MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > I find Elvis's music has aged better tha...

I find Elvis's music has aged better than the Beatles


For the following reasons:

1) vocal ability. Now that music is autotuned, the Beatles wouldn't be able to release vocals so pitchy and often weak, if made today. So their vocals aren't up to today's standards.

Whereas Elvis, for the most part, was pitch perfect. His voice has such tonality, grit, softness, strength, range, that he is a pleasure to listen to these days just as much as in his prime.

2) Recording quality. Both the Beatles and Elvis started with very basic sound quality, but it has a classic sound. Elvis went on to enjoy the use of the best studios, live bands and orchestras. His music sounds very polished.

The Beatles went for a different direction, more experimental with their recording and production techniques. Although it may have sounded edgy in its time, now it just sounds distorted or sloppy.

Yes, I know that they wanted that sound, but it hasn't aged well. Nobody is listening to Get Back and thinking "all music should sound distorted like this!'

reply

Elvis was just a hip shaker who didn't write any of his music. If he looked like Kowalski his music wouldn't be considered any better than U2.

I'd rather hear Paul and John singing about the Taxman taxing the street than Elvis' Blue Suede Shoes.

reply

THIS CLOWN IS LOWER THAN AARDVARK SHIT...BUT HE MAKES A SOLID POINT...THE WRITING ALONE MAKES THE DICKLESS OP'S POST JUST AS DUMB AS THE REST OF HIS POSTS. NOEMOJI

reply

I should clarify that I think both of their music sounds dated, but at least the Beatles had talent and is less dated than the guy who died on the crapper. Speaking of crap, Elvis made shittier movies too.

reply

He didn't write his own music, allowing other song writers a chance to shine, similar to other greats like Sinatra and Houston.

reply

Then it's barely his music.

reply

Troll post of the day!!

Yes, Elvis had a better voice than any Beatle, but he never wrote a song in his life, and his taste in songs written by others was atrocious. His legacy is chiefly of bad taste.

reply

The Beatles knew when to quit. Elvis didn't. Outside of his 1950's heyday, his music has aged badly, albeit with the rare gems like Suspicious Minds & Burnin' Love. The Beatles have only grown in stature.

reply

Although his musical tastes ended up being of a country flavor, he still had many gems, and immense musical talent, including playing the piano, as evidenced here with unchained melody: https://youtu.be/gfnZbjFPSrU

reply

Oh bullshit. Troll is trolling.

reply

It’s the only thing she knows how to do, Otter. She was a sperm in the 60s.

reply

Still old enough to have seen an Elvis Movie movie, which are the real death of his legacy.

reply

The movies were good enough to sell to their desired market. So who cares? Some gave the world decent songs too.

reply

Admit it, you've never seen one.

May I recommend "A Change of Habit" where Elvis falls in love with a nun played by Mary Tyler Moore? No, really, this movie was made and I saw it for snark material.

reply

I saw "it happened at the world fair". And "Blue Hawaii"

reply

You're still trolling. Bugger off.

reply

"King Creole" is pretty good, some good songs {title track, "Trouble" (covered by Meat Puppets live when i saw them in the late 80's) and "Crawfish" (covered by Johnny Thunders on a 2007 single) plus co-stars Morticia and Walter Matthau.

reply

I never loved Elvis.

reply

Neither did I.

reply

Tickets..... please.

reply

I hate the Beatles and Elvis equally.

reply

I agree that he had a better voice than any of the Beatles, but I think the Beatles win in the songwriting and production categories. They were major, perhaps unparalleled innovators and influencers in both areas. Also have to give ample credit to Sir George Martin, who is still rightly regarded as a legend among music producers.

reply

As revolutionary as they were, their sound is not contemporary in the way that Elvis is.

reply

Not to my ears. Agree to disagree.

reply

You're insane, Beatles songs will be covered for as long as this planet exists. Elvis not so much.

In My Life cover https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-VSDUqVmnI

reply

Beatles has great songs but the quality of their vocals aren't up to scratch by today's standards, you seem to have missed the point

reply

quality of their vocals aren't up to scratch by today's standards,


"Today's standards' ? You mean todays standards of vocals being auto-tuned to death?

reply

Some overdo it but even the best vocalists are autotuned. No room for any pitchyness.

reply

three of them were great singers.

reply

LMAO...THE FOURTH ONE TRIED REALLY HARD...HE STILL DOES. NOEMOJI

reply

Ringo gets an A for effort.

reply

I’ve got all his albums - they’re really fun - it’s like a who’s who of famous musicians. He just calls loads of his mates and says, ‘do you fancy making an album?’ and everybody says yes because he’s such a nice guy.

reply

my thoughts exactly. people love covering their songs.

reply