MovieChat Forums > Dirty Harry (1971) Discussion > A Few Landmark Things About Dirty Harry

A Few Landmark Things About Dirty Harry


Dirty Harry is, alongside Star Wars, probably the most influential movie to come out of the 70's in terms of how the movies would be after that point.

I think it boils down to two key points:

ONE: The Western gunslinger becomes the Urban action hero cop. A lot of actors turned down Dirty Harry before Eastwood got the job: Frank Sinatra, Paul Newman, Steve McQueen, Robert Mitchum, among them. (And reputedly Bill Cosby, Walter Matthau and John Wayne, too.) Eastwood getting the role made the connection direct -- in a way that only John Wayne would have as well -- between the Western gunslinger and the Urban action cop. You only have to back up three years to Steve McQueen as Bullitt to see a San Francisco cop presented in a more realistic manner -- unwilling to fire his gun unless forced; remorseful after having to kill. But Harry "shot it out" on the street with bank robbers and with Scorpio at various locations(and, in the sequels, with even more abandon.) Eastwood made his name in the Western, but realized that the Western was a dying genre. He used Dirty Harry to re-configure the terrain for action, and everybody followed: Charles Bronson, Burt Reynolds, Mel Gibson, Bruce Willis, Chuck Norris, Steven Seagal, Sly Stallone(Cobra) and of course, Arnold.

TWO: The Evil of the Villain. There had been bad guys before with a certain evil you just HAD to hate, but Scorpio took it up to 11. The relatively new R rating allowed it. The movie opens with Scorpio shooting a beautiful woman who is in a bathing suit, and later in the film, he rapes a 14 year old preteen and buries her alive and nude(after pulling out her tooth as evidence.) He kills a young black child. He hijacks a schoolbus with small children on board and terrorizes them(threatening to kill their parents.) NO screen bad guy had ever been this cruel, this vicious. One spends the whole movie CRAVING Scorpio's death, and what's great is that along the way to that death, he still gets messed up pretty bad: Harry sticks a switchblade in his thigh and he pays a black man to beat him up very badly(to blame Harry, but still -- such masochism.)

The collision course between a hero who shoots first and asks questions later and a villain of indescribable evil would set the template for many "R" rated cop pictures for decades to come. Dirty Harry made everything suddenly "elemental." Very little detective work. Very few trials. Just good versus evil, guns, knives and fists -- brutally and to the death.

But as with all truly good -- classic -- seminal movies, Dirty Harry is also a great movie. It is beautifully directed by Don Siegel with an eye towards San Francisco as a dangerous city of darkness, whether day or night. It is tightly scripted with such gems as the two "Do you feel lucky?" speeches and Harry's ruminations on how he could tell a man had intent to rape("When I see a naked man running after woman with a knife and a hard-on, I shoot the bastard."). It has that great long suspense sequence of Scorpio running Harry all over late night San Francisco with the ransom for the buried-alive girl (who dies anyway).

And Eastwood himself finally found himself a role in which he could express his inner rage and his outer cool in equal measure. Look at his pleasant wimpy guy in "Paint Your Wagon" of 1969 and see how Harry gave him cajones. (His Spaghetti Western guy, while a great shooter, was perhaps too mysterious and laconic to "register.")

As for the reputed "Fascist" law and order elements of Dirty Harry ("Then the law's crazy!!"), the deck may well have been rigged, but i could quote you ten cases in real life where killers got off or served light sentences for murder. The movie tapped into something real about justice, and made this fictional tale very timely and real -- and debateable.

Great movie. Changed a lot of things AT the movies. To this day.

reply

Excellent post!

reply

Thank you for reading!

reply

Well said! I agree with every word.

reply

Thank you!

reply

Great post. Btw Scorpio killed a cop as well (initially thought it was the priest but it was a cop).

Clint taking his western persona to the cop thriller had sort of been done already with Don Siegels Coogans Bluff but it wasn't anywhere near on the scale of this classic. (btw interesting you mention in the actors that followed Clint in to the hard R gritty cop thriller being Mel Gibson as both he and Clint had especially similar transitions - Clints Man With No Name trilogy/Mels Mad Max trilogy which was certainly based on Clints persona. Kurt Russel did the same with Snake Plisken) it must've been such a thrill for audiences to see The Man With No Name in the present day urban environment in an absolute no holds barred hard R (or 'X' rated) violent thriller the likes no one had ever seen before, and an instant classic film with instantly iconic scenes/lines etc.

In fact I literally just watched it on TV for the first time in what must be like a decade maybe more. I wasnt going to watch it again as know every scene as watched it loads when I was younger but couldn't stop as it was so mesmerizing (the gritty 70s look, the relentless 'dangerous city of darkness' feel - a brutal beating or murder around every corner and a high velocity bullet from any rooftop.. and one man trying to save the city from an insane murderous madman in the face of redtape and bureaucracy by any means necessary - Dirty Harry basically becomes The Dark Knight of San Fran lol) also the length of time not seen it and seeing it in more clarity/HD made it seem almost fresh and also i mainly saw it all the many times in my younger years in the form of the edited for TV version with alot of the extreme violence cut out/toned down (the beating at the cross, the football torture scene, the 'every pennys worth' beating) and had only seen the uncut version maybe just a couple of times at least 15 years ago on dvd (I have the 5 film box set but have rarely watched them) so had forgotten just how violent it was. its still a hugely effective thriller just relentlessly violent (and that's now even after seeing all kinds of violent movies since), awesome acting, and the feel of realism which I felt the sequels increasingly lacked (think Magnum Force is the only sequel that can approach the original in terms for realism but even that isn't in the same league) its abit like Indiana Jones - the first is the absolute classic and has an element of realism with the Nazis/WWII etc, the sequels are great but are almost to the point of parody and they cant touch the original for its classic status and realness ..and its similar with all the other actions series like Die Hard, Lethal Weapon, Beverly Hills Cop, Rambo and even stuff like Terminator, Alien, Predator, Robocop and Matrix (in each case like Dirty Harry, the 1st sequel are probably closest to the classic original movie feel of realism/grittiness etc)

Also had forgotten (or just not realised before) that quite a few of the scenes had been remade in other stuff - which did their own spin on them. the suicide jump (Lethal Weapon) the phone calls run around (Die Hard 3)

reply

Thank you!.

---

Btw Scorpio killed a cop as well (initially thought it was the priest but it was a cop).

---

That's right...you know, I recall being confused on that issue way back when I saw the movie(on release, Xmas 1971.)

---

Clint taking his western persona to the cop thriller had sort of been done already with Don Siegels Coogans Bluff but it wasn't anywhere near on the scale of this classic.

---

I suppose that Coogan's Bluff is a "duh" mistake on my part -- same director and star, Clint in a cowboy hat even. But I suppose "Coogan" was more of a fish out of water tale in which Clint's Arizona sheriff(though everybody keeps thinking he's from Texas) doesn't really get to be a "gunslinger" like Dirty Harry will be.

And yes, its weird...same director, same star, but Coogan's Bluff simply isn't at the level of Dirty Harry. It was made for Universal, and bespeaks of some cheapness(and the Universal backlot). The villain simply isn't as monstrous. And the final motorcycle chase is oddly "blah." Siegel and Eastwood together(Coogan's Bluff, Sister Sara) -- and Siegel by himself(The Black Windmill, Telefon) -- didn't always hit the mark like they did in "Dirty Harry."

---

(btw interesting you mention in the actors that followed Clint in to the hard R gritty cop thriller being Mel Gibson as both he and Clint had especially similar transitions - Clints Man With No Name trilogy/Mels Mad Max trilogy which was certainly based on Clints persona. Kurt Russel did the same with Snake Plisken)

---

Oh, sure, Eastwood was quite the template for the modern "action star." I recall Schwarzenegger giving Clint some award and saying "are you sure you didn't visit Austria when you were young? Are you my daddy?"

Russell practically mimics Clint's whispery voice as Plissken.

And when Eastwood felt he had "out-aged" Harry and other action roles, he said something like "Well, I did my time. I think I'll let the younger guys take over."




reply

it must've been such a thrill for audiences to see The Man With No Name in the present day urban environment in an absolute no holds barred hard R (or 'X' rated) violent thriller the likes no one had ever seen before, and an instant classic film with instantly iconic scenes/lines etc.

--
Oh, yes. I was there, I remember it well. Eastwood really 'took off" with the Dirty Harry role.

It was a somewhat bumpy road getting to it. Hollywood knew Eastwood was now some sort of star from the spaghetti Westerns, but they didn't really know what to do with him at first.

Hang Em High and Coogan's Bluff were sort of low budget, TV level films.

Eastwood was barely given any lines to say in "Where Eagles Dare" -- he just killed people while Richard Burton(with higher billing) carried the plot.

And famously, Eastwood was mild and colorless in two big movies with other stars -- the musical Paint Your Wagon with Lee Marvin and the WWII caper movie Kelly's Heroes, in which more colorful actors Donald Sutherland, Don Rickles, and Telly Savalas chewed the scenery while Eastwood played it straight.

Eastwood didn't like working in big budget-wasting movies like Paint Your Wagon and he started to focus on his low budget"Malpaso" films(like his directorial debut, Play Misty For Me) and on his films with economical director Don Siegel. Indeed, Siegel made four films in a row with Eastwood: Coogans Bluff, Sister Sara, the well-reviewed The Beguiled and then, finally The Big One: Dirty Harry.

Dirty Harry hit big, but Eastwood rather had to struggle in the trenches for a few years to get it.

reply

In fact I literally just watched it on TV for the first time in what must be like a decade maybe more. I wasnt going to watch it again as know every scene as watched it loads when I was younger but couldn't stop as it was so mesmerizing

---

"Mesmerizing" is a good word for Dirty Harry. It has an intensity to it that never really lets up. And I think it sounds as much in the "horror movie" tradition than in the usual "cop drama" that folks had been used to up til then. "Bullitt" with Steve McQueen was a precursor, but nowhere near as violent and terrifying as Dirty Harry.

Indeed, I'll re-state: even if Dirty Harry converted the western gunslinger into the action cop as a "template," THIS cop movie is also very much a horror movie. Look at how much of it takes place at NIGHT; and how scary Harry's journey is from phone booth to phone booth over a long night to a final series of confrontations with Scorpio(not the final confrontations of the movie -- indeed, this gets us only about 2/3 of the way there.)

reply

(the gritty 70s look, the relentless 'dangerous city of darkness' feel - a brutal beating or murder around every corner and a high velocity bullet from any rooftop.. and one man trying to save the city from an insane murderous madman in the face of redtape and bureaucracy by any means necessary - Dirty Harry basically becomes The Dark Knight of San Fran lol)

---

The Dark Knight of San Fran is...a pretty good estimate of the film, isn't it? Dirty Harry posits a city of such dark brutality and madness that only an "outlier" like Dirty Harry can take it on. The film is pointed, btw, in showing us that Harry's wife is dead from a drunk driver crash(this would be given to Mel Gibson in the Lethal Weapon films, too, but turned into a stupid twist by the second installment), he has no children, he is a total loner and thus able to risk it all to fight crime.

With all the "night action" in Dirty Harry, it gets rather haunting in the other hours: the early morning retrieval of the girl's body from the hole in the ground; the "no risk" DA lacerating Harry on his arrest techniques from the safety of his office in the light of day; the paid-for beating of Scorpio by the black thug in darkness that gives way to bright sunlight...

reply

also the length of time not seen it and seeing it in more clarity/HD made it seem almost fresh and also i mainly saw it all the many times in my younger years in the form of the edited for TV version with alot of the extreme violence cut out/toned down (the beating at the cross, the football torture scene, the 'every pennys worth' beating) and had only seen the uncut version maybe just a couple of times at least 15 years ago on dvd (I have the 5 film box set but have rarely watched them) so had forgotten just how violent it was. its still a hugely effective thriller just relentlessly violent (and that's now even after seeing all kinds of violent movies since),

---

The violence level is off the charts in "Dirty Harry," and it came out during a famously violent time in American and international filmmaking: Straw Dogs, A Clockwork Orange, The Godfather, Frenzy, and Deliverance are just a few of the violent (and SEXUALLY violent) films of that six month period.

But at least in Dirty Harry, Harry was a good guy(not a gangster) and delivered violent payback to the psycho killer...that knife in the thigh got audiences cheers and so did Harry shooting Scorpio in the leg and then stomping on the wound. All this BEFORE Harry finally kills Scorpio for good.

---

reply

awesome acting,

--

When Nicholas Cage was picking up one of his acting awards for "Leaving Las Vegas" in 1995/96, he singled out Eastwood's performance as Harry Callahan as an inspiration. I think people rather missed how much Eastwood "dug deep" for that performance -- Harry is cool a lot of the time, but he's one enraged SOB for a lot of the movie too -- there's a desperation in his voice to his superiors when he says "You're not just going to pay him off are you?" and I love his snarl when he says that he couldn't have beaten up Scorpio "because he looks too damn GOOD, that' why!" Great performance.

As was Andy Robinson as Scorpio, with a voice that goes squeaky high and scary low at will. Total madness...total sadism.

As were Harry Guardino(always good) and John Larch as sympathetic cops and JOhn Vernon as a compromised mayor.

And who didn't want to punch out that slimy DA? It led to a career of smarmy bad guy roles for that actor.

reply

and the feel of realism which I felt the sequels increasingly lacked (think Magnum Force is the only sequel that can approach the original in terms for realism but even that isn't in the same league)

---

Agreed. Folks like to rank the "Dirty Harrys" best to worst, but for me it is: one great classic movie(Dirty Harry) and some knock-offs, of which the second is somewhat better than the rest(because it has an "on point" plot about Harry versus police vigilantes) but already feels too "TV-ish" ("Harry foils a plane hijacking" "Harry foils a store robbery")

I feel that "Dirty Harry," "Psycho" and "Jaws" all play the same way, btw: one great classic followed by leser knock-offs.

--

its abit like Indiana Jones - the first is the absolute classic and has an element of realism with the Nazis/WWII etc, the sequels are great but are almost to the point of parody and they cant touch the original for its classic status and realness

--

Well, there you go. Let's add this movie and series in, too. Indeed, I felt that "Temple of Doom" was a real drop-off(no Nazis) and the return to Nazis in Last Crusade was rather a "re-tread."

reply

---
..and its similar with all the other actions series like Die Hard, Lethal Weapon, Beverly Hills Cop, Rambo and even stuff like Terminator, Alien, Predator, Robocop and Matrix

--

You raise an interesting point here: in some ways, Dirty Harry was more influential on EIGHTIES movies than on seventies movies. In the 70's, Eastwood really only had Charles Bronson as a competitor/imitator. Burt Reynolds didn't do a lot of action films. But in the EIGHTIES...everyobyd got into the "Dirty Harry" act. Including Burt Reynolds(Sharkey's Machine) , Sly Stallone(Cobra), and the ones you mention above.

---

(in each case like Dirty Harry, the 1st sequel are probably closest to the classic original movie feel of realism/grittiness etc)

--

That's another good point. Perhaps any good/great movie can really only extend out "one more time." The classic "prestige" example is: Godfather II was great; Godfather III...not so much.

---
Also had forgotten (or just not realised before) that quite a few of the scenes had been remade in other stuff - which did their own spin on them. the suicide jump (Lethal Weapon) the phone calls run around (Die Hard 3)

---

There ye go. "Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery."

reply

Nice post. I love the shot in San Francisco and Bay Area location movies and Clint Eastwood. I know of the penthouses and homes on top of the hill in the City that one can see other rooftops. Some guys have telescopes for that purpose. I assume that because they're not pointing towards the sky. I did not know and am amazed at who was offered the role before Clint. The movie also alluded to the real Zodiac killer who was terrorizing the poor citizens of San Francisco.

As far as I'm concerned, this is Clint's best role and what he will be remembered for. He may have done better movies, but Harry Callahan is his most iconic role. While it ranks up there with the top movies of the 70s, there were other films better such as The Godfather, The Godfather Part II, Jaws, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Taxi Driver, Rocky, Apocalypse Now, Alien, Chinatown, The Exorcist, Clockwork Orange, etc. Even The Outlaw Josey Wales as a Clint movie could be considered better for the 70s. I put Dirty Harry up there, too, as one of Clint's best and iconic films. He could have made Ray Ban sunglasses popular. Again, I think Harry Callahan will be the character he is best remembered for.

reply

Great post, agree 100%!
Streaming now on Netflix, one of my comfort films I never tire of

reply

I like these movies, but Dirty Harry, it's really "Dirty".

I would assume that "Dirty" means he will lie and frame people he knows are guilty just to arrest them. Instead, he's a great guy and gets the job done.

It's a cool name but he should have been WAY more gritty.

reply

His police partner said he was called "Dirty" Harry because "he always gets the shit end of the stick."

A little later, after dealing with a potential suicide, he says, "Now you know why they call me Dirty Harry - every dirty job that comes along."

(It's a touch worrying that I didn't have to look up those quotes...)

reply

Oh, I don't recall that.

He gets the tough jobs. That makes sense.

reply

In the 70s, my group could quote passages from the movie, and frequently did. One fellow had a very realistic replica Smith and Wesson which he took to parties etc with him.

reply

Well, that sounds like quite a circle of friends!

I was always a bigger fan of his westerns I didn't start watching his Harry films until much later, even then I have seen them a couple times vs endlessly like the westerns.

Do you know what happened to the people you used to hang out with?

reply

They were good lads. We were as thick as thieves. And we never were arrested for carrying concealed weapons, although it was a near thing sometimes.

Never having been a fan of westerns, I haven't seen Clint's versions. High Plains Drifter was the only one of his that I recall seeing, and I wasn't overawed by it. His urban cop ones, on the other hand, I can watch endlessly, as my head full of Dirty Harry quotes attests.

All my mates married and had kids, as did I. But we rarely meet these days.

reply

That's too bad, you guys sounded crazy!

Anyway, the westerns and his character was modeled after my famous Japanese actor, Toshiro Mifune. He was awesome!

Also, his character was supposed to be an angel from what I gather. I love The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly a lot and there's many references to that in there.

He made High Plains Drifter and instead of an Angel he was a ghost, which is more negative but close.

Anyway, I can watch those and the Dirty Harry films many times and still enjoy them. On a funny note, I thought the Harry movie where he's dealing with "hippies" was funny. There was a Star Trek episode with Hippies and I recently watched a Lost in Space with Hippies. They are got the treatment like they were dangerous unpredictable crazy aliens.

Meanwhile, hippies grew up to be greedy yuppies. Very amusing dated material.

reply

I don't recall a Dirty Harry movie that had hippies. Which one was that? Hippies were mainly an American phenomenon. Not quite so much in my country.

Toshiro Mifune is probably everyone's favourite Japanese actor. Certainly he's mine. Endlessly watchable, he always dominates the scenes he appears in.

reply

I can't recall the exact film with hippies, I have to look.

Anyway Mifune was was the basis for the Eastwood cowboy. Yohimbo was the basis for A Fist Full of Dollars. He was also in The fortress which was the inspiration for Star Wars.

That's a weird one to watch. Two peasant guys are R2 and C3PO.

reply

I'll echo the general sentiment here... this is a great analysis.

The next movie -- Magnum Force -- sort of walks back on some of the elements that you describe in the first movie. Given the chance by the rogue cops to deliver 'frontier justice' in modern times Harry ops out, and decides to take them down.

I remember when I watched it that the character was noticeably "softer" from the first movie. Now, of course, it was important that the film makers keep the character on the right side of the law... I get that. But, the movie doesn't really make Harry's choice the obvious one based on what we had learned of him in the previous movie.

Is he tempted to join them? Does he agree with the end result, but has problems with the means? Is he re-examining his own attitudes about who determines guilt? These questions could have been better presented and explained.

In the end his only self-analysis amounts to about a half dozen words... "A man's got to know his own limitations" (or very similar). Looks hard into the camera. Fade to black.

It has been a very long time since I've seen it though, so maybe I'm forgetting key scenes or developments.

reply

Nobody, I mean NOBODY puts ketchup on a hotdog.

reply

The next movie -- Magnum Force -- sort of walks back on some of the elements that you describe in the first movie. Given the chance by the rogue cops to deliver 'frontier justice' in modern times Harry ops out, and decides to take them down.

I remember when I watched it that the character was noticeably "softer" from the first movie. Now, of course, it was important that the film makers keep the character on the right side of the law... I get that. But, the movie doesn't really make Harry's choice the obvious one based on what we had learned of him in the previous movie.

--

Though director Don Siegel was no longer on board with "Magnum Force" I think he considered himself a "Hollywood liberal" who was a bit upset about accusations that he had directed a "fascist" movie. Clint Eastwood claimed that politics had nothing to do with Dirty Harry beyond showing how a bad guy "could get away with it" and that's not fair.

But "Magnum Force" indeed elected to walk back some of the first one, with Harry pitted against REAL fascist cops who -- Harry reminds them -- killed one innocent guy along with all the "deserving" mobsters and pimps.

I liked Magnum Force enough --though it is not as good as Dirty Harry. But I felt the "defense" was rather too obvious. Harry was never a psycho fascist cop in the first one.

Though a hippie-era 1971 movie poster tried to suggest it: "Dirty Harry and the homicidal maniac. Harry's the one with the badge.""

---
CONT

reply

In the end his only self-analysis amounts to about a half dozen words... "A man's got to know his own limitations" (or very similar). Looks hard into the camera. Fade to black.

---

In the annals of Dirty Harry movies, "Go ahead, make my day" is probably the most famous line(though in a not-very-good late breaking sequel.) The two "Do you feel lucky?" speeches in the original Dirty Harry(the first "foxy" , the second "pissed off" said Eastwood) are probably the best catchphrases in the series -- good speeches done different each time in a great movie.

But a lot of folks like "A man's got to know his own limitations" (or "A man's got to know his limitations" -- I can't remember) and it is pretty famous too. I've said it and heard it said over my lifetime; I've read it in political articles.

Its good advice. If you don't know your own limitations and try to do certain things...you may fail. You may lose. You may get humliated. You may get fired or go to jail. Or die.

OR: You can work to rise above those limitations and make yourself better.

The WORST Dirty Harry catchprhase comes in arguably the worst Dirty Harry sequel. The last one(The Dead Pool):

"You're shit out of luck."

Eh...that was old hat before even before Harry said it.

reply

Nobody, I mean NOBODY puts ketchup on a hotdog.

---

I do, all the time. But always with mustard, too. And sometimes relish.

The bigger question: what does this line tell us about Harry?

reply

Harry is very set in his ways

There's that line about Harry hating everybody...He's a loner type with set opinions and if you don't fit his mold he's got no use for you

Funny thing about that, he's the hero and bumps off the bad guys in every film but defends people of all backgrounds

*Quite 'frankly' I put all sorts of stuff on hot dogs...pickles, cheese, chili, ketchup, mustard...whatever

reply

Harry is very set in his ways

There's that line about Harry hating everybody...He's a loner type with set opinions and if you don't fit his mold he's got no use for you

---

Yes. The original film gave him a Hispanic male partner to play against that. Then Magnum Force gave him a black male partner. Then The Enforcer gave him a white female partner. In all three cases, Harry seemed to resist his partners not over race or gender(at all) , but mainly because he felt they were neither as tough as him or as experienced as him. Well -- strike that -- Harry seemed to think that the WOMAN was just the weaker sex. But he grew to respect all of them. Of course, not all of them made it out alive --- Harry was rather a jinx, probably another reason he wanted to be a loner.

And as Eastwood himself has pointed out, remember that in the original we learn that his wife was killed by a drunk driver -- "No reason, really" -- and THAT has made him the loner he is, as well.

---

Funny thing about that, he's the hero and bumps off the bad guys in every film but defends people of all backgrounds

---

Yes. Dirty Harry director Don Siegel said that a key scene written for the original was the one where the black doctor tends to Harry's leg wound and we see that the men have a mutual respect -- whatever Fatso said about all the races that Harry "equally" hates -- he really doesn't.

And he does defend all backgrounds. He has this funny retort in one of the sequels:

Boss: Are you bullying the minority community?
Harry: Minority? You mean...hoods?

---

*Quite 'frankly' I put all sorts of stuff on hot dogs...pickles, cheese, chili, ketchup, mustard...whatever

--

Ha. Me, too. And I tell ya -- such is "the influential power of movies" -- I always felt bad about having ketchup on my hot dog after hearing Big Clint make such an impassioned speech AGAINST it.

I felt bad. But I didn't stop having ketchup on my hot dogs.

(rhetorically) : what WAS Harry's problem here?

reply

bump

reply

Bump.

reply

Excellent thread ecarle. My username and avatar are based on the character.

Andy Robinson is worth mentioning. You mentioned how shocking the character was in the thread.

Dan Siegel allowed him to interpret and, on occasion ad lib lines.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcUiryx6g3k

When he is chasing Harry all over town via payphones during one call at the end he says "Hubba hubba pig bastard hee hee!" That was an ad lib. I cringed the first time I heard that line.

Outstanding villainous performance by Andy Robinson.

Great film!

reply