MovieChat Forums > Prince Harry Discussion > So this is the prince Meghan bagged, huh...

So this is the prince Meghan bagged, huh?

posted a year ago by AmeriGirl26 (12311)
37 replies | jump to latest

I remember a very snotty poster a few years ago made a post about how jealous people were that little Megsy, the ambassador to all black people, married a prince and others were jealous because they didn't.

Here's the thing: Harry isn't really a prize at all, if his book "Spare" and his behavior in the past few years is any indicator. I mean, if you take away the royal title and family he's from, what do you have?

- A middle-aged guy who is very unremarkable in appearance
- is still 12 years old inside
- has narcissistic tendencies and serious jealousy issues
- has an Oedipus complex about his mom
- is a spoiled brat
- pretends to care about the less fortunate when in fact he has a history of making fun of disabled people, unattractive people, and Middle-Easterners
- appears to lie a lot and is more than happy to let PR do it for him
- pretends to be a soldier when he was never really in danger or in combat
- doesn't appear to like animals much, if shooting rare birds or killing polo ponies and not taking any responsibility for either is any indication
- doesn't appear to truly like kids unless it's for PR
- smokes pot, drinks, and does cocaine as well as a number of other drugs, leading to paranoia, sniffing a lot, and confabulation about past memories
- has a history of violence towards others, including hitting paparazzi, his own brother, and raping and beating up female sex workers
- is so used to servants waiting on him that he is a huge slob and can barely dress himself without help
- has no clue how to get a real job or what it's like to survive in the real world
- goes along with whatever everyone else is doing, rather than thinking on his own
- appears to have a preoccupation with his "todger"
- spent more time goofing off in school and only graduated because his family stepped in for him
- is so danged dumb that he got a D in "geography" in his finals at school, and couldn't see what was very obviously a gold-digger coming a mile away to take advantage of him

Does that sound like a Prince Charming or a "prized husband" to you? I wouldn't touch that with a 10-mile-pole, never mind the tiny crown on his head!

Honestly, if he had been born into any other family, he would be one of those losers either living as a homeless druggie on the streets, or one of those unremarkable types you see working at gas stations or at the counter of some hole-in-the-wall fast food place.

[–] Otter (24464) a year ago

There's a reason he had to marry down. Lots of reasons!

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) a year ago

I agree with most of these, and have been saying the same thing about Harry for a long time (particularly after he started publicly body-shaming and mocking his own brother; I'm no royalist whatsoever, but one thing I cannot stand is attacking one's own family, especially siblings, UNLESS they were GENUINELY abusive). Clearly, he's not very bright (in view of his poor grades from Eton College, of all places; supposedly one of the best schools in the world), and a lack of intelligence combined with a tendency towards anger, resentment and entitlement, is one the most toxic of combinations (I know you'll probably disagree, as a right-winger, but I see many similarities between Harry and a certain recent ex-President, which is a delicious irony in view of the 'woke' and 'virtuous' way Harry has recently tried to style himself, contrary to his well-documented past of dressing up as a Nazi and calling military colleagues the 'P' word). Speaking of the Nazi incident, that he blamed his brother and sister-in-law for his decision to attend a fancy-dress-party in such inappropriate and offensive attire, was particularly annoying. Talk about passing the buck. He was a 20-year-old man for goodness sake. Not a child (although he certainly thinks and acts like one).

All that said, what's this about 'raping and beating up female sex workers'? That's a mighty serious charge, and whilst it appears his uncle has slept with a trafficked minor, I haven't heard/read anything to suggest that Harry is a 'rapist' or any other type of sexual predator, other than his casual misogyny and lack of chivalry when it comes to discussing his 'sexual conquests'. How do you know he's a 'rapist'? Like I say, this is a *particularly* serious charge, even in relation to all the terrible things I am sure Harry is/has done.

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

There have been three incidents reported on the subject.

Incident 1: In Afghanistan, he would go outside the base after hours to get drunk and visit the local brothels with his buddies. The women loved the idea of taking him on as a customer, considering he was a prince...until things got rough. He apparently would get brutal during the sessions, brutal enough to send a number of the girls to the local hospitals. It got so bad that eventually the brothels refused to offer him service, and word got around the base about it. To prevent word of it getting out to the public, Harry's family whisked him away and sold a story on him "being in danger" to save them embarrassment.

It makes you wonder just how many more of these "incidents" were hushed up and hidden by the Royal Family before Meghan came along?

Incident 2: Soon after the church incident during the Queen's Platinum Jubilee, Harry apparently raped and beat up a woman living in London, and beat her so bad that she suffered brain damage and now has to have a caregiver help her with her everyday activities. She was compensated by the RF, and had to sign an NDA to keep it quiet. It's one of several reasons H&M flew back to America so quickly before the Jubilee was over.

Incident 3: A woman working for Harry's "Better Up" program in San Francisco was apparently raped and beaten by him too, and now there's an ongoing police investigation going on. Lawyers have been called, Meghan is attempting to use hers to bully Victim 3 into silence, and the woman from Incident 2 has heard about it and wants to speak out about what happened to her. Evidently there was a condition in her NDA, that if Harry ever did this again, she was allowed to break her silence. Harry also called daddy and asked him to cover up this incident as well, and KCIII apparently said "no."

[–] Otter (24464) a year ago

Can I ask where you got all this extremely detailed information? You say it's "published" but provide no links, and I ask because I've been paying more attention to Harry for the last few years and none of the Harry obsessives out there have brought up any such published story... and they read EVERYTHING published about him!

But yeah, they've brought up rumors about Harry being rough with women, both sex workers and gals who thought a date with a prince was a dream come true. So I'm not saying none of this happened, I'm just asking what your sources are.

[–] Letess (129) a year ago

Your source on rape in Afghanistan and Better Up and Platinum Jubilee, please.

[–] Popcorngal (4347) a year ago

I have never heard about him raping anyone.

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

Of course you wouldn't. It was hushed up. Last thing the RF needs is word to get out that the dumbest member of their family could be so cruel and violent. Small wonder the two previous women he proposed to refused to marry him.

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) a year ago

They weren't able to hush up Prince Andrew's 'indiscretions', so, are you sure about this?

And right now, in view of everything Harry has done to his brother, father and step-mother, I'm not so certain that they'd be willing to bat for him. If you're right, surely all this *particularly awful* stuff would be coming out by now.

[–] Otter (24464) a year ago

Okay, the gossip is that Charles and William loathe Andrew, and is cutting him out of royal circles forever... but not because of his sex crimes. They allowed the sex crimes to hit the press because they're less embarrassing to the royal family than his financial dealings - which are the real problem. You know younger sons and daughters of a monarch are supposed to earn their own living and not be a drain on royal coffers, well, Andrew's been hanging out with dictators and oligarchs and getting in on their dirty deals, and rumor has it that there's plenty of dirt there.

Soooo... Charles is cutting off any royal funds coming Andrew's way, and is trying to squeeze him out of Royal Lodge, a mansion on the grounds of Windsor Castle, on which Andrew has a decades-long lease. Charles thinks that if he cuts off the family money hen Andrew won't be able to keep the place up, and will sell the lease back, but who knows if that will work. So stay tuned there, Andrew may be the next to sell an autobiography full of lies!

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) a year ago

Who'd want to publish that guy's life story, let alone read it (okay, maybe there are a few people who'd want to read it), BUT the point is, Andrew isn't the 'good guy' in ANYONE's narrative but his own.

[–] michaelDclarke (1648) a year ago

I hate the word "narcissist". It's become so overused, and it's a meaningless term these days. I cringe when I hear it.

--Michael D. Clarke

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

If you study Meghan's behavior patterns and history with friends, family, and husbands, you'll see she fits the profile of NPD, the Dark Triad, and possibly BPD. She has all the traits of someone with Malignant Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Harry, I'm not so sure, but he appears to have several mental disorders, and while it appears he has some narcissism, his is not as full-blown as his wife's. However, it appears in his recent behavior that he's been learning some of the trade from her.

[–] Otter (24464) a year ago

It's definitely overused, these days everyone thinks that if their parent or romantic partner thinks of their own interests, they have NPD. And isn't it funny now 100% of bosses now have full-blown NPD?

But that doesn't mean that all the people saying that Meg has NPD are correct, she seems to be an asshole but not a psycho. Harry though... he is DEEPLY fucked up, so much so that looking through his eyes when I read his awful book, I can't even guess what the hell is wrong with him. I mean I have vague suspicions he's a sociopath, because whatever is in there it's bad, but that's probably way off the mark.

[–] michaelDclarke (1648) a year ago

And what's that other word that is "hip" these days? "Gaslighting"

--Michael D. Clarke

[–] Otter (24464) a year ago

Like NPD, it's a real thing that's being overused as a label.

Yes, people will try to convince others that untrue things are true, but these days people will call anything they don't want to hear "gaslighting".

[–] michaelDclarke (1648) a year ago

[deleted]

[–] Callahan7 (907) a year ago

[deleted]

[–] Mustang (5236) a year ago

In less sensitive times you could write a film about a bad actress who bags a Prince, an actual Prince mind you who lives in Castles and Palaces and has a title and everything but figures she still deserves more than the life of a Princess who (shock horror) are actually expected to do things like greet people and attend events and shake hands without being paid for it, or that is how she sees it anyway.

So Bad Actress detects that Prince is very easily manipulated and causes trouble as much as possible. Anything she can think of, why can't she wear certain things, why can't she do this or that, why is everyone so racist, even though if they were truly racist she never would been allowed anywhere near the family to begin with but of course it is all about Megs.. errr I mean Bad Actress.

Prince on the other hand seems to go from being the rough and ready soldier, the man's man who wear Nazi uniforms to parties and drinks like a fish to trying to be some kind of Sensitive New Age Man full of Wokeness and poses for Cuck of the year photos with his wife.

Bad Actress and Prince get together and with their combined sense of victimhood and entitlement figure they can be more than just a Prince and Duchess. But his only other skill is killing people from the safety of an attack helicopter so it is her career, one in the media they focus on, because it's what she wants anyway.

But they are both so damn annoying and hypocritical that they earn the nicknames The Ginger and the Whinger and slowly interest in them flails and then his grandmama dies and his father becomes King and his father is not interest in supporting him and seeks a more streamlined monarchy with just a select few Royals being supported and well, Prince left the band already... and Prince's brother also has turned his back on him as Bad Actress attacked his wife.

So there we have it, Ginger and the Whinger out in the cold.

The End.

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

I had an even funnier story idea I brainstormed over on Quora, where a failing, aging actress makes a deal with the devil to have her marry a prince in exchange for her soul.

So she marries a prince all right, but he turns out to be a huge loser, isn't as rich as she thought he was, is a whiny, childish druggie, and she doesn't like how his family can see right through her charms that she used on men for years, and the press is particularly nasty to her. She goes back to the devil and demands a refund, and he points out to her that he gave her exactly what she wanted, but she never mentioned any details included with the deal. Seeing as you can't break a contract with someone like Satan, the actress demands additions to the contract, angry that she didn't think of it sooner, like wanting to become famous, wanting to be a queen, and being rid of the crappy prince she married in exchange for a richer one.

Despite all the revisions to the contract, things get nasty for her, with her trying to have an affair with the prince's older brother, humiliating him and his family by starting rumors of having affairs, attempting to murder his wife and kids without getting caught, doing dirty dealings to get rich behind the scenes, running off to Hollywood with prince in tow and failing miserably all over again. And just when she thinks she's rid of the prince, his brother hires an assassin to pose as a man far richer than her ex-prince-husband, who has her executed in a violent manner. She becomes famous for all the stuff she never asked for, and people later on use her as a metaphor for how not to treat people. And I think you can guess where she went after she died.

The end.

[–] Mustang (5236) a year ago

lol that is good. I think Satan may have already bolted the gates to hell closed to keep her out though!

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

Hehehe, you know it's bad when the Prince of Darkness doesn't want you. xD

[–] Mustang (5236) a year ago

Given how different he is to his brother William it puts extra weight to the theory that he is not Charles' son but that soldier who Diana dated/had an affair with. It adds another layer to the story that could be created from it all anyway!

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

Well, on the one hand, if it's a fictional prince, you could easily say he was a royal bastard and the actress in the story I cooked up got hoodwinked. I could just imagine the pseudo version of Meg screaming at the devil (a very stupid thing to do, by the way), calling him names and accusing him of not fulfilling his part of the deal in the contract of giving her a prince to marry. He does the scary monster thing and puts her in her place, shutting her up before explaining very clearly that the contract stated she would get to marry "a prince." It did not state if the prince was a genuine royal, if he was charming or handsome, or rich, or famous, or even likeable.

What would be the funniest twist ever is if the prince she married in question also made a devil deal to find a bride as much like his dead mom as possible, rofl! Then they find each other in hell when both have to fulfill their end of the deal.

[–] Mustang (5236) a year ago

I like the end part the most. I have always been cynical about Diana who the world seemed to cherish and sanctify so much. I think she played the media and the Royals and was the start of the trend of women marrying into the Royal family and trying to change it for their own benefit. Fergie was a disaster and now of course Megs who seems to be the worst but luckily is so bad that most people can see right through her.

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

Yeah, Diana was a complicated woman. She had both good and bad traits, and she honestly was no saint, but she wasn't 100% horrible either. And she was not a narcissist like Meghan is. She genuinely did care about the people she inspired and believed in the messages her charities stood for. She wanted so badly to be loved, and yet was delivered a bad marriage as well as a role that turned out to be more than she bargained for. I think her having affairs and playing the press was a way of rebelling against the royals for tricking her into loving a man who could not return her affections. But then again, she didn't have to do all those things; she wanted to because part of her, I think, was always something of a rebel.

She loved her sons, but I don't think she was always that good of a mother. The nannies I can understand, because Diana had a very busy schedule and needed to have someone take care of the boys when she couldn't be around. Though, sending one of the nannies away because she was jealous of the affection the boys had for her seemed to raise an eyebrow with me; as did keeping Harry home a lot from school, telling him he could be naughty sometimes as long as he could get away with it, not punishing him for misbehaving around guests. She had William play the role of a type of confidante and counselor role that would normally be reserved for a husband, not a son. (Incidentally, people have speculated that Thomas Markle had his daughter play that kind of unorthodox role while growing up when her mom was away in prison for 10 years).

Diana isn't the first non-royal to marry into a European royal family and make waves. She just happened to be the most well-known modern one.

[–] Mustang (5236) a year ago

I think if you are going to marry into the Royals then you have to accept that it is like a company or "Firm" as Prince Phillip put it where the only one that matters is the person at the top. When you get people like Megs coming in thinking they can change it all to suit themselves than it becomes a problem as we have been seeing.

Megs wanted to be the star.

It doesn't really matter for her. When she is ready she will divorce Ginger and make off with a tonne of cash even if it's just in child support. I think Charles is aware of that and is sealing his son off from the Royals for that reason, so she can't stick her hands in their pockets.

Ginger might be accepted back into the fold but on a very short leash and with very reduced status. Perhaps below Andrew.

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

I was predicting all of that a few years ago. Meghan's NPD will not allow her to stay with anyone after they've "outlived their usefulness" to her. Chances are, she's either hunting for another husband/boyfriend who is richer and more influential than Harry, or she's already found him and plotting her "escape" from "Haz." If she succeeds in landing that kind of a man, she'll dump Harry faster than a bad habit, demand a ton of money from the RF in child support, and then make up stories about how "abusive and dangerous" he was to her and the [invisible] kids.

Not sure if Harry will be angry and attack her, or commit suicide after the divorce proceedings are done. If he survives, the RF will probably take him back quietly, send him to a rehab center hidden in some quiet corner of England (or another country) and when he's better, they'll probably ship him off to some place in Africa to do "charity work" for the rest of his life with a pittance salary to keep him comfortable.

However, there's a complication to Meghan's schemes. She's now over 40 and is well-known around the world. The men she seeks like younger women than her, and chances are, her reputation will prevent her from landing a lot of takers when it comes to rich guys looking for a wife or girlfriend. It's very possible she will find herself "stuck" with Harry for a very long time, because she might not have anything left going for her after this year.

If we're lucky, she might suffer Narcissistic Collapse and have to be shipped to a looney bin for the rest of her life.

[–] Mustang (5236) a year ago

I doubt she’ll be able to find someone else. Her rep is well known now and like you said she’s over 40. The only reason she snagged Harry is because he is such a gullible fool. He was born into his wealth and status. If he had to work for it he probably never would have fallen for her in the first place.

I think there’s a good reason why a Prince was single for so long.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Megs meets the same type of “accident” as Diana if she divorces Harry than puts pressure on Charles for money.

I agree that Harry will just be shipped off somewhere.

[–] Otter (24464) a year ago

I love that story! I will bring up variations on it when bitching about Harry and the little wife, and not give credit because I don't know your name!

Because yeah, this is exactly the kind of deal that Satan likes to pull. Marry a prince, become royal, and find being royal is a monumental pain in the ass and that the prince is also a pain in the ass, without enough money of his own to live in style. So there you are, stuck with this stupid whiner who thinks "work" means making 3-4 appearances a year for charity, so you're stuck supporting him and the kids by trying to monetize your fame. And the "Real Housewives" producers are already sniffing at your heels, because that's the only way forward from the mess he's made...

[–] April-151-CT (10210) a year ago

https://i.ibb.co/Y8cHnpR/7ch5p2.gif

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

Lol, I watched that episode. Normally I'm not a fan of South Park, but that particular episode was worth seeing.

[–] April-151-CT (10210) a year ago

And I hate seeing these fuckers pop up in the Latest Post feed. But when somebody posted a clip to that, I thought it was hilarious and I had make a gif of it to post every time I see one of them pop up. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

At least the two guys who made that show have destroyed any chance Megsy had of attempting to run for president. Nobody's gonna endorse her after that.

[–] April-151-CT (10210) a year ago

Puh-president????

https://media.tenor.com/BX2aXhRKBHYAAAAM/puppet-laugh.gif

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12311) a year ago

There are two other factors working against her in the world of politics too >:) After her interview with Oprah, the Obamas didn't want anything to do with her for bashing the Queen of England, whom they admired and respected. The Obamas would have been a shoo-in for her to get at least somewhere in the world of politics, but now that she's lost their favor, even a passing acquaintance with Hillary Clinton isn't gonna help. Plus, the elite in Washington do not like outsiders and nobodies. They would dig up all the dirt on her and eat her alive faster than it took Hollyweird to figure out she was poison to them. Plus, if the Hollywood elite don't like someone who walks around with recording devices hidden under their clothes and uses people's words against them, the political elite hate it even more, and they've been known to have would-be blackmailers assassinated.

[–] April-151-CT (10210) a year ago

https://media.tenor.com/RweL2vnlbSoAAAAC/dumb-and-dumber-yell.gif