for a man who has consistently fought to ensure that poor Americans couldn't get even half the treatment he is getting for his illness. all because he didn't want to pay a slightly higher amount of tax. or at least was happy that "he had made it" and would be fine keeping the peasants from getting what he did.
shareSympathy isn't earned. It's given freely, like compassion.
shareso you have sympathy for hitler and Stalin? What about that German guy who raped his daughter and had her prisoner? We all die. you don't magically get compassion and sympathy for what we will all face when you are a garbage person. We all crap too. should we give sympathy over that?
lol
You clearly have no understanding.
shareExcept I do clearly have more than your dichotomous child like understand and "morals" of "compassion and sympathy is given freely!!"
shareThank you for proving my point! :)
shareI know tis really easy when you don't aha to actually support an argument. you can just say "seeee proved my point!!"
proof of americas failed education system right here.
"I am right! thanks for proving my point!"
I guess I won cause I said that right?
Thick as a brick, this one... First of all, did you proof read what you wrote? Because it's gibberish and second, please explain this dichotomy you're referring to.
sharelol. do you ever actually add anything or argue or just say things like "thick as a brick"
you are 70 years old right? alone and dumb?
So you don't actually know what dichotomy means. Got it.
shareyes its black and white, a false use of extremes that are shown to be extremely different with no nuances.
tell the nurse at the home to keep you off the internet. you've typed 5 comments and you've literally said nothing.
do you just come here to pick fights and yell at people? lol seek help
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You're one of the most vile, fight picking, insulting ding-a-lings on MC!!
You're not correct in your meaning of dichotomy but even if you were, there was nothing "dichotomous" in what I said.
BTW, all of your comments are nasty and hateful. You seem like a very angry, bitter soul and I DO have sympathy for you.
actually it was correct. Awwwwwwwwww another hollow post that doesn't add anything. Lol how embarrassing. another loser unmanned
shareOkay, Copernicus. Explain the dichotomy in what I said.
BTW, you saying my posts are hollow is a 5th grade diversionary tactic that doesn't work, at all at disguising the abject hollowness of all of yours.
Just as I thought...
sharethat we are 7 comments in. and you have yet to explain that "sympathy isnt earned, its given freely"
I know. you re a sad loser
You never asked for an explanation, however I have asked you to explain your dichotomy that you mentioned but you are unable to. Btw, what do you get out of calling people names, as a bratty child would do? Do you think intelligent people are the least bit bothered by it?
shareactually I did. I talked about your "morals of compassion" and said "I know tis really easy when you don't aha to actually support an argument."
because you kept not doing so. again what a sad fucking loser you are.
Again, where's the dichotomy?
I'm really amazed that you can't figure this out but here's a question for you:
Do you think the majority of people who help others are doing so because the people they help have earned their compassion/sympathy? People who volunteer to help drug addicts/alcoholics do so because their charges are such awesome, upstanding individuals? People working soup kitchens, etc?
They do so because their hearts are touched and they give freely to others, despite the fact their compassion wasn't earned.
FINALLY A COHERENT ANSWER. I think that the majority of people help others and are compassionate/sympathetic as part of our human. UNTIL SUCH TIME as a person loses any sort of sympathy.
If a guy is down on his luck and lost his job I have sympathy and compassion for him and try and help. if I find out he beats his wife for fun, he LOSES IT.
if I meet someone on the road who has been beaten up ill feel compassion and sympathy for them. until I find out he got beaten up because he was trying to rape a girl and the police are coming.
Again you don't seem to operate in reality. Some people are more or less compassionate and most people operate on the grounds that "you have my compassion until such time as you lose it". so yes. it is earned.
wow that was tough huh?
It IS tough for you!! AGAIN!! The dichotomy you're trying to avoid. Explain.
You somehow seem to have the idea that I have or suggest that others should have compassion for everyone but I never implied such a thing.
I said rush doesn't deserve sympathy because he is a monster. you said "Sympathy isn't earned. It's given freely, like compassion."
so trust isnt earned either? love isnt earned? again you make no sense
Who said trust isn't earned? I never said that although some are very trusting of people who haven't earned that trust. Same with love.
shareYes. It's sad the life people like Hitler and Stalin must have led, the things they experienced, that made them turn out that way.
So, yes, in a way i do pity them.
Don't you have any empathy for the human condition?
We are already taxed too much, and too much of the revenue is squandered, especially in California, where I live. That being said, being opposed to obamacare is more than just not wanting higher taxes. My wife and I are not wealthy, not even what anyone would call well-off. We're probably barely middle class. We had pretty good employer-provided health insurance, but the moment obamacare took effect our premiums and copayments doubled, and our annual deductible went from $300.00 to $4,000.00. Remember obama's promise that everyone could keep their same doctor? Well, thanks to obamacare, we lost ours. We can't really afford to go to a doctor or the emergency room anymore, either. Those are the reasons people like Limbaugh were against legislated insurance for everybody.
shareLOL,
It is always hilarious when psychos online always are glad at the deaths of those that have differing political views.
LOL, apparently opposing governments raising taxes and requiring different percentages for different people instead of one common, across the board % is worthy of death!
Online freaks are everywhere.
You have no clue about those who have little sympathy for someone like Limbaugh - it really has nothing to do with differing politics, but instead the character of a person.
He has shown no sympathy for others at all - for example, prior to his own drug addiction (which led to his deafness), he called for the death penalty for drug users; when he was obese and lost his weight (before gaining it back again) he hammered the obese as lazy and unwilling to change; look at his own morality - none; look at how many people he has visciously attacked throughout his life; kids, gays and so on. Hell, he even refused to criticize the tobacco industry through out his life (I have no idea what he says about tobacco use now, nor do I care to know).
Then, when he received his cancer diagnosis he never changed one iota and kept his behavior amped up. So it is character, not politics.
Whoa. Where do you get your information? He didn't call for the death penalty for drug abusers. What a crock. Nothing you said is true. What a crazy time we live in.
Name the last thing you didn't believe from the Left Twix factory.
Practice skepticism, please!
LOL.
Some internet guru is an expert on everything. I guess if some poster says it, it must be true.
Internet psycho is the ultimate judge of who is and isn't an evil person.
Internet dude read something and decries he isn't worthy of life.
Internet judge has determined he has "no morality"
LOL
what are you, like ten years old?
share