[deleted]


[deleted]


Here I am, I hate it! My reasons? Hmm... let me see... Ah, here they are:

https://moviechat.org/tt0120915/Star-Wars-Episode-I-The-Phantom-Menace/6200fe100d92a97371aff130/Unbelievable-displays-of-carelessness-and-laziness-by-George-Lucas

Feel free to dispute any of the points, and keep in mind that this list is by no means exhaustive.

reply

I tried to read your thread, but I couldn't even get past point one.

1. When Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon arrive, the Trade Federation wants to give up the blocade because they don't want to confront the Jedi. That means they had... no plan for that option??? I think they should have expected that eventually the Jedi will be involved,

Of course Sidious was expecting the Jedi to get involved. He was relying on it. That was the whole point of the blockade in the first place. It's the entire point of the entire three movie trilogy. Are you kidding me with this?

This is a case of someone (you) thinking you're oh so very clever and have some sort of deep analysis and critique, when in fact you fall flat right out of the gate. It is literally the intent and purpose of the blockade to draw the Jedi in.

You people are all so tiresome.

reply

Sidious was, but sati_84 was talking about Trade Federation guys. They don't go, "Okay, the Jedi are here; move to phase 2," they're surprised and panicked. This isn't in front of anybody, either. This isn't a performance they're selling. They panic in private. The assumption is that Sidious hasn't told them everything, yes? He had a plan, they didn't. The problem with that is that it's hard to swallow that they would have gone into a MASSIVE gambit like this without knowing why, what for, how it would come about, etc.

reply

The Neimoidians were outright deferential and servile toward Sidious. He was using them and manipulating them - he a master Sith and they weak minded cowards. They just did as they were told.

I don't see this as a big issue. Sidious had a plan and this is how it played out. I won't agree that this is laziness in writing. This is exactly what was intended according to the story.

reply

"This is exactly what was intended according to the story."

See my other post about a detailed breakdown, but let me address this statement here.
No, we can't let a writer off the hook this easily. Of course all writers have an intention to tell a story. But that story has to make sense, isn't it? "Write this story, the end goal is to have Sidious win." Literally anyone can write a story like that, and will succeed at the end - Sidious will win. But if the plot doesn't make sense, that's plain laziness.

The Jedi council is not overconfident, they are plain stupid. The Trade Federation's goal is to trade tax-free with other planets. From that POV, every move has to make sense. And there are so many steps that don't... which again points towards George's laziness. He didn't really think about the in-universe implications. He didn't really think about how all this would make sense for all parties involved. He just wanted Sidious to win... and he succeeded, but you must agree that the whole thing doesn't come together very well...

reply

So, let's go from the Neimoidians' perspectives...

They're blockading Naboo. We aren't told why, but I can presume that there's some vague economic or political reason for it. Sure. I'll buy that; I don't need those details.

What happened before that?

They were told to do this by Sidious. Either by Force or manipulation/agreement. If it's the former, what clues do we have that they are being directly controlled? None. In fact, I'd argue that their conversations with Palpatine belie differently. If he was just warping their minds, those conversations would be more, "Yes, my master," and less, "Oh, no, we need help, oh, no!"

Okay, so it's some deal they've worked out. Your point is well-taken: they're clearly being bullied. But did he just go, "Blockade Naboo; it'll be fine." Did they never go, "Okay, what about the Jedi?"

Palpatine wants a vote of no-confidence. But they don't know that, do they? Or do they? If they know that, why don't they reference it? They never talk of, "When we have more sway in the Senate," they only talk about the blockade as an endgoal. Actually, no, they're really planning to invade the planet. Why are they invading? I know, Sidious wants control. Why do the Neimoidians want to invade? Aren't they worried about retaliation?

Any one of these questions isn't necessarily a big deal, but when we only have vague sketches of the plan and the pieces don't add up, we need more details or our suspension of disbelief gets thrown for a loop.

reply

Thanks, you worded it more concise than I did :-)

reply

"Of course Sidious was expecting the Jedi to get involved. He was relying on it. That was the whole point of the blockade in the first place. It's the entire point of the entire three movie trilogy. Are you kidding me with this?"

Come on, man, you can't be serious. I was not talking about Sidious there, I was talking about the Trade Federation. Without them being prepared for the Jedi, the oh-so-brillant master plan of Sidius is laughable. Yes, I am aware that in the background, he is scheming and pulling the strings. But from the Trade Federation's perspective the whole plan makes absolutely no sense. What are they even trying to accomplish? They want the queen to sign some document, but she would be signing it essentially with a gun to her head, threatening her people with a droid army... and they seriously expect any other planets to trade with them after that? Jesus, what a dumb plan overall.

But let's assume they go for it. The Jedi are well known across the galaxy, so the TF must be aware that they are going to come. And when they arrive, the TF wants to immediately bail, as they very well know they stand no chance against the Jedi. Then Sidious tells them to kill the Jedi... and they try to. Which is... again, really stupid, since let's say they were successful. On top of threatening a planet with a droid army, they would have had two dead Jedi on their track record. Jedi that were sent to negotiate on behalf of the Jedi council. Do they seriously expect to be able to get away with all this and enjoy tax-free trading with multiple planets?

Remember - we the audience are aware of Sidious' plan, but the TF is not. Everything that happens must make sense from their POV. But it doesn't, and the whole thing falls apart, as I just demonstrated.

It's like a really stupid chess puzzle. "Black (Sidious) wins in 3 moves" - well, the proper way to solve those is to make the best move with white, not the stupidest one...

reply

getting the Jedi involved and ending the blockade doesn't move his plans on at all.

reply

When this was in theaters, I used to frequent the local poker room. Occasionally it would come up in conversation. The main complaint at the time was that it was "slow" and "boring" with "too much talking."

It was a victim of evolving viewer expectations. By 1999, few people were interested in storytelling and narrative. They wanted ACTION!

And although there were plenty of wide scale epic battles and the best lightsaber duel in the entire film universe, they simply couldn't look past the expository midichlorian scenes and senate speeches.

reply

The 13th Warrior was mostly action, very little political dialogue, yet people disliked it. The Matrix had philosophical conversation, exposition about a weird world and AI oppressors, but people loved it. The Iron Giant isn't wall-to-wall action, people love that movie. Those are all 1999 films.

I don't think that's the only factor.

reply

Just as I wanted to reply, you beat me to the punch...

Speaking of 1999 I'd add Fight Club and The Sixth Sense to the mix. These films have no action scenes, but strong on story and characterization. They are classics now, and were runaway hits at their time.

reply

I left Fight Club out because I figured it was more of a drama. It's target audience was also older. The Matrix is an R, but it's still an action-sci-fi film. The Iron Giant isn't an action movie, but it's meant for roughly the same demographics as Episode I. Sixth Sense is pretty close, though.

Maybe there is something in that, though. I do respect that maybe I'm just not the target audience for TPM and the prequels. I don't think that's entirely correct, especially because I LOVE movies like My Neighbour Totoro and I'm not a little Japanese girl.

reply

Great story , poor execution , poor choice of actors , poor dialogue , far too much CGI, crap characters, Jar Jar, story plods in parts , trade treaties , if you watch this then a new hope you should understand why it was received so poorly , has very little rewatch appeal.

reply

"poor execution , poor choice of actors , poor dialogue , far too much CGI, crap characters"

This is all true, yet it's all exponentially worse in the next two. TPM isn't a good movie, but is somehow the best of that bunch. The other two are just sooooo bad.

reply

I actually prefer revenge of the sith , its faster paced, good action , better cgi, i hate attack of the clones , i just wish the prequels were more organic effects, but i will say one thing, the story arcs are really good, the rise of skywalker and the empire, the downfall off the republic .

reply

I don't think the actors were (all) chosen poorly. Jake Lloyd gives a bad performance, but between the script and the director, is that his fault? I say not.

The main cast were pretty well-cast, though. Neeson, McGregor, Portman...

I guess Samuel L. Jackson was cast against type, but that's not necessarily a "miscast", it's just against type. Better script and direction and he'd have been great.

reply

-no clear protagonist. who do I root for again? was it obi-wan? but he spent half the film on the ship doing nothing?

-an overly complicated and boring plot about space trade and a blockade and politics. that wasn't that interesting or engaging

- antagonists were literally fodder and easily cut down

-an easily rateable, silly ridiculous character in jar jar

- a silly ending of confusing tone. cutting from silly jar jar to being sad for a death to more silliness and celebration almost immediately. sorry what emotions am I supposed to I feel?

- the thing thats makes action good is not just states but the characters. when obi cuts down droid #14566 I do not care. Yet the only semi interesting antagonist, Maul, doesn't receive any character development, and gets cut down immediately. Imagine (in the movie verse not the animated) he escaped instead and that haunted Obi-wan and drove Obiwan to train Anikan and avenge Qui Gon

reply

" far too much CGI" is probably the most common criticism (& misconception) that still get thrown around today. TPM literally had more practical effects, models & real locals than the entire OT combined. In reality the Di$ney's The Farce Awakens used signifcntly more shots of CGI than the Phantom Menace but was inexplicably praised as some sort of bold "return" to use of practical effects. It just goes to show how effective propaganda is.

reply

The force awakens production is vastly superior than TPM, and a much better more enjoyable movie for all its flaws.

reply

The force awakens also uses much more practical effects.

reply

"The force awakens also uses much more practical effects."

While I suppose you can't be "wrong" for loving atrocious movies like TFA but your statement is patently false. Like i touched on earlier, you're just blindly running with the fact that "practical effects" was heavily propagandized by Di$ney & their do boy J.J. Abrams, despite the reality that TFA in fact used MORE shots of CGI & LESS practical effects than The Phantom Menace. By all means enjoy your turd of a movie but spreading verifiably untrue misinformation about its technical merits isn't going to retroactively make it any better.

reply

I've yet to meet anyone who thinks it's anything other than garbage. You need to find friends with better taste.

reply