MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > House Intelligence report exonerates Tru...

House Intelligence report exonerates Trump


https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/27/politics/house-intelligence-committee-republican-russia-report/index.html

It should be noted that the intelligence community redacted large portions of the report AGAINST the wishes of its authors. If Trump and the GOP are the bad guys, then why is it that their opponents are always trying to hide information from the public? What a bunch of sore losers the Democrats are!

reply

Shocked I tell you! The Rethuglikkkan led House Committee exonerated him? Beyond shocked. Who saw that coming besides every American?

reply

Another sore loser. Sad!

reply

Trump is the Republican’s golden goose, no offense to geese. Of course they want his brash rubber stamp.

reply

Nunez seems like such an honest guy. LOL. Top honors for his Paul Revere run across the WH lawn last year!

reply

What, you thought Trump was gonna stand there and let 'em wiseguy him out of his Presidency? No. Absolutely not. He opened up his own battle front, sent out invites to step thru the ropes and brawl with him. He's employing that 10x harder thingy, that in association with the (60) put him there and birthed this Board and all the stations like it along the line.

The old man ain't no easy clean, daddy. He already counts coup on Franken's scalp & Conyer's scalp. He'll garner a passel more before he takes up the rockin' chair.

CHARGE!!!

reply

It should also be noted that this House investigation conducted by Republicans was exposed as a joke by the undercover video of Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix mocking his time being questioned by House Republicans in closed door hearings. “After five minutes — done,” Nix said of his testimony.

This was confirmed by Adam Schiff when asked about how House Republicans conducted their white wash to protect the president:

my colleagues had a habit of asking three questions: Did you conspire, did you collude, did you coordinate with Russians? And if the answer was 'no,' they were pretty much done," Schiff said in a statement.


Impossible to take the majority "findings" seriously when they were exposed as not having actually having done their jobs of conducting an investigation.

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) said Sunday that he places more faith in federal investigators’ conclusions on Russian election meddling than those of Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee, of which he is a member.

So is Gowdy a "sore loser" too?

reply

The House Committee investigation was one big, expensive joke to American taxpayers. Almost - but not quite - as bad as the 2 year "Benghazeeeeeeeeeee" investigation of Hillary.

reply

Yup. It's hilarious that anyone would try to point to this report as vindication when Gowdy himself was unwilling to go there when asked.

reply

You have to admit, this is just partisan posturing.

When Mueller exonerates him or indicts him, THAT'S when it will matter.

reply

Watching the CNN last nite they're exhausted by Trump. They're finally figuring it out:::he's in his wheel house at commotion, at frenzy. They thought they could match it, but, nobody likes to be at war 24/7/365, cept the old man. He wouldn't have it any other way. Mule is finally understanding that as well.

You're right though, as soon as Mule stops the drum beat, asks for an interview and the old mans tells him straight out: "No." we'll move on to Phase 2, the courts.

& the longer the drum beat goes on the better for Trump.

reply

Yes they are. Curious, how many people have responded to this? I see it has 4 replies but I don't see them. I'm guessing it must be a bunch of crybaby libs who blocked me because they only want to hear people echo their thoughts

reply

Maybe you blocked them? I never had that happen til I blocked doggie lemming. 50
Posts on Fox and Friends was just too stupid.

reply

Lol, maybe. I forgot I blocked doggie. Alternate opinions are one thing,but he just saturated the board.

reply

Exonerated from what?

Being a lying, conceited POS conman?

reply

Please site one example that isn't pure speculation.

reply

Let’s start with an oldie but goodie - Trump University 😅

reply

So it's your genuine belief that Donald Trump,the owner of a Billion dollar corporation,is personally responsible for seeing to the day to day operations of every aspect of every part of his unfathomably huge business, rather than just attaching his brand to an investment opportunity? Are you really niave,or feigning stupidity because you don't have a better reply?

reply

I’m really naive and feigning stupidity to have stepped in your shit fanboy

reply

That's what I thought. You're full of shit and you knew it,but don't let your salty tears of bitterness get in the way of facts.When Trump gets his second term, understand that people like you are the reason.

reply

Uh-oh! This thread reveals I’ve been blocked by two Russian bots who have been flooding our forum. Hmmm...I may be on to something rather great for Americans!

reply

The ignore function:::last bastion of the thoroughly vanquished.

reply

Between all of us, I don’t think they appreciated being “ outed” by me as Russianbots- especially so quickly. They had to hide behind their monikers at least through November. But that was not meant to be. LOL

reply

I don't see how anyone could believe Russia was exonerated without knowing where exactly the intel committee looked. You're literally taking their word for it that they looked really hard. Where did they look? What did they even investigate? If all they are doing is researching some stuff that other people half-assed, then all the committee is saying is they don't know jack shit what happened and they don't really care. To exonerate Russia on something as weak as that is criminal.

reply

Simple, there’s no evidence of Trump/Russia collusion so he was exonerated. Nuff said.

There never has been.

#DontBeALemming
#ThinkForYourself

reply

Guccifer 2.0 hacked the DNC server a few days after Trump said Russia would be rewarded for finding Hillary's deleted emails.

reply

"You say "barracuda" everybody is 'huh? what?' You say 'shark' and we have a panic on the 4th of July."

Same thing here:::You say Guccifer, blah, blah blah, and everybody is walking past you without looking. You say "naked pictures of Mel." and Jergens stock just went up 20%.

reply

Yet another post of yours with a bunch of words that doesn't say anything.

reply

The rank & file of the electorate can't, don't, and won't decipher "Guccifer 2.0, hacked the DNC server..." They'll pass that in search of whether the old man is going to sit with Mule, or, not.

reply

You mean you'll pass it. Ignorance is your strongest point.

reply

ROTF!!!!!!

Is that the private sever Hilary illegally built in her basement?

No evidence of collusion. 2 years of illegal wiretaps, investigations, illegal breaking and entering. Nothing. The Mueller witch hunt hasn’t produced a single shred of evidence of collusion.

Because demokkkrats lost is not evidence of collusion.

#ThinkForYourself

reply

No, it wasn't Hillary's private server that was hacked. It was the DNC's perfectly legitimate server that was hacked. Here it is in May of 2018 and you still don't know what happened.

reply

It’s a wonder Nunez isn’t in charge of the FBI, or special counsel for this investigation.

reply

Yet he still goes on in Twitter about witch hunts, no collusion, rigged system... If there was no collusion and it's just all a witch hunt, just answer the damn Mueller questions and get it over with then fire/sue afterwards. If the system was rigged like he said also during the presidential run, he wouldn't be president in the first place and that the so-called deep state would've stopped him from ever stepping into office. But since he won they're making excuses that oh noes deep state losing power or they couldn't control it, yeah right.

reply