And that interracial gay kiss was immediately followed by an interracial hetero kiss to send "The Message." CNN, Fox News, CBS, NBC and Hulu all showed this. https://x.com/thevivafrei/status/1741690776315179244?s=20
shareSo what? Why does that bother you so much?
shareShut up, groomer.
shareNice... Why do homosexuals and interracial couples bother you so much? Do you even know any homosexual or interracial couples? You really are a dumbass.
shareShut up, heterophobe. You wouldn't have been born without hetero coupling.
shareSo you hate other Americans just because you don't like their lifestyle? Of course I wouldn't have been born without hetero coupling. What a stupid thing to say. You are obviously very stupid and frightened of people who are different from you. You must be miserable.
shareDisgust =/= "Fear"
You guys really love projecting "fear" onto people's disgust...why is that?
What is "disgusting" about it?
shareTwo dudes kissing? Beats me, but nature made most of us this way.
For a reason.
Straight women and gay men would not find that "disgusting"
shareAnd they choose a way of life where they can never reproduce and pass their DNA onto future generations.
They are doing it completely wrong.
The designer's did it intend to do things that way.
>And they choose a way of life where they can never reproduce and pass their DNA onto future generations.
Straight women chose this? Or are you referring to the gay men kissing?
So?
>They are doing it completely wrong.
Based on what?
>The designer's did it intend to do things that way.
I don't give a fuck what you think 'god' intends. I'm not a christian
You dont have to believe in god.
The way they choose to have sex is completely wrong.
That area of the body is designed as an exit for the toxic waste of the body.
It was specifically designed for things not to go in but only out.
And like I said they are choosing a lifestyle where they can never reproduce.
It's almost nature's way of stopping their DNA from passing onto future generations.
Many examples of historic family names around for multiple generations.
And because of their lifestyle, they cannot reproduce and thr family name is forever erased in history
>You dont have to believe in god.
Your position is rooted in the presupposition of a 'god' designing us for specific intent.
>The way they choose to have sex is completely wrong.
Based on what?
>That area of the body is designed as an exit for the toxic waste of the body.
You know plenty of straight men and women have anal and oral sex, right?
>And like I said they are choosing a lifestyle where they can never reproduce.
Okay. So? Although they can still have kids via surrogacy or sperm donation.
>It's almost nature's way of stopping their DNA from passing onto future generations.
Except that's not how homosexuality works.
>And because of their lifestyle, they cannot reproduce and thr family name is forever erased in history
Again: If they wanted to they could donate sperm, or do surrogacy. But what's the relevance here?
To donate sperm would require a highly intelligent society
Far from anything natural.
Science and scientist say it's an exit only toxic waste area.
In layman's terms.
Scientifically they studied natural lubrication and design and determined its exit only.
>To donate sperm would require a highly intelligent society
People literally donate sperm right now.
>Far from anything natural.
Who cares?
>Science and scientist say it's an exit only toxic waste area.
Straight people still do this.
>Scientifically they studied natural lubrication and design and determined its exit only.
In any case. Who cares?
My guy, why does not using something in its natural way for pleasure matter to you in the first place? You being on this website on a computer instead of living like a caveman is going against your evolution, yet you do it because you like it.
shareMe being on this website did not prevent my dna and family name from disappearing from earth.
Many families have been doing this for generations. And today it's very popular for people to end that. Its completely unnatural.
Dont ask me..ask entire countries like Africa, the middle east, Russia, China.
>Dont ask me..ask entire countries like Africa, the middle east, Russia, China.
Ah yes, the famous country of Africa.
It's not banned universally in Africa. Africa is a continent, not a single country. It's banned mostly in the Middle East because they are Islamists. It's somewhat restricted in China, which is a totalitarian state.
Are you proposing you support those things? Are you proposing the USA should attack LGBT peoples first amendment rights?
So what? That's such a strange reason to be against it lol, and I thought you'd like that they weren't passing on their gay genes.
There are also bi people that have kids, gay people that have had sex with the opposite gender, lesbian couples can get a sperm donor, and surrogates for male couples.
At the end of the day though, it's just something people do for happiness, and not everyone needs to have kids.
I see you edited your comment with the country bit, and I don't even know what to say lol. If those fucked up places are something you look up to for their policies, then you have greater issues than being religious.
Because it doesn't need to be forced down people throats(which the gays love to do to each other).
Forced participation is going to have grave consequences down the road.
Seeing two gay people kissing is "forcing it down people's throats"?
>(which the gays love to do to each other).
Do you think straight people don't like kissing?
That is precisely why they should keep their degeneracy, perversion and depravity in the privacy of their homes and not expose themselves to children in any way.
shareWhy should they do that? Who gives a fuck if it's supposedly "unnatural" There's nothing wrong with two gay men kissing. Just as there is nothing wrong with a heterosexual couple kissing. It's no different than kids seeing their parents kiss, or their random people in the street kiss.
shareAre you OK with confusing children? Yes or No?
shareNo reason to think it "confuses children" anymore than seeing a straight man and woman kiss. Loaded question. I'll ask again.
Why should they do that? Who gives a fuck if it's supposedly "unnatural" There's nothing wrong with two gay men kissing. Just as there is nothing wrong with a heterosexual couple kissing. It's no different than kids seeing their parents kiss, or their random people in the street kiss.
Answer the question:
Are you OK with confusing children? Yes or No?
THE QUESTION IS DISINGENUOUS...KNOWING AND OR SEEING THAT PEOPLE OF ALL KINDS LOVE PEOPLE OF ALL KINDS IS NOT CONFUSING...IT IS COMORTING AND NATURAL.
shareI don't accept the premise that it is "confusing children". Your question is a loaded question rooted in a false dichtonomy.
Also you ignore almost all of my question, so I see no reason why I should ever answer anything by you again.
--
Why should they do that? Who gives a fuck if it's supposedly "unnatural" There's nothing wrong with two gay men kissing. Just as there is nothing wrong with a heterosexual couple kissing. It's no different than kids seeing their parents kiss, or their random people in the street kiss.
Fascist scumbag.
It is a simple Yes or No answer.
Are you OK with confusing children? Yes or No?
I don't accept the premise that it is "confusing children". Your question is a loaded question rooted in a false dichtonomy.
Also you ignore almost all of my question, so I see no reason why I should ever answer anything by you again.
--
Why should they do that? Who gives a fuck if it's supposedly "unnatural" There's nothing wrong with two gay men kissing. Just as there is nothing wrong with a heterosexual couple kissing. It's no different than kids seeing their parents kiss, or their random people in the street kiss.
Fascist scumbag.
Ignoring the fact that the question you posed is deliberately biased, and loaded, you refuse to answer many of my questions that are "yes" or "no" questions.
You piece of shit fascist hypocrite
Are you OK with confusing children? Yes or No?
shareIgnoring the fact that the question you posed is deliberately biased, and loaded, you refuse to answer many of my questions that are "yes" or "no" questions.
You piece of shit fascist hypocrite
A simple question with a simple answer, Yes or No.
Are you OK with confusing children? Yes or No?
Ignoring the fact that the question you posed is deliberately biased, and loaded, you refuse to answer many of my questions that are "yes" or "no" questions.
You piece of shit fascist hypocrite
Bullshit excuses and deflection.
Are you OK with confusing children? Yes or No?
Ignoring the fact that the question you posed is deliberately biased, and loaded, you refuse to answer many of my questions that are "yes" or "no" questions.
You piece of shit fascist hypocrite
In that case, my statement that you defend and support child groomers stands.
shareNo, it does not. Your question is loaded. Children seeing gay people doesn't necessarily "confuse" them nor is it remotely equivalent to "grooming" anymore than a child seeing an older sibling with their girlfriend is grooming. You don't seem to know what the definition of "grooming" actually is.
You fascist weirdo.
It was a simple question, your refusal to provide a simple answer is confirmation that you defend and support child groomers.
shareNo, it was a disingenuous loaded question.
"Are you OK with confusing children? Yes or No?"
Children seeing gay people doesn't necessarily "confuse" them nor is it remotely equivalent to "grooming" anymore than a child seeing an older sibling with their girlfriend is grooming. Your question is rooted in a false premise. You don't seem to know what the definition of "grooming" actually is.
Fascist.
If you or anyone else were to ask me that same question, my answer would be "No".
See how simple that is?
You refuse to answer because you don't want to admit the truth.
>If you or anyone else were to ask me that same question, my answer would be "No".
Because it's a crafted question that suits your bias.
I don't want to see children "confused" (in a general sense), but I also don't think that them being made aware that gay people exist "confuses" them.
Biased or not, it is the truth backed by convictions.
You have neither truth nor convictions.
You only have deflections and bullshit excuses.
>Biased or not, it is the truth backed by convictions.
What "truth"?
>You have neither truth nor convictions.
I literally answered your question (although noted the loaded bias in it): I don't want to see children "confused" (in a general sense), but I also don't think that them being made aware that gay people exist "confuses" them.
Bullshit, you provided deflective excuses.
shareWhat "truth" is somehow embedded in your question of "Do you want to confuse children"?
---
I literally answered your question (although noted the loaded bias in it): I don't want to see children "confused" (in a general sense), but I also don't think that them being made aware that gay people exist "confuses" them.
🤣
shareMaybe its a conspiracy to stop people from watching tv at new years eve and do something fun ?
shareIts banned in Russia, banned in Africa, banned in the middle east, banned in China.
In the u.s. they make up maybe 5% of the population. And the elite in Hollywood are pushing this narrative that 95% of the population dont want to see
>Its banned in Russia, banned in Africa, banned in the middle east, banned in China.
It's not banned universally in Africa. Africa is a continent, not a single country. It's banned mostly in the Middle East because they are Islamists. It's somewhat restricted in China, which is a totalitarian state.
Are you proposing you support those things? Are you proposing the USA should attack LGBT peoples first amendment rights?
>In the u.s. they make up maybe 5% of the population. And the elite in Hollywood are pushing this narrative that 95% of the population dont want to see
What "narrative" is this? Do you think everyone who isn't LGBT objects to seeing LGBT people depicted?
American TV is pretty gay, so what did you expect? Degeneracy is the order of the day now...
shareYou think being gay is in itself "degenerate"?
shareIt's not an opinion.
shareWhat makes it "degenerate"? What is your working understanding of the word "degenerate"?
shareShoving your penis up a dudes poop-chute is fucking gross, and unnatural. It's also the least sexiest thing you can show on TV. I didn't even turn on my TV last night because I'd knew they'd be shoving something political down everyone's throats, and I was right lol.
share>Shoving your penis up a dudes poop-chute is fucking gross, and unnatural.
Who gives a fuck? Is anyone making you do this? Straight women have a different opinion on this.
>It's also the least sexiest thing you can show on TV.
Is this something you think is regularly show on TV, or something?
They showed a kiss, not anal sex.
America Today :
Gay Couple ✅
Black man with white woman ✅
And is there something wrong with those things?
shareIn a vacuum? No.
As a tool to subvert culture with a clear agenda via mass media and government? Yes.
>As a tool to subvert culture with a clear agenda via mass media and government? Yes.
And how is it being used in that way? What's the end goal here exactly, in your mind?
"You will own nothing and be happy."
shareI've heard that, but I have no idea what this has to do with "LGBT propaganda"
shareBlack vs White , Man vs Woman , Republican vs Democrat , LGBT vs Regular people. They use these things to keep us distracted and divided.
share"You will own nothing and be happy" is in relation to rent culture, and people not owning any media but instead subscribing to it. Not sure what it has to do with anything you're talking about here.
shareYou can't handle the end goal, so I will not waste my time typing it out.
Those in the know, know what I'm talking about.
So no, you have no idea and you are again just making shit up.
shareHe isn't making anything up , he's mentioning EXACTLY what I brought up to you before.
share"You will own nothing and be happy" has nothing to do with LGBT issues at all
shareHonestly you lack the knowledge for this discussion.
"You will own nothing and be happy" has to do with EVERY SINGLE FUCKING THING.
EVERYTHING.
>"You will own nothing and be happy" has to do with EVERY SINGLE FUCKING THING.
It doesn't relate to the supposed conspiracy theory proposed here by many regarding LGBT rights in public life.
Of course the leftoids are clueless, especially since they are going along with it.
shareGoing along with what? Gay people having the temerity, the audacity to exist in public?
shareThey should keep their unnatural perversions in the privacy of their homes and not expose it to children in any way.
Stop defending groomers.
>They should keep their unnatural perversions in the privacy of their homes and not expose it to children in any way.
Why should they do that? Who gives a fuck if it's supposedly "unnatural" There's nothing wrong with two gay men kissing. Just as there is nothing wrong with a heterosexual couple kissing. It's no different than kids seeing their parents kiss, or their random people in the street kiss.
>Stop defending groomers.
When did I support child groomers? When did I support pedophiles?
Or are you implying that all LGBT people are inherently child groomers and pedophiles?
Fascist scumbag
Once again, because it is an unnatural perversion and they should stay away from kids.
Stop defending groomers.
>Once again, because it is an unnatural perversion and they should stay away from kids.
Why should they do that? Who gives a fuck if it's supposedly "unnatural" There's nothing wrong with two gay men kissing. Just as there is nothing wrong with a heterosexual couple kissing. It's no different than kids seeing their parents kiss, or their random people in the street kiss.
>Stop defending groomers.
When did I support child groomers? When did I support pedophiles?
Or are you implying that all LGBT people are inherently child groomers and pedophiles?
Fascist scumbag
Heterosexual couple kissing = Natural
Gay couple kissing = Unnatural Perversion
Stop defending and protecting child groomers.
Leave the Kids alone.
>Heterosexual couple kissing = Natural
Gay couple kissing = Unnatural Perversion
Heterosexual couple kissing = natural
Gay couple kissing = natural
It's less common but that doesn't mean there's anything wrong with it, anymore than there's anything wrong with being left-handed.
>Stop defending and protecting child groomers.
When did I support child groomers? When did I support pedophiles?
Or are you implying that all LGBT people are inherently child groomers and pedophiles?
Fascist scumbag
It is apparent that you have been indoctrinated and brainwashed by other perverts.
Stay away from kids.
>It is apparent that you have been indoctrinated and brainwashed by other perverts.
When did I support child groomers? When did I support pedophiles?
Or are you implying that all LGBT people are inherently child groomers and pedophiles?
Fascist scumbag
To certain "minds," it's the thin edge of the coming apocalypse.
shareNo surprise but I'd be surprised if any of those programs had decent ratings. I'm going to say no. I really do hate New Year's as a Holiday.
shareGreat! Good for them.. Only one small hair in the soup though with their assumption of this: No one cares whether they choose to make out in Public or not, it's the shoving their ideology down everyone's throats who don't agree with it is what grows tiresome..
shareDude, you literally regard anything that depicts a white-woman, black-man relationship as "shoving their ideology down everyone's throats" based on your racist idea that all black men like to have "house parties" and "love hip hop" whilst all white people, apparently hate those things and can't possibly be with someone who does.
shareMethinks thou dost protest too much! Here are some resources to help you discover your true self...
https://www.hrc.org/resources/coming-out
https://www.glsen.org/activity/coming-out-resource-lgbtq-students
https://www.thetrevorproject.org/resources/guide/the-coming-out-handbook/