MovieChat Forums > Star Wars (1977) Discussion > what EXACTLY was so bad about the empire...

what EXACTLY was so bad about the empire taking over and running things?


I get it. People CLAIM freedom will be gone, but you can't stop all of society and just have them be slaves.

What EXACTLY was the empire going to change things into that nobody wanted? Other than always wearing black and white.

Seems like overall the empire just wanted to sort out the messy governments that sounded like a train wreck of disorganation.
They could build a whole planet, image what they could do for the people.

Why was the empire BAD?? Because the emperor was deformed??

reply

no ideas?

reply

Other than being totalitarians who used murder to instill fear and "bring order" to the galaxy?

reply

sure, but lets say they took over everything. You dont enslave and kill off all your population... what would have changed? Basically everything was working so they would not have thrown a monkey wrench into everything.

They don't really go into the why "these bad guys verses these rebel good guys" is at stake.

love the movie, but just seeing a unique perspective now :D

Maybe the galaxy NEEDED some order? Maybe it was a falling apart mess, getting worse - just look at the dump of Mos Islie Space Port - maybe the galaxy needed an enima

reply

As far as I am concerned anybody that blows up a planet is completely evil. And frankly I cannot believe you are defending them for it.

reply

but that was because someone stole the plans to their planetblowerupper

reply

You and the TC are evil people for trying to insist that evil people are good.

reply

i care about the rebellion

reply

Sorry. I just hate this whole mentally of "The dark side is not bad and neither is the empire." that some people have.

reply

all good.

reply

Are you a religious freak?

reply

relax its JUST a movie. hahahahaa you are right. I kinda forgot about the blowing up planets part. Even THAT doesnt seem to well thought out... why remove a planet filled with gigatons of resources they could have used?

we just dont see thier endgame well. (its an old movie, and not going to change, I know)

lets say they did take over with fear. then what?

"YEah! We RULE!! Ok... no one else to blow up... let's play cards!"

reply

Hasn't this already been argued about 18 million times in the last 40 years? They should probably close the board for this movie down, because there's really nothing that can be said about it that hasn't already been said.

reply

sorry I missed it. I promise to back and read everything on the internet so it will never happen again.
JEEZ people, chillax :D

reply

and I do feel sorry about someone putting a gun to your head and forcing you to waste time reading, then responding to such an innate thread :D

reply

Sorry. But there probably have been whole books, essays, blogs, thesis papers, etc written about it. It just seems redundant. I will quit harping on you about it though.

reply

The word us “inane.” It describes you perfectly. You have an innate grasp of the irrelevant.

reply

The word us “inane.” (as spelled in the above post until they edit it)

The word is IS and your post explains simple typos perfectly. Welcome to Earth. Is that REALLY the best you got? Kinda weak. :D

reply

Because they summarily destroy whole planets because one person from that world isn't cooperating with an interrogation.

reply

Exactly. The Empire is a fascist operation running immoral operations at the whim of a single, unchecked leader. Like North Korea?

Maybe also like how a portion of the USA population wants things to change in their country (although there is a slapstick idiocy to the U.S. situation that is a major component. Check the recent Axios interview for the full intel)

Villagers buy into the idea of more law and order, never mind that mostly former criminal "droogs" make up the force as opposed to Superman clones.

reply

Trump, Putin and Netanyahu supporters, no doubt, would love having an Empire ruling over them.

reply

Eventually the Jedi will take over and make their religion the dogma and law of the land.

reply

Any regime that will destroy a planet with millions of innocent people on it as a demonstration of its power isn't a regime you should root for.

reply

But resistance to the Empire began long before that. It is actually a good question: Why was the Empire so bad that rebelling against it was right or good? What was the Empire's actual policies?

We aren't told, and it's not important. Star Wars is a space opera, or a fairy tale in space if you will. The hallmark of a fairy tale is that right and wrong are always clear cut: these are the good guys, those are the bad guys. No analysis needed. And sure, Lucas tried to explore nuances in the prequels, but didn't really succeed in doing so. It's still "these are the bad guys because we say so." And the most compelling piece of evidence seems to be that they have sinister names, which serve as a constant reminder.

reply

You are thinking about this way too hard. It is told - it's implied. We don't need some guy to point and say "these guys are evil." This was the first Star Wars movie. It was established when Vader walked in, strangled a prisoner and threw him against a wall, and a team of stormtroopers attacked a ship. They torture Princess Leia, slaughter a planet, destroy an innocent farm and burn Owen and Beru alive. I think it's insanely implied who is good and who is bad.

reply

We don't need some guy to point and say "these guys are evil."

Sure we do. And in fact, that is the very first thing that happens. It's right there in the title crawl:

"It is a period of civil war. Rebel spaceships, striking from a hidden base, have won their first victory over the EVIL Galactic Empire."

Emphasis mine. The fact that you generalise an entire group based on the actions of a single man only reinforces my point: one side is all good, and the other is all evil. Han Solo is a rogue with a heart of gold, he gets to be a good guy with bad guy traits, because he isn't really part of the rebellion. But the Rebels themselves are all good, and the Empire all evil. There is no nuance. Again, we are never shown what makes the Empire evil, we are only shown that they employ scary names like "stormtroopers", "death star" and the like, and we are shown the occasional atrocity. But nothing about politics, individual freedoms or anything like that. Just "Epire evil, just because." The atrocities shown are not the result of policy, but happen for the practical purposes of quelling a rebellion. They can be used as examples of how ruthless the Empire is, but not how evil they are. The Allies committed numerous atrocities in WWII as well, even to the point of nuking two civilian cities, yet ultimately one would have to agree that the good guys did win the war.

reply

Holy cow man, I have listed a slew of reasons why the empire is evil and you're saying there is no proof. I don't think they are practical reasons whatsoever for 'quelling a rebellion.'

That's like saying slaughtering the jews in WW2 or the Japanese pulling the Nanking Massacre was a practical purpose of quelling a possible rebellion.

reply

Holy cow man, I have listed a slew of reasons why the empire is evil

No, you never did anything of the kind. You listed reasons why Darth Vader and possibly the Emperor were evil, but not the Empire itself. Show me examples of POLICY.

I don't think they are practical reasons whatsoever for 'quelling a rebellion.'

Are you serious? So you think nothing they did had anything to do with defeating the rebellion, but just being evil for evil's sake? The stormtroopers attacked a ship because they needed to retrieve the plans to the Death Star. The prisoner who was force strangled, same reason. Destroying the farm, same reason. Leia was being tortured for information about the Rebel base. Her home planet was also destroyed in order to break her. Why break her? Because she was a vital link to the rebellion. These sorts of things happen all the time in war. Except for the planetary destruction, though that can certainly be said to take place on a lesser scale.

That's like saying slaughtering the jews in WW2 or the Japanese pulling the Nanking Massacre was a practical purpose of quelling a possible rebellion.

I'd like to see you justify that comparison. Exterminating the Jews took place because Hitler wanted to, well, exterminate the Jews. It had nothing to do with the war effort itself. We do not see any indication that the Galactic Empire practices ethnic cleansing. The massacre in Nanking, on the other hand, was part of Japanese strategy to break the Chinese will. It was very much in the spirit of medieval warfare: if you besiege a city, you let them go easy if they surrender quickly. The harder a time they give you, however, the harder a time you will give them when they are forced to surrender. That will send a clear message to the next city.

reply

I think it was confirmed when the Empire blew up an entire planet, almost at random, to blackmail a prisoner they had.

I've heard of torture and blackmail techniques but killing billions is an brand new one.

Hitler took how many years to kill how many Jews with it being his master plan. The Empire takes seconds to kill billions of innocents they dont even care about and its not even a top level decision, upper management waved their hand and it was done without the CEO or the board of directors even knowing about it.

reply

I think it was confirmed when the Empire blew up an entire planet, almost at random, to blackmail a prisoner they had.

It wasn't random at all, it was Leia's home planet.

I've heard of torture and blackmail techniques but killing billions is an brand new one.

You've heard of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, haven't you?

Hitler took how many years to kill how many Jews with it being his master plan. The Empire takes seconds to kill billions of innocents they dont even care about

The difference is merely one of technology.

and its not even a top level decision, upper management waved their hand and it was done without the CEO or the board of directors even knowing about it.

If true, then it is a war crime for which the Empire itself is blameless.

reply

[deleted]

I dont think you totally thought this through or remember the movies. 😂😂😂😂

reply