Episode 3...


...was pointless to the series and to the story.

ND

reply

I’m absolutely baffled to what I just watched, two random gay guys who have very little to do with the plot have sex and then kill themselves in the next scene. Like what the fuck was that. Am I supposed to care? These characters have been here for 5 minutes

reply

"Progressive" Hollywood for you. The writers undoubtedly jerked themselves off the entire time they were writing the episode. It'll likely be the one nominated for an Emmy next year.

reply

No, they were there for an hour. A pointless dreary hour that felt more like two.

reply

Apparently they were leads in the game during a section? Have yet to play game so someone else can confirm.

reply

They were in the game, but the tone of it was very different. The TV show decided to make their relationship end happily, rather than sad (Frank hung himself after being bitten, and Bill became bitter). But Bill was gay in the game.

reply

You'd think for a TV show they'd extend out these characters rather than only have them in 1 episode. It baffles me.

reply

Explained the car the main characters needed. And it was a nice story, well acted. Sorry if you haven't experienced love before, must have been a tough watch.

reply

The car could have been explained any number of ways. The explicit gay aspect was gratuitous and could have been handled another way without the deep throating of the two "bears."

ND

reply

What's wrong with two people kissing? They are not you so what does their gender matter?

reply

Straight guys are usually turned off by such things. 94% of the male US population is straight and my guess is that most of that 94% are turned off by gay male sex/kissing.

Now...my other bet is that most of that 94% straight male population find nothing wrong with two gorgeous chicks kissing/having sex.

More than a little hypocrisy?

Sure...deal with it. ;-)

reply

It is repeated exposure that gets us used to things. The kiss helped in that way. You are correct.

reply

No it isn’t. If you’re repeatedly exposed to people eating faeces you’re more repulsed the more you’re made to witness it, and eventually you’ll lose patience with the creeps trying to force it on you.

The revulsion straight men experience when forced to watch butch, hairy men kissing and fucking doesn’t dissipate with exposure, it increases.

Gays are a tiny percentage of the population and people are happy to let them do their thing. Shove it in people’s faces and especially their kid’s faces with endless degenerate ‘pride’ parades and forcing it into school curricula and get ready for an aggressive pushback.

reply

Maybe marketing isn't really your thing, Chester.

reply

Marketing panders to desires one already has. Sex sells because it appeals to your sex drive.

Butch hairy men kissing and fucking might appeal to you but it doesn't appeal to straight men, it repulses them.

If you think that forcing people to watch what repulses them is good marketing then you have no instinct whatsoever for marketing. You have minus marketing skills.

Of course, kids don’t have sexuality and those pushing this stuff on kids are known as groomers. I hope you’re not one of them.

reply

Exactly!

reply

The revulsion straight men experience when forced to watch butch, hairy men kissing and fucking doesn’t dissipate with exposure, it increases.


This is so utterly pathetic. It's a TV show. It's fictional. Fiction is a mirror of reality. Gay people exist. Therefore writers put them into fiction.

I'm straight, and I have no problem with seeing people kiss in TV shows male or female. The success of many 'woke' TV shows, or gay relationships depicted on TV is demonstrative of this.

reply

Makes no difference what you think, what I said is true for straight men.

reply

I'm straight. It does not remotely bother me.

reply

I’m straight.

Sure.

reply

Accusing me of lying, are we?

Why did Heartstopper and Sex Education and Euphoria do so well if straight people cannot possibly abide seeing gay people on TV?

reply

No it didn't. I literally hid my eyes from it. They think they're normalizing it but it won't. I'd rather watch zombies eat people ass first than two dudes in a romantic interlude. I don't want to see it and if you trick people into watching it, it has the OPPOSITE effect. In fact, I wish there was a website that told us this ahead of time because I would avoid ANY and ALL movies or TV shows with gay "love scenes". It's disgusting, it's deviant, it's absurd and I don't want to see it, ever.

reply

Why should all entertainment be rooted purely to protect you from your own personal discomfort?

Should there be a "fornication" warning for all content to appease Christians? Or a "contains music" warning to placate Muslims?

reply

I would ask you the same thing. Should mainstream television shows be catering to the smallest demographic, to simultaneously attempt to convince us it's "okay", while trying to make you feel better about being a deviant???

reply

Except most straight people do not have any problem with seeing gay people on camera in relationships.

And I am not gay, as I've told you.

reply

You presume to speak for "most" people? How arrogant.

reply

Provide evidence that most people can't stomach seeing two gay people in a relationship.

Why have Euphoria, Heartstopper and Sex Education been successful TV shows?

reply

Thats called programming, or brainwashing. Why do we need to keep seeing things we dont wanna see? Maybe the jokes on all of us as we should just stop watching the show.

reply

I did exactly that. I'm not going to watch crap like that. It's a POS show anyway.

reply

Im currently watching The Man in the High Castle, which is a great series! Yet they are now (in season 3) showcasing several gay kiss and romance scenes...I get it in the shows context. Jews are still being hunted, Gays are persecuted just as much, heck they even execute people who are sick with incurable illnesses in this Nazi Dystopia on earth. But it truly seems like every single show has to have some obligatory gay romance in it. Im also watching Boardwalk Empire for the first time, it shows a gay (more like bisexual though) woman having secret relationships as a B or C subplot.

At least these shows are heavily R rated.

reply

TV shows often have large casts now. It's demographically unlikely for a TV show with a large cast for there not to be 1 or 2 gay characters.

Man in the High Castle also shows John Smith and his wife, Frank & Juliana, Joe & Juliana, Joe & that German girl (can't remember her name), Kido & an American comfort girl... Childen and his Japanese wife, but apparently you note, specifically, Ed McCarthys brief romance (shown)?

reply

I havent seen Childens wife yet? Please no spoilers.

All in the same episode, We see Eds gay kiss, German Lebensborn lesbian affair with Journalist lady in New York, and the exiled Reichsmarschall in Cuba paying a male and female dancer to make love to him and to eachother in his hotel room granted he is murdered by an assassin before it goes to far in showing it

You've already used the "large cast must include gay people argument" with me. If you wanna get real technical: statistically speaking you will not find gay people in every random selection of the population. Go to any town or city and choose 100 people, you will not find gay people in every random group. You just wont. Your chances are certainly higher in San Fransisco, I would bet, but most places you just wont see it.

No need to keep writing me what you already have before. Yes gays exist, yes they have history, but in my opinion they do not need gay character in every single show put on TV. You claim to not see it, and that it doesnt bother you. But it bothers me. It used to not bother me, but it really does seem like every show has to include gay romances.

reply

I havent seen Childens wife yet? Please no spoilers.

Oh. Sorry.

All in the same episode, We see Eds gay kiss, German Lebensborn lesbian affair with Journalist lady in New York, and the exiled Reichsmarschall in Cuba paying a male and female dancer to make love to him and to eachother in his hotel room granted he is murdered by an assassin before it goes to far in showing it

I mean, the Nazis were genuine hypocrites. Plenty of straight men throughout time have done that shit.

You've already used the "large cast must include gay people argument" with me. If you wanna get real technical: statistically speaking you will not find gay people in every random selection of the population. Go to any town or city and choose 100 people, you will not find gay people in every random group. You just wont. Your chances are certainly higher in San Fransisco, I would bet, but most places you just wont see it.

If you chose 100 people at random, statistically you will find 5-10 LGBT people in them.
It is not higher in San Francisco. It is just more likely that LGBT people will be open in San Francisco vs. rural USA.

reply

Thank you, I thought it was funny that Childan was prim and proper and so precise and my fiance thought he would be gay and we were both surprised Ed turned out to be gay. But I figured Childan was just a "man of taste" and that doesnt equal gay. Also when Childan was first invited to the Japanese womans house in the first season, it seemed like he was ready to have an affair with her xD but it was actually an invitation by the couple so they could practice their english and see if he would make a "good american friend" like he would become a token american friend xD

With his love for the culture and art, it makes sense he ends up with a Japanese wife.

San Francisco was the center of gay rights activists at one point, I assumed it had a higher population of gay people. Oddly enough it seems right now DC has a higher chance to find a gay person than California. I guess we are about to experience the fall of rome again.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/gay-population-by-state

https://www.census.gov/popclock/

reply

Childan is literally just a weeaboo, but to Imperial Japan.

San Francisco was the center of gay rights activists at one point, I assumed it had a higher population of gay people. Oddly enough it seems right now DC has a higher chance to find a gay person than California. I guess we are about to experience the fall of rome again.

That only measures LGBT who have come out in some way. My point is that in reactionary states, gay people are more likely to be in the closet. And the trope of the anti-homosexual activist being caught doing a discreet bit of buggery is a tale that haunts Christian churches in USA.

reply

The gay stuff was nowhere near gratuitous compared to HBOs usual standards

reply

yep totally agree

reply

The games were rather despairing at times as most people or infected wanted to kill or harm you. Bill was just surviving. He was doing fine. And yet by the end he left with Frank despite his objections to Frank's way of life initially. What he found was a reason for living and living well.

Joel survives just fine but he needed a reason to live. That reason is Ellie who is like his replacement daughter. Joel's journey with Ellie will follow a similar trajectory. No matter how miserable life is they find comfort and reason to keep going for someone else.

Without it they might as well skip all the exposition and just have waves and waves of attackers every episode.

We all die. Are all our relationships similarly pointless?

I saw this as someone that was similar to the initial Bill. I was resisting the urge to tell him to kill Frank at the start. Would Bill have lived longer without Frank? Possibly (if we assume he doesn't get shot in the attack). But would he have fully enjoyed life that way?

What makes us fully human is the ability to love and sacrifice. Apparently the infected are still aware of what is going on but have no control. These plot points show the contrast and how we can make selfless choices, even if sometimes they lead to ruin.

reply

It's social engineering and political shenanigans. I have no patience for it and refuse to watch it. Hollywood can take their agenda and shove it up their asses.

reply

Showing two men in a relationship is "social engineering"?

reply

Why does Hollywood insist on pushing the agenda of ~5% of the population onto the 95%?

It is "social engineering" in that enterainment vehicles (series, movies, etc.) are portraying gay relationships in a way that "normalizes" them, therefore attempting to make them more acceptable to the majority, non-gay population. About 95% of the US population is straight.

reply

Why does Hollywood insist on pushing the agenda of ~5% of the population onto the 95%?


How is it an agenda? Fiction depicts reality. Gay people exist in real life. They therefore can exist in fiction.

It is "social engineering" in that enterainment vehicles (series, movies, etc.) are portraying gay relationships in a way that "normalizes" them, therefore attempting to make them more acceptable to the majority, non-gay population. About 95% of the US population is straight.


Why should being straight mean you should find anything untoward about gay relationships?

reply

"Why should being straight mean you should find anything untoward about gay relationships?"

Because it's fucking gross. If you have to ask......

reply

I find the idea of old people having sex "gross", but I don't find anything untoward about seeing older couples.

reply

Show me where people are being tricked into watching old people do it.

reply

No-one was watching gay people have sex here either.

In any case, this show is rated MA. Deal with it.

reply

No, I'm not going to "deal with it", any more than you are. What if we reacted to every social change you wanted in the name of the alphabet community? You'd have a sore ass, wouldn't you? But it's okay for you to react that way to me? That makes you a hypocrite. Which is typical.

reply

What if we reacted to every social change you wanted in the name of the alphabet community?


What reactions are you hinting at? And what "social changes" do you think I want?

But it's okay for you to react that way to me? That makes you a hypocrite. Which is typical.


You are whining that a show has gay people in it. Watch another show.

reply

Then what are you whining about? I can do this all day.

I'm aggravated they ALL have gays in them. Without warning. It's not done because it adds anything to the story. It's done to normalize deviant behavior. I want to be entertained, not preached to.

reply

Then what are you whining about? I can do this all day.


If I don't like a TV show, I just stop watching.

I'm aggravated they ALL have gays in them. Without warning. It's not done because it adds anything to the story. It's done to normalize deviant behavior. I want to be entertained, not preached to.


This is highly subjective. There are plenty of shows where the depicted relationships add plot to the show.

Ellie is gay by the way

reply

Ellie is a 14yr old girl. Her sexuality should never be part of ANY story.

reply

She's literally lesbian in the original.

reply

Only a liberal thinks that's okay.

Ellie is a 14yr old girl. Her sexuality should never be part of ANY story.

reply

I suggest you drop the series then.

reply

I think I said that, genius.

reply

Also I should note that I don't know how old Ellie actually is in the video game where she starts going into relationships since she only starts off as 13 (14 in the show) and there's a 5 year jump into TLOU: Part II, albeit the actress in the show is actually 19.

reply

Yep. The director admitted to it.

reply

Evidence?

And you know Bill was gay in the original, right?

reply

Thats something I wondered. Did they not want to follow the game story in this episode "Bills Town" because it showed that their gay relationship fell apart? In the game Bill and Frank had a major falling out. You dont even find out Bill is gay until you read the letter that frank left behind. But in the HBO series Bill and Frank never had a falling out and basically lived excellent to eachother for twenty years. Was this why they changed the story, because they didnt want to show that relationship didnt work out, but instead glorify it and show it worked so well that they would kill themselves together rather than live without eachother?

I can see the poetic, romantic, artful side of this story about two people finding true happiness in this apocalyptic world. It was more hopeful than the "Bills Town" in the videogame. Yet I can also see hollywood pushing that gay stuff and ramping it up for an audience that is not mostly gay.

Representation matters (no taxation without representation!) but why does every show have to have gay and transgender characters? I use to not mind it so much. But it does feel like everyone is trying to outgay eachother on every show.

reply

Yes, it was shown differently - but the point is that Bill being gay wasn't invented for the TV show.

I can see the poetic, romantic, artful side of this story about two people finding true happiness in this apocalyptic world. It was more hopeful than the "Bills Town" in the videogame. Yet I can also see hollywood pushing that gay stuff and ramping it up for an audience that is not mostly gay.


Is any happy relationship depicted between two homosexual people just "pushing gay stuff" to you? Could it ever exist in a way that it would not be that to you?

Representation matters (no taxation without representation!) but why does every show have to have gay and transgender characters? I use to not mind it so much. But it does feel like everyone is trying to outgay eachother on every show.


Transgender characters are much rarer. But statistically this makes complete sense. Gay people are, what 3-5% of the population? TV shows tend to have large casts. It's actually statistically unlikely for a cast to be exclusively straight.

reply

Perhaps you need to remind your point to some else, as Im a different poster than the one you replied to originally.
I noticed you glossed over my first paragraph, I stated Bill was gay in the game and the how it was done differently. Any thoughts as to why you think they changed it from the game?

for recent shows, Mr. Terrific in the show Arrow was done well. I had no problem with him being gay or his husband. It felt organic and his problems in life didnt stem from him being gay. The man had ordinary problems stemming from extraordinary situations. Its really the only recent gay relationship I can think of quickly that I didnt get annoyed by it.

They genuinely beat you over the head with gay people these days. Thats why people are annoyed by it. If this exact show came out 15 years ago and episode 3 was unchanged, I have a feeling people would be less annoyed than they are now.

The relationship shown had some positives to it, but with how the current times of media are, everything looks like an agenda being pushed instead of organic storytelling. Its why people are already primed to wanna tune out or become easily annoyed.

reply

I noticed you glossed over my first paragraph, I stated Bill was gay in the game and the how it was done differently. Any thoughts as to why you think they changed it from the game?


They wanted a much more optimistic spin on the outcome of Bills' relationship?

I simply do not get your premise that they are "beating you over the head" with gay people these days just because relationships are more commonly depicted. It's not even something I think about.

reply

The only thing I can take from their direction that is positive, is that it showed a more hopeful side of life in this world. That happiness can be found and even maintained. The videogame was much more brutal and apathetic in "Bills Town".

But all the rest?...Im tired of it too.

reply

They should have kept it true to the game, devoting an entire episode to two people we never see again is so absolutely stupid in a show that will only have 9 episodes and only one more season. I wanted to see Ellie’s back and forth reactions to Bill, and him help Joel get the battery and prep the car, like in the game.

In future rewatches, the entire pointless middle segment of this episode is getting skipped.

reply