MovieChat Forums > Politics > A perfectly concise yet detailed history...

A perfectly concise yet detailed history of the modern “woke” Democrat media/party.


https://youtu.be/ucORkGAL-Rs

How do you get a conservative black philosopher, Jewish political commentator, leftwing Canadian professor on the same side?

An outstanding detailed yet concise history of the post JFK/MLK Democrat party of hate and chaos. How it got where it is today. Why it’s there. And what its plans are for the future.

It started in the late 1960s. From the summer of love to centralized medicine, it’s all part of the plan.

Remember all the flag burning before the late 1960s?

https://youtu.be/ucORkGAL-Rs

reply

It's "interesting" that the same people who label others as "woke" will in the same breath tell those same others to "wake up."

The cognitive-dissonance being illustrated by that OBVIOUSLY contradictory, ignorant action alone is simply sad!...and any further diatribes further promoting the ideology are basically all sound and fury, signifying nothing.

reply

Nothing in your post addresses the topic.

reply

That's the point. The elimination of the rules of logic allows the narrative to change second by second.

reply

And you ALSO conveniently ignored the OPs use of the term. It seems that like bicksurn, YOU also have no problem with the elimination of the rules of logic when it allows YOU to try to change the narrative.

reply

The title of the post includes the use of the word "woke", but YOU conveniently said nothing about THAT.

reply

LOL, seroiusly?

The label "WOKE" at least as used by opponents, does NOT indicate someone that has actually "wake up"-ed, at least in the opinon of those said opponents. And thus, there is no contradiction.

What you are trying to characterize as some big thing, is actually a really minor semantic thing.

reply

These people know exactly what is being discussed, but they lie about it and try to gaslight people about it. Same with antifa being "antifascists" and all the apocalyptic "peaceful protests". No one is fooled.

reply

If it is only a minor semantic thing, why are there so many people here (including yourself) trying to make such a big deal about me questioning the OP's use of the term in the title of the post?

Can't have it both ways.

And just because you apparently don't understand the contradiction taking place doesn't mean there isn't one.

reply

I understand it fine. I addressed it in my post. Before you were making a mountain out of a semantic molehill, now you are just gaslighting.

reply

Your post included an assumption that the opinions of the opponents you referred to were actually correct about their usage of the term. Those opinions however rarely, if ever, prove to be factual or correct...so YOU can take YOUR gaslighting regarding said opinions elsewhere.

reply

Your post was making a point about the cognative dissonance occurring in the minds of the "opponents".

That makes it about THEIR view of the term, and I made my point, clearly, based on their "OPINION" of that word.

You found a cute... oddity due to semantics, that you could possibly work up into some form of a joke, at the expense of people you don't like.

But, it is not an insightful lesson of any sort. Sorry if you thought you had something here.


reply

You're still deliberately ignoring the fact that it was YOUR "opponents" whose opinions aren't factually correct.

reply

That's a seperate issue. YOu do understand that right? Your point was about a conflict between ideas in the head of the opponents.

The conflcit that you imagine, does not occurr because the opponents of woke, do not beleive that woke peopel are truly "awake".


Ironically here, the only way that YOU could envision such a conflict, that is not really there, is that YOU have an issue, where you believe that people that disagree with you, actually hold the same opinion as you, on "wokeness".


That is YOU having congnative dissonance.


Can you see that? Do you have the balls to admit it? I would be very impressed if you could.

And I dont' think I would be alone in that.

reply

No, the issue, that has always been the issue, is that opponents of the "woke" (like you) are simply trying to utilize a fallacious argument "thinking" (and I use that word VERY loosely where opponents of the woke are concerned) no one will notice.

Do YOU have the integrity to admit THAT? You've sure not shown any in this debate yet anyway...

reply

What is the argument that you think we are trying to use? Cause we were discussing your point about cognititive dissonace.

And really fail on your part for not being able to see or admit it.

reply

That you just admitted you don't understand what I've been saying, and yet then STILL suggested it is me who is failing to see what is happening here perfectly encapsulates the "argument" YOU have been making. Sad.

reply

Mmm, no, I understand what youve been saying, better than you do yourself.

In order to avoid looking at how stupid and projection your point was, you are desperately trying to change the subject AND to conflate hte previous discussion, to be aobut the new point.

reply

No, that's what "woke" opponents have been doing, and you're still simply being disingenuous about what I've been saying.

reply

lol. You are talking nonsense.

reply

Apparently to you anyway. Meaning that all you've just done is provided yet ANOTHER example that you in fact DON'T understand what I've been saying. ; )

reply

BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. Give it a rest.

reply

Thank you for proving what your inner dialogue apparently sounds like when confronted with things you don't understand. ; )

reply

lol. I understand you perfectly dude. You are not fooling anyone.

reply

And yet you've REPEATEDLY proven you HAVEN'T understood what I've been saying, so as far as anyone fooling anyone goes, it seems the only person YOU are fooling is YOURSELF. Sad.

reply

Your point was about a conflict between ideas in the head of the opponents.

The conflcit that you imagine, does not occurr because the opponents of woke, do not beleive that woke peopel are truly "awake".


Ironically here, the only way that YOU could envision such a conflict, that is not really there, is that YOU have an issue, where you believe that people that disagree with you, actually hold the same opinion as you, on "wokeness".


That is YOU having congnative dissonance.

reply

What a surprise, just more of the same projection from opponents of the "woke". Sad.

reply

I don't believe woke people are actually "awake". Thus, me telling them to wake up, makes complete sense.

It only SEEMS to not make sense, if you assume that I agree with you, when I clearly don't.

That's not projection on my part. I got your point. Your point was wrong.

reply

Well, you've proven you "believe" a lot of things that aren't true, so it makes perfect sense that the rest of your "reasoning" is ALSO wrong.

reply

YOUR point was about MY thinking. It is consistent for me or someone like me to tell a "woke" person to "wake up".

That you can't bring yourself to admit such a minor point, is pathetic and weak of you.

reply

No, the point is, and always has been, that your "thinking" is obviously and inherently inconsistent.

reply

We think that the people that call themselves "woke", are actually not awake, they are "asleep".

This is not us being confused, this is you being unable to understand that other people can disagreee with you.

You, both individually and as a representative of "woke libs", are so closed minded that it is beyond belief.


You are so divorced from being able to deal with reality, I am seriously suprised that more of you don't wander into traffic or eat glass or something like that and thus dies of your mental oddities.




reply

And based on your responses, we have no choice but to view your use of the word "think" VERY loosely. ; )

reply

Not really. Your point only made sense to you, because you assumed that people you hate, agreed with you.

That was you being stupid. The fact that you can't admit that and take this teeny tiny L, is something else.

I'm not sure if it is that you are too weak to admit such a tiny fail, or that you are just so deeply dishonest that you have no human feeling of caring that you are holding on to a clearly false position.

There is no way that you could be too stupid to understand. You would have to be non-verbal to be THAT retarded. And...you are using words. So, it's not that.


reply

No, the person being stupid here is you, since you're now obviously having to resort to suggesting that I "hate" others in your transparent attempt to deflect attention away from yourself, and you just can't admit to that.

That you've also had to resort to using the word "retarded" for your "argument" on the subject matter in question is simply the ironic cherry on top of the projection you're illustrating.

reply

Dealing with your "points" in reverse order, I only mentioned "retarded" in pointing out that I did NOT believe you were that.

And yes, your odd NEED to hold on ot your little gotcha point, that you thought you had, does look like "hate" to me.


Your point was based on how insanely closed minded you are. That is what this thread is about.

reply

That you used the term AT ALL was the point.

And are YOU seriously trying to lecture ME about holding onto gotcha points, when you entire argument has been based on semantics? -Eyeroll-

Lastly, YOU wanting ME viewed as close-minded is quite simply projection on your part.

reply

1. Retarded is a fine word. It is a real thing and m point about not believing you are that deficient was relevant and true. You are doing somethign else.

2. Semantics? Your point is based on your inability to understand or admit that other people think differently than you.

3. That is you pretending to be retarded again. YOUR point is the one based on the words being used, and pretending to not understand them.

reply

You obviously need to go back and read my original post, where I CLEARLY illustrated that it's the people who go around using the word "woke" in a negative way that are the people doing the things you've just accused me of doing. "Pretending not to understand" indeed...unless of course YOU STILL...ACTUALLY...don't understand...either of which you've proven repeatedly could be the case. Either way, you've lost, deal with it.

reply

Dude. I've covered all of that in my first post to you. What kind of loser are you that you are still pretnding otherwise?

reply

Seeing as how you're still arguing the anti-woke side of the discussion, the only person possibly pretending here would be you...same as the "leadership" in the maga party that uses such made-up, opinion-based, "woke" rhetoric to rile up its base.

It's either that, or you're a part of the maga crowd the pretend rhetoric is being used against by their own "leadership" that obviously doesn't understand how they're being manipulated. Either way, not a good look for you. Sad.

reply

"Woke" people are teh sheeple of this era. You have demonstrated that nicely.

reply

And there it is. As a last ditch, hail mary act of desperation, you resort to calling me "woke", when doing so proves it's obviously you who is still asleep. Thanks for playing. ; )

reply

Your behavior says differently.

reply

Your behavior has said exactly what I just said it did. ; )

reply

You're talking shit.

reply

Your behavior and comments like this latest one have basically said exactly what I said it did. ; )

reply

Nice straw man at the end of your comment!

reply

You obviously wish.

reply

The left made the term “woke”, they labeled themselves woke. The majority got educated on what the “woke” stands for and thus the left are now scrambling to cover up their true intentions.

It’s just like the libs of TikTok. They post videos of leftingers own videos to educate the public on what these clowns are doing.

Very common with the Democrat media/party who will never tell you what their true intentions are.

The video posted is clips of the founders of the modern Democrat party/media belief system. Their pawns who run big education. Big pharma. Big tech. It’s extremely educational, concise, and something everyone should watch.

It’s probably the best clip I’ve ever seen on spelling out what and why the crazy left is what it has become.

The chaos is engineered. Their lunatic gender nonsense. Their catastrophic climate predictions that have failed to come true for the last 50 years. Their race war reignited under Obama. The constant Democrat media/party gaslighting. All engineered to create chaos.

reply

I'm embarrassed to have ever considered myself a liberal.

reply

Please provide proof that you ever actually were one, because based on the majority of the other posts I've seen you make, you simply claiming you were is not proof at all.

reply

No.

reply

Exactly. Sad.

reply

No, actually liberals are embarrassed that you ever considered yourself a liberal.

reply

speaking for all of the liberal hivemind?

reply

No, the left made the term woke, then the right proceeded to deliberately and disingenuously try to misrepresent the word any chance they could get, just as all of you right-wingers are doing here and now. Sad.

reply

You're on the wrong side of history. You might want to actually wake up.

reply

How hilariously sad this comment is.

reply

Not to mention ironic considering the other "arguments"/opinions sandy has been promoting here.

reply

That would be you.

But you know that.

reply

Get the fuck outta here, robot.

reply

What happened to you to make you so bitter and twisted? Poor thing.

reply

You need a new alarm clock!

reply

Ah, right-wing projection...what a surprise.

reply

I watched the video a few days ago, you obviously did not. No one is "labelling" the woke, that's what they called themselves.

Video is called "History of WOKE Ideas". The author is articulate and educated. You sound like someone with a degree in Woke Studies and Bad Philosophy.

reply

You've simply proven yourself to be one of the people I referred to earlier who deliberately and disingenuously try to misrepresent the word any chance they get.

reply

They call it “woke” because calling it basic human empathy would expose how dead they are inside.

reply

And sadly it seems, they'll "go to their graves" never having realized that fact.

reply

Gd5150, I'm sorry you didn't get enough affection as a child.

reply

Glad people have taken a look. The lemmings needs to understand how and why they’re being manipulated by their Democrat media/party masters.

There is no logic in there beliefs. In just 10 years they’ve been convinced that men can get pregnant. Nuclear war is good. There are 173 genders. Being forced to take an untested ineffective “vaccine” that does irreversible damage to your dna is good. Mythological white supremacy is the biggest threat to mankind. Mail in voting is legitimate.

The chaos is orchestrated. It’s laughably obvious. The plan began in the 50s with the post WW2 communists existing the Soviet Union and infiltrating the US. Flags started burning. The US was suddenly the enemy. And it’s been pushed by big media and big education for 60 years now.

Reality bites for democrat lemmings. Fortunately what’s really happening has been documented and the majority knows it. No matter how many mentally ill retards are convinced to spend $250k to be brainwashed at “university”.

reply

wanna buy a tinfoil hat?

reply

Don't blame the communists. Communists are about the working class. They are not down with identity politics. They too are pissed that their spaces are being infiltrated and co-opted by woke degenerates.

reply

IMO the whole thing was a Soviet plan to destabilize the West. Back then, Communist agents and sympathizers operating in the Western nations created a cancer that has incubated for over 50 years and even outlasted the USSR itself.

Now, we are watching it come into its full fruition as our society staggers on its last legs. How can any society survive while there's an "anything goes" outlook toward sex and drugs and lack of personal responsibilty, and its children are being taught to despise their own nations' achievements and values?

reply

They knew it then. There have been dozens of books documenting it. The hate American first philosophy came along i the 60s and was adopted by the Democrat media/party once they had JFK killed.

reply

Notice also when ever hate America first is brought up, the left NEVER denies it.

reply

you conservatives are delusional as always CONSPIRACY IS NOT FACT!!!!!

reply

Joe Biden's America

14.4% Increase in YOUR Cost of Living

Inflation at a 40-year High

American Citizens abandoned behind the lines of our Taliban Terrorist Enemy in Afghanistan

China allied with Russia against the U.S.

Two consecutive quarters of negative economic growth.

Unprecedented US supply chain crisis

Gas prices still up more than $1.0 per gallon since Biden was inaugurated - even after he depleted US national security oil reserve.

U. S Southern Border wide open and being overrun by Illegal Aliens without any attempt by the federal government to enforce its Constitutional Duty under Article IV; Section 4 to stop the Invasion

Ukraine invaded by Russia after Biden said a "minor incursion" would be okay.

Biden's Department of Justice - responding to a Teachers Union request - by calling for surveillance of parents at school board meetings because parents are labeled as "domestic terrorists" for peacefully objecting to school boards forcing their children to be masked.

Violent Crime soaring all across the U.S.

Biden Unconstitutionally taking $10,000 from people who never went to college and giving it to graduates of Harvard Law School.

reply

It’s good to see hundreds of todays yoot being educated on why they’re being mislead to believe the left wing version of reality.

It’s not to late to educate and free yourself from the shackles of Democrat party slavery.

reply