1. My family is all White. My friends and peers are mostly White. Your pretense of not understanding how groups work, is not very credible.
2. You said that you identify as a Dane. Note how i have NOT grilled you as to why, or what you mean by that, or how you think that will manifest or any such questions. You identify that way, and it does not hurt me and I respect it and that is the end of it. YOU are hostile.
3. I identify as a member of multiple, overlapping groups. I am also a member of various communities. My hypothetical black neighbor would fall under both city and Nation groups, and depending on the context, that could easily outweigh or be outweighed by the White grouping. The way you need normal human interaction explained to you, is not very credible.
reply
share
OldG (626)
2 years ago
1. How do I not understand how groups work? It is you who have presented this gigantic group called white people which you want to survive... but when I try to get you to explain something more about this group... it is suddenly friends and family... If you would have started this conversation with I want my friends and family to survive... there would have been no discussion because most humans would feel the exact same way... I also want my friends and family to survive... but this is not what we are talking about at least not what you presented at the begining of this discussion... but your hypocrisy is now out in the open... because you cannot give me a valid answer to why you want your group (white people not friends and family) to survive.
2. Again with the hostility... Is that what you throw at me anytime you do not have a decent answer to my question
3. Well you brougt up the group white people and that you want them to survive... so that is the group we are discussing... But please explain to my which other groups you are part of outweigh the group white people... I would assume family, then friends are more important than some white guy you have never met?
reply
share
Corbell (8413)
2 years ago
1. Everything you say, is you acting like you need the concept of groups explained to you.
2. You identified as Dane. Note how I did not grill you on it, nor call you a name for doing so. I respect how you identify. Do you really not see a difference in our respective responses to each other?
3. I made a passing reference to how I was called a bad person for wanting my group to survive. I was hoping that you would agree that that was really out of line of that person, thus us finding common ground and the discussion could move on from there. Instead you seemed to just accept that, and instead focused on why I would identify as white. And to call me a name for doing so. Do you not see how this makes you look?
reply
share
OldG (626)
2 years ago
1. No... it is you not capable of explaining what the group 'White People' consists of... when I dig deeper... you come up with family and friends... c'mon nobody was ever questioning people's desire to protect his family and friends
2. We are not discussing what you identify yourself as... that is pretty clear... but what does it mean when you say you will fight for your people's survival... I asked you for peaceful examples of this fight... but you still haven't answered that question?
3. Did I call you a bad person? Sorry if I didn't defend you against some other poster... I thought you could handle yourself... What name did I call you?
reply
share
Corbell (8413)
2 years ago
I am not incapable of doing it, I am refusing to do it, because I am not playing your asinine games.
I'm White. Deal with it.
I made a comment about wanting my people to survive, and you are pretending that that is confusing to you, when obviously, the truth is that you are opposed to it, for some reason you will not share.
reply
share
OldG (626)
2 years ago
haha that is great... why did you even reply in the first place...
So you are capable but refuse? That is a great way to have a discussion...
What won't I share? You brought up: 'I want my people to survuve' I am asking you to elaborate so I can understand you reasoning... But as you said you refuse to... I guess that is because your reasoning is pathetic... oh well I will never know...
reply
share
Corbell (8413)
2 years ago
No elaboration is needed. My meaning was clear. YOu are grilling me with asinine questions, not because you don't understand, but because you oppose my goal, but don't want to clearly state that.
The crux of the matter is, that the vast majority of what gets called w.s. today, as per the op, is NOT actually white supremacy.
It is white people who dare to identify as white, or God Forbid, actually state that they have interests as White people and want to pursue them.
Such as my stated desire to survive.
Actual, real w.s. are as rare as hen's teeth.
reply
share
OldG (626)
2 years ago
Oppose your goal??? How can I oppose something which has not been explained?
You say you want your people to survive... I have asked you time and time again... to explain how you want to reach that goal... But you never come with anything concrete...
It seems like you either don't know how you want your people to survive or you are afraid to tell me?
reply
share
Corbell (8413)
2 years ago
Not at all. As I clearly pointed out, you opposed it, without the means being discussed. Your opposition is clearly based on the goal, not the means.
Asking about the means, is you trying to find excuses for your opposition, instead of admitting what the real reason is.
reply
share
OldG (626)
2 years ago
Again no answer... just you trying to turn it around... which clearly shows that you are in way over your head...
Either answer my questions or don't bother to reply...
reply
share
Corbell (8413)
2 years ago
Your question is irrelevant to your opposition, as I clearly pointed out.
And your reason for it, is so dark, that you cannot risk discussing it.
I identify as White, and want my people to survive.
You have a problem with that, for reasons you are unwilling to share.
LIkely anti-white racism.
reply
share
OldG (626)
2 years ago
You only try to make it irrelevant because you are not capable of giving a coherent answer...
And as you seem to know my reason please tell me... it is apparently so dark an scary?
reply
share
Corbell (8413)
2 years ago
1. You oppose my goal. THe questions you have asked, are designed to lead AWAY from the crux of the matter, which is WHY, you oppose it.
2. My goal, for any reader, is just for my group to survive. That is what has triggered oldG.
3. I just did. Anti-white racism.
reply
share
OldG (626)
2 years ago
1. Again you are wrong... how can oppose what what you won't describe... explain how you will reach your goal? And then I will tell you if I oppose it...
2. Nothing triggered me... remember you replied to me in the begining... so the only one triggered is you..
3. So because I believe in equal rights for all human beings no matter race or religion... I am anti-white... I guess that says more about you than me...
reply
share
Corbell (8413)
2 years ago
If you believed in equal rights for all groups, you would support the right of Whites to identify as White and to pursue their interests such as surviving.
Your actions show you to be anti-white.
reply
share
OldG (626)
2 years ago
You are like a broken record... By all means identify yourself as white... I have never said you couldn't... But still you haven't told how to reach your goal?
reply
share
Corbell (8413)
2 years ago
Yeah, you didn't say I couldn't, You just insulted me for doing so.
Your opposition is not based on my means. It is based on your anti-white racism.
reply
share
OldG (626)
2 years ago
Again a lot of hostility from you... instead of just answering my questions?
When did I insult you?
And now another unfounded accusation... please explain how I am anti-white?
reply
share