Gay dads of babies "we have no formula!"
Oh no, looks like your male nipples aren't designed to deliver food, the source of baby food for millions of years.
Maybe take the clue and realize the child should be raised by its mother???? 🤷♀️
I agree with you in terms of gay males adopting infants. It's absurd. It should be illegal. A child needs a mother. Stop trying to play house. If gay males were meant to have babies they'd come out of our asses when we take a shit.
But if through divorce or death of a spouse, a gay or bisexual man must raise a baby, more power to him.
Part of me wants to give you the benefit of the doubt since you’re reasonably new and possibly unaware of this particular user’s history of trolling. Another part thinks you may have been told and has noticed how you often cozy up to the extreme right wing bigots when they spew their hate.
But whatever, maybe you’re just the type of person who tries to ingratiate yourself to those who wouldn’t even piss on you if you’re on fire. So few queer users here, it’s a bummer to me to have one who vocally supports these muppets time and again. But you do you, I guess 🙂
Bro, you don't know me well. I'm fucking GameBoy. 🤣 I don't kiss up to anybody. I have my own masculinist view of our struggle for equality in a heterosexist world. I'm been advocating online for over 15 years for an alternative to the limpwristed pandering of the LGBT establishment. Not every queer person has to agree on these issues.
So you're a male homosexual couple. Your sexuality is non-reproductive. If you want babies, marry a fucking woman and produce one. Reproduction and child rearing is not conducive to homosexuality. Stop pretending you can be hubby and wifey because you can't. I actually believe that nature and the universe gave us gay men and lesbians something much better than the heteronormative baby mill.
I project a strong alternative for gay males and lesbians. We don't have to ape them. I truly believe homosexuality is superior. And I'm out to convert.
I don't know this Ticketplease fella. But if he says something I agree with, I'll expound on it. He posted on a topic I feel strongly about. I believe children should have a mother. I know I love mine and the idea of being raised by two males sounds frightening to me. I'm a gay man who was put on this earth to conquer the world - not to rise somebody else's babies. Get thee to a nursery!
I'm not trying to ingratiate myself to anyone, least of all homophobes. I'm ready to destroy them. But I also think we've been sold a bill of goods by the LGBT establishment. Just be open to hearing a different queer opinion. We don't all have to march in lockstep.
PLENTY OF MEN(SOME GAY AND SOME NOT) ARE WONDERFUL FATHERS WHO PUT A LOT OF MOTHERS TO SHAME...15 YEARS OF ONLINE ADVOCATING FOR OUTDATED DUNCE VIEWPOINTS MEANS YOU ARE GETTING REAL CLOSE TO NURSING HOME TIME...MIGHT WANT TO PACE YOURSELF.
shareWhy are you screaming?
Where did I say one word against gay fathers? I know some. It happens. But their kids had mothers too and the fathers didn't take them from them.
I'm talking about two faggots who by design adopt infants who could be better raised by a heterosexual couple. It's nonsense.
You're entitled to your opinion, but why do you gotta lower yourself and call them faggots? That's pure hate. I get that you're comfortable throwing around those slurs on an anonymous message board, but be careful in real life or someone might react in a way you don't like.
shareI'm gay. I say "faggot" tongue-in-cheek. If you want a baby, homosexuality is just the wrong way to go about getting one.
shareDamn dude. You said something horrible and can't even own up to it. That's both sad and pathetic.
shareOwn up to the fact that I don't give a fuck about a word? I'm gay. I can say it. You can't. Words don't bother me. It's pathetic to judge people based on choice of slang.
shareNo you're not. You're just hiding behind a lie so you can freely use slurs. Be better.
shareDude, half the fools here have known me for years. Try again. The problem with people like you is that you stereotype gays. We all must have the same beliefs and all talk the same, or it shatters your world view.
Drop your pants, bend over and I'll show you how gay I am, you nonce. 🤣
Nah, we absolutely don't need to have the same beliefs and talk the same, but I'm genuinely perplexed you don't see something wrong with referring to other people as faggots, especially on an anonymous message board where anyone can create a persona. If you're personal circle is cool with it, have at it, but have some damn decorum and realize it shouldn't be a word to casually thrown around when discussing something like this.
shareAre you gay or bi?
If you're personally offended, I'm sorry.
I might be offended if a straight guy used it.
It's sorta like black people repossessing the 'n' word. When a gay person cavalierly uses it, it strips it of its oppressive power.
Neither. I simply think its wrong to use the word so broadly. Again, in your own social group, cool, but not everyone is going accept your leniency towards it. I guess I'm just thinking of some friends and feel I should have their back on the matter because I know they would hate that.
And I get your point about black people repossessing the n word, but it seems clear not everyone wants to be referred as that. Boundaries, dude. Learn them.
Free speech for the win, but its also out responsibility to think before we say something.
Well, I'll be frank. I don't give words power over me.
In the face of 5,000 years of homophobic oppression, I believe my use of the word is warranted.
If the word is not acceptable here, then MovieChat should censor it.
This is really an issue for the site's mods.
NOBODY HERE KNOWS YOU...YOU ARE NOT GAY...YOU ARE A JACKASS.
shareAre you Polish by any chance?
shareI AM LUCKY ENOUGH TO BE PART ALMOST EVERYTHING.
shareAn Italian and a Polish guy are walking down the beach wearing Speedos.
While walking they get a lot of attention from women, but it seems that all the women are interested in the Italian guy!
After the day was over the guys are hanging out and the Polish guy asks, “Ok you have to tell me what’s going on, I’m not bad looking, I’m athletic and physically fit… what’s your secret? Why are they all into you and not me?”
The Italian says, “Ok, tomorrow when we walk the beach, put a potato in your speedo.”
The Polish guy nods his head in understanding.
The next day they walk the beach again, but strangely it happens again! All the women are only interested in the Italian guy…
That evening the Polish guy ask him again, “Man, I did what you said and nothing… WHAT IS YOUR SECRET!?!”
The Italian guy says, “Ok bro, tomorrow, put the potato in the front…”
🙂
share"If you want babies, marry a fucking woman and produce one"
Oh dear oh dear oh dear. You do realize that a huge number of the world's problems are due to heterosexuals fucking and producing babies, and then being totally unable to raise the children they've bred? And that anyone who's sane and kind enough to be trusted with an adoption needs to take over the job that you are trying to reserve for heterosexuals?
Not that you'd know about that, obviously no woman wants to breed with you.
Your comment makes no sense. We're talking about adoption, not heterosexuals fucking. You don't want heterosexuals to produce babies? Then let them adopt children who need homes.
The problem is that you're trying to force childrearing on us queer people. No thank you. It's not good for the gay men who put on aprons and change diapers. And it's not good for children who won't have mothers. This stuff is not rocket science.
Nope. No benefit. This is the user who told me yesterday in response to trying to explain that if someone wishes to stop the act of intercourse after they've started for really any reason, like pain or discomfort, or just really not liking what the other person was doing to them that it's not rape. Even if you say no.
[–] OnanTheBarbarian (1032) 21 hours ago
If it's to that point, you're talking about an abusive relationship. If they keep doing it, over and over, I would suspect they are violent in other ways. That's a whole other issue. That's domestic violence. You call the police.
But if we're just talking about one time in a sex act, when it starts out consensual, and in the heat of passion one partner is thinking "oh just let me finish". And lets be honest, moans and "no's" during sex are often signs that the "protesting" partner enjoys it. My thinking here is if the man finishes he may have been inconsiderate. But I can't see it as rape. That's an issue for the couple to resolve as a couple, without calling in the gendarmes.
I dunno, unless one is dying, if consent has already been given it's rather selfish to stop a man just before he orgasms. Just suck it up and deal with it and talk to your partner after.
Repeat that last sentence. Please. So if I'm crying, saying no, trying to push someone off of me, I'm the selfish one for not letting someone else finish???? FUCK THAT share
I WAS ALSO GIVING THIS "PERSON" SOME LEEWAY AS THEY ARE FAIRLY NEW...THIS THREAD ENDS THAT ENTIRELY...ONAN IS A PIECE OF SHIT WHO DERSERVES TO BE SCREAMING NO AND CRYING UNDER THE WEIGHT OF MY BODY WHILE I IGNORE HIM AND FINISH.
shareI just can't explain how much rage filled up in me because of that comment.
shareOMFG, I never said if someone is pleading crying and saying no that the creep shouldn't get off them.
We're parsing emotion before orgasm. As a third party you can't say that the man knew his partner felt like she was being raped. Without intent, how can there be a crime?
So an assault was definitely committed. But should the man be thrown in jail, or is this a matter to handled privately by the couple?
These online arguments become so hypothetical and theoretical that you can't make such a judgment on another person. I'm not defending rape, sexual assault or being selfish. It's like you and I are talking about two different events.
If I've misunderstood you, then I'm sorry. But I did read our exchange again, as well as some of your other comments and I'm still not sure. If you say that I've got you all wrong, then you know you better than I do, and you know what you are actually trying to say.
shareThis is the problem with these message board arguments. Sorry if I was unclear. I am categorically against any man forcing sex on anyone, even after consent is given. I'm just saying there's a difference between a rape with intent, and one that occurs in the middle of the act where both parties may be drunk or misinterpreting their partner's actions. The latter is still sexual assault. I'm just not sure it's always rape since there may not be intent on the man's part.
shareYou can still murder someone even if you don't intend to. The difference between rape and sexual assault is penetration. So if there is penetration, it's rape.
shareFUCK YOU.🙂
share