Is Kathleen Kennedy gay??


Maybe that's the reasons?

reply

I don't see why.

reply

I don't know, but she is clearly a misandrist.

reply

Interesting. I always wondered if Missandei from GOT was misandrist too.

reply

No, you are thinking of "Miss Andy"

reply

Misandrist is such an ugly term, I think they prefer the more clinical Freudian phrase 'Penis Envy'.

. . . sensitivity matters.

reply

Yeah, that's probably a more well known term than misandrist.

reply

She's married to Frank Marshall and evidently they had two children. If so, she's deep in the closet.

reply

Who knows? It's Hollywood, their marriage is probably a business alliance.

reply

[deleted]

I hope so. She was given Star Wars so she could play the super-empowered woman. And it's a $4 billion toy.

reply

Of course it was given to her, you don't actually think women have the talent, intellect, and work ethic to create something like that themselves, do you?

It's men's jobs in the world to create things of value, then turn those things over to women to break.

reply

Of course it was given to her, you don't actually think women have the talent, intellect, and work ethic to create something like that themselves, do you?

Yeap, it was given to her.

Of course, there's women that have talent and intellect enough to create something like that themselves, but they're not considered politically correct in modern woke world. They don't fit the narrative that portrays women as poor victims that can only create something when feminism helps them.

A perfect example is Marcia Lucas. She was extremely important in the creation of the original trilogy. Once Disney decided to go for a "female team" in the new trilogy, you would imagine that FIRST thing would be trying to bring back Marcia. Guess what? nope. Marcia was a creator, Kathleen is a glorified secretary. Marcia doesn't fit in modern narrative, Kathleen does.

reply

[deleted]

Having the vision and ability to create and build an empire, and contributing to the building of that empire are two different things.

George would not be where he is today without 10s of thousands of contributors across all fields, but to have the intellect and acumen for the creative, technical, and business side of things in one person, that's a rare combination indeed.

If he hadn't had all those skills in the right amounts, his empire never would have been built, and his ideas stolen.

George Lucas was already creating top quality stuff years before Star Wars, like THX 1138 & American Graffiti, he was heading for the top regardless if Star Wars succeeded or failed.

reply

Cmon, she's almost 80...

reply

Checking iMDB, she's actually one year younger than George Lucas, and they've brought him back to help them in the last one. Why not her? Why at least not to make an offer?

reply

I think she's done with movies. Although her influence was significant back then.

reply

No, she has no talent.

She has ridden to success by cashing in on the hard work of others. Just proof that spending money makes money.

Now she has creative input on something for once and totally fucks it.

She is a stinking pig.

reply

No argument, thought I said that in my own endearing misogynist sort of way?

:o)

reply

Oink oink, I can hear the pig grunting now.

reply

Yes it was given to her. MAYBE because of her background and working relationship with Lucas, PROBABLY because she's female. Either way, she has made some terrible choices. True Star Wars fans can't agree with what she has done. She cares more about political correctnes and her own agenda than she does the fans and the films/series.

reply

I wonder if she ever got in touch with Harvey Weinstein back in the day?

reply

Does it matter?

reply

Don't be so binary, dude! LGBTQRTUV+-÷× is the real deal.

reply

Well what ever she is she is more successful than you and could probably buy and sell your entire family.

reply

kathleen was that you?!

reply

Yes thank you for spending your money on my movies please keep it up

reply

Butthurt detected.

reply