MovieChat Forums > Politics > Name some benefits of gay relationships

Name some benefits of gay relationships


How do gay relationships benefit society. Ready? go.

I'll keep a list.

#1 relationship make gay no cry.
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7

reply

How does heterosexual relationships where the couple are sterile, or not wanting kids benefit society?

But in any case, they don't in any tangible way other than some people just happen to be gay and should be allowed to, as consenting adults, enter into relationships with someone of the same sex. Are you proposing that shouldn't be allowed?

reply

Can you name a benefit?

reply

It has the same benefits that any relationship between consenting adults confers: it makes them happy, and it has nothing to do with you or I.

Companionship tends to be good.

reply

so that would be no benefits to society. That's too bad, I really thought there would be something.

reply

You don't think people entering into consensual relationships is in itself, a benefit to society?

reply

Now I've answered your question. Answer mine please: How does heterosexual relationships where the couple are sterile, or not wanting kids benefit society?

reply

well I cant think of anything. But most heterosexual couples can have children. But you knew that.

reply

Right. That's why I specifically said *sterile* or heterosexual couples who don't want kids. Do they benefit society?

reply

Dont repeat the same question I just answered.

reply

So no benefit? Okay.

So what's your point? What were you getting at with this thread?

reply

I think my point was very clear. Gay relationships dont benefit society.

reply

Neither do sterile straight relationships, or relationships between a straight couple who don't want kids (per your term of reference).

So?

reply

You know when there's nothing left to say, you dont need to continue responding. I made my point unless anyone else can think of something.

reply

I don't measure the worth of a relationship or a thing purely on its capacity or desire to produce offspring, or we could disvalue lots of things based on that.

Homosexual people exist, and like straight people, want to be in relationships with people.

reply

WE ARE OVER-POPULATED...PLUS YOU CAN MAKE BABIES WITHOUT RELATIONSHIPS EASY
NOWADAYS....NO RELATIONSHIP BENEFITS SOCIETY.


GAY OR STRAIGHT.


LOVE AND POSITIVITY BENEFIT SOCIETY THOUGH AND BOTH CAN BE FOUND IN GAY AND STRAIGHT RELATIONSHIPS.

reply

The USA has a population replacement issue actually. We need more intelligent babies, from intelligent people, to become intelligent workers.

The EARTH may be overpopulated, but that's the overpopulated countries' problem. Maybe we need to stop sending so much aid around the world and let them figure out how to feed themselves?

reply

1 And stop letting the overpopulated areas spread their population and problems into our NOT overpopulated areas.

2. Babies without relationships, are babies without good parenting, which leads to problems for them and for society.

We've seen a LOT of that for a long time now. We shouldn't have to be going over that one at this late date.

reply

OH GOOD...ANOTHER ANTI-GAY EMBARRASSMENT.

reply

The effeminate thinks I need his opinion again.

reply

YOU WILL CONTINUE TO EMBARRASS YOURSELF...I WILL CONTINUE TO COMMENT...IT'S THE CIRCLE OF LIFE,DEAR 💫

reply

😂🤣😂🤣😂

reply

That one is neutered and emasculated.

reply

He's a sodomite in frilly lace.

reply

double the wardrobe and shoes if you are the same height and weight.

reply

THAT WOULD BE PRETTY COOL...KIND OF DIFFICULT TO FIND A SIZE CLONE YOU LIKE ENOUGH TO LIVE WITH THOUGH.

reply

Still waiting for #1.

reply

I already answered in a general sense that companionship is in itself a net good for society, and people being happy is a net good. You reject that as relevant, that's up to you.

reply

ok that's one. updated.

reply

"relationship make gay no cry."

That's not really what I said at all.

reply

LOL, I actually made myself laugh with that one.

reply

If you don't mind me asking, what point are you trying to make with this topic?

Do you have your own answer to your own question? And if that answer can also be applied to other relationships, then what is your reason for specifically singling out gay relationships?

reply

why dont you give me your spiel and tell me why I should celebrate gay people.

reply

Not arcticdragon, but I don't think you should celebrate gay people. I would suspect he does not either.

reply

but I don't think you should celebrate gay people.

So you agree that we should take away all their celebratory days and the entire pride month?!

reply

How can you "take away" a day that a subculture celebrates?

reply

"So you agree that we should take away all their celebratory days and the entire pride month?!"

Skavau sounds like a hateful bigot to me.

reply

When did I agree with that loaded question?

reply

I can play your game too. WHen did I say you agreed with that loaded question?

Like I said previously...you can't tell when you're being made fun of.

reply

>I can play your game too. WHen did I say you agreed with that loaded question?

It was by implication. I said that I don't think anyone should have to celebrate gay people. TVfan replied as if that meant I was suggesting their celebratory days and pride month should be taken away from them, which is a weird response. You responded, clearly with irony, as if that would make me a bigot.

In any case, I'm well aware you guys continually drift in and out of being ironic or trying to make cheap points based on fundamental misunderstandings of what I'm saying. But why can't you just argue honestly? Why do you guys constantly have to behave like this?

reply

TYPICAL LOW IQ TROLL TACTIC...SAY OUTLANDISH SHIT AND DEMAND OTHERS PROVE YOU WRONG.


YOU SHOULD REALLY BE TRYING HARDER.

reply

I don't even know what this is about, but I'm just going to assume you're wrong as usual.

reply

HOMOPHOBIA...YOU'RE COOL...YOU HAVE NO DICK.

reply

Oh, so then you're definitely wrong.

reply

I thought you wanted to know the benefits of gay relationships in general, not the benefits of gay relationships TO YOU.

reply

I got the feeling you were going to educate me on why I shouldn't disparage gays? Was I wrong?

reply

Well, ARE you disparaging gays? If so, why? Can you justify yourself?

In any case, are you going to answer any of the questions that I previously asked you? They were fair questions.

reply

He's obviously making the point that he's a proud homophobe, although since he's a Trumptwat we already knew that!

reply

If you don't want homophobes than don't be a homo.

reply

Gay people cannot reproduce together so they don't have any societal benefit.

reply

should we do a pro and con list?

reply

Does that mean that sterile couples and couples that don't want children have no societal benefit?

reply

You are using rare instances as a deflective non-argument.

Rare = Unnatural
Gay = Unnatural

reply

RARE DOES NOT EQUAL UNNATURAL...NEITHER DOES GAY FOR THAT MATTER...O FOR 2,KIDDO.

reply

Your claims are unargued for here. Something being uncommon doesn't make it "unnatural".

Not sure why that should matter anyway. We do lots of things that are "unnatural".

reply

Something being uncommon doesn't make it "unnatural".

It is for people having same sex relations. There's nothing natural about it.

We do lots of things that are "unnatural".

That doesn't mean that we should.

reply

>It is for people having same sex relations. There's nothing natural about it.

This is just a restatement. What makes it unnatural?

>That doesn't mean that we should.

What "unnatural" things should we not do?

reply

"There's nothing natural about it."


As usual, tvfan is wrong!


Same-sex sexual behaviour, that is, any attempted sexual activity between members of the same sex1,2,3,4, has been reported in over 1500 animal species, including all main groups from invertebrates such as insects, spiders, echinoderms, and nematodes, to vertebrates such as fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals1,2,3.


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41290-x

reply

It's still not natural. LMAO

reply

Define "natural". It is literally observed to happen naturally in the animal kingdom.

reply

Those are Aberrations.

reply

So what are you meaning when you say "natural"?

reply

Unnatural: Contrary to the ordinary course of nature; abnormal, unusual, uncommon, freakish.

Aberration: The act of differing especially from a moral standard or normal state; anomaly, deviation, divergence, abnormality, irregularity.

reply

>Unnatural: Contrary to the ordinary course of nature; abnormal, unusual, uncommon, freakish.

So "unnatural" is simply just "unusual". Okay. So why should something being abnormal, unusual, or uncommon mean it is bad? What makes it "freakish"?

>Aberration: The act of differing especially from a moral standard or normal state; anomaly, deviation, divergence, abnormality, irregularity.

What makes differing from an expected behaviour inherently morally bad?

reply

😂

reply

Yeah, I mean, if you look at the areas where they contribute to our current culture, we could easily get straight people to do those things too, like:

- the fashion industry
- screenwriting
- songwriting
- theater
- musicals
- costume design
- baking and cooking
- directing and producing movies
- college professors
- philosophy
- sociological studies
- artists
- politics

reply

WOW🙄

reply

Believe it or not, the relationships themselves isn't what's bad. It's trying to force society to accept them and treat them like royalty that pisses people off. Not to mention recruiting the children of straight couples behind their backs at school. I saw a meme online that describes it well:

It shows the guy from either the Twilight Zone or the Outer Limits, saying "Imagine a group of people so disgusting and unlikable that they have to come up with laws to force people not to openly dislike them."

reply

"Imagine a group of people so disgusting and unlikable that they have to come up with laws to force people not to openly dislike them."

That's quite true. But IMO it's only true of the militant gays and groomer gays. Hell I'd have dinner with the other ones who go about their daily lives and shut the hell up about their sex lives and dont try and push their shit on everyone else.

reply

I wish they would all live like the European ones: quietly and not bothering anyone. The trouble is, the militant ones rule Hollywood and parts of Washington, so they demand all this stuff and are ruining entertainment, even for their own people!

reply

🙄

reply

What do you mean "quietly and not bothering anyone"?

You know fucking nothing about the world. You suggested in another thread that Greece might be getting inundated and replaced by middle-eastern immigrants, even though the bulk of Greek immigration is actually from Albania.

LGBT people operate openly and publicly in most of Europe. We have gay pride parades. We teach LGBT content in schools. They are present on TV. Parts of Europe are way more liberal than the USA on this issue.

reply

NO YOU DIDN'T...YOUR WEIRD BRAIN INVENTED THAT ...LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE YOU SAY.

reply

https://ifunny.co/picture/imagine-you-will-a-group-of-people-so-disgusting-they-45hAqkqZ9

reply

I STAND CORRECTED ON THIS ONE...WHAT A TERRIBLE MEME.🫤

reply

As fucking stupid as this post is, adoption rates are higher amongst homosexual couples than heterosexual ones.

I realize that obviously ruffles conservative feathers, but it's a pretty big positive for the kid that gets to go to a loving home and away from a fucked up foster system.

reply

💯

reply

adoption rates are higher amongst homosexual couples than heterosexual ones


That's because heterosexual couples can make their own children lmao... they don't need to adopt unless they want to.

How would that in any way "ruffle feathers"...its kinda Captain Obvious. 🤣🤣🤣

but it's a pretty big positive for the kid that gets to go to a loving home


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11658079/Gay-Atlanta-couple-charged-raping-adopted-sons-pimped-local-pedophiles.html

I think I'd take my chances with the Foster System...

reply

SHALL I POST ONE ARTICLE ABOUT A STRAIGHT COUPLE DOING SOMETHING TERRIBLE TO CHILDREN AND THEN SAY THE FOSTER SYSTEM IS BETTER THAN A MOM AND DAD?

reply

Nothing is better than Mom & Dad in almost every child's life, so whatever you post would be stupid and laughable.

reply

EXCEPT...LOTS OF THINGS ARE BETTER THAN A MOM AND DAD IN A LOT OF KIDS REALITIES...HAVING A VAGINA DOES NOT A GOOD PARENT MAKE.

reply

I would still choose the foster system.

reply

I agree, less chance of getting diddled.

reply

One in 9 girls and 1 in 20 boys under the age of 18 experience sexual abuse or assault. 82% of all victims under 18 are female. Females ages 16-19 are 4 times more likely than the general population to be victims of rape, attempted rape, or sexual assault.



https://www.rainn.org/statistics/children-and-teens

reply

Ha, I was going to make fun of you for one of your comments above and I said to myself, "Lord Rake you've been picking on this guy too much lately, it's a good joke but let it go." Now you've gone and made me regret it. You are much better commenting on shit movies than the politics section.

reply

I AM VERY GLAD TO HEAR YOU KNOW THE LEGEND OF KOWALSKI™️....THIS PLEASES ME...HOWEVER I BARELY KNOW YOU...EXCEPT YOU ACT LIKE AN INTOLERANT BLOWHARD...BUT THERE IS ALWAYS ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT.😉

reply

I'd bet money that there are far more kid diddlers hiding amongst the hetero community than the gays. Its always some straight coach or youth pastor taking advantage of unsuspecting parents.

reply

What is the ratio of hetero to gay?

Oh, and even without that ratio, the diddling is still much higher for the gays.

The stats source from the other degenerate doesn't take either of those into account.

reply

I'd like to see the Per Capita stats on this one...

reply

It's funny how you suddenly understand per capita stats in this particular context, but failed to understand them repeatedly when it came to violent crime as compared to USA vs. UK.

reply

I never failed to understand anything. You made that assumption since you didn’t want to accept my point.

reply

Yes you did. Repeatedly. I pointed out the major differences in murder rates in the UK/USA **PER CAPITA** and you kept appealing to the USA having a larger population, which would be irrelevant since we're making *per capita* comparisons.

Fuckwit.

reply

It was the same point I made in this thread. More of your semantics and sophistry as usual.

reply

No, it was not. You are a lying sack of shit.

I pointed out that the murder rate in the UK was lower per capita than the USA, and you appealed to the USA having a larger population. Which was not relevant to the point.

reply

Does the USA have a larger pop than UK? Yes or No?

The same point I applied in this thread.

reply

>Does the USA have a larger pop than UK? Yes or No?

Yes, but it's irrelevant because we're measuring PER CAPITA statistics. Per 1,000 people there are more murders in the USA than the UK.

Gay men do, I believe, commit rates of pedophilia at higher rates than straight people - but the UK does not have a higher rate of crime than the USA. It has a lower rate.

reply

Did I reference anything pertaining to 'per capita'? Yes or No?

reply

No, but I did. My original point was that the USA has a worse murder rate **PER CAPITA** than the UK.

reply

The gay community is a tiny fraction of the hetero but they still hold up comparable overall numbers, so it's clear you would lose that bet. If you were being honest you'd replace bet with wish in your comment above because that's what it all comes down to. You wish something to be true so very badly to prove Mother Nature is wrong and a deviancy is superior to the norm. But the very fact it is a deviancy makes it much more likely that there is something else wrong there. Like when your brakes wear out and start screeching, it becomes more likely that they fucked up your rotors too.

reply

No, i wish pedophiles didn't exist at all, but I'd bet they're far more likely to be found pretending to be straight guys. For one, my wife is a probation Officer and has the unfortunate job of dealing with these guys. She's dealt with hundreds of these guys over the years and she'd tell you she could count on one hand the number of child molesters who were openly gay guys. Apparently it's most married guys or ones in relationships who do this shit to their own children.

reply

Ok, the openly gay guys are still a tiny fraction of the population. So it would make sense that your wife would see mostly married guys or ones in relationships.

reply

Wow! Just now scrolling through Reddit and stumbled across this sick SOB who's a perfect example.
Cop
Married to a woman
father of twin girls
And molested a damned toddler!

https://www.reddit.com/r/iamatotalpieceofshit/comments/1c78qlz/child_rapist_cop/

But keep telling yourselves that gay guys who only want to bang other adult men are the danger!

reply

You just keep proving my point.

reply

Apparently; he didn't get your initial point or mine.

reply

You're interacting with people that read, believe, and share Fact-Checking website articles... They don't exactly have critical thinking skills... the jury is even out on actual thinking.

reply

Yea, I always have to remind myself that they are only driven by internet scriptures and emotions. lol

reply

FOSTER SYSTEM AND A COUPLE OF CHECK LOVING WEIRDOS OVER TWO PEOPLE WHO WANT YOU AND LOVE YOU AND CHERISH YOU?....YEAH...EVERYONE ELSE HAS THE PROBLEM...EVERYONE ELSE MISSED YOUR POINT...LMAO.

reply