MovieChat Forums > Glass (2019) Discussion > Unbearable. Unforgivable. TERRIBLE MOVIE...

Unbearable. Unforgivable. TERRIBLE MOVIE.


The first film is called ‘Unbreakable’; I think this film should have been called 'Unbearable'. Or perhaps ‘Unforgivable’? It’s so weirdly, awkwardly bad. 20 years of anticipation, & M. Night delivers this shit? I haven’t seen a trilogy end this poorly since Chuck / Tito III.

First off, let’s start with the title. The fucking movie is called GLASS, right? And yet, Samuel L. Jackson literally doesn’t say a goddamn word, for the first HOUR of the fucking movie. He spends the entire first half of the film (when he’s even shown) just sitting there, catatonic. What an absolute waste of a great actor, & character. The first film was about the hero Dunn; the second film was about the villain, Crumb. Clearly, this film was supposed to be about the architect behind them both, Mr. Glass; but it really wasn’t. It really kind of isn’t about any of them. In fact, this shitty actress from American Horror Story & Birdbox (who seems to be popping up in every shitty fucking thing lately) is in *more of the movie*, than Mr. Glass is. And she sucks, and her character sucks. Robin Wright, an actual good actress, who was actually relevant to this story, is conspicuously absent from the film.

Which leads to the next major problem with this suckfest: even David Fucking Dunn himself, is barely used to any meaningful extent in this movie. We don’t really flesh his character out any more, at all. Wondering what he’s been up to for the last 20 years? Apparently, next to nothing. Some lazy ‘Dunn Security’ facade is thrown together at the very beginning for just a few minutes, and we’re supposed to believe that he’s just been kinda hanging around, literally walking around the block, stopping the occasional mugger or two. And he still just wears the same poncho to do it, with his face exposed, in the age of cameras everywhere. It’s just goofy as fuck. His son is back, and it’s the same actor - I actually appreciated that, and liked him. He even does a decent job; it’s just that like everyone else, he has been given garbage to work with here.

Most of the film (the vast majority) takes place in the most unrealistic criminal psychiatric institute ever. They have a notorious serial murderer (The Horde) locked up here; and yet, the total staff of the place seems to be: ONE mall cop at the front entrance, and then ONE orderly on duty, and… that’s it? A few random employees, hanging around far away in a basement tunnel? We’re talking about a place where a high-risk inmate’s cell door can be blown off, & people can be killed, and no one notices… for HOURS, upon hours? It’s fucking stupid, terrible writing.

The whole ‘twist’ ending is insultingly bad, as well. A secret group of people, with the same *highly visible* 'I'm in a secret society' tattoo on their wrists, have been, for centuries, looking for superheroes & villains… in order to try & convince them, that they’re not really superheroes & villains, because… yeah this sentence is literally too stupid to finish. Unless your name is M. Night, apparently. And then, it's a good enough idea to hinge your entire legacy of a story on. Maybe the M. stands for ‘I M. a fucking retard’? At best, this was like the worst Twilight Zone episode ever. But not even the original series, that would be too high-quality; more like if there was a Twilight Zone reboot on the SyFy channel. Bad ideas, with mediocre execution.

The only problem is, this wasn't just some random movie: this was supposed to be the follow-up to a truly remarkable film 19 years ago - Unbreakable - and a direct follow-up to a very good film, in SPLIT. This film does not hold a goddamn candle to either one. Not even close. All the directions Shyamalan could have taken the story after all these years, all the ways he could have wrapped it up, and instead he just kind of fucks around half-assed with his characters, and then does next to nothing with them. There are no truly great scenes in this movie; zero. Nothing that takes your breath away, no big moments that will stick with you afterwards, the way there were a bunch in the previous films. Even the little things, that felt huge in Unbreakable - like Dunn’s power of seeing a person’s sins when he touches them - fall completely flat here. We see that power used twice in GLASS, and both times, it is completely underwhelming.

And the saddest part is, all the ingredients were here. Willis, Jackson, McAvoy - all the pieces are right there on the chessboard, ready to be used; but M. Night just had no great ideas on how to use them anymore. There is no great script here, no amazing concepts. He doesn’t delve deeper into ANY of the characters: their best moments are all behind them, in the previous films. The only ‘resolution’ they get is to suddenly die at the end, but there is no great meaning to it. In fact he actually sacrifices the entire combined story of the first two installments, for a dumb twist that had absolutely zero buildup in the previous films.

reply

So the trilogy ends with Shyamalan suddenly killing off the 3 main characters, for the sake of a quick awful twist, that isn’t very fleshed-out, was not all that interesting to begin with, and also is not remotely believable. It’s a cheap, cheesy move, and it doesn’t work on any level. Ironically, GLASS is a bigger disaster than anything Mr. Glass himself could have masterminded.

It doesn’t even match the tone of the previous two films, either. Those films are both dark, gritty, taking place in ‘the real world’; this one is bright, cheesy, & feels fake from beginning to end. Again, it feels more like a SyFy original film or something. This film fails so badly, especially when compared to the original films it attempts to conclude, that I will pretty much just ignore it entirely when I think about Unbreakable, or SPLIT. It’s basically in the same ‘Let’s just pretend this shit didn’t happen’ category as Indiana Jones 4. As far as I’m concerned, it’s not canon; it’s a piece of shit, that should be fired out of a cannon. Preferably, into M. Night’s stupid face.

Other than that, I have no strong feelings on the matter.

reply

I agree. I've read since that he was going for a superhero version of One Flew. He missed the mark, the psych ward stuff was boring, predictable, ridiculous (as you hilariously pointed out) and lacking any depth or new ideas.

I love the high security psych ward allowing 3 highly dangerous criminals to come together for a group session in the facilities gym.

reply

And also, apparently the mastermind who could have broken out of this horribly low-security facility any time he wanted to, decided not to instead, & has just been sitting in a room doing nothing for 20 years, because... it wasn't time for the sequel yet?

God this movie sucked so badly

reply

Plus they decided not to review security footage of how he had wheeled himself out in to the hallway. Just explain it away as he was drawn to music lol.

reply

Yeah, no big deal. After all, Mr. Glass is merely a TERRORIST WHO BLEW UP A FUCKING AIRPLANE, a train, and burned down an entire hotel full of people. Seriously this would be like if they had captured Osama Bin Laden or whoever, and left the task of overseeing him to one male nurse, and a mall cop. This movie was truly stupid

reply

Not to mention house them all in a low security psych ward within a taxi ride of down town. Such a fail M Night.

reply

I get and even agree with some of your points but I liked the movie. It was, indeed, a lesser film that the previous two but I liked the story.

My big complaints:

Not that they killed Dunn at the end (expected that) but the manner in which they did was poorly imagined.

The train station vigil at the ultimate end was a major let down.

Security at the hospital seemed too light. They should have made some connection to the "Club" after the fact.

The "Club" or whatever they were called could have been a little more covert than the tattoo. Lose the tat.

I, too, wanted more from Mr G. His plan was cool to me and I did enjoy it but I wanted a bit more focus on him.


More the most part, that sums up my complaints. I don't share your hatred of it. There are only two M Night movies that I don't like so I do have a bit of a bias.

U: A+
S: A+
G: B-

reply

I guess you're more easygoing than I. Personally, I'm not usually a vindictive guy, and I don't wish violence on people; however after watching this terrible film, as the supposed follow-up to actual great movies like Unbreakable & Split: I hope M. Night has a really dripping wet sneeze, & shits himself at the same time, at the beginning of a long flight.

reply

LOL! And that it runs down his legs into his shoes? I could back that curse just for Airbender.

Funny to be considered "easygoing" when I am always the one in my circle of friends that didn't like movie x. It's to the point now that I deny having even seen some movies (like Aquaman which I hated) just so I don't shit all over my friend's opinions. Again, it is probably my bias for MNS. I love his movies (mostly) and that probably made me far too forgiving of Glass.

reply

I still can't bring myself to watch Airbender. It's the only Shyamalan film I haven't seen. Wish I could say the same about Glass.

reply

Watch the cartoon "Avatar." It is three seasons and is an American made show that has a very unique lore unto itself with a slight Japanese style. It is high quality (I don't often recommend any cartoon at all since 90% Ive seen are kid-shit garbage). Never watch Airbender.

reply

You know what your not alone in that feeling. After I had seen Glass, opening weekend, and was walking out of the theater I thought and genuinely felt that if I ever had the opportunity to meet him I would punch him in his face. I literally felt like he had spit in my face by what he had done in this story and the follow up to the beloved Unbreakable.

reply

Amen!

reply

Wow - I really loved your review. You hit every point that bothered me .. and I was too lazy to articulate.

Yeah everything seemed so pedestrian. What was the point of talking about the big fight at the tower.. and then climaxing in the parking lot. Was that supposed to be funny? Did Unbreakable David really die in a puddle of water? And the greatest criminal genius thing Mister Glass could come up with was let's make a viral youtube video?

Oh man.. what a waste.

reply

He pulled a Rian Johnson on us. ROFLMAO.

reply

The movie called Glass because Mr. Glass is the main hero. The movie revolved around him beating the secret society.

"have been, for centuries, looking for superheroes & villains… in order to try & convince them, that they’re not really superheroes & villains"

No, they've been killing superhuman for centuries. Trying to convince them that they're normal is the pet project of dr. Staple, she said so herself on the last meeting of the society.

I think this one is as dark as the previous movies. The concept of the series has always been how is it if superhuman really do exist in a realistic world.

I enjoy the movie, it's not as good as I hoped, but I still enjoy it. Ironically, the movie does have many shortcoming, none of which you point out in this thread.

reply

"Ironically, the movie does have many shortcoming, none of which you point out in this thread."

And yet you don't name any, so your comment is about as worthwhile as the movie was.

reply

Fantastic review that i agree with 100 % !

The way they killed off david dunn was absolutely the low point for me !

Pathetically written and handled !

reply

Agreed. What I learned from Glass is that MNS is only making movies for himself and no one else. He fancies himself so clever that if he likes it, it must be great.

reply

The way David Dunn was killed was atrocious. As a huge fan of Unbreakable it felt like I was being trolled by M. Night. It reminded me of The Last Jedi and how they handled Luke in that movie.

reply

He really pulled a Rian Johnson on us, didn't he? :D :D :D

reply

Agreed, i only made it halfway through glass until i came out to this forum pissed off because the movie was dragging big time. I'm not even going to finish it now. Thanks for filling me in, and assuring me that i'm making the right choice.

reply

I though the film looked like something a person would shoot on their cellphone with a bunch of friends.

The ending was horrible as well.

The Bruce character in the first film had a weakness for water, like falling in it, sinking, can't swim, etc. That is far different than having your body out of the water and someone drowning you in a fucking puddle!

Did he have to take sponge baths because getting in a shower would kill him?

Suddenly, water was like Kryptonite that gives off radiation draining him of power in his whole body. But, that's nonsense since I assume he drinks water, baths in it, etc.

The director sucks. He seems like a person who believes he's smart but doesn't think things through. I mean anything would have been better than being drown in a puddle.

reply

His death in the puddle was made worse by his strength in the water tank just five minutes previous. He was completely submerged in water, yet he had the strength to punch his way out of the tank. Next scene: his face is plunged into water, yet his limbs are mysteriously too weak to fight back. Ridiculous.

reply

Right, I never thought, due to the first film, that he had no strength in water, it just appeared that he sinks and can't swim. Whatever the case, he still moves in water and has at least limited strength.

But, when getting drown in puddle, he couldn't do a push up or even roll to the side?!

That's stupid.

Like I've said, according to that, he would die in the shower.

I don't understand how such stupid stuff ends up in films. For all the money being spent on them, you're think there would be a person who doesn't allow glaringly stupid things to happen.

reply

Also - these mass murderers are tossed into a minimum security asylum. For some reason, flashes of light PHYSICALLY become a barrier for the Horde. It's one thing to have the light change his personalities. Whatever. But to physically stop his progress? Dumb.
So back to the asylum - they take these mass murderers, and also toss in this guy who gets in fist fights with people who may be criminals. Was Dunn supposed to be on the same level of guilt as these mass murderers? How was he supposed to be insane? "He's fighting people on the street. Lock him up. Wait a second - how do you think he feels about it? Do you think he thinks he's a super hero? Fair enough, throw him in with the mass murderers at the asylum instead."

reply

I thought the same thing.

However, since there's a conspiracy afoot about superbeings so perhaps the prison was a set up and another injustice by these people.

reply

The only problem is, this wasn't just some random movie: this was supposed to be the follow-up to a truly remarkable film 19 years ago - Unbreakable - and a direct follow-up to a very good film, in SPLIT. This film does not hold a goddamn candle to either one. Not even close. All the directions Shyamalan could have taken the story after all these years, all the ways he could have wrapped it up, and instead he just kind of fucks around half-assed with his characters, and then does next to nothing with them. There are no truly great scenes in this movie; zero. Nothing that takes your breath away, no big moments that will stick with you afterwards, the way there were a bunch in the previous films. Even the little things, that felt huge in Unbreakable - like Dunn’s power of seeing a person’s sins when he touches them - fall completely flat here. We see that power used twice in GLASS, and both times, it is completely underwhelming.


Perfectly said. I couldn't agree more. Glass was a huge disappointment to me.

reply