Her Nudes


Now I am 100% sure that we are living in some alternate reality, when we have the First Lady of the United States of America with Naked pictures of herself readily available for anyone's enjoyment online.

reply

This message has been deleted by the poster

reply

Send me the link I need new masturbation material

reply

I wish they had cameras when Dolley Madison was First Lady. Va-va-voooom!

🇺🇸 Liberty • E Pluribus Unum • In God We Trust 🇺🇸

reply

Hey, I resent that remark. I`m not a Democrat and I like pictures of naked First Ladies. Got any of Grace Coolidge or Frances Cleveland?

If you have any of Eleanor Roosevelt, you can keep them — although she did have a great set of knockers.

🇺🇸 Liberty • E Pluribus Unum • In God We Trust 🇺🇸

reply

bingo. there is something really...wrong and i thought it was off when trump won because when i looked at her as the first lady i thought this is wrong that someone so young and hot could be first lady. i mean, what's next kanye president with kim kardashian as first lady? i mean, that's the only more wrong thing than this that is possible.

reply

yeah, melania doesn't have any class. if you pose for a nudity picture for a magazine you should immediately be disqualified to be first lady.

reply

I'd have to disagree with that. Modeling was her job, pure and simple. She did nothing illegal.

reply

You mean a woman doesn't have the right to work any job she chooses and to do with her body what she chooses?

And you (a man based on your name) have the right to decide what roles she can hold based on her choices? That is a great example of misogyny.

I need to report you to the women's movement.

reply

it's not a job... it's not an actual position... it's just whoever happens to be married to the president...

reply

If you're responding to me, I was talking about her modeling. I agree with you on the First Lady.

reply

I repeat:

You mean a woman doesn't have the right to work any job she chooses and to do with her body what she chooses?

And you (a man based on your name) have the right to decide what roles she can hold based on her choices? That is a great example of misogyny.

I need to report you to #MeToo.

reply


At least they're attractive. No one wants to see Big Mike

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcRtFuOBcplaKpRGZl-Gv1hSeseiadWALZ-KXNkV1Zgoj4b-8oQE&usqp=CAU




reply

Her nudes are gross. She's worse than Kris Jenner

reply

But better than Kate!

reply

All of Melania Knauss's nude photos are in Europe, where it's not a big deal. Funny how most of the critics are US Democrats!

Here are some tasteful shots from 2000.
https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

reply

You have as many naked pictures from the former French first lady Carla Bruni as you want in internet (she was a model and a famous singer-songwriter). Nobody ever dared to suggest that she didn't have the right to be a first lady.

It's interesting how the new sex puritans are coming from the left, though.

reply

how do you ,and satan2016, know they coming from the left?

reply

In one of the most important European cities, a couple of years ago the major prohibited girls in bikini in billboards, because that was against moral and decency.

I'll let you guess, left or right?

reply

I guess left or you wouldnt be bringing it up.
Is it a secret which European city?

would it turn out this was one particular billboard that was a bit too far?

reply

Are you referring to London, and the ads that asked if your body was beach ready? That wasn't because she was in a bikini. It was they received a ton of complaints that it was body shaming. Protein World, was accused of “directly targeting individuals, aiming to make them feel physically inferior to the unrealistic body image of the bronzed model, in order to sell their product" and there was a petition of over 70000 signatures to get the ads removed.

reply

So that was because she was in a bikini.

You can argue what you want about "body shaming" or whatever, it's just another way to argue that it lacks decency, decent girls are more covered and don't "body shame" wearing a bikini. That's the idea.

At the end of the day, what the Muslim Leftist Major of London prohibited were girls in bikini in billboards. End of the story.

reply

Can you please direct me to the full ban on ads with bikinis in London? I have looked and all I can find is the story about this particular beach body ad and that the ban is on body shaming ads. Considering that one of the protests was a take back the bikini rally, one can infer that it isn't a problem with the bikini. I could be wrong. I'm just looking for any proof that there can no longer be victoria secret ads, or any ad of a scantily clad woman in London and I'm unable to find that.

Now, obviously you have an issue with the fact that he's a liberal muslim, but I would really just like to argue the actual facts, and not your biases.

reply

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3639069/Body-shaming-ads-BANNED-London-s-transport-network-new-mayor-Sadiq-Khan-declares.html

https://www.rt.com/uk/346627-khan-body-shaming-adverts/

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/15/world/europe/london-bans-ads-with-unrealistic-body-images.html

reply

Okay, all those say body shaming, or ads with unrealistic body images. That's not just bikinis. Does it say anywhere that there cannot be ads with bikinis or otherwise that aren't aimed at making women feel like crap to buy a weightloss program? The RT suggested that it was because of faith and used twitter posts. That's hardly fact.

I am asking you again, if bikinis are banned outright in advertising in London?

reply

I am asking you again, if bikinis are banned outright in advertising in London?

I see where you are going.

What has been banned were billboards considered "body-shaming" by the Leftist government. The original billboard, which was considered "body-shaming", was this one:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/06/13/14/2818604C00000578-0-image-m-5_1465823601277.jpg

Of course, you're trying to argue that this is not explicitly banning girls in bikinis... even though in practice that's how it was applied.

It shows how modern left are willing to defend puritan censorship. You didn't try to argue that it didn't represent the left. On the contrary, you defended it. You feel identified with it... and that interesting and meaningful.

reply

You are still side skirting the issue and making it into something that fits your agenda. I have not implied my opinion on anything. All I've asked for is facts, not opinion. I am not making this a left or right issue. Not all issues need to be.

reply