing. Musk made his name with electric cars, a subject I think is dumb. Peterson? He said he probably would have voted for HILLARY, if he was American.
I disagree with these people, yet respect them and do not consider them Bad People. Three good examples to challenge your assertion.
2. The only evidence I have seen so far of individual variation on your part. I am sorry you have failed to give me more. But other than that, you seem to be a standard issue lefty.
4. You did it as a smear, and you are too balless to own it.
MEanwhile, my use of it FIGURATIVELY, was ironically far less homophobic.
5. I didn't. I think you are wrong. I have always heard of it, as a weird thing that some people sometimes do, not a common thing. YOur usage is... very new.
6. LOL Sure you did.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
Yes but he now supports Trump. Therefore that is all you need. Musk gave a voice to your camp by buying twittter. Peterson also backs Trump. Notice the pattern here? You only like those guys because you get something out of them. Also why is an electric car dumb?
My assertion still stands. All of which you listed I just cited benefits your camp is some way shape or form. I unlike you can respect a conservative even if nothing they do benefits me.
Does not matter it still challenges your assertion and generalization. We have not gone over other stuff that I disagree with liberals on. You agree with everything conservatives do, they can do no wrong in your book.
Nope I just know those that use that insult are typically gay themselves.
Nah it was homophobic and you are now projecting again.
Bullshit I do not believe you never heard of it.
Oh no I have plenty to comb through you getting checked on here. Going through your history is funny. You are even more ignorant than I originally thought.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. Did you forget your position? You said that I see all people that disagree with me as bad. Maher disagrees with me on nearly everything. ect.
2. Nonsense. Drop teh shit.
3. You used it, and are still using it as a slur but don't have the balls to admit it. You are pathetic.
4. You don't believe me? Except you are such a shit talker you are probably just lying more.
5. But, you would lie to claim that. Becuase you lie for no reason.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
4 months ago
However he agrees with you on Trump. So he does not totally disagree with you.
No nonsense here. That is from your end.
Nope you used the slur. I did not.
No I do not believe you.
Nope like I said go through my history.
reply
share
tvfan (8751)
4 months ago
"Liberals in name only."
Nonsense, they are classical-liberals that still have some common sense.
reply
share
Corbell (8746)
4 months ago
1. The world is full of leftards with similar anti-American and anti-white racist beliefs. I met one at a party a few years ago. She whined that hte party was too white. I pointed out that she was judging the people at the party based on their skin color and judging against them based on her skin color. She looked at me, like she did not have a brain in her head.
I disagreed with her. She expressed racist speech. She did not interupt a national televised unity ritual to make her divisive and racist speech. I do not hate her. I am fine with her saying waht she said. I consider her a racist and anti-America leftard bimbo. She very well might be a bad person.
You seem to be having trouble distinguishing between disagreeing with someone and considering them bad people. you can done one or the other. You can also to BOTH.
2. "Often times generalizattions are used as a means of spreading hate"?
Ironically, that is a generalization.
But I know what you meant. I am not going to nitpick. I am not going to demand a link or some such bullshit.
"Black people are uneducated".
Name the last time you can think of that that caused an issue in this country.
3. But I would not challenge a generalization like "conservativdes are generally the people that support the Drug War". Not unless I had a real reason to doubt the claim or a point to be made that challenged it.
I also would not bog the discussion down, in whinging about the use of a generalization.
4. But why did you do that? You did it to insult me. Your implied insult is based on the idea that being gay is bad. Thus you are a homophobe. That you did not use the word, "fag" is... that you focus on the word, instead of your homophobic intent, is just, classic leftard. Completetly missing the point.
Leftards. All the self awareness of a potted plant. If that potted plant was high. And dead.
5. Doesn't work. YOu are the leftard troll boit, being a troll boi. I'm not.
reply
share
tvfan (8751)
4 months ago
I can easily cite proof for you conservatives are generally for the drug war. If you asked I can easily provide it.
Promises, Promises. More of your tricks, games and bullshitting.
reply
share