MovieChat Forums > ss5mmyers > Replies
ss5mmyers's Replies
How did nobody else close to her die?
Right. There's no point.
I mean it failed miserably when they actually did it.
It still holds up fine. People are quick to dismiss it for the gore sometimes.
No, I've seen Home Alone 4.
Partly this has to do with the time. In the late 80s to early 90s, crime in NY spiked to an all time high.
He had no problem with nearly killing 2 people, so I would say no.
He's clearly that relative nobody likes but doesn't say anything because it would start a family war.
No, the way Buzz's eyes keep darting to them making sure he's scaring them give away he's making it up.
When Macaulay Culkin declined to reprise his role as Kevin for the third outing, John Hughes briefly considered writing the screenplay with Joe Pesci and Daniel Stern reprising their roles as burglars Harry and Marv, respectively, who target Kevin's cousin Fuller (Macaulay's real-ife brother Kieran), and Fuller would be the main character, with Gerry Bamman and Terrie Snell reprising their roles and Fuller's parents Frank and Leslie, respectively, who go on vacation and leave Fuller home alone, to defend himself against Marv and Harry. The idea was scrapped, as Pesci and Stern refused to reprise their roles, and wanted to pursue other projects, and Kieran felt he couldn't follow in his brother's footsteps as the lead. Hughes then wrote an entirely different screenplay with no characters from the first two films.
He also knew about Kane and the car.
1) That's Poltergeist III's explanation for it. In the original it's just that her life force is so luminous it distracts them from the light and beast uses that.
2)SNL
He thought he was dealing with a couple of rough juvenile delinquents and not innocent kids just avoiding a bad situation and getting into hi-jinx
Why was Nick on the list when she saw him get killed in a different loop?
Because Lori's card said there's no tomorrow.
I never saw it until UPN started showing reruns. I didn't catch much ABC channel back then.
Why make multiple threads over the same dumb scene?
But why focus on the one line from Bergen? This movie clearly hates all of its characters equally.
How can I take Reese's side after she lied about her family and history, then strung a guy along and dumped him at the altar without talking about how she felt before everybody spent all that money and traveled all that way? What, I'm supposed to believe she suddenly cares about it? Face it, whatever fault the movie tries to force on Bergen, Witherspoon's character is much worse.
Why didn't Kate punch Melanie for stringing her son along and leaving him at the altar? Isn't this a worse offense?