MovieChat Forums > UncleRuckis > Replies
UncleRuckis's Replies
So you drop your nukes and possibly(doubtful) kill Thanos, meanwhile you definitely kill all of earths heroes (except maybe hulk) and leave Earth totally vulnerable to the next Thanos.
If I remember right, this was the Security Councils plan in the first Avengers movie which Nick Fury referred to as a stupid ass plan.
So Thanos wants to wipe out 50% of the people, so your response is beat him to the punch, "drop nukes all over the place", and wipe out the full 100?
It's mentioned, but only in the sense that Back to the Future time travels rules absolutely do not apply in the Marvel verse.
It's more saying that Capt America is a symbol.
Why be Robin when you could be Batman!
Or, they realize they need Nat for some world ending event and since they cant resurrect her, they just snag another one from a different timeline.
Those were plot holes. The hulk/banner perfectly explained why changing the past doesn't effect the present you came from. Meaning it doesn't matter what you do in the past.
Now the fact that they just didn't go back and ask their past selves to borrow the stones and save trillions, rather than go through a convoluted heist plan, is kind of a plot hole. But I enjoyed the ride so I'm not complaining.
When Rhodie is watching Quill dance is probably the best time.
It's got a 96% on RT. If that is so-so, what do you think is bad? Sub 90's.
Seeing as how their actions are already going to cause changes to these alternate realities, why even bother with heisting the stones. For instance, Cap and Iron Man could have just popped into Avengers tower, prove that they are their future selves, and told themselves that they need to borrow the stones for about half a second. Same with Asgard.
That is literally what Hulk did.
Aegon Targaryan was a conqueror before he became king.
Robert was a rebellious usurper who had zero claim to the Throne before he became king.
Clearly, being a monarch has nothing to do with rite and everything to do with having the ability to take it, which she sure as hell does.
Like Missandei said, she isn't their queen because of her lineage. She's queen because her people believe in her. Her army won't accept Jon as king no matter who his parents are(even if he did want it). She was going to have to pound the northern and southern lords into submission either way. Absolutely nothing has changed for her other than she has family now.
Probably chilling at the Vale making thieves "fly" for fun.
Why would Davos even be upset? Yeah it's slightly awkward, but they were on opposite sides of a war. Plus Tyrion was the one defending his(kind of) city. It would be completely out of character for him to hold a grudge towards Tyrion.
Well there are like 15 major characters at Winterfell right now, so a scene with them trying to load up on two dragons could be kind of funny. Would Drogon carry Brans wheel chair in his mouth I wonder?
So the fall back point is a thousand miles away with an army who would be ordered to kill them on sight?
I wouldn't. I'd grab a bag of gold, head east until I hit the best whorehouse in Braavos, and enjoy myself until the night king shows up.
To be fair, she was like 11 when she signed up for this show.
Definitely a body double.
A moving headshot would be hard, but if you stand your ground, aim, and let him get closer, it becomes much easier.
Granted, it would take some huge stones to stand still while a charging zombie is coming at you, but it's much more preferable than popping off a bunch of half-assed shots and wasting precious ammo.
I tried to think of the most annoying music which would make these things bash their skulls into the side of a fully armored truck and kill themselves.