Japan bans mRNA Covid shots
Japan has just banned Covid mRNA shots for public use and called on other nations to follow suit after an official government study tied the injections to the nation’s soaring sudden deaths.
Like many other countries around the world, Japan has been battling a crisis of skyrocketing sudden and unexpected deaths since 2021.
https://x.com/jimfergusonuk/status/1772587852733288843?s=46&t=veox07EZp4AKnPBj_ooPpA
https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14969010
Japan’s health ministry admitted to a second “undeniable” causal relationship between a COVID-19 vaccination and death after a hitherto healthy teenager was found unresponsive following a third inoculation against the novel coronavirus.
A total of 2,076 deaths related to receiving the COVID-19 vaccine had been reported to the ministry by April 30, officials said. Although the frequency of deaths varied, according to the types of vaccines, the figure came to approximately one to nine deaths per million inoculations.
Good move by the Japanese, but it's too little too late. The nation's citizens almost universally took the clot shot when they were rolled out and you can't unjab yourself. I know of at least 5 people in their 40's and 50's who have died suddenly in the past few months. One poor guy went right in a classroom at my wife's school, instantly dead. It seemed like these stories had been slowing down, but suddenly in my neck of the woods there's been a massive uptick in them. Anecdotal for sure, possibly coincidental, but the overall trends in excess mortality continue to be frighteningly high and there's really only one explanation. There's a good case to be made that the damage down by the mRNA shots is permanent.
Now if only the Japanese would similarly come to the realization that wearing your underwear on your face does nothing to stop the transmission of airborne colds and flus. They're smart people, but boy are they hive-like in their behavior.
Brother, it’s not only in your neck of the woods! We have it here as well 35 - 55 years old, dead, die during a workout, die during the drive to work, die in your sleep! Heart attack at age 37 but alive.
Don’t get me started on the cancer cases.
The list of people I've personally known that are dead/damaged because of the shots is staggering. The Wuhan flu was nowhere near as dangerous.
shareI know absolutely no-one. Funny that.
shareI wouldn't say it's funny, but I know of roughly 10 people who died very suspiciously; suddenly and without warning, always of a cardiac arrest, in the 40-50 age bracket. At the very least, this raises some very serious alarm bells that warrant a closer look. But who's going to do it? The people that tried to force everyone to take these shots?
When the shots were rolled out in 2021-22, at my place of work I can count at least a dozen people who had adverse reactions immediately. From hives, to emergency room visits, female hair loss, to severe heart damage. A guy in our warehouse has a step daughter, in her 20s, who is a nurse. Naturally she was forced to get jabbed because of her job. She had a heart attack a few days later. At least in her case, the doctor treating here was man enough to admit it was the jab. To make matters worse, she eventually needed a port in her chest because of the constant blood draws they were doing. Well, that got infected last year and she spent a couple weeks in the Cleveland Clinic as they tried to combat the sepsis that developed. All because this healthy young woman was forced to get an experimental injection that was of absolutely no use to her.
This trail of death and illness dwarfs the effects of the coof in my circles.
And I know no-one who has had any negative impacts whatsoever due to the vax.
It's a total non-issue in the UK. People have moved on.
Also your nurse example would 100% hit the news. Can I see a source please? In the UK, someone's wife died after being vaccinated and they tied it to the COVID vaccine (can't remember which one they took) and it was NOT covered up. If I can find the source (it was 3 years ago now), I'll show it.
EDIT, here it is: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/aug/26/bbc-presenter-lisa-shaw-died-of-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-complications-coroner-finds
Why would it hit the news? It was a common enough story that it falls under the "dog bites man" column.
shareThis is literally literally [citation needed]
I flat out do not believe you. I know many people and I know no-one who has been negatively impacted by the COVID vaccine. It it was so common, so likely, I would statistically have heard of someone. It is was so common, it would be impossible to keep under wraps.
I'm sure Guardian readers have moved on; they're the types to be jabbed to the hilt and ready to avoid all discussions of possible side effects. Meanwhile, to the friends and families of the >100,000 non-Covid excess deaths that occurred in the U.K. during 2022 and 2023, hand waving might not suffice.
shareHow do you know all excess deaths in any country have anything to do with the vaccine?
Additionally, it is a non-issue here.
I am English. You are not.
No-one cares, whether or not they read the Daily Mail, Telegraph or Guardian.
There's a strong reason to suspect this because non-Covid excess mortality rates didn't spike until after the vaccine rollout. Yes, yes, correlation and causation, so if you're able to provide an alternate explanation I'm all ears. But there's really no other plausible cause.
share>There's a strong reason to suspect this because non-Covid excess mortality rates didn't spike until after the vaccine rollout.
https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-link-uk-excess-deaths-covid-19-vaccines-2024-02-06/
"However, health agency data, standardised for age, challenge this narrative. For example, ONS data show all-cause deaths in England were higher among the unvaccinated than those who had received at least one dose, for every month in its April 2021 to May 2023 dataset"
"McDonald said the long-term effects of COVID infection and a lack of preventive medication during the pandemic were among more plausible reasons for the excess deaths.
“The British Heart Foundation (BHF) found half a million people who should have been put on blood pressure medication were not,” he said, referencing a 2021 report, opens new tab by the advocacy group that described the pandemic’s impact on delaying heart disease diagnoses and causing people to put off care. “So, they are walking around without preventative medication.”
BHF said in a June 2023 report, opens new tab that there were more excess deaths involving cardiovascular disease in England since the beginning of the pandemic than any other disease."
This is literally fake news. Japan has not banned MRNAs.
>Now if only the Japanese would similarly come to the realization that wearing your underwear on your face does nothing to stop the transmission of airborne colds and flus. They're smart people, but boy are they hive-like in their behavior.
When you sneeze or cough, do you cover your mouth or avert your gaze or do you cough in people's faces?
If I was walking around sneezing during the entirely of my waking hours you might have a point. But wearing a fag rag morning, noon, and night has no effect on the spread of airborne illnesses. All the literature before, during, and after Covid has borne this out, on top of the fact that we ran a worldwide experiment, involving billions of people, and there wasn't a single nation, state, province, municipality, etc. where mask mandates were responsible for bending an infection curve. As the kool kidz say, "the science is settled".
shareRight, but I assume you instinctively averd your your gaze, cover your mouth. You don't just brazenly cough in people's faces.
> But wearing a fag rag morning, noon, and night has no effect on the spread of airborne illnesses.
Why do you not cough and sneeze in people's faces then?
If the amount of virus particles has no impact on spread, why do you choose to not sneeze in people's faces?
Also, no, there's tons of data on this:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7106e1.htm
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499874/
I could provide a list of contrary citations that would tax the servers of this website, but that's a fool's errand in this case as you have blind adherence to a limited coterie of "experts". But at least look at this study from your side of the pond. 40+ years ago Neil Orr studied the use of masks in an operating theater and gained permission from patients to undergo surgery by unmasked doctors. Long story short, there was no difference in post-op infection rates between masked and unmasked procedures. Now, if masks aren't altering the course of bacterial infections in open wounds via spittle, how effective can they be when tasked with stopping viral particles expelled during normal breathing?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf
What's more, you continue to change the subject. Which is, does universal, or even widespread, masking affect community transmission rates. It doesn't. And there's no geographical area that showed otherwise during the Wuflu hysteria.
>But at least look at this study from your side of the pond. 40+ years ago Neil Orr studied the use of masks in an operating theater and gained permission from patients to undergo surgery by unmasked doctors. Long story short, there was no difference in post-op infection rates between masked and unmasked procedures. Now, if masks aren't altering the course of bacterial infections in open wounds via spittle, how effective can they be when tasked with stopping viral particles expelled during normal breathing?
Lmao. Are you unironically arguing now that surgeons shouldn't mask up when operating?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/
And I will ask again: Why do you not cough and sneeze in people's faces then?
If the amount of virus particles has no impact on spread, why do you choose to not sneeze in people's faces?
>What's more, you continue to change the subject. Which is, does universal, or even widespread, masking affect community transmission rates. It doesn't. And there's no geographical area that showed otherwise during the Wuflu hysteria.
You clearly didn't bother to read any of the actual studies that do show an impact.
https://poverty-action.org/study/impact-mask-distribution-and-promotion-mask-uptake-and-covid-19-bangladesh
https://egc.yale.edu/largest-study-masks-and-covid-19-demonstrates-their-effectiveness-real-world
I guess Yale universiy are propaganda now.
"Lmao. Are you unironically arguing now that surgeons shouldn't mask up when operating?"
I'm saying that when the issue was studied in a very scientific manner, masking or not masking showed no difference in preventing infection. If you know of someone who ran the same study and came to a different conclusion, I'm all ears. Otherwise, you seem to be saying "evidence be damned! I'm right because I'm right." Your credibility is now shot as you've come right out and admitted that you will ignore facts that don't support your narrative.
The mask studies you linked to are full of holes and don't actually support the conclusion you desire. Beyond that, it shouldn't have required any formal study at all beyond the imposition of mask mandates, public compliance, and the ensuing transmission rates. If rates went down in Bangladesh because of masking, then masks work and the rate would have gone down everywhere masks were imposed. But they didn't. My God, they didn't.
Look at the East Asian countries, where mask compliance was essentially 100%, uninterrupted for more than 2 years. They shouldn't have had any waves because the masks would keep the transmission rate steadily low, but they went through the same cycles as everywhere else. So when their infection rates were spiking, did that mean the masks briefly stopped being effective, only to resume doing their job several weeks later? You and the other Covidians have no answer for this. If universal masking works it should work period, regardless of time or place.
You haven't actually challenged any of the studies other than just dismissing them, and no, mask compliance in east asian countries was never 100%. And it's not just masks, but a combination of social distancing, lockdowns and emphasis on personal hygiene.
And I will ask again: Why do you not cough and sneeze in people's faces then?
If the amount of virus particles has no impact on spread, why do you choose to not sneeze in people's faces?
I can see you haven't been able to come up with a link to help you explain why masking (allegedly) works sometimes but not other times. Better luck next time.
Polls put mask usage at greater than 95% in Japan in 2022, and even one year ago - after all mask rules had been rescinded - it was still hovering around 90%!
https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Coronavirus/Masked-Japan-90-cover-face-1-month-after-rules-lifted
So how do you explain the three sizeable waves of infections that occurred in the year and a half prior (after the non-sterilizing clot shot had been rolled out, I might add)? If masks work, they work. You won't get a more obedient, consistent, and homogenous population than the Japanese, particularly one as fastidious about hygiene. Their experience with rising and ebbing transmission rates proves that masks are pointless theater.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/japan/
"And it's not just masks, but a combination of social distancing, lockdowns and emphasis on personal hygiene." is what I said. It is, and was always more than just masking up.
I am under no obligation to respond to any of your new questions until you answer mine. Why is Yale wrong? Why are these wrong?
https://poverty-action.org/study/impact-mask-distribution-and-promotion-mask-uptake-and-covid-19-bangladesh
https://egc.yale.edu/largest-study-masks-and-covid-19-demonstrates-their-effectiveness-real-world
And I will ask again: Why do you not cough and sneeze in people's faces then?
If the amount of virus particles has no impact on spread, why do you choose to not sneeze in people's faces?
Your credibility is now shot as you've come right out and admitted that you will ignore facts that don't support your narrative.
>He’ll also play The Hatchling - farting out endless questions about self-evident facts (like excess deaths of vaccine victims), again hoping to exhaust you and manufacture a fake ‘win’ for himself.
It's not "self-evident" - it's completely debunked.
https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-link-uk-excess-deaths-covid-19-vaccines-2024-02-06/
"However, health agency data, standardised for age, challenge this narrative. For example, ONS data show all-cause deaths in England were higher among the unvaccinated than those who had received at least one dose, for every month in its April 2021 to May 2023 dataset"
"McDonald said the long-term effects of COVID infection and a lack of preventive medication during the pandemic were among more plausible reasons for the excess deaths.
“The British Heart Foundation (BHF) found half a million people who should have been put on blood pressure medication were not,” he said, referencing a 2021 report, opens new tab by the advocacy group that described the pandemic’s impact on delaying heart disease diagnoses and causing people to put off care. “So, they are walking around without preventative medication.”
BHF said in a June 2023 report, opens new tab that there were more excess deaths involving cardiovascular disease in England since the beginning of the pandemic than any other disease."
>He’s also a stinking hypocrite - calling others fascists and censors while he runs to the mods to have anyone who calls out his tactics shut down.
That's not remotely hypocrisy. Do you think websites having terms of service for continued access constitutes fascism? Should everyone be allowed to do whatever they want on any site they like without any kind of rebuke? Should websites not be allowed to control who their audience might be?
Are you against freedom of assembly?
Do you think the moderators on here are fascists? After all, they did remove some of your attacks against me. Are you going to accuse them of being fascists?
The Journal you cited actually supports that face masks are useless/ineffective to both surgeons and patients.
Doctors and physicians wear them mainly to respect tradition and to maintain social structure.
Your journal does not discuss toxicity caused by carbon dioxide and certain chemicals from face masks.
Another cited source that you and the other leftoids on this forum failed to read as usual.
However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.share
even today, it remains unclear as to whether they confer any tangible benefits to surgical outcomes.
Intuition would suggest that facemasks offer a physical barrier preventing the emanation of droplets from the oral or nasal passages and therefore satisfy the efficacy requirement of the evidence ladder. However, there are a number of different hypotheses as to why this may not be the case.
Indeed, the latest National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on the matter do not require operating staff to wear a mask in theatre.
The study concluded that ‘it is unclear whether the wearing of surgical facemasks by members of the surgical team has any impact on surgical wound infection rates for patients undergoing clean surgery’.
Based upon the findings of this review, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines state that there is ‘limited evidence concerning the use of non-sterile theatre wear’ such as surgical masks when trying to minimise the risk of surgical site infection, although there was an overall ‘consensus that wearing non-sterile theatre wear is important in maintaining theatre discipline’.
Facemasks do have a clear role in maintaining the social cleanliness of surgical staff, but evidence is lacking to suggest that they confer protection from infection either to patients or to the surgeons that wear them.
>Your journal does not discuss toxicity caused by carbon dioxide and certain chemicals from face masks.
Any evidence that is is a remotely serious issue?
https://www.journal.acorn.org.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1105&context=jpn
Moreover, this doesn't disqualify the various studies showing the (partial) impact of society wearing masks to mitigate COVID (and other illness) spread.
>Another cited source that you and the other leftoids on this forum failed to read as usual.
This is rich coming from you who dismisses any and all claims and explanations from fact-checker adjacent sites without reading them ever.
Your cited journal literally proves that face masks are useless. LMAO
Once again:
- Fact checkers are created to refute and obfuscate the truth.
- Fact checkers are opinions not facts.
- Fact checkers never prove nor disprove anything.
- Fact checkers are created to reinforce preconceived bias.
- Fact checkers are funded by the same globalists and elites that support, push and endorse transgender surgeries, vaccines, wars and all the establishment/DS narratives.
>Your cited journal literally proves that face masks are useless. LMAO
No, they say it is unclear and focus on the impact to the surgeon, rather than the person being operated on.
Going to comment on these?
https://poverty-action.org/study/impact-mask-distribution-and-promotion-mask-uptake-and-covid-19-bangladesh
https://egc.yale.edu/largest-study-masks-and-covid-19-demonstrates-their-effectiveness-real-world
>- Fact checkers are created to refute and obfuscate the truth.
>- Fact checkers are opinions not facts.
>- Fact checkers never prove nor disprove anything.
>- Fact checkers are created to reinforce preconceived bias.
All of these are just baseless claims. You have provided zero evidence for any of it. You have provided no evidence that you have ever read a single site that discredits any of your positions.
>- Fact checkers are funded by the same globalists and elites that support, push and endorse transgender surgeries, vaccines, wars and all the establishment/DS narratives.
They're all funded by different groups and peoples, with varying levels of crossover. I'm sorry you're such an ideological island that almoat nothing with any level of social consensus is amenable to you, but that doesn't make the articles from fact-checking sites inherently inaccurate. What "wars" are you referring to that they endorse? Vaccines are generally endorsed by 95% of the planet. Do you think that there's anything inherently dangerous about malaria or flu vaccines? Or the smallpax vaccine?
The journal was clear. They don't work.
Using deflections, semantics and sophistry does not change the facts.
I'm referring only to the mRNA vax. Don't conflate other decades proven vaccines with it.
99% of Fact Checkers are nothing but opinionated propaganda of mis/dis-information.
Only liars rely on them.
>The journal was clear. They don't work.
It does not say that at all. Neither does.
Going to comment on these?
https://poverty-action.org/study/impact-mask-distribution-and-promotion-mask-uptake-and-covid-19-bangladesh
https://egc.yale.edu/largest-study-masks-and-covid-19-demonstrates-their-effectiveness-real-world
>I'm referring only to the mRNA vax. Don't conflate other decades proven vaccines with it.
So you're solely an anti-vaxxer when it comes to COVID?
>99% of Fact Checkers are nothing but opinionated propaganda of mis/dis-information.
No evidence provided for this claim.
Yeah if you went to a real news site
like one of those lying commie MSM ones you've written off, instead of "some guy on twitter"
..you'd get the real story:
"Japan recalls faulty batch"
Look Jack, it' safe.
Rachel Maddow told me so:
https://rumble.com/vrkgip-flashback-rachel-maddow-vaccine-stops-covid-and-prevents-further-transmissi.html
Rachel Maddow March 29, 2021: “we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person… The virus does not infect them… It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to get more people.”
its crazy that not one democrat got sued over spreading false misinformation.
look here jack you lying dog faced pony soldier.
Fact check: Biden makes false claims about Covid-19, auto prices and other subjects at CNN town hall
https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/22/politics/fact-check-biden-cnn-town-hall-july/index.html
>its crazy that not one democrat got sued over spreading false misinformation.
So much for any support of free speech that you may have had.
Are you proposing that all politicians be sued for lying?
God damn, the hypocrisy of you morons is boundless. Maddow spreads fake news about the vaccines, it's "free speech". A conservative shares a skeptical opinion about the vaccine, they're an anti-vaxxer to be dehumanized and ridiculed at every turn. Trump says the election was rigged, "prosecute him".
I remain ever convinced that neo-liberalism is a mental disorder that turns stupid people into braindead zombies.
Bottom line, we were right and you were fucking stupid for lining up for the clot shot. We told you so.
Trump is not being prosecuted for saying the election was rigged. When did I propose prosecuting anyone for being skeptical abouit the vaccine?
>Bottom line, we were right and you were fucking stupid for lining up for the clot shot. We told you so.
Based on a fake news story posted on Twitter?
Fact checkers are fake news.
Fact checkers are nothing but opinions.
Fact checkers never refute anything.
Fact checkers are funded by elites like Bill Gates which is responsible for pushing the most deadly and injurious vaccine (mRNA).
We're not talking about fact checkers.
We're talking about another post that is clearly based on a total lie from a nonsense website.
Uh yeah, he is.
People have lost their fucking jobs for refusing the shot. 20yr veterans of the special forces have been forced out because they refused the shot.
Even military doctors have reported massive increases in heart related illness. Keep burying your head in the sand and perpetuating the false narrative.
No, he is not. The charges have absolutely nothing to do with him claiming the election was stolen.
>People have lost their fucking jobs for refusing the shot.
Okay. Not sure what this has to do with the fake news of the OP.
>Even military doctors have reported massive increases in heart related illness. Keep burying your head in the sand and perpetuating the false narrative.
[citation needed]
That is a lie, once again.
Do your own fucking research, Googler.
His task and goal is to lie. The only research he will do is to find whatever narrative reinforces his lies.
shareWhat lies? You made a bunch of nonsense claims you didn't bother to back up. What you insist without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
shareTwitter? LOL!
If you bozos scroll down, the next panel links to a website debunking your antivac nonsense:
"Japan has not banned MRNA. In fact they recently increased production and have been developing new vaccines."
https://www.contagionlive.com/view/first-self-amplifying-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-approved-in-japan#
Nothing was deboonked.
Your article of “increased production” was based from 2023.
The new announcement to ban the vaccines is from this month (March 2024).
The other imbecile below also used google results based from 2023 with a few dated 2024 that was citing the 2023 article.
You leftoids are always citing fake bullshit without reading your own sources.
>The new announcement to ban the vaccines is from this month (March 2024).
There is no such announcement. It's completely made up. No source exists for this claim.
The source is at the bottom of the X-post.
Tell me another lie.
https://prepareforchange.net/
A bullshit fake news website that promotes "alternative healing".
Its own article on this supposedly happening has zero citations. It is making shit up.
Another of your many lies as usual. So predictable. Facts are Facts. Cope with your denialism.
shareWhat am I lying about here? What sources are cited here?
https://prepareforchange.net/2024/03/24/japan-bans-covid-shots-over-soaring-sudden-deaths/
It cites absolutely nothing. This is not a Japanese site. Why isn't there any Japanese media claiming this?
You going to explain to me why you can't find a Japanese site for this claim?
sharehttps://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=ab02dd2696e7e4b9&sxsrf=ACQVn091fumSDtX098_cif2XU8i80b9c9Q:1711482999821&q=japan+mrna&tbm=nws&source=lnms&prmd=nivsmbtz&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj98_iB25KFAxXLWkEAHX6mDLUQ0pQJegQICxAB&biw=2133&bih=1032&dpr=0.9
There's nothing on this dude
"Japan has not banned MRNA. In fact they recently increased production and have been developing new vaccines."
If people want to inject themselves with experimental goo without informed consent... let them. As long as no one is forcing anything into my arm at the expense of my livelihood/freedom...we're good.
If not, we're fighting...it's as simple as that.
_______________________________________________
Current MC Posters with B1cKsurN Derangement Syndrome
Skavu
Keelai
robocat893
That guy (Ferguson) is the UK equivalent of Margery Taylor Green.
share