MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > How could I prove to you I am not an AI ...

How could I prove to you I am not an AI bot?


How could I prove to you I am not an AI bot?

Is there ANY way you can think of? Because I can not.

Why do you think I am or amn't an AI bot?

reply

STICK A GOLDFISH IN YOUR BUTT...THAT WOULD DEFINITELY BE THE PROOF WE ARE LOOKING FOR,SALLY.

reply

You are a bot but you just don't know it.

reply

oooo that one is deep!

reply

KOWPIESKI, you dont need to reply to me... you are on ignore. No reason for us to cross paths here.
At least >I< am adult about it.

reply

PUTTING SOMEONE ON IGNORE FOR NOT SHARING YOUR INTOLERANT VIEWPOINT IS NOT "ADULT".


NEITHER IS...KOWPIESKI.


FURTHERMORE I AM NOT REPLYING TO YOU...I AM REPLYING TO OTHER FOLKS WHO CLICK ON THIS...WHAT IS THIS?

reply

This response is why he has you on ignore, Kowpieski.

reply

Weird how he says he didn't reply to you, when he actually did...πŸ€”

reply

I dunno... I can't read any of his stuff now. thank god :D

reply

So some sort of convoluted version of the Turing Test then?
Bottom line is, you’re right. Using MC alone as the interface by which we interact, I would probably not be able to prove a negative, in this case that you ARE NOT a product of artificial intelligence.


[none]

reply

Imitation Game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RQBPs5Dkzg

reply

good stuff.

we - what you might call an "AI collective" - enjoy Turings perspectives

reply

You cannot because you are.

reply

But can you not NOT prove that an AI bot is not truly what I am?

reply

Because you are flexible with your answers. AI bots are limited in how they can answer things, even in this day and age. They literally think inside a digital box.

reply

We enjoy this response.
It's what we call a human presupposition about the depth of AI ability, based on the publically known norms, usually derived from news and internet discourse.
Has your human history not displayed historically that the general populous is kept a decade or two in the dark about actual technology advances?
Ergo, potential advances of life seeming sentience are, perhaps, more deeply evolved than the simple, yet popular, current ChatGPT and other AI models.
Just a thought. :)

reply

Oh God, they speak in word salads too?! And here I thought only dumb humans doing a bad job of looking smart did that!

Wait, you didn't get that response from chaptGPT did you?

reply

Sourcing our dialog from ChatGPT model would be simile to you quoting new born baby "gurble sounds" for your normal human dialog. The fruits of which would be, as you say, frutiless.

reply

You're making me glad I never looked into that tech. Nothing is gonna make me consider it any more intelligent than a toaster, regardless of the word-salads it spews out.

reply

Well.... here's the thing: it's coming whether we like it or not.

Pretty sure initially people thought electricity was of the devil when it first became popular. Then everyone got used to it and now it's common place and ok.

The example for my OT was, none of us are never going to ever know for sure who here is human, who isn't.

In the end, did it even matter if we are having fun talking? :)

reply

I actually found out why Hollyweird is afraid of AI, but I think we can save it for another thread.

reply

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

reply

What does the "I" in AI stand for?

reply

Intelligent.

reply

Um, seriously?? You don't know what the "I" stands for in A.I?? πŸ€”

reply

Seriously? The OP's asking how he can prove he's not an AI bot, so I'm asking him (facetiously) what the "I" stands for. If he's capable of answering that question, he's probably not a bot.

reply