MovieChat Forums > Politics > Where is the evidence that Chauvin was m...

Where is the evidence that Chauvin was motivated by race?

posted 3 years ago by davebuffalo (3037)
33 replies | jump to latest

BLM was all over this from day one but where is the evidence that this was specifically a racial crime, and not just a bad-cop crime? Would there be 1/10th the coverage of this if Floyd had been white? Would there have been riots, fires, destruction and looting?

Does Chauvin have a history of abusing ONLY black people?

I think it's a travesty that BLM and the liberal media jumps on every white-on-black crime and calls it racism. Sometimes it's just CRIME. Liberal media and BLM aim to widen the racial divide in this country, not narrow it.

I know not every racist crime is going to have a smoking-gun "N word" moment to prove it was driven by race. So in the absence of such, is it fair that every white-against-black crime is labeled as a racist hate crime?

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

He's a sacrificial offering to appease the new gods of BLM

[–] legnadibrom (5746) 3 years ago

undoubtedly there will be a sculpture erected of George as the centerpiece in the foyer of the official BLMansion in Bev Hills

[–] davebuffalo (3037) 3 years ago

And his family can use a fraction of their $27M windfall to move in next door, a la Beverly Hillbillies.

[–] kspkap (13056) 3 years ago

Undoubtedly there will be a George Floyd day so noted on calendars. The new posters for the parades in his honor will depict him sitting up in his $40,000 gold plated casket, smiling while holding fistfuls of cash.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6001) 3 years ago

Remember though according to you he committed no crime. Well looks like I was correct when I told you that's not how the law works huh? Care to debate the law some more?

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

You think BLM wasn't going to doxx jurors if they voted not guilty? You think Minnesota wouldn't be up in flames right now? Do you think Maxine Waters and Pelosi and Biden's comments do not equal a mistrial?

Answer those

[–] moviefanatic505 (6001) 3 years ago

First answer my questions. We will address yours once you address mine.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

You - care to debate law some more

Me - asks more questions

You - answer me!!!!

Lol you're a fucking retard

[–] moviefanatic505 (6001) 3 years ago

I asked you if I was correct that it wasn't how the law works? You said he committed no crime. Were you wrong?

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

Nope and I stated why

[–] moviefanatic505 (6001) 3 years ago

Then why was he found guilty? If he committed no crime.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

I just explained it in asking my questions that you're refusing to answer

[–] moviefanatic505 (6001) 3 years ago

No you didn't. You asked a question read your quote.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

Then you really are retarded. There's three reasons up there look again idiot

[–] moviefanatic505 (6001) 3 years ago

This was your quote verbatim.

You think BLM wasn't going to doxx jurors if they voted not guilty? You think Minnesota
wouldn't be up in flames right now? Do you think Maxine Waters and Pelosi and Biden's comments do not equal a mistrial?

Answer those

Where was your answer?

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

I'm asking you those dumbass and also stating what I think in those questions. Are you really this daft?

[–] moviefanatic505 (6001) 3 years ago

Yes without answering the questions I asked first nimrod. Remember when you said he committed no crime? If you would like I can dig that quote up from you. If he committed no crime why was he prosecuted? Remember when you said it was not illegal to kneel on someone's neck for over 5 minutes? Own up to being wrong and we can move forward. Or if not explain yourself.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

I already have and you keep dodging so have fun jackass

[–] moviefanatic505 (6001) 3 years ago

Lol no you did not. Okay anyway we are done here. You were wrong your boy Chauvin is going to the slammer. Your concession is noted. Next time think twice and know the law before making yourself look foolish.

[–] davebuffalo (3037) 3 years ago

re: He's a sacrificial offering to appease the new gods of BLM

They sure could've found a better poster child than Floyd.

[–] Gd5150 (11101) 3 years ago

Think that’s an accident? Who runs the media? Why do they always put the worst in the black community on the pedestal for the most ignorant to worship. Did they have astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson interview Biden during the campaign? Or even Oprah? No they had an ex hooker and thief Cardi B.

Tomorrow it’ll be a new loser for them to worship. Chosen by the billionaire Democrats who run the media. They’d never uplift someone who was actually accomplished and a real role model. And the mental enslavement rolls on.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

Thank you, you get it

[–] Filmtenk2 (3391) 3 years ago

I don't think anyone thinks Floyd was a good guy or a pillar of morality. It should be irrelevant as it relates to what happened. If Chauvin could get off doing that to Floyd then none of us (of any race) would be safe in this country from bad apple police officers.

[–] christomacin (4540) 3 years ago

I have no idea why Chauvin didn't get off of Floyd once he stopped moving, and not even after he no longer had a pulse. The point is he didn't. I do agree that MANY police killings BLM has made a lot of fuss over are clearly NOT racially motivated, and some aren't really even cases of police abuse... but some are. This case may or may not have been racially motivated, but this was never established clearly. What was established clearly for the jury (which is all that counts) was that his actions were unnecessary after a certain point and were done in a very callous manner. I personally think Chauvin's behavior was primarily directed at the crowd that had gathered to witness the event (he repeatedly glared at the them). He resented them calling his actions into question and may have been motivated by that more so than Floyd's race. His past history with Floyd may have been a factor as well, but we just don't know what the exact issues if any between them were. Anyway, a very bad judgement call on his part.

[–] davebuffalo (3037) 3 years ago

I've also long-suggested that these two had history going back to their days as Security Guards. There seemed to be a personal vendetta here. I agree with you. Chauvin's actions were both excessive and unnecessary. Not to mention incredibly stupid, especially with witnesses.

[–] joej2923 (2959) 3 years ago

According to the BLM website and other critical race hustlers, the police were created to crack down on slaves. Blacks are overrepresented in prisons/jails so this is supposedly racial inequity. BLM wants to defund the police on the local level and abolish federal law enforcement. BLM sees police as one tool of the systemic racism that maintains white supremacy.

https://blacklivesmatter.com/blm-demands/

[–] davebuffalo (3037) 3 years ago

Yeah that pretty much validates my thought, that

White Cop + Black Perp = RACISM, regardless of the facts. Case Closed.

[–] Gubbio (3893) 3 years ago

I'm so sick of this... Every time I hear that a cop shot a perpetrator, I pray that they were both Black -- or you'll never hear the end of it.

And, why is it an issue if the perp was unarmed? Disobey a police order, and bad things happen. You don't try to "negotiate" your position in the street.

[–] davebuffalo (3037) 3 years ago

I agree. A lot of this "unarmed" information is not known for sure until after the dust settles and everyone is a Monday morning, armchair quarterback looking at how the "play" should have been executed.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 3 years ago

He was convicted of 2nd degree, 3rd degree, and manslaughter, not "killing a black man".

[–] davebuffalo (3037) 3 years ago

I understand that. But BLM will have you believe that the motive was 100% racism and nothing else. If BLM was around during the OJ trial, you can predict what their stance would've been.

[–] Gd5150 (11101) 3 years ago

Don Lemming at ABCNNBCBS said so. Facts.

Any questions?

[–] TimMC (9143) 3 years ago

Stop looking for evidence.

This is a FEELINGS crime.