MovieChat Forums > Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) Discussion > One thing better about the prequels over...

One thing better about the prequels over the original trilogy


The light saber duels were much better. The originals don't really show the jedi as master swordsmen, they're more like clumsy clods.

reply

That's because they were illustrated in completely different ways. The prequel duels were all about action and cool effects, while in contrast, the OT duels were all about dialogue, emotion and struggle between the characters.

Personally I can enjoy both. The only one in the OT that I think looks a little clumsy is in episode IV's. Knowing now, how powerful the Jedi and Sith are, that rematch could have been a lot better. Episode V's, imo, is one of the best as Vader just toys with the completely outmatched Luke.

I should also add that the Sidious v Windu fight is the worst duel by far imo. Talk about two clumsy old men fighting lol

reply

The only one in the OT that I think looks a little clumsy is in episode IV's. Knowing now, how powerful the Jedi and Sith are, that rematch could have been a lot better.


Something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=to2SMng4u1k

reply

I disagree. The choreo in the Darth Maul fight is pretty slick, but I get more thrill out of Luke fighting Vader. I also don't think the choreo in the Obi-Wan/ Vader fight is bad, either. If you watch a kendo match, it looks similar to one of those. Swords out front, a lot of quick cuts to test defenses, and then a serious strike or two. Being as it is influenced by kendo, I can't really fault it for looking bad (save only that slo-mo spin move...)

Contrariwise, I do not like the Yoda fights (Yoda fighting with a sword?) or the Obi-Wan/ Anakin fight (drawn out and boring). There are so many flashy moves that it becomes hard to care about the fight and I lose interest. It's a balletic competition, not a fight. The worst of the prequels is that I don't care about most of the combatants. I like Obi-Wan well enough, but Anakin is a poorly-written character, and many of the fighters (Dooku, Grevious, and Maul) are generic villains. They have all the emotional core of a Boss Fight in a video game.

I would place the prequels' fights third in the trilogies. I've got a tonne of gripes about the new films, but they're throwing out some great swordfights.

reply

The light-saber fights in the original trilogy were awesome, but as drama, rather than as exciting fights. The Luke-Vader fight is one of the most awesome screen fights ever, but because it's a tightly filmed interpersonal conflict scene that happens to have some weapons involved.

The thing is, the original films didn't really have room for a top-level light-saber fight, because a top-level light saber fight takes two top-level participants. In the first film it was Obi-Wan vs. Vader, and Obi-Wan was no longer at the top level, and he wasn't playing to win anyway. In the second film, Luke was definitely not at the top level. In the third film maybe he was, but his conflict with Vader was so personal that the weapons were kind of incidental.

So yes, the light-saber fights in the prequels were much showier and stuntier, and yeah, I like them. They're fun to watch, and if some of them are balletic, then great! I'm a huge ballet fan! And I know it's as cheesy as cheesy can be, but I still love Yoda kicking Dooku's ass. I also like cheese.

reply

Liking cheese is good. Nobody has topped the Errol Flynn Robin Hood, and that's full of cheese (he does a great, cheeky, cheesy sword flourish while fighting guards at the feast near the start of the film).

But, for me, for Star Wars, I don't like most of the prequel fights. They weren't about great characters, they weren't good scenes, and they wouldn't have worked without the stunts. They were showing off. If you take the sword fight out of the Dooku fight, you don't have a scene. If you take the sword fight out of Vader v. Obi-Wan or Vader v. Luke, and you still have a scene. Much shorter and less action-packed, but Vader and Luke would try to turn each other in Jedi, or "I am Your Father" would be happening - there's still a scene.

As to the quality of the swordplay itself, well, frankly, I think there's really great action in the original trilogy. I find those sword fights tense, thrilling, and the swordplay is great. It doesn't look less impressive to me than the prequels. The prequels have a flashier style and more flips. But the sword fight itself still looks skilled and impressive. Just more "kendo" and less "Cirque du Solei".

In the prequels, I appreciate the epic quality that was brought to the Qui-Gon/Obi-Wan v. Maul duel. A lot of that is John Williams' doing. I also liked the fight between Mace Windu and Palpatine, which I felt would have been a scene (not a *great* scene, but...) without the fight. Other than that, I must confess I find them bland, tedious excuses for sword demonstrations (and on that mark, they are impressive), and I tune out.

To each his own - if you like them, more power to you. But for me, they fall flat.

reply

"I appreciate the epic quality that was brought to the Qui-Gon/Obi-Wan v. Maul duel. A lot of that is John Williams' doing."

Ain't it the truth about John Williams! Yes, without the awesome score, the three-way fight in "Phantom Menace" would fall as flat as the medal-awarding scene in "A New Hope". The score makes the scene work. Williams doesn't get enough appreciation from the fans, he's elevated the films as a whole and single-handedly saved a lot of iconic scenes.

It's so nice talking to a sane and perceptive Star Wars fan, for once.

reply

I think Williams gets overlooked because he's so prolific, we hear his music so much, and that almost makes us forget how awesome he is. He sets a benchmark for all music in cinema. He also sounds "classic" movie, with big, bold brass sections triumphantly proclaiming the epicness of film, which we expect.

But he's great. I've never heard a John Williams soundtrack that wasn't great. Star Wars is a masterwork of composing.

"It's so nice talking to a sane and perceptive Star Wars fan, for once."

Right back at ya. I get a little bored by all the aggression often displayed between Star Wars fans on these (and other) boards. Instead of laying out arguments and debating the merits and demerits of, say, whether or not The Last Jedi was any good, people just angrily blast away at each other, calling each other morons, tasteless, or worse.

It's great to just converse about films, films we love or hate or are confused by or enthralled with, and just have a good conversation about a wonderful medium.

reply

I enjoyed both PT & OT lightsaber fights. As many acknowledge the duel in IV was somewhat clumsy & awkward looking. No doubt what inspired the "re imagined " Vader/Obi Wan fan films.

reply

I don't mind the duel in IV. The sad little spin does look silly, but other than that, I think the duel works. The scene is good, and the choreography obviously owes a lot to kendo. Watch a kendo match and note the way they feel out the other's defenses with the sword tips before a couple quick cuts. Then watch the duel in IV again - it's almost the same pattern. It's not acrobatics, but that's not "sword fighting", it's stunt work. All the spinning and twirling and backflips they do in I, II, and III just look like a choreographer showing off.

reply

My top lightsaber fights:

1) Vader vs. Obi-Wan on Dagobah (Episode III)
2) Vader vs. Luke on Bespin (Episode V)
3) Darth Maul vs. Qui-Gon/Obi-Wan (Episode I)
4) Vader vs. Luke on Death Star II (Episode VI)
5) Count Dooku vs. Anakin/Obi-Wan on random starship (Episode III)

reply

The duels in the OT had far more emotional depth. The prequel duels looked like a video game.

reply