MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > What's the most difficult character arch...

What's the most difficult character archetype to play?


I was watching a Korean drama which is actually quite entertaining. One problem, though, the (allegedly) badass main character (one of the main characters) seems more a pretty guy trying to act cool.

And that's not uncommon. The usual tough badass main character who is at the same time a seductive womanizer, that's a difficult character to play. It goes often too badass to be charming, or too charming to be badass. I've only seen Sean Connery pulling off the trick easily (Robin and Marian, The Wind and the Lion).

Other difficult archetypes to play? Or other actors that do it well?

reply

Depends on the actor. Even the best have their strengths and weaknesses. Nicholson excels at playing kind of edgy mischievous characters. He might have a tougher time playing a more meek and mild character like someone like Michael Cera plays all the time (though Nicholson is the better actor). And I don't think anyone would buy Cera as a badass, no matter how much time and effort he put into the part.

reply

I disagree about Nicholson. He could play meek and mild characters without problems, though he rarely did. In Wolf (1994) he plays a meek and mild character that becomes edgy and mischievous because of the Werewolf curse, and he does the meek and mild part credible. I remember that was a surprise, when I watched the movie, I didn't expect it.

reply

He also nailed the meek and mild character in As Good As It Gets (1997). But it's not that convincing, because his face just looks evil.

reply

Wolf you might have a point, though I don't think he reaches Michael Cera levels of meekness. He played that kind of guy in one of his first movie parts, Little Shop of Horrors too. Maybe not the best example, but I think you get my point.

I don't see his character in As Good As it Gets as that way, though. He was a pretty mercurial, angry guy, though he does reign that in when he gets interested in Helen Hunt's character.

reply

You're right. I don't think there's any living being that reaches Michael Cera level of meekness, though. You could make a meekness scale using Cera as the absolute top. šŸ˜„

reply

About Schmidt would be a better example of Nicholson playing meek.

reply

I think Jack can play anything.

reply

As opposed to "meek and mild", I prefer gentler, compassionate in his role as Jerry Ford in The Pledge. And I think the performance is contrary to the hard-boiled persona (which could actually also be considered an archetype) in which retired, veteran detectives are often portrayed. The movie even ends on a note of despair, with the character appearing tormented, even pathetic.

reply

Nicholson played a retired office worker in ' About Schmidt '. I don't know about meek exactly but he was certainly a reserved and conservative character in that role.

reply

The villain makes the movie, bad guys are probably the toughest to write and act

reply

tough badass main character who is at the same time a seductive womanizer = Brad Pitt

reply

I disagree. Brad Pitt can play the badass or he can play the womanizer, but he can't blend both well.

reply

I wanted to write Ryan Gosling first, but what you said is definitely true in his case.
With Pitt, idk... Even if he's not playing a womanizer, he usually shows a romantic side (Mr. and Mrs. Smith, Troy). Not as good as Connery, though.

reply

Another option: Denzel Washington. He's very good playing both too. But I don't remember any role where he blends them well.

reply

Iā€™d add Robert Downey Jr. He did both pretty well as IronMan. Really bad ass and very seductive and charming.

Chris hemsworth as Thor is another one who can pull of both

reply

Normal. No one's been able to successfully pull it off yet.

reply

Seductive villains: Christian Bale, Michael Fassbender, Vincent Cassel, Ralph Fiennes

reply

For me 'villain' and 'tough guy' are different characters. The tough guy is usually on the right side.

reply

To play? I'd say likeable, grounded sidekicks.

For example, I think villains are usually poorly written and definitely poorly directed, which is why so many of them come off as cheesy or silly a lot of the time, but if we could get the best Lex Luthor to ever exist in a show as campy as Smallville, then it doesn't seem like they're that hard to play.

But despite how they're written, making a sidekick both likeable and grounded seems like it would be pretty hard to pull off. Likeable alone is a tough gig.

reply

Anybody whose character is witty, like a smart-aleck type I guess.

reply

Playing God is difficult. Satan on the other hand is not so difficult.

reply