MovieChat Forums > Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987) Discussion > Why is Doctor Pulaski (2nd season of TNG...

Why is Doctor Pulaski (2nd season of TNG) almost universally disliked by Trek fans?


https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Doctor-Pulaski-2nd-season-of-TNG-almost-universally-disliked-by-Trek-fans

reply

Well I think the fans hated her because she was so mean to Data. They were trying to recreate the Spock-McCoy dynamic, but in that case Spock was often very condescending towards the doctor and have it out as bad as he got so it was just fun to watch them bicker. Here it just came off as her picking on Data because he never said anything back to her.

I thought the actress did a nice job and she was an interesting character but she just didn't seem to fit in with the rest of the cast for whatever reason.

reply

https://www.quora.com/Was-Dr-Pulaski-viewed-negatively-because-of-her-interactions-with-Data-or-because-Dr-Crusher-was-actually-missed-in-season-two-of-Star-Trek-TNG-I-always-liked-her-character-better-but-think-it-s-a-minority-opinion/answer/Jon-Mixon-1

Something about the way that Muldaur emotes or inhabits her characters makes her “off putting” to the average viewer. Although she was in two episodes of the original series, in neither one was she particularly sympathetic. In fact, despite being the victim of alien taking over her mind in her first appearance, Muldaur came across as being the episode’s antagonist.

If you watched her performances throughout the 1970s and early 1980s, prior to her being cast in Star Trek: TNG, it’s clear that productions had great difficulty classifying her, and she experienced a great deal of career turnover (although a lot of work) until she landed on Star Trek for the second time. A good example of why it’s difficult to cast Ms. Muldaur can be seen in the 1970s anthology series McCloud, where she portrayed a love interest for the main character, but seems to have little chemistry with him.

By the time that Star Trek: TNG came around, Muldaur was a television veteran, but not someone who was in high demand. She replaced Gates McFadden who was a likable, if bland actor, when McFadden left due to what now seems to have been an extended period of sexual harassment, but Muldaur wasn’t able to define her character. She came across as prickly and cold and that’s not what the role required. Unfortunately, since Muldaur was also older at the time and not dressed in a figure flattering wardrobe, she came across as matronly and not a desirable character.

reply

Because she replaced a more likeable character.

reply

Her acting was absolutely terrible.

reply

> Her acting was absolutely terrible.

Agreed. Whether she was playing Pulaski on TNG, or Rosalind Shays on L. A. Law, or her roles on TOS, or anything else, Diana Muldaur seemed to have one facial expression and one tone of voice she used for every situation -- love, rage, fear, etc. I'd call her acting "wooden" but that would be an insult to trees.

reply

I heard that just about everybody in the main cast with the exception of Michael Dorn, hated working with Diana Muldaur. They didn't like the fact that she was making more money than all of them except Patrick Stewart due to her long career in television. They were also pissed that Muldaur got a more comfortable uniform because she refused to wear the one piece uniform (Stewart had been pushing for a costume change since the first season).

And speaking of Patrick Stewart, he in particular, went out of his way to give her shit for having so much trouble memorizing the medical jargon she had to spout that she resorted to cue cards. Stewart found that to be completely unprofessional. It didn't help that he adored Gates McFadden and was deeply upset by her firing.

reply

At the time I probably preferred Crusher however I think the way they just swapped the 2 after season 2 was weak.

Muldaur worked on both TNG and ToS. Her character on TNG saves both Riker and Picards lives. They could have at least made her head of Star Fleet medical or something.

She was ahead of her time. She could’ve been kind of a badass if they had written her into it. Maybe had her captain the ship through some battle and earn Worfs espect etc...

reply

She was based on McCoy for the most part her behavior with Data and her transporter phobia. Her interactions with the characters wasn't very good even thou the character did have a couple of very good episode.

I think one of the issues with her character is she didn't really have an episode centered around her, she was also introduced poorly in the 2nd season and she disappeared the same way.

reply

[deleted]

The writers screwed up.
They thought they would bring in Pulaski and recreate the Spock-McCoy trashtalking that was so amusing in the original series. But they didn't comprehend that Data was no Spock. Spock, when needled, would have a way to needle McCoy back. But Data, being a Pinocchio just learning how to be human, had no ability to do that. Consequently, Pulaski just looked like a bully to Data. which was especially bad as Data was being the most popular character on the show. The fans had no choice but to hate her most of the time.
Major screwup.

reply

Pulaski WAS a bully. End of.

reply

Because she was a grouch.

reply