MovieChat Forums > Politics > Renting now cheaper than owning in all 5...

Renting now cheaper than owning in all 50 top cities




Thanks Biden!




Elevated mortgage rates and rising prices make home buying more expensive than renting in the top 50 metropolitan areas

Thanks to rising home prices and elevated mortgage rates, it's now cheaper to rent than it is to buy a home in all of America's biggest metropolitan areas, according to a new report by Realtor.com.

In its February monthly rent report, the company found that it's more affordable to rent than to buy a home in all of the top 50 metro areas in the U.S.

While it was already cheaper to rent than to buy in 90% of metro areas as of last year, a hot real-estate market has pushed that to 100%.

And it's the first time that has happened since Realtor.com began tracking renting versus buying in 2021.

"With rents continuing to fall and the cost of buying a home remaining high" due to mortgage rates and home prices, "renting a home is now a more cost-effective option in all major U.S. markets," Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com, said in a statement.

Realtor.com is operated by News Corp subsidiary Move Inc., and MarketWatch publisher Dow Jones is also a subsidiary of News Corp (NWS) (NWSA).

To be sure, buying a house is a form of forced savings that builds wealth via an asset that appreciates over time. But the current market is too expensive for many Americans, given the steep rise in borrowing costs and home prices, relative to rents, in recent years.

For instance, the median rent in the New York-Newark-Jersey City metro area was $2,852, which was far cheaper than the $4,995 monthly cost of buying.

Realtor.com calculates the monthly cost of buying a home by averaging the median listing prices of studio, one-bedroom and two-bedroom homes in a market; it is weighted by the number of listings in each market. It also assumes that buyers are putting down 8% on a home purchase with a mortgage rate of 6.78%, and the figures include taxes, insurance and any applicable homeowners association fees.

Why rents are falling in the Austin area

That gap between renting and buying is the widest in the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown area in Texas, where the median rent was $1,530, while the monthly cost of buying was $3,695 in February.

In other words, it was 142% more expensive to buy a home in that metropolitan area versus renting.

Rents were lower there in part because of increased supply. "There's definitely quite a bit of rentals on the market in certain neighborhoods," Cynthia Mattiza, an Austin-based real-estate agent with JBGoodwin, told MarketWatch.

Austin has seen a wave of new apartments hit the market in recent years, according to analysis by RealPage Analytics, a real-estate software company. In 2023, over 17,000 apartment units were added to the market in Austin, which increased the total inventory by 6%, the company said. The city is expected to see an 11.2% increase in apartment inventory this year.

The Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue metro area and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler area ranked second and third, with renting $2,422 and $1,528 per month cheaper than buying a home, respectively.

Nationally, rents fell across the board in February, Realtor.com said. The median rent was $1,708 overall, down 0.4% from a year ago.

Meanwhile, the 30-year mortgage rate marched upward in March, according to Freddie Mac data.

The median sale price of a home in March was $374,047, Redfin said in a blog post. That translates to a monthly mortgage payment of roughly $2,685 for a 30-year mortgage at a 6.74% rate.


https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20240330264/renting-is-now-cheaper-than-owning-in-all-of-americas-50-biggest-metro-areas

reply

"Thanks Biden!"

While I want to agree with this I'm not sure if Trump would be any better.

After all he is a failed businessman with multiple bankruptcies.
He can't run his own companies how is he expected to run the economics of a whole country?
Plus he is a landlord so he may be more on their side and encourage renting vs owning, unless that is to own to rent to others.

I'll blame Biden but I need it to be justified.

reply

Failed businessman?

He's worth billions. Sure, he had a head start, but none of his siblings are billionaires so he must have some type of skill.

And we know Trump was better because housing was far cheaper while he was POTUS. There's a lot of factors, but the easiest to prevent would be to not aid illegal invaders into the USA, which causes a housing shortage.

reply

how much were the houses *before* Trump was POTUS?
even cheaper?

reply

Yep. They increased with inflation rate for the most part.

Now, real estate has gained value many times the supposed inflation rate under Biden.

reply

Is it real value or another 2007 bubble? Remember...banks are doing DEI Loans right now.

_______________________________________________
Current MC Posters with B1cKsurN Derangement Syndrome
Skavau
Keelai
robocat893

reply

"ep. They increased with inflation rate for the most part.

Now, real estate has gained value many times the supposed inflation rate under Biden."

I will agree with this since they say that the proxy war with Russia is a reason for inflation.
And we can blame warmongering OLD geezer Joe for that and not Trump.

reply

Trump's old administration was put together by Mitch McConnell. That's now gone. Trump's admin will be nothing but culture war shenanigans and election denialism.

reply

Which will be better than Biden's high treason of invading the USA with tens of millions of illegal immigrants and plundering the treasury for Ukraine and Israel.

Personally, I'm voting RFK Jr.

reply

failed businessman


You need to do your homework, man... Trump's business success rating is 92%.

_______________________________________________
Current MC Posters with B1cKsurN Derangement Syndrome
Skavau
Keelai
robocat893

reply

Not with the casinos, steaks, "University," water, booze, airline and all other products he put his name on.

As a Businessman, Trump Was the Biggest Loser of All
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/as-a-businessman-trump-was-the-biggest-loser-of-all

reply

That's great but you are pointing out his 8% failures... the other 92% successes still exist.

_______________________________________________
Current MC Posters with B1cKsurN Derangement Syndrome
Skavau
Keelai
robocat893

reply

As the article points out if he didn't have so many failures then he wouldn't have so many loses.

92%?
That's a bit high.
Where are you getting that number from?

reply

I can't find the article...it was from 2016, so I'm sure it's been deleted off the web...

If I put my name on 1000 products, and 80 of them fail. That's 92%.... 80 is a lot of things to harp on while ignoring the others.

I could endlessly write articles about 1 person's 80 failed business ventures. The common person doesn't even own 1 business so 80 is a lot to them.

_______________________________________________
Current MC Posters with B1cKsurN Derangement Syndrome
Skavau
Keelai
robocat893

reply

They don’t comprehend ratios or percentages. They are too blindsided by simple numbers.

reply

Don't even get me started on the Per Capita nonsense lol.

_______________________________________________
Current MC Posters with B1cKsurN Derangement Syndrome
Skavau
Keelai
robocat893

reply

You will rent everything and be happy.

Start being happy.

Or else.

reply

IMPEACH JOE!

reply

Not Biden. Wall Street is the problem. Large corporate investors are buying thousands of houses.
https://www.toptal.com/finance/real-estate/wall-street-buying-single-family-homes

I've been complaining about rich investors driving up house values for years.

reply

Ok.

And who is the candidate of choice of said investors?

That's right, it's overwhelmingly Biden due to Biden's policies.

Just look up who Blackrock donates to.

reply

Blackrock and Wall Street ARE Israel.

_______________________________________________
Current MC Posters with B1cKsurN Derangement Syndrome
Skavau
Keelai
robocat893

reply

I just found out of the Blackrock/Ukraine connection.
That Biden wants the war to help out BR and other MIC companies who gain from war at the cost of civilian lives.

Do you know if Biden is invested in BR and other MIC contractors so that he can gain profits off of war the way Dumbya and Prick Cheney went to war with Iraq to increase bank accounts for them and their buddies?

reply

Worse than that.

A reason why Biden supported the Iraq War and was W's biggest cheerleader is because he wanted government contracts.

Joe's brother Jim, despite having no experience building housing, got awarded a $1.5 billion project building affordable housing in Iraq.

https://nypost.com/2012/10/23/crony-capitalism-joe-bidens-brother/

This is far from an isolated incident of Biden's family members being given suspicious money.

reply

Damn, the corruption runs deep in that family.

It's all bad.

reply

"Biden due to Biden's policies."

Specifically define these policies. I'm positive you won't because they don't exist.

Biden is attempting to stop rich investors that Republicans support and create more affordable housing:

"President Biden believes housing costs are too high, and significant investments are needed to address the large shortage of affordable homes inherited from his predecessor and that has been growing for more than a decade. During his State of the Union Address, President Biden will call on Congressional Republicans to end years of inaction and pass legislation to lower costs by providing a $10,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers and people who sell their starter homes; build and renovate more than 2 million homes; and lower rental costs. President Biden also announced new steps to lower homebuying and refinancing closing costs and crack down on corporate actions that rip off renters."
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/03/07/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-plan-to-lower-housing-costs-for-working-families/

"Biden Targets $41 Billion Tax Break for Rich Real Estate Investors

The U.S. president wants to cut back a tax break that allows investors to keep buying and selling properties without paying capital gains."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-28/1031-exchange-biden-pushes-to-end-real-estate-investment-tax-break

reply

Um. Okay. That was a great rant I suppose, but it's missing the forest for the trees.

The number one policy that is driving home prices is immigration. It's not even close.

All other issues are not even close to this one factor. More immigration, less houses to go around and higher prices.

Of course, there's other policies that contribute like Biden putting tarriffs on Canadian lumber companies that increase housing construction, as well as DEI and such, but massive immigration is the majority of the problem here.

Biden giving first time home buyers a $10,000 credit (something he hasn't actually done, by the way) is not going to change anything...but it feels good to say and distracts from the real problems of massive immigration and inflation.

Likewise $41 billion? (Once again, something he hasn't actually done). Given that he has the debt increasing at $1 trillion every 90 days, this is nothing.

And speaking of the debt increasing (which is the second biggest cause of inflation), Blackrock is all for the wars Joe Biden is financing in Ukraine and Israel.

reply

The $10,000 credit and funds to build new housing have to be approved by Republican-controlled Congress.

Trump gave a huge tax cut to billionaires which added trillions to the debt. That has nothing to do with house values.

The U.S. birthrate is low. Immigration helps replace the population, helps the economy by providing needed workers and entrepreneurs, and much needed tax revenue.

Ukraine military expense is only 5% of the annual military budget and has weakened our enemy Russia militarily and economically. Hundreds of thousands of Russians have fled Russia for a reason.

re: Israel: Presently, AIPAC owns both political parties. That will likely change in the future. Right now, AIPAC is the 3rd rail and no politician will go against them.

You're 100% wrong about the root cause of high housing prices. It started before the 2007 Subprime Mortgage Crisis and Collapse. Buying new houses was becoming unaffordable for regular folks, therefore politicians and legislators dumped Glass-Steagall to keep housing prices from falling to keep homeowning voters happy. This allowed subprime mortgages to be given to poorer Americans who should never have been given them. Many ended up losing their homes.

After the collapse, the politicians wanted to remove surplus houses from the market to restore value. They invited corporate investors to buy them and gave them a huge taxbreak. This move is the #1 reason why housing prices are unaffordable. Regular folks are competing with multi-billion corporate investors to buy a house. Even smaller pro investors have very deep pockets. These smaller investors then flip the house they buy and sell them at a greater price. Larger investors have become landlords who charge whatever they want.

Bankers and Wall Street are not your friends. You need to stop shilling for them.

reply

Mass immigration does not "help the economy" for anyone middle class or lower. It does, however, give the illusion of economic growth since it increases GDP, but not GDP per capita. With a lower birthrate and elimination of immigration, housing would be far more affordable. This can't be understated.


You're wrong about bankers not being your friends. The local banks have a financial tie to the local community. Now, large banks and Wall Street are not my friends...but those aren't the people giving me loans.

You have a lot of misconceptions about rental homes. I'm a property manager for a living, by the way.

reply

Not true. Both Republicans and Democrats were pro-immigration until Trump. Both parties were aware about the benefits to the economy.

The economy is roaring. Immigration is a key reason.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/02/27/economy-immigration-border-biden/

Immigrants Make Economies More Dynamic, Increase Employment Growth
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2023/02/23/immigrants-make-economies-more-dynamic-increase-employment-growth/?sh=16d65954427c

The U.S. Economy Is Surpassing Expectations. Immigration Is One Reason.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/29/business/economy/immigrants-labor.html

https://www.cbpp.org/research/immigrants-contribute-greatly-to-us-economy-despite-administrations-public-charge-rule

Millions of mortgage loans were made to unqualified people which wrecked the economy when the rates went up. Banks didn't care because they sold their loans to investors. Are you denying this?

You're assuming incorrectly that I have never had any professional involvement in our topics including real estate.

You're a xenophobe who is blinded by your hatred. I can link from credible sources because I am using facts.

reply

"Credible sources"? LOL. You literally linked to opinion pieces. Lauren Kaori Gurley is the author of your Washington Compost article and her degrees are in literature and latin American studies, lol. That would explain the lack of economic data to support the outrageous claims that the economy is somehow "good" and that importing massive amounts of unskilled labor is somehow beneficial.


Yes, both parties were pro-immigrant....just like they were both pro war before Trump. That doesn't make them correct and neither was nearly as pro illegal immigration as the Biden admin is.

reply

Florida is among the worst with housing costs. The issue is not enough homes versus the amount of buyers. It has nothing to do with Biden and even became a problem before Biden was even in office. You are very clearly exhibiting Biden Derangement Syndrome.

reply

And this issue driving this is mass immigration.

It's not "Biden Derangement Syndrome" to point out how Biden is objectively worse than any President since at least the Reconstruction. It's just facts.

reply

The mass immigration in Florida are from Cubans, and they support Trump over Biden.

reply

I don't live near any major US city...but right now in 2024, I'm currently paying less for my house(2700sq/ft) than I'd be paying for my old 1 bedroom apartment(450sq/ft) had I stayed there and not bought my house in 2018.

That's insane.

_______________________________________________
Current MC Posters with B1cKsurN Derangement Syndrome
Skavau
Keelai
robocat893

reply

Location! Location! Location! Was the apartment in your present neighborhood or a high-demand trendy area?

Mortgage rates were less in 2018.

Investors drive-up the value. They were given huge tax breaks too which should be removed. Millions of houses and rental apartments need to be created. The Federal government would need to lead by creating, and subsidizing them like they did after WW2. Also, zoning laws need to be changed nationwide which suburbanites have fought. Changing zoning laws would allow less expensive apartment buildings to be built.

reply

I've lived in the same town for 15 years. A small suburban town that every section is in demand.

Renting also builds literally no equity. Being a homeowner allows you to make money using your assets as collateral.

Owing is better than renting in almost every way except maintenance.

_______________________________________________
Current MC Posters with B1cKsurN Derangement Syndrome
Skavau
Keelai
robocat893

reply

I meant an apartment in a trendy section will be more expensive than a house in a less trendy section which is the reason I asked about location.

Renting vs buying depends on personal circumstances. I know people who lost their house in a disaster and were still required to pay the mortgage. Meanwhile, insurers were slow to pay for rebuilding years later. A renter can just walk away.

I thought Kato Kaelin's living situation was the best. He lived rent-free in his friend's guest house. He saved a fortune.

reply

" I know people who lost their house in a disaster and were still required to pay the mortgage."

I very much doubt that this is the case.

For one thing, banks require you to have insurance on a house. Most even put it into your loan payments and call it the "escrow" portion. They also usually pay the property taxes in a similar matter. Since the bank is the payee on the policy, this shouldn't force a mortgagee to be stuck holding the bag.

reply

"You must continue to pay your mortgage even if your home is destroyed or unlivable due to a disaster."
https://www.americanfinancing.net/mortgage-basics/natural-disasters

That spooked me from spending a lot on any house. I asked about his house a few years later and was told they still hadn't rebuilt. Insurance companies didn't want to pay, therefore were giving homeowners a hard time which the news reported. There was also a huge delay for homeowners with repair money because so many houses were destroyed at the same time.

It was major natural disaster. Numerous apartment buildings are still in the middle of repairs even though many years have passed including the one I used to live in. Climate change.

reply

Um, so the bank didn't make him have adequate insurance and/or didn't care when the insurance didn't pay the bank for the home that got destroyed? Banks would have had him list them as a payee in the event of a claim.

Yeah, this is a made-up story.

"Lenders will likely require that you carry enough insurance to cover the amount of your loan. For instance, if you bought your home for $300,000 with a $60,000 down payment, your lender will want you to have at least $240,000 worth of dwelling coverage. However, we always recommend insuring your home for its full replacement cost to ensure it could be replaced in the event it’s ever destroyed."

https://www.thezebra.com/homeowners-insurance/guide/lender-requirements/

reply

You can buy enough home insurance in which the claim is later denied when needed.
There is no way you're a property manager if you don't know this. You live in your mom's basement.
https://www.vosslawfirm.com/blog/appealing-a-homeowners-property-damage-denial-in-texas.cfm

https://www.fhlawgroup.com/common-reasons-texas-insurers-deny-homeowners-claims-and-what-to-do/amp/

https://www.ticerlawfirm.com/insurance-coverage/insurance-claims-denial/

Anyway, I didn't say he was denied. I wrote that his house hadn't been rebuilt years later and he still had to pay his mortgage. Other people were being denied or given a hard time. rif.org You're welcome.

Furthermore, a bank would never require a homeowner to have insurance covering a specific situation if it historically didn't occur in the area. For instance, earthquake insurance for an area that doesn't get them.

reply

Read the link. No you can not as the bank requires you to have at least coverage for what you owe them and require you to list them as the payee. They honestly don't care if you're out of a house, but they do care if you default on the money they lent you.


The exception, which you've touched on, would be sinkholes, earthquakes, landslides, and such. You are correct that those rare events wouldn't be covered by just homeowners insurance.

reply

You left out a few other natural disasters. I just googled and the article said insurance coverage was through a government program since private insurers don't cover on their own. I think FEMA.

Anyway, years later and fewer homeowners are insured because of costs, etc.. according to various news sites.

I know another government agency is refusing to pay residents whose homes were more recently hit with a natural disaster - ongoing lawsuits.

It's likely that most homeowners wouldn't be covered since the disaster was a complete anomaly. I just know they were slow to rebuild.

Banks will foreclose when you don't pay. When foreclosure starts, they want the entire mortgage payment all at once.

You're forgetting one important part. If you were paying 30% of your income on a home that had been destroyed, you still have to live somewhere which will cost you more money, therefore you're paying a mortgage AND rent. You have to hope the government helps by paying for rent.

reply

"According to the Insurance Information Institute, 15% to 20% of Florida homeowners are forgoing coverage, more than the 12% national average."

reply

Correct. But not Florida home owners with bank loans.

reply

Large corporate investors are buying trailer parks in Florida and nationwide then raising rents.

"Investors Are Buying Mobile Home Parks. Residents Are Paying a Price.

Across the country, corporate landlords are expanding manufactured housing portfolios and driving up rents, pushing longtime residents out."
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/27/us/mobile-home-park-ownership-costs.html

"Hedge funds vs. homeowners: Entire mobile home parks are being bought by investors

Residents received a 90-day rent increase notice from the park’s new owner, Big Oaks MHP LLC.

Lasure’s monthly rent for the land beneath her home that she owns jumped almost 60% -- from $440 a month to almost $700"
https://www.wftv.com/news/action9/companies-are-buying-local-mobile-home-parks-jacking-up-rent/IRS5YMZYKNBMPIP7BITU5XPHKA/

That's rich people screwing over regular folks - not immigrants.

Also, luxury apartments are built instead of middle-class housing. They're bought by foreign investors to park their money. They don't even live in them.

Rich vs everyone else started in the 1600s. Read history books about labor and how horrible workers were treated.
"A People's History of the United States: 1492-Present" by Howard Zinn

Trump is rich and exploits working-class and migrants. He hired illegals! He refused to pay working-class contractors and other small business owners.

You're repeating his BS instead of educating yourself. Trump was the one who told Republican-majority Congress not to sign a bipartisan tough immigration bill because his campaign is about fearmongering instead of solving problems. Where the Hell is that wall he never built when both Houses were Republican-majority?
He did nothing for two years when he could have.

Use your critical-thinking skills instead of mindlessly repeating talking points.

I'm not a fan of either party, but historically conservatives tend to help the rich and large businesses at the expense of everyone else. Republicans want to diminish Soc. Sec., Medicare & dump Obamacare while giving the rich another tax cut they don't need. That harms regular folks!

reply

What a shock to see you refer to (((Zinn's))) book as an authoritative source on American history.

Our views on many of these matters are probably closer than you think, but to point to a con artist like that doesn't reflect well on your ability to discern reputable sources of information. Even if you were in complete agreement with Zinn's politics, did it escape your notice that his book (which I own and have read) paints "The People" as perpetual losers who are foiled at every turn by those crafty elites? Every single chapter of the book ends with the plucky underdog getting squashed or outwitted.

Republicans want to diminish Soc. Sec., Medicare & dump Obamacare while giving the rich another tax cut they don't need. That harms regular folks!

I agree that tax cuts to the rich should not be on the table but are you serious about Obamacare? Since the enactment of that monstrosity, everyone's premiums and costs have gone up while coverage has become more limited. It's been a disaster by any metric. The true harm to regular folks came from that half-baked handout to special interests.

reply

Link:

"Governments Begin Pushing Back on Investors Snatching Up Homes

Institutional investors purchased nearly 20% of all U.S. homes for sale in the last three months of 2021, turning most into rentals. Now, some state and local officials want to slow the trend, worried it is boxing residents out of homeownership.

As real estate investors scoop up bulk quantities of single-family homes in the Sun Belt and elsewhere, some state and local officials are trying to make it more difficult to convert that property into rentals.

In the fourth quarter of 2021, institutional investors spent approximately $50 billion to buy more than 80,000 homes—18.4% of all homes purchased in the U.S. and nearly 75% of them single-family homes, according to the real estate company Redfin. More than three-quarters of the purchases were paid in cash.

In Atlanta, investors last year bought 32.7% of all homes for sale—the highest share in any major city—followed by 32.1% in Charlotte, North Carolina, and 29.8% in Jacksonville, Florida. And investors purchased more than 27% of homes for sale in Las Vegas, Phoenix and Miami.

In addition, the number of new single-family homes built as rentals increased by 16% last year, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

Officials in the Atlanta suburb of College Park, where 75% of its approximately 14,000 residents are renters, turned away one developer who requested permits for a build-to-rent subdivision of new single-family homes that would never be offered for sale.

“We were not interested in that,” Motley Broom said. “We’re interested in building pathways to wealth through homeownership for members of our community.”

Great Recession Starts the Trend

Before 2010, corporate landlords were absent from the single-family rental home market. But the recession of 2007 to 2009 left in its wake more than 6 million homes in foreclosure. Two dozen or so private equity firms stepped in and scooped them up and then continued to buy more, made easier by a hefty surge in foreclosures related to the pandemic.

They converted most of those properties to rentals, taking them off the for-sale market and, according to housing advocates, driving up the price of real estate and exacerbating the shortage of affordable homes."
https://www.route-fifty.com/infrastructure/2022/07/while-investors-are-snatching-homes-governments-fight-save-properties-residents/368927/

I told you the above info in my last comment. Great idea is to make it harder for investors to rent them out. All municipalities should do that

reply

"it's the first time that has happened since Realtor.com began tracking renting versus buying in 2021."

Just began collecting data in 2021? Sounds reliable...

reply

Renting should be cheaper. It should be a lot cheaper. The problem is rents went up 50% since Biden was inserted via the rigged election. Mortgage payments have gone up over 100% in 3 years. Just calculate the payment on a $400k house at 3% in 2020 vs the same house for $750k at 7% today.

This is what happens when…
- Democrats cut off oil drilling and coal production
- Democrats spend with no concern of the national debt.
- Democrats lockdown small business, pass trillions in stimulus that doesn’t go to the American people.
- Democrats raising minimum wage 100% in 5 years.

Inflation.

Like weve all been saying would happen when Democrats wanted lockdowns longer than 2 weeks. They’d rather destroy the country than to lose power. It’s been this way since they were taken over by Soviet communists in the 1960s.

reply

Not true:
https://www.route-fifty.com/infrastructure/2022/07/while-investors-are-snatching-homes-governments-fight-save-properties-residents/368927/

Investors bought millions of houses driving up the value.

reply

Investors are a symptom of the disease, not the cause of it.

Obviously when interest rates shot up due to government overspending causing inflation, this made cash buyers much more likely to purchase homes since many working class Americans couldn't afford the higher payments to the bank....in addition to higher payments for taxes and insurance and higher expenses for repairs.

Likewise, when Biden opened up the border, this caused a drastic population increase that caused rents to go up as well. Supply and demand.

In addition, if home prices weren't surging due to government caused inflation, investors wouldn't be buying so many. Since they are beating the market, investors are drawn to real property in times of high inflation.

If investors weren't buying the homes, nobody would be. It wouldn't even be profitable to build new ones. The only way to reduce housing costs in the short term is to begin a massive deportation campaign to bring the supply of empty homes up.

reply

No credible link provided as usual.

Typical delusional Trumpite.

reply

Firstly, I support RFK Jr.

Secondly, you can use Zillow and look at home prices going up year over year.

Third, I'm not exactly espousing any extreme economic principles here.

Fourth, I'm a property manager and am using what I see every single day at work as my source. This means you questioning my experience would be the equivalent of me trying to argue that McDonald's uses peanut oil instead of canola oil in the fry machine despite your extensive experience in the field.

reply

You support a kook with zero chance of winning which is fine with me since you would've voted for the other kook, Trump.

Not extreme. Wrong.

"After accounting for inflation, home prices have jumped 118% since 1965, while income has only increased by 15%"
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/10/home-prices-are-now-rising-much-faster-than-incomes-studies-show.html

That's not Biden.

Similar situation with rents. You could have a minimum wage job in a fast food restaurant and easily afford a 1-bedroom apartment during the 1960s. Now two midrange incomes are needed.

The problem is that paychecks remained flat for decades while the costs of everything went up especially in the 1970s when the rich, with Republican help, attacked FDR policies which helped most Americans become middle-class.

"Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History is a nonfiction book by Kurt Andersen

Evil Geniuses examines coordinated efforts to implement conservative economical and political policies in the United States from the 1970s to 2020, and discusses how the resulting unfettered laissez-faire approach to capitalism has resulted in an extreme level of economic inequality. "
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil_Geniuses:_The_Unmaking_of_America

Inflation didn't start 3 years ago.

You believe immigration just started 3 years ago. Immigration has been ongoing for centuries. Furthermore, immigrants don't settle in every part of the country equally. Most of the country doesn't have immigrants moving into the area, therefore home prices should NOT be rising according to you.

You collect rent and phone for repairs. Big deal! I have numerous law books on my desk at work and deal with the mess left by greedy investors, idiot politicians and legislators and their victims.

reply

Mass immigration actually started in the time frame you stated. Specifically with the Immigration and Nationality act of 1965, which you accidentally quoted as being the tipping point of inflation in your post. LOL. Unintentional comedy.

Now, we've never had immigration near the level that Biden has allowed, which is why things got worse so rapidly.

And your source, "Evil Geniuses", doesn't even cover the Biden period of mass inflation and misery! Honestly, I can't make this up how delusional and off topic you are.

And "most of the country doesn't have immigrants"? Huh? 17% of all Americans were born in another country!

That's an astronomical number that is driving up housing prices.

reply

No, mass immigration started in the 1800s, then dipped and rose again.

"Nearly half (45%) of the nation’s immigrants live in just three states: California (24%), Texas (11%) and Florida (10%)."
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/08/20/key-findings-about-u-s-immigrants/

Nope! Your salary has stagnated because of Republican failed trickle-down economics and tax cuts for the rich described in Evil Geniuses:

"After accounting for inflation, home prices have jumped 118% since 1965, while income has only increased by 15%"

You need to find a way to earn more money instead of looking for scapegoats in regard to your failure tto afford a house.

reply

No, wages have stagnated because politicians like Biden flooded the market with cheap labor.

Not everyone can be a leech on the system and be a lawyer. Some of us have to do real work to pay for the illegal invaders' benefits.

I find it ironic that you're telling me to pull myself up by my bootstraps and stop complaining about the lassez faire policies Biden has on the border.

By the way, as a property manager, I'm doing great financially as a direct result of Biden's disastrous policies....but I'm seeing my country destroyed by Biden.

reply

Someone doing well wouldn't be complaining about not having money to buy a house and then scapegoat immigrants for Reaganomics.

reply

Did I complain about me not having a house?

Reagan was 40 years ago. Biden is president and has been for years.

reply

Salary stagnation and wealth gap started in 1970s and escalated under Reaganomics. The book details which laws, policies and taxes were changed. I observed most of the changes in real time.

Have you heard of the “The Powell Memo” ?
https://billmoyers.com/content/the-powell-memo-a-call-to-arms-for-corporations/

reply

How awful that you support flooding our neighborhoods with cultural and linguistic aliens. They make our cities materially less safe, they drain the resources of our tax base, and they drive down the wages the people who produce and service the goods making your life comfortable. I can't imagine how spiteful one has to be in order to crap on her neighbors like that.

reply

Says the descendant of immigrants.

reply

What kind of immigrants? From where? When did they arrive? How did they sustain themselves?

You don't know the answer to any of those questions, but you felt smarmy enough to think you were making some kind of point. You weren't. Further, you're implying that immigrants, no matter their country of origin, are without distinction. If your neighborhood was suddenly hit with an influx of Congolese, or an influx of South Koreans, or an influx of Norwegians, you'd know the difference. And believe me, if it was sub-Saharan Africans, you'd have a "For Sale" sign up in your yard faster than you can say "Century 21". Your type are all the same, talk like MLK but live like the KKK.

reply

You hate all immigration.
Typical MAGA bigot.

reply

You're right, I do wish to stop all immigration posthaste. Why? Because I live here, that's the only justification I need. Since you take the opposite tack and wish to irreversibly alter my circumstances, you need to make the very convincing case as to why you're justified in doing so. Otherwise, I reserve the right to forcibly stop you in your tracks.

I'm not MAGA, but as for the bigot charge I've already been over this with you. That's your morality and not mine. What you're engaging in (without realizing that you've been programmed to do so) is an attempt to paint my virtues as vices. But I'm on to your game; it's a tired act and it won't work on me.

reply

maixiu = xenophobe

reply

And you didn't tell us what you'd do if your neighborhood suddenly became majority African. Pray, tell us how delightful it would be to live amongst such vibrancy!

reply

maixiu = racist

reply

Nice dodge. What would you do, Keelai, if your neighborhood became majority black? It's something you advocate for others, so what would you do? Why are you so afraid to tell us the truth, that you'd hiring a moving van at the earliest practicable opportunity? As I said, talk like MLK, live like the KKK.

reply

" if your neighborhood suddenly became majority African."
" if your neighborhood became majority black?"

That's your fear, bigot. Stop projecting your hatred and ignorance onto other people.

reply

We all know the answer, despite your unwillingness to provide it. Under your paper-thin veneer of tolerance, you know there's a huge difference among people. The fact that you currently choose not to live among blacks is proof positive that you understand this.

reply

You're projecting, bigot!

reply

It's a good thing that "Operation Warp Speed" prevented a 5-12 year lockdown.

reply

It was a grand slam. They were saying a minimum of 5 years for a vaccine. (Back when vaccines were thought to be legitimate).

We had no tests or testing centers. Trump got the heads of multiple retail organizations together to provide areas for testing. And tests were completed in record time.

Meanwhile Democrats were standing around with their dick in their hands doing nothing.

reply

Build Back Better working as intended

reply