MovieChat Forums > The Sixth Sense (1999) Discussion > Bruce Willis' performance is underrated

Bruce Willis' performance is underrated


In fact, I think he's underrated in general. Sure he's been phoning it in lately, but he gave some great performances in the 90's. This movie wouldn't have worked at all if his performance wasn't top notch. I've seen way worse performances get nominated and even win Academy Awards. Take a look at Alan Arkin in Little Miss Sunshine or even Brad Pitt in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood this year. Both unremarkable performances that won Best Supporting Actor.

reply

I agree. I wish he could've been nominated for an Oscar for it.

reply

Alan Arkin and Brad Pitt were both great in those movies ya butthead.

Bruce Willis was also great in Sixth Sense and arguably even better in Unbreakable

reply

Alan Arkin's performance in particular was painfully unremarkable. The character required no depth or nuance to play. Playing a disgruntled grandpa is not a stretch for Arkin.

reply

You are a retard

reply

Great counter-argument moron.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Lol f*** outta here, I didn't even see your shitty comment. Admins probably thought it was so stupid they deleted it themselves. Dumbass.

reply

[deleted]

He is very good in the film - along with Nobody's Fool and Twelve Monkeys, probably his most impressive performance.

reply

Willis was such a star back in the day, that people overlooked his acting chops...

reply

barely moving a facemuscle was really outstanding

reply

On another note about what you said about worse performances winning, I automatically think about Jack Palance winning for City Slickers and Km Bassinger winning for L.A Confidential. Bruce Willis in the Sixth Sense is better than those.

reply

Bruce was always weak actor and played himself everywhere. What are you talking about?

And he was his usual self here too

reply