MovieChat Forums > Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi (1983) Discussion > Why Did Luke Allow His Redeemed Father T...

Why Did Luke Allow His Redeemed Father To Be Re-masked And Burned On A Funeral Pyre Like Some Cheap Pantomime Villain?


This seems wrong to me.

The last thing Anakin Skywalker did was to return to good side and help his son out. Yet, rather than embrace this legacy for his now deceased father, Luke either personally or let someone else re-mask him, so he could be burned atop of some deforested wood like some cheap Guy Fawkes bonfire night prop!

Surely this was wrong. Why did Luke allow his late father's body to be desecrate in this way?

reply

No one knows

reply

Can you explain what you mean by "Cheap Pantomime Villain" or "cheap Guy Fawkes bonfire night prop"?

reply

Eh, like the Wicker Man I guess.

reply

Well, burning the body is a traditional way to honor a warrior at his funeral. That's how it's been in history, or at least in old literature.

Also, I believe it's canon that Anakin's organic body disappeared, like Obi Wan and Yoda. And that the "body" that Luke burned was his mask and metal parts left behind. Something for Luke to burn in the body's place. So he didn't "remask" his father.

reply

Well, burning the body is a traditional way to honor a warrior at his funeral...

Indeed. Had he been burned without the mask on that would have been a fine send off for the redeemed Jedi...

Not sure about your second paragraph. Certainly not film canon.

reply

Not sure about your second paragraph. Certainly not film canon.


Well, some people who have more information than I do think so.

https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Funeral_of_Anakin_Skywalker

You can decide whether to agree with them and their sources, or disprove them. As for me, I'm fine with the mask where it was. The significance of burning the body outweighs the problem with the mask.

reply

Well the source given there is a kiddies learn to read book, so I guess that's pushing the "canon" boat as far as it can go...

As I was saying, definitely not film canon - although it's funny because I don't recall ever seeing any hullabaloo over why he didn't fade away, like there certainly was re Qui-Gon Jinn.

reply

Vader was worst than Hitler.

reply

I was about to say the same thing.

reply

"deforested wood"

reply

Good spot...

reply

Because it was in the script.. Seriously, I'm grateful the internet never existed in 1983 to come up with Questions like this

reply

You must be fun at parties.

reply

If by fun, you mean, not approaching at a party and asking them a Question about why Luke allowed his father to be re-masked and burned on a funeral Pyre in Return of the Jedi, a movie that's almost 40 Years old, then NO, I guess I'm not fun then..

reply

I rest my case.

reply

maybe he didn’t want anyone to know his dad was vader

reply

I've gotta be honest. I always thought it was bullcrap Luke got Darth Vader's metal parts and got them on the X-Wing before the Death Star blew up.

reply

Luke didn't fly out the Death Star on an X-Wing. He flew out on one of those Imperial shuttles that was available.

reply

how did he know where the keys were to start it? this is a joke.

reply

There was no x-wing. Luke surrendered to Vader on Endor...

reply

I've always been of the opinion that just because Darth Vader did something good right at the end of his life, it didn't redeem him and make up for the literally millions of innocent people he killed and helped kill. Just think of all the Ewoks that were killed during the battle for Endor. How do you think the survivors would feel if, just a few hours later, Luke comes back with Vader's body and they're expected to treat him like some kind of hero and give him a "fine send off", when he was responsible for the death's of their friends and relatives? Imagine if Hitler had done something good at the end of his life, do you think the remaining Jews would all be like "Hey, let's give him a hero's funeral, he has redeemed himself!"?

reply

I agree. I guess the concept was, not that he redeemed himself for everything, but that he wasn't "all evil"

reply

Just because Return Of The Jedi provided a satisfying conclusion for the original trilogy, doesn't necessarily mean that Anakin is redeemed and forgiven of any wrongdoing. People come along later and slap on terms like "redeemed" as if it defines the outcome of the whole story. One of the reasons that redeemed pops up is that the audience wishes for Anakin to be redeemed. But I don't think anyone seriously considers all those sins atoned for.

It's not a hero's funeral. It's one man burning the body of the father who gave his life to save him in the end. Whatever you think of Vader's career, I should think there is plenty justification in the story for Luke to personally commemorate the end of his life, privately.

What would you prefer? Chucking Vader's bones down a well? Feeding him to the Ewoks.? Dragging him through the streets of Theed? Stuck on a spike in Bespin?

reply

Then why does Anakin become a force Ghost at the end and stand next to Yoda and Obi Wan?

reply

Industrial Light & Magic had a tenner left in the special effects kitty?

and in the SE's, they changed the Force ghost from "adult" Anakin to Hayden Christensen (this probably means something)

reply

Uh, Lucas only did that to tie it into the prequels.

reply

yep

reply

Because he was taught to become one before his identity merged fully with the force.

reply

It's a bit early in the conversation chain to be pulling Hitler out of hat but it's worth remembering the Ewoks were quite vicious themselves - don't forget they were quite happy to make musical instruments out of the helmets of the Stormtroopers they'd ruthlessly slain...

Plus - Did they really know much of Darth Vader? I'm not sure if he would have been down on Endor much before the whole shenanigans kicked off.

And that doesn't change the fact that they're only seeing Vader because Luke chose to dress him back up and put his helmet back on after he'd fled the Death Star. I'm not sure if Darth wore pyjamas under that suit but he could surely have dressed him up more appropriate if he'd wanted him to have a redeemed Jedi hero's send off rather than that of the panto villain...

reply