Johnny Cash


I recently re-watched the episode with Johnny Cash from 1974, I think , and...

...Cash was pretty good(if a little wobbly on his lines sometimes), definitely charismatic(The Man in Black at a great age) and...just too damn sympathetic to play a killer.

I found it a rather hard watch. As Columbo did his thing of catching Cash in lie after lie, and Cash tried to fend him off like all the more "evil" Columbo killers do...I kept feeling sympathy for CASH: "Oh, leave the poor guy alone."

Of course, he had killed not only his shrewish evangelist wife BUT his jailbait teenage lover(what a risky plot issue in 1974) and his dead wife's brother angrily punched him out but STILL...he was good ol' likeable, almost loveable, and certainly talented Johnny Cash.

His final chat in the car with Columbo ("Aren't you scared to be alone up here with a killer?") cashes in on his sympathy factor ("No, I always figured you'd confess," says Columbo as Cash's gospel song "I Saw the Light" came on the radio, with Cash answering "Yes, it surely has worn on me.")

A good ending...but a hard episode to watch. Some good guys just can't play bad.

reply

I had no sympathy for him. Cash's portrayal was also rather boring.

reply

Cash is my favorite singer - I didn't much of like him as an actor. This episode was average. Ida Lupino played his wife btw.

reply

Boss Hogg also appears in this episode as a record producer or something of the like. Sorrell Booke would later get murdered in the "Bye Bye Sky High IQ" episode.

reply

[deleted]

I've never heard of it but may have to check it out....he's so likable it's really hard to picture Andy Griffith as the villain in anything lol!

reply

[deleted]

I think the plot element of his particular choice of lover was *more* common in 1970s movies. Today it would be more scandalous.

reply

When I watched this as a kid in the 80s I didn't really know why he killed them. But loved the cat and mouse approach with Columbo catching him out. But now when watching it I would say not many would be sympathetic to Cash's character.

reply

This is one of my favorite "Columbo" episodes. I'm a Johnny Cash fan and I think it's cool to see him here playing a "bad guy."

I understand why he killed his wife...but I thought killing his lover like he did was pretty heartless. He almost got away with it...but for Columbo! 😃

reply

This is one of my favorite "Columbo" episodes. I'm a Johnny Cash fan and I think it's cool to see him here playing a "bad guy."

I understand why he killed his wife...but I thought killing his lover like he did was pretty heartless. He almost got away with it...but for Columbo!

--

I return from my OP to find that a lot of people on this thread think that Cash WAS unsympathetic and truly "bad" in the role.

Which is interesting to me. I mean he does kill TWO victims, and one of them(the lover) was pretty heartless to do.

I suppose the issue is one I can use by comparing Johnny Cash to a movie actor(not a singer) named Robert Forster, who had a long career in B movies but got a big role in "Jackie Brown" and went out as a character actor star.

In a 1980's movie called "The Delta Force," where Chuck Norris and Lee Marvin were commandos out to save hostages from evil Arab terrorists, Robert Forster(with some dark make-up) played the "most evil" of the hijackers. But I always felt that Forster simply LOOKED TOO NICE to be playing that evil guy believably. And indeed, years later, Forster played a REALLY NICE GUY in Jackie Brown -- and the role fit.

Now Johnny Cash didn't have a very kindly face -- he didn't seem like a "real nice guy" -- but on this Columbo, he still had a certain down home warmth to his charcterization, and his voice was friendly and it was just hard to reconcile THAT man to being a killer. The clincher came at the end when Cash asks Columbo if he isn't scared to be in a car with a killer and Columbo replies: "I think there is some good in every person."

By the way, "nice guy" Dick Van Dyke DID convey real evil as his Columbo killer -- even though HIS victim was, indeed, a shrewish wife too (but he killed an innocent ex-con , too.)

A "politically incorrect" comment: did audiences(MALE audiences) perhaps cut Johnny Cash and Dick Van Dyke some slack because they killed shrewish wives?

reply

Hi again, ecarle...I loved reading your response. I'll try to address your points as best I can:

1) Robert Forster: I'm not really qualified to address this one, because I've only seen Forster in "Jackie Brown." And, yes, I agree that he's great in it...a very interesting character and a great performance.

2) Johnny Cash: He was such an interesting figure in real life...a very flawed, but very talented performer. His voice was just so unique and amazing. I agree that he comes off as friendly and charming at times in this episode. From what I've read and heard about Cash, that was how he mostly was in real life. I thought he did a very good job in this episode...but I liked Cash a lot, so I do have a bias there.

3) Dick Van Dyke: Yes, you nailed it with him. He seemed so cold-hearted in his episode and it was so satisfying to see Columbo nail him in the end. I do think Van Dyke is/was a better actor than Cash. Dick Van Dyke also played a corrupt judge on the old TV show "Matlock," which was one of the more memorable episodes of that show. For someone who seems to be nice and pleasant in real life, he did have a gift for playing SOBs..very talented actor.

4) The spouses (and lover, in Cash's case): Yes, I get that Cash's spouse was "shrewish," so I did have some understanding for him in that regard. I think if she had been the only one to die on the plane, then he would've been one of the more "sympathetic killers." But, yes, I think the way he killed his lover was pretty heartless...that crossed the"sympathy line" for me.

As to Van Dyke's character...I didn't have any sympathy for him and was so glad to see Columbo nail him. Yes, his wife was a shrew also, but the way he killed her was so cold and calculating...he pretty much tortured her physically and (especially) emotionally before he killed her. The ex-con killing was pretty cold-hearted as well. He really seemed like an evil man inside (and credit to Van Dyke for his portrayal).

Merry Christmas to you!

reply

Hello, there, golfnguitars!

---

1) Robert Forster: I'm not really qualified to address this one, because I've only seen Forster in "Jackie Brown." And, yes, I agree that he's great in it...a very interesting character and a great performance.

---

Tarantino says that at first he felt that "Max Cherry, bail bondsman" was the kind of major role that would require Paul Newman or Gene Hackman in it(good casting, sure.)

Then he started thinking of "specialty actors" for whom he had fondness. John Saxon was a possibility(except I can't say that Saxon ever projected "nice guy.")

So he locked it in for Robert Forster. And QT said he HAD to lock it in because other actors wanted that role bad. So he could say "I promised it to Robert Forster and I can't go back on my word."

One actor who wanted the role was -- Robert DeNiro. But QT gave him his Forster speech and DeNiro said "OK, then let's talk about this guy Louis." Which DeNiro took. And was GREAT!

It occurs to me that Robert Forster -- very handsome and fit in his youth -- might have been an OK Columbo, what with his quiet warm manner. But-- NAH - Columbo was Peter Falk as much as Norman Bates was Anthony Perkins and Spock was Leonard Nimoy. (I don't care who else played those roles.)

CONT

reply

2) Johnny Cash: He was such an interesting figure in real life...a very flawed, but very talented performer. His voice was just so unique and amazing.

--

His voice could actually be kind of SAD , I thought. Regretful, tired. I suppose that's another reason he was sympathetic to me on Columbo.

They tried Johnny Cash as a Western movie star versus Kirk Douglas in some seventies movie(A Gunfight), and then put him in with his "Highwayman" country artists(Willie Nelson, Kris Kristofferson, Waylon Jennings) in an OK 80s TV movie remake of Stagecoach. But Cash's stardom was on stage and in his records I guess. He had too much charisma as himself to effectively play other people.

---

I agree that he comes off as friendly and charming at times in this episode. From what I've read and heard about Cash, that was how he mostly was in real life.

---

That's good to know.

---

I thought he did a very good job in this episode...but I liked Cash a lot, so I do have a bias there.

--

Me, too.

CONT

reply

3) Dick Van Dyke: Yes, you nailed it with him. He seemed so cold-hearted in his episode and it was so satisfying to see Columbo nail him in the end.

---

Van Dyke did put across -- as you mention below -- a truly evil personality. Very conceited, too. Part of the delight in how Columbo nails him is how CERTAIN Van Dyke is that Columbo is his lesser("I like you...you're not too smart, but I like you") and then how his own ego about camera expertise does him in and his ego shatters into a very devastated looking ...loser. ("You KNEW I'd do that...")

---

CONT

reply

I do think Van Dyke is/was a better actor than Cash.

---

Probably so. Van Dyke honed his skills in comedy(on that sitcom) which is hard to do and acted a LOT more than Cash -- TV , Disney movies(Mary Poppins above all, so what if his accent was wrong, his charm was good) various serious "against type" roles. After his Disney period, there was an attempt to make Dick Van Dyke into a movie star from about 1966 to about 1972 (Divorce American Style, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, Fitzwilly, The Comic, Cold Turkey), but it didn't take. Still, this made him more "starry" when he did his Columbo in 1975.)

---

Dick Van Dyke also played a corrupt judge on the old TV show "Matlock," which was one of the more memorable episodes of that show.

---

Hmm. Have to catch that. Here's a weird one: he did a version of Strangers on a Train for the old "Supertrain" TV series -- and played the Robert Walker villain part. I suppose for some "good guy comedians" it is fun to play bad.

---

For someone who seems to be nice and pleasant in real life, he did have a gift for playing SOBs..very talented actor.

--

He was so good at evil that I worried about him sometimes. Is he maybe NOT such a nice guy in real life? He's lived a long time, I think he must be nice.

CONT

reply

4) The spouses (and lover, in Cash's case): Yes, I get that Cash's spouse was "shrewish," so I did have some understanding for him in that regard. I think if she had been the only one to die on the plane, then he would've been one of the more "sympathetic killers." But, yes, I think the way he killed his lover was pretty heartless...that crossed the"sympathy line" for me.

--

And they probably wanted it that way. Same with Van Dyke callously killing the "nice" ex-con in his episode. As if killing the wives wouldn't be enough to show villainy!

---

As to Van Dyke's character...I didn't have any sympathy for him

---

None whatsover. Certain Columbo killers DID get our sympathy(Donald Pleasance, Ruth Gordon) but certain ones were HATEFUL. Indeed, Van Dyke's killer turn came right after fellow good guy Robert Conrad (The Wild Wild West) was a REALLY evil guy on Columbo the episode before.

---

and was so glad to see Columbo nail him. Yes, his wife was a shrew also, but the way he killed her was so cold and calculating...he pretty much tortured her physically and (especially) emotionally before he killed her.

---

Yes, it was rough to watch the shrewish wife's commanding manner slowly collapse as Van Dyke manhandled her and made all his evil pronouncements. He probably married her for the money anyway. Here the victim very much deserved sympathy and we're reminded: just because people are irritating, you can't KILL them.

---

The ex-con killing was pretty cold-hearted as well. He really seemed like an evil man inside (and credit to Van Dyke for his portrayal).

---

Yes. I suppose the Columbo show was interesting that way - a villain written as truly evil could allow a "good guy actor" to show their talent. Ross Martin(ALSO from The Wiid Wild West) was another particuarly evil villain. And Leonard Nimoy. And George Hamilton(the first time). They killed more than one victim and were really cruel and callous.

---

Merry Christmas to you!

--

And a Merry Christmas to you!

reply

I recently watched the van Dyke episode for the umpteenth time. It really is one of my favorites. The character had my sympathy at first. I mean, his wife was only on for ten minutes and I wanted to kill her myself! lol What sane person could listen to her shrewish harangues on a daily basis and NOT contemplate an unfortunate ending for her?

Galesko could have divorced her on the grounds of mental cruelty. But he probably didn't like the idea of alimony (and there wouldn't have been an episode). But I lost sympathy for him when he framed poor Deshler for the kidnapping and killed him. That was really coldblooded. Albert Deshler never did anything to HIM, yet he was willing to use him to further his own plans. The ec-con seemed like a nice guy who was sincere about staying on the right path and never going back to his criminal ways.

This episode has two of the finest "comedy" scenes in Columbo; the nun who mistakes the rumpled detective for a homeless man (That coat, that coat) and the driving instructor who is terrified by Columbo's driving.

reply

I always find it strange that Columbo says to the cash character at the end , no one who can sing like that can be all bad !

Okay some might have sympathy he murdered his blackmailer , but to kill such a young woman also , nope in my book he is bad , very very bad ! Evil in fact !

reply

I always find it strange that Columbo says to the cash character at the end , no one who can sing like that can be all bad !

Okay some might have sympathy he murdered his blackmailer , but to kill such a young woman also , nope in my book he is bad , very very bad ! Evil in fact !

---

Your point is well taken. Though Columbo maintained things rather at a "fantasy" level(all the killers were well off, sometimes rich, educated), he WAS dealing with people who had elected to murder other people, and that (in real life) is quite a dark plunge.

Perhaps the most sympathetic killer was Donald Pleasance as a mousy(if snobbish) wine maker whom Columbo literally toasted at the end of the program because Columbo admired the man's professionalism(as Columbo admired his OWN professionalism) but also -- I suppose -- because Pleasance had -- in a fit of anger, not planned -- killed his younger more handsome and swinging half-brother out to ruin the family business. The victim was a louse.

Not so with the young woman singer in the Johnny Cash episode.

As I recall, Ruth Gordon's victim was a pretty evil guy -- and he got a pretty horrible death, locked into a room to suffocate. Still...a "bad guy" victim so Columbo could be nice to the killer.

And then there was William Shatner as a TV detective who killed a female blackmailer. Upon arrest, the actor told Columbo "at least in this story, the killer had the sympathetic part."

But back to Cash...clearly an "evil" killer as to one of his victims(if not so much the other, the mean wife)...but the episode elects to end with Cash in a contrite, pleasant mode. I rather believe that he WAS getting ready to confess, that the guilt WAS too much...

reply

"Perhaps the most sympathetic killer was Donald Pleasance as a mousy(if snobbish) wine maker"

He was probably the least sympathetic killer.

"Pleasance had -- in a fit of anger, not planned -- killed his younger more handsome and swinging half-brother"

That's not how he killed him. If he'd stopped after his fit of anger then he may have been somewhat sympathetic, but then there would be no Columbo episode because the half-brother wouldn't be dead. Instead he locked him in the wine cellar, tied him up, and turned off the ventilation so that he would suffocate to death, which was very deliberate/planned.

reply

That's not how he killed him. If he'd stopped after his fit of anger then he may have been somewhat sympathetic, but then there would be no Columbo episode because the half-brother wouldn't be dead. Instead he locked him in the wine cellar, tied him up, and turned off the ventilation so that he would suffocate to death, which was very deliberate/planned.

--

Oh, yeah...another slow suffocation death(as per Ruth Gordon.)

My memory's bad. Sorry.

I know that Peter Falk himself said that Columbo was admiring of the wine guy's professionalism..and the wine guy was proud that Columbo learned well enough to gift him with a fine wine.

I suppose the moral of this story is that NONE of the Columbo killers were truly "sympathetic." Everyone who pre-planned their murders had evil within them and the "accidental murderers" engaged in cover up.

But a few of them over time, were somewhat resigned and humble when Columbo got them. I recall one of them -- I think Lindsay Crouse in the "second series", asked Columbo for sympathy and to offer support for a light sentence -- and he said something like "That's for the court to decide, m'am."

reply

I think Cash is a natural on camera. He does a great job for someone not "formerly trained".

I think he is likable and charismatic in this role but not very sympathetic.

My vote for most likable and sympathetic killer in the Columbo series goes to Ruth Gordon in Catch if You Can. I'm almost hoping she's not caught in that one!

reply