10 Ways Lord of the Rings has aged poorly.


https://www.cbr.com/ways-lord-of-the-rings-has-aged-poorly/

Because Tolkien was largely inspired by white European history and myths, The Lord of the Rings is not a very diverse series of books. The main cast of characters is all presumed to be white based on the books, and even adaptations of the work reflect this lack of diversity.

Representation in media matters, as some studies have suggested that positive representation can lead to greater acceptance of people who are othered. Having a series of books featuring all-white lead characters is a notion that feels dated with today's sensibilities.


In The Lord of the Rings, there are certain races that are only represented by evil characters. The orks, uruks, and goblins, for instance, only appear in the form of evil antagonists, leading readers to believe that all members of these races are evil.

Tolkien said, "nothing is evil in the beginning," which is a good sentiment. However, when every character from a race is shown to be evil, it does make readers think that every member of that race must be evil. Even if the races depicted are fantasy races, the idea that a group of people is all born with the same immutable qualities is outdated and frankly problematic.


Some critics of Tolkien's work have pointed out some potentially concerning connections between where certain groups live in Middle Earth and real-life biases. Geographically, there is a largely East vs. West dynamic in the books, which is even directly referenced in the text. In the books, the good characters are from the West, and the bad characters are from the East.

Tolkien addressed this criticism, saying it arose simply due to the narrative he was telling, but it does parallel some concerning talking points. The idea of protecting "Western civilization" has been used by some bad actors in support of white nationalism and xenophobia. More politically active readers of The Lord of the Rings will likely see some red flags in this similarity.


The Lord of the Rings is largely a story about male characters. The female characters in Tolkien's work are largely side-lined or defined by their relationships to men in the story. By today's standards, this type of storytelling doesn't really hold up.

Similar to ensuring there is good representation across races, it is also important for media to portray characters of multiple genders. Though Tolkien does include some good moments for his female characters, notably Éowyn slaying the Witch King, they do not feel like fully realized people.

reply

Sean (he/him) is a writer and enjoyer of all things nerdy. Apart from comics, he enjoys table top games and occasionally making video content.


https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1547673931158413312/WOQObMtd_400x400.jpg


Hard to believe individuals like this are real. You'd normally assume articles like this are a joke or an attempt at trolling but with how some people behave it may well be his true opinions. Mad world.

reply

It is hardly necessary to see all characters in a fantasy work as white if you don't want to.

When it comes to some races in LOTR being seemingly all evil...
Sometimes, it is important to just see fantasy as fantasy and not overanalyze it.

And I guess that most women in the quasi-Medieval world in these stories would be more passive than the men.
Still, it is true that some female characters are given a moment to shine.

reply

And you know what? I don't care. These movies are far better than the woke shit that is made today.

"Witness the field in which I grow my fucks. Lay thine eyes upon it, and see that it lies barren."

reply

Are you telling me it sucks MORE today than it did when originally released?

reply

No surprise, leftwing racists triggered. These people produce nothing of interest to anyone.

reply

I’m not a huge fan of this adaptation but even I have to admit your complaints are bullshit.

reply

A movie isn't meant to serve as a catalyst for societal improvement or to encompass every identity and gender across the globe. I can envision this critic raising a sign that reads 'Orks' Lives Matter.' Such a stance is truly absurd. Furthermore, there isn't any underlying agenda woven into the film, unlike many woke movies today. The critic's comments are simply banal assertions about representation. What's even more evident is their apparent unfamiliarity with Tolkien's books. None of the points raised by the critic pertain to the essence of the story or the quality of the film itself.

The purpose of a movie is to tell us an engaging and captivating tale with intriguing characters that might offer occasional insights into life.

reply

Seems fitting the person who made this post has deleted their profile. This click bait article is garbage. It's not offensive to see a movie full of white people if it fits the story and there's no need for pointless female characters if they weren't in the books.

reply

When mods here existed they deleted the user's account. It's amusing because the original post is tenfold less inflammatory than the racist gaslighting currently being posted here.

reply

[deleted]

Where is there "racist gaslighting" in this post?

reply