https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOASktzMHtI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AP96roY1sI4
You know, the one that had affair with another FBI agent and talked about stopping Trump. The one that was assigned to the investigation of Russian meddling with Trump.
From the comments, we need to divide US apart sooner or later. It's pretty much gotten to that point or nearing it. That or we need our First Purge.
That weasel sat there with a smirk on his face and refused to answer simply questions. And the Dems defending him is just beyond the pale.
shareHe refused to answer questions that the FBI instructed him not to answer because they pertain to an ongoing investigation into the president. It would be completely inappropriate for him to publicly reveal details of an ongoing investigation and he was not authorized by the FBI to do so.
He explained this many times.
What's beyond the pale is Republicans attacking him when they have absolutely no evidence of law breaking or wrong doing. All they know is that he doesn't like Trump.
shareSpeaking of weasels: Too bad T-rump won't sit for Mueller. After all, he claims he's innocent - so he should sit with Mueller. Why hasn't he?
shareI love the excuse of Trumpie's shyster lawyers for why he won't talk to Mueller: it's a perjury trap.
Um, so basically the President of the United States will not swear to tell the truth in an investigation that could clear him of any charges, any suspicions, and put this whole sordid mess to rest...
But he won't because he might unintentionally (or by inference, intentionally) LIE and possibly get himself into hot water.
Any fool with a brain can reach the conclusion here that this argument means that our President is an idiot and/or a sociopath who is unable to speak truthfully because the act of lying is a primary component of his character (or lack thereof).
Sadly for the country, Trump supporters are primarily fools WITHOUT brains.
I have.
What gets me is the shamelessness of the GOP House stooges to attack this guy for bias against Trump when his texts were critical of Trump AND Hillary AND just about everyone else during the primary and election except John Kasich.
Not just that but if he really wanted to hurt Trump he would have just leaked the fact that his campaign was under investigation.
They already interrogated him for 11 hours behind closed doors. They already know everything he has to say. The only reason they're holding this public hearing is for the chance to browbeat him in public to score brownie points with the president. Such obedient little tools.
It also backfired big time against Gowdy and Gohmert when they made fools out of themselves.
This guy is a disgrace and should’ve been canned a year ago. Deep state dream team.
“We won’t let him” Trump become president. No bias there as he heads the Hilary’s email and the fantasy Russian collusion investigations. What an absolute joke.
These public hearings are all for show anyways. Big waste of time. Fortunately the country is stronger and can absorb this kind of absurdity. The American people spoke, elected the right person for the job, and the country is now booming because of it.
The FBI needs its house cleaned. They think they’re bigger than congress, ie the American people. Sadly nothing will happen.
Yet you can't point to one thing he did where his bias affected the investigation. Not ONE. That's why he was cleared by the IG as having not materially affected the case.
FYI: FBI agents are allowed to hold political opinions in this country. It's his first amendment right to express his opinions.
No they aren't allowed to hold opinions. For example if his opinion is that he's going to kill somebody he goes to jail for attempted murder. If his opinion is that he's going to stop Trump, he goes to jail for treason, or is supposed to anyway.
Why wasn't Hillary prosecuted for destroying her hard drives? Why wasn't her house raided by the FBI before she had the chance?
OMG, you are so ignorant. You need to study the Constitution. It guarantees all citizens inalienable rights under equal protection. Specifically, the First Amendment guarantees everyone the right to express their opinions without fear of being thrown in jail. That includes FBI agents.
You can't be punished for threatening murder unless a court determines it's a "true threat". You need to read and learn:
https://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2016/01/criminal-penalties-for-murder-threats.html
"No they aren't allowed to hold opinions."
I wish people like you weren't allowed to hold opinions.
The American people spoke
3 million welfare collecting leftists located mainly in three or four democRAT controlled sanctuary cities. They are subhuman in my book and their vote is null and void.
The true American voter’s voice was heard in the last election, and luckily this nation dodged a bullet.
MAGA!
Classy.
shareSpoken like a true nazi. I'm sure your Fuhrer would be proud of you.
share[deleted]
The Youtube chat section of that feed was massively against the smug, smirking, traitor Strzok.
shareWhich really isn't saying a whole lot. People on live youtube chat are typically there to troll out one liners.
shareEverybody in the chat was their to put out one liners for or against Strzok. The one liners are overwhelmingly against Strzok. Nice try.
shareHow do you troll out a one liner FOR Strzok? That's not trolling and that's not what trolls do. They're there to criticize, demean, and put people down. Trolls don't troll out one liners to defend someone.
Nice try.
You don't know that someone in a chat could post cheering on Strzok and saying he's doing well? I read a couple of those in the chat.
shareThat's not a troll. That's someone there that supports Strzok.
Regardless, my point stands. Youtube chats for live events overwhelmingly attract trolls, but especially in regard to sport or politics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXTAlUormPA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bX9561LeOY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANohtXQhkQw
Damn... talk about a heated debate. Like children yammering away getting no where. Dems calling him a hero, republicans yelling at him. I was smiling along with Strzok though since watching these folks argue is such a joke of congress in general. No wonder they don't get much of anything done and have such low approval numbers.
Also, Strzok has a sorta creepy face. He sorta looks similar to Bill Clinton.
This wasn't a debate, it was an attempted character assassination. Which failed, because there was nothing more to dig out of this manufactured controversy than had already been discovered and dealt with when Strzok's emails first came to light. Trump's toadies in the House of Reps only wanted to rake Strzok over the coals again so they could achieve two things: diminish the reputation of the FBI (and by extension, the Criminal Justice division in charge of investigating their King); and distract from Trump's blundering in the UK, his blustering about the EU, and his upcoming idiotic and potentially dangerous unsupervised one-on-one meeting with Putin.
From his demeanor, Strozyk's obviously dealt with a lot tougher customers than these Republican dweebs in the House. He rarely lost his cool, and even when he did (like when that a-hole from Texas levied the personal insult against him for having an affair), his angry response was still rational and composed.
Ah yes, Gohmert making that crack about him staring unfaithfully into his wife's eyes.
Yet he fails to ever question his lord and king in the White House who has serially cheated in every relationship he's ever been in. I'd like to see a reporter ask him to use that line of questioning on Trump. He'd probably melt in the corner in fear.
...Gohmert. Doesn't his name sound like it would be perfect for a character in a story who's a servile henchman to the main villain? The sort who's too ignorant, petty, and just not diabolical enough to be a Big Bad himself, but just evil enough to be a boot-licker in service of his master. Kind of like Maximillian to Professor Fate in The Great Race.
shareHahah!
Well the guy is notorious for being the dumbest member of congress hands down. That title should leave him lots of competition in a House filled with dipshits, but it's really not close. He's the poster boy for why gerrymandering is deeply harmful to the republic. He's in such a gerrymandered to a fault Texas district it makes him safe from ever being held to account for being the national embarrassment he is.
But yeah I can see your point about him being too dumb to be truly evil, but dumb enough to be truly dangerous.
He's the anti-vaxxer and birther who argues about marriage equality being the path to legalizing bestiality. Right wing quackery manifest, he blew a fuse somewhere. He's even called John McCain a pro-Al Qaeda terrorist.
Somewhat stunningly, he's a former judge. Imagine him ruling over your case. My head would explode.