700,000,000 doses administered in the US as of May, 2023.
For the three Covid-19 vaccines, the CDC has stated that there's no evidence from clinical data, death certificates or autopsies to confirm reports of them directly causing death. Compare that with Covid-19 infection, which leads to death in nearly 2 percent of cases in the United States. That means 2 out of every 100 people die from a COVID-19 infection.
Keep taking them then.
You will notice that most people have stopped getting them. Only 15% of Americans back in November had taken the new mystery shot. So either they didnt work or people stopped getting them because they had side effects or knew someone with side effects from it.
If covid is as deadly as you say and the vaccine is as effective as you say people would be taking it.
The country is effectively fully immunized (at least 70%) and the CDC has not as yet said another booster is necessary. People didn't keep getting the polio vaccine after their shot in infancy, you DOLT!
shareYet, people are getting covid repeatedly over and over again... "immunized"...lmao. Multi-vitamins are vaccines now.
Covid snuffed itself out of any lethality it had. Humans didn't solve the pandemic, it solved itself like every coronavirus before it.
I'm talking about the current booster which we have been told everyone needs in order to be Fully vaccinated against covid.
share>If covid is as deadly as you say and the vaccine is as effective as you say people would be taking it.
It no longer is. It was never to be expected that anyone but older people would keep getting the vaccine.
17,000,000+ deaths is a pretty good sample size of evidence.
Give it up. The Purebloods will forever remain pure. The Darwins will see themselves out of existence.
Cope posts such as these, which are 100% false...serve literally no purpose than to perpetuate MSM disinformation.
If you want to continue shoving experimental poison into your veins, literally no one is stopping you. Go get your boosters and leave everyone else the fuck alone.
>17,000,000+ deaths is a pretty good sample size of evidence.
What are you referring to here? Can I see your sources here please?
Do you have any comparative data showing the death rate for unvaccinated people vs. vaccinated people?
Why was the US govenrment giving money to red chinese bio-labs?
shareThis isn't an answer to my question, and since you refuse to answer most of my question - I'll just tell you to fuck off.
---
>17,000,000+ deaths is a pretty good sample size of evidence.
What are you referring to here? Can I see your sources here please?
Do you have any comparative data showing the death rate for unvaccinated people vs. vaccinated people?
What does it say about our government that it was giving US taxpayer dollars to our enemies, to develope plagues, even after the lab failed the safety regulations?
EVERYONE who was involved in that giving of money, AND everyone LIKE those peoole, need to be fired, and the positions eleminated.
>17,000,000+ deaths is a pretty good sample size of evidence.
What are you referring to here? Can I see your sources here please?
Do you have any comparative data showing the death rate for unvaccinated people vs. vaccinated people?
What does it say about our government that it was giving US taxpayer dollars to our enemies, to develope plagues, even after the lab failed the safety regulations?
EVERYONE who was involved in that giving of money, AND everyone LIKE those peoole, need to be fired, and the positions eleminated.
>17,000,000 deaths is a pretty good sample size of evidence.
What are you referring to here? Can I see your sources here please?
Do you have any comparative data showing the death rate for unvaccinated people vs. vaccinated people?
"Why was the US govenrment giving money to red chinese bio-labs?"
The Wuhan lab is where it is because that is a location where respiratory viruses tend to emerge due to certain cave bat populations near a high human population density.
Your response had absolutely no relevance to his question, lol.
shareGo find it yourself.
shareI'll take this a concession that, as usual, you have fuck-all evidence for your laughably bullshit claims.
shareGuten Morgen, Skavau! ☼
I missed you so much. ☻
So, how many boosters did you have?
Here's reality. Convincing you of anything literally changes nothing in the world.
I'm not here for you, I'm here for the lurkers. They can do the research and find whatever I say to be true, and then see you as a dumbass clown.
It's a very effective method...
He doesn’t want to be convinced of anything, that’s part of his game.
The coyness and pretending is also part of his game.
He wants others to believe that he requires convincing so that you and others would post information (sources and citations) so that he can demonstrate how smart/clever he thinks he is by citing fact-checkers in inept attempts to refute and debunk their sources, lol.
- He has proven that he is capable of applying “circumstantial evidence” if/when possible according to his own narrative.
- He has proven that regardless and in spite of the official leftist narrative that he can apply his own theories if/when possible according to his own bias.
>The coyness and pretending is also part of his game.
Pretending to what exactly?
>He wants others to believe that he requires convincing so that you and others would post information (sources and citations) so that he can demonstrate how smart/clever he thinks he is by citing fact-checkers in inept attempts to refute and debunk their sources, lol.
Have any of you ever bothered ever to actually look at any sources, not just the evil fact-checkers you complain about, to see what they say? Or do you just only look at sources that support your presuppositions and ignore any dissent?
>- He has proven that he is capable of applying “circumstantial evidence” if/when possible according to his own narrative.
I never rejected the concept of circumstantial evidence. I rejected the claim that you provided any.
>- He has proven that regardless and in spite of the official leftist narrative that he can apply his own theories if/when possible according to his own bias.
Can you tell me what it is you are referring to here?
Fascist
There are no studies online that confirm any of the absurd and salacious claims you make about COVID.
You are completely full of shit, and a compulsive liar
There are no studies online that confirm any of the absurd and salacious claims you make about COVID.
>I know for a fact there is.
No, you don't. You source from hucksters and con-artists.
The Governments, Pfizer and Big Pharma are the hucksters and con-artists, LMAO.
shareYou have provided no evidence whatsoever for this claim ever that there's institutional deception to the point of the vaccine itself neither working, and being so dangeorous that up to 2.2 billion people have been "harmed" by it. You apparently think random non-medical clowns on Rumble are examples of evidence.
You still haven't sourced this 20,000 doctors claim.
You haven't answered about your claim about "17,000,000+ deaths".
Do you want to retract that?
thank you President Trump for saving billions of lives...
shareWhy on earth would you continue to keep getting these death shots over something literally the equivalent of the common cold & flu?? They have virtually the same symptoms, only the Left chooses to phase out the "Cold & Flu" and simply rename it Covid??
shareIKR?
Trump admitted to reporter Bob Woodward in early February that he knew the coronavirus was "more deadly than even your strenuous flu," but continued to compare Covid-19 to the flu for weeks, claiming he "wanted to always play it down." At a press briefing on Feb 26, the president told the American people that Covid-19 "is like a flu. It's a little like a regular flu that we have flu shots for." The following day, he said the virus is "going to disappear. One day — it's like a miracle — it will disappear."
DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE VACCINES: President Donald J. Trump is harnessing the full power of the public and private sectors to deliver a safe and effective vaccine as soon as possible.
The President is using all available means to ensure safe vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics are developed, manufactured, and distributed in unprecedented time and scale in response to COVID-19.
Earlier this year, President Trump launched Operation Warp Speed, a groundbreaking partnership between the Federal Government, scientific community, and private sector to develop and deliver vaccines in record time.
Operation Warp Speed’s goal is to produce and deliver 300 million doses of safe and effective vaccines with the initial doses available by January 2021.
The Administration has made large investments in multiple vaccine candidates to provide financial infrastructure for mass manufacturing, in parallel with late-stage clinical trials.
Operation Warp Speed is directing a colossal industrial mobilization to ensure the rapid delivery of an eventual safe vaccine.
It's a good thing we had a no-bullshit leader like tRump going to battle against the Left and all their scare tactics about a simple flu, eh?!
Because that's all it is!! What more needs to be said about this?? Explain how someone like me, not vaccinated and never will be, never got this & feel fantastic because that has to piss some people on the Left off over it?? Well?? How about it??
As for Trump?? What did you want him to do at the time?? He was damned if you did and damned if he didn't and you know it??
Of course. The political pressure on him to develop a vaccine for an imaginary disease was just too much for any but the most ideological of politicians to deny. Sic semper tyranus.
shareCrazy how Trump turned out to be correct, and we should have opened back up in May of 2020...
A vaccine was never necessary for anyone that wasn't 85+ with multiple comorbidities. Joe Biden forcing on everyone has led to 17 million deaths... Depleted military, short on healthcare workers, and much much more...
Everything they did was malicious and deliberate including killing children during their trials.
"PFIZER KILLS CHILDREN IN DROVES - An employee at a Pfizer branch in Ukraine exposes shocking clinical trials."
https://twitter.com/JackStr42679640/status/1760061080355950882?s=20
the president told the American people that Covid-19 "is like a flu. It's a little like a regular flu that we have flu shots for." The following day, he said the virus is "going to disappear. One day — it's like a miracle — it will disappear."
Wait, is that legit?
shareYeap, he ordered 63 million HCQ doses which was part of his “operation warp speed” and would serve as the first two doses then the DS/FDA revoked the emergency use for it.
By the time he realized what happened, he stated that he didn’t support the booster(s) but instead “natural immunity.” If he had spoken out directly against the booster, they would have impeached him immediately.
JFC.... so that's why the attempts to pin the vax shit onto him last year fizzled out....the public would know that OWS had nothing to do with the mRNA injections.
HO-LY SHIT
Trump was lied to just like the rest of the world.
He tried to promote Iver and HCQ which was denied to everyone.
Remember when he was telling everyone about HCQ and Iver and the media demonized him.
Dr. Simone, Dr. Stella and other physicians agreed that those medications were effective and safe and Trump met with them and they had press conferences to inform everyone about those medications and they were censored and silenced on social media as well as shunned by the media.
Yup, then they took the woman who killed her husband with Fishbowl cleaner and tried to say they were Trump supporters and ate the shit because of Trump.
That one was a doozy.
>Remember when he was telling everyone about HCQ and Iver and the media demonized him.
https://www.kumc.edu/about/news/news-archive/jama-ivermectin-study.html#:~:text=In%20an%20article%20recently%20published,of%20COVID%2D19%20to%20avoid
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2209017
https://www.medsci.ox.ac.uk/news/study-supports-evidence-ivermectin-not-effective-to-treat-covid-19
https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/why-ivermectin-should-not-be-used-prevent-or-treat-covid-19
You are asserting without evidence the vaccines kill people.
Put up your evidence or shut up.
You are a dumbass liberal who clearly doesn't listen unless it fits your Narrative, so for the love of God, actually do your fucking research for once.
https://www.newsweek.com/covid-vaccine-maker-astrazeneca-sued-over-deaths-1872414
If you try and punch holes in this and do this typical liberal round and round in circles just to hear yourself speak, then you're on ignore like the other 3 doofus
If they can't find a bullshit fact-checker for it, they will still deny it with excuses, deflections and moving the goalpost.
shareOk, here's what YOUR article said:
The American Society of Haemotology says that the "risk of death and serious outcomes of COVID-19, including thrombosis, far outweigh risk of VITT possibly associated with highly efficacious vaccines."
Honest to sweet Jesus, I can't believe that this is as hard as it is to try and convince people that this so called Covid vaccine is simply not good in any way and not just this article, but others have highlighted this as well, so the way I see it, go ahead and go get 1 booster after another and keep this up and see what happens..
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4162874-a-third-of-adults-believe-covid-19-vaccines-caused-thousands-of-sudden-deaths-poll/
A third of adults believe COVID-19 vaccines caused thousands of sudden deaths: poll"
"The new polling data found that a third of adults believed the COVID-19 vaccines “caused thousands of sudden deaths in otherwise healthy people,” with 10 percent believing that claim to be “definitely true” and 23 percent saying it was “probably true.” Another 34 percent said it was “probably false,” and 31 percent said that claim was “definitely false.”
Until fake news/MSM does a 180 and propaganda is banned, nothing will change.
shareYou continue to show your support for big government, and fascism in your support for the state censoring media.
shareAnd yet, you are the one that is always citing big government sponsored and funded sources like fact checkers, lol.
shareAre you braindead? How is this relevant to anything? This isn't remotely comparable. I don't want to use the state to persecute people. I don't support kicking down the doors of right-wing media.
You do want to use the state to persecute left-wingers. You want to empower the state to violate the first amendment and shut down left-wing media outfits. You hate free speech. You are a fascist scumbag.
Show me where in the USA, the government is kicking down the doors of the alphabet cult?
Leftwing media outlets is woke propaganda. ObamaThePedo lifted the ban on propaganda before he left office.
>Show me where in the USA, the government is kicking down the doors of the alphabet cult?
It's not. But you want that to happen. That is what you support.
>Leftwing media outlets is woke propaganda. ObamaThePedo lifted the ban on propaganda before he left office.
Where is your evidence that Obama is a pedophile?
And no, Obama did no such thing. Of course you are misrepresenting what he did.
No, the fact checker misrepresents what he actually did by rewording/rephrasing it.
Everyone knows that he lifted the ban on it.
Once again, you rely on lying fact checkers sponsored and funded by the government that protect, defend and endorse pedos and child groomers.
>No, the fact checker misrepresents what he actually did by rewording/rephrasing it.
No, they do not. The fact checkers respond to obvious lies from fascist pieces of shit like yourself.
And tell me what it is he did. And also provide evidence that Barack Obama is a pedophile.
I notice you ignoring my point that you do in fact want the state to shut down LGBT groups and persecute LGBT people.
Where does it say they're have been +17,000,000 deaths from the Covid vaccines?
shareThe new polling data found that a third of adults believed the COVID-19 vaccines “caused thousands of sudden deaths in otherwise healthy people,” with 10 percent believing that claim to be “definitely true” and 23 percent saying it was “probably true.” Another 34 percent said it was “probably false,” and 31 percent said that claim was “definitely false.”
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4162874-a-third-of-adults-believe-covid-19-vaccines-caused-thousands-of-sudden-deaths-poll/
The Hill, lol!
shareWould you have preferred CNN?? I can post that too, but I don't think it really matters because you've already made up your mind, so go ahead, take more boosters and see what ultimately ends up happening
share[deleted]
The more shots they took the lower the life expectancy. If they took more than two, they are fooked.
shareScience doesn't care about beliefs.
shareAnd people with common sense don't believe in made up Liberal science
shareBut you believe in made up nonsense
shareIt's not made up and plenty of links have been posted proving this vaccine has caused Myocarditis and has even lead to death, but every time someone posts a link to it, you shit on it and continue the round and round and round crap and people grow tired of it.. It's typical liberal shit when you don't have a leg to stand on and it's shit like this that puts people like you on ignore for it
shareWhere you look like a lying tool is when you take a bit of truth that has never been denied and then make up greatly exaggerated claims and then when those claims are challenged you act like the truth is being denied.
Yes, there were cases of thrombolytic events with one of the vaccines (The AstraZeneca traditional, non-mRNA vaccine) which was identified as a risk factor for certain groups of people in the first months of its being approved. It was NOT recommened for those people who instead were given the mRNA vaccines which did not have this issue.
You (that's the royal you, as in asshats like you) then take the real matter and use it to claim that the mRNA vaccines were a huge, awful experiment on humanity that hadn't been tested (it had been tested in one of the largest vaccine clinical trials in history and has not been shown to cause many problems) and you make absurd claims that the vaccines are responsible for 10s of millions of deaths. When asked for evidence for this latter claim you only cite public opinion polls which indicate only that a lot of people have been fed the lies that you are promoting.
If "liberal" means that I have the ability to recognize the dangerous bull shit that people like you are pushing then I gladly wear that label.
Given that 20+ million has been confirmed dead as a direct result of the vaccine and that this is due to a range of only (1-10% reported) the 2/100 fits to a closer number of deaths resulting from the vaccine.
shareYou have provided no evidence that 20 million people have been confirmed dead as a direct result of the vaccine.
You are making shit up, again.
Facts are Facts.
Making shit up is exactly what the fact-checkers does.
You should read the "entirety" of those fact-checkers that you are always citing as none of them ever provides any "actual" proof or evidence to refute anything.
They all provide written opinions as to why they disagree with something without ever providing any actual evidence to backup anything.
That is one of the reasons that they are considered misinformation and disinformation.
For example; if you worked as a fact-checker and "the truth" is released about something or someone and you don't have any "actual" proof or evidence to refute that truth than you create an entire wall of information as to why it is not true or why it is false and call it a fact-checker.
>Facts are Facts.
I have no reason to accept as "fact" that 20 million people have been "confirmed dead" as a direct result of the vaccine. You have provided no evidence for this claim. It is not fact. It is you making shit up.
>Making shit up is exactly what the fact-checkers does.
You have provided no evidence of this.
>You should read the "entirety" of those fact-checkers that you are always citing as none of them ever provides any "actual" proof or evidence to refute anything.
I see no evidence that you've ever read any of them. You just dismiss them without looking.
>They all provide written opinions as to why they disagree with something without ever providing any actual evidence to backup anything.
That is not what I've ever read from any of them at all ever.
>That is one of the reasons that they are considered misinformation and disinformation.
It's a reason you've just made up. Only far-right nutters who exclusively get their news from Rumble and other grifters ever characterise their assessments as such.
If we are making things up like you say and we use those so called "grift-sources", why do you always insist on asking everyone for proof and evidence?
shareI want to see where you get your claims from.
shareBut no one has been providing them, and yet you insist.
Try again with the actual truth.
I don't care. I've already told you this. You make claims. I will ask you to back them up.
>Try again with the actual truth.
What "truth" is this?
You just stated that we make shit up and use "grift-sources", however, you continue asking because you want to see where we get our claims from even though no one is providing you with anything.
Your previous reply about "wanting to see where we get our claims from" is a bullshit lie, so I ask you again, why do you continue asking when no one is providing you any sources?......try answering with the truth this time and don't play coy like an imbecile.
>You just stated that we make shit up and use "grift-sources", however, you continue asking because you want to see where we get our claims from even though no one is providing you with anything.
Correct.
I believe that you do make shit up. Part of why I ask you for evidence is to demonstrate that you simply lack sources for the utter batshit crap you say, in most cases.
>Your previous reply about "wanting to see where we get our claims from" is a bullshit lie, so I ask you again, why do you continue asking when no one is providing you any sources?......try answering with the truth this time and don't play coy like an imbecile.
I've already answered. I am asking to you to provide your sources. A refusal from you, as you so often do is indication to me that you never had them in the first place.
Not sure however, why I am obliged to answer anything from you. You refuse to answer my questions all the time. So why should I answer yours?
You have just confirmed that you are a liar and a hypocrite.
share>You just stated that we make shit up and use "grift-sources", however, you continue asking because you want to see where we get our claims from even though no one is providing you with anything.
Correct.
I believe that you do make shit up. Part of why I ask you for evidence is to demonstrate that you simply lack sources for the utter batshit crap you say, in most cases.
>Your previous reply about "wanting to see where we get our claims from" is a bullshit lie, so I ask you again, why do you continue asking when no one is providing you any sources?......try answering with the truth this time and don't play coy like an imbecile.
I've already answered. I am asking to you to provide your sources. A refusal from you, as you so often do is indication to me that you never had them in the first place.
Not sure however, why I am obliged to answer anything from you. You refuse to answer my questions all the time. So why should I answer yours?
I believe that you do make shit up.
to demonstrate that you simply lack sources
A refusal from you, as you so often do is indication to me that you never had them in the first place.
>So you based that on feelings since you lack common sense. Got it.
No, it's based on the fact that you've very rarely sources any of your absurd claims about the world. You claimed that Obamacare was a front for child-trafficking, that Lady Gaga is Jewish and that 2 billion people have been harmed by the vaccine. No evidence provided for any of it.
>And all your sources are misinformation, disinformation, and fake news.
Based on what? I've never once seen you actually criticise the content of any of the sources I've ever given.
>We have them, but there is no point in providing any sources to liars and hypocrites that are always moving the goalpost.
What goalposts have I moved?
Why shouldn't I just regard this as a pathetic snivelling excuse from a known fascist?