MovieChat Forums > Batman Returns (1992) Discussion > Columbia University students accuse BR o...

Columbia University students accuse BR of antisemitism with Penguin


The meat of the article below. Seems they're really overreaching here.

In their Times article, (available now in an archived version from Gainesville Sun), authors Rebecca Roiphe and Daniel Cooper claim that symbolically, the Penguin "is a Jew, down to his hooked nose, pale face and lust for herring." Further, the character's hostile ambitions feed into the stereotype of the Jew who is "unathletic and seemingly unthreatening but who, in fact, wants to murder every firstborn child of the gentile community." Although Roiphe and Cooper stop short of claiming that the film is overtly anti-Semitic, they argue that these tropes and stereotypes are dangerous nonetheless.

The controversy doesn't end with the Penguin. Roiphe and Cooper point out that the Penguin teams up with corrupt businessman Max Shreck (Christopher Walken), whose "Jewish-sounding name is borrowed from the actor who played the first bat-man of the silver screen, the vampire" from Murnau's classic Nosferatu. Further, the two critics propose that the film carries troubling references to openly anti-Semitic composer Richard Wagner: "The Penguin sails the sewers in a giant wooden duck, a parody of the 'Schwan der Schelde' from Wagner's Lohengrin." These and other criticisms open up a number of troubling questions for Batman Returns.

In an extensive 2014 article, Southern California Public Radio breaks down the movie brick by brick, identifying the Penguin as a "warped Moses" who ruins multiple Christmas tree lighting ceremonies, thus establishing a thematic "war on Christmas" as well as a more fundamental Christian vs. Jew opposition. The article points out that like Die Hard, Batman Returns qualifies as a quasi-Christmas movie, but in its case, Christmas must be saved from a pernicious Jewish stereotype rather than a German terrorist. Although the SCPR article locates some validity in Roiphe and Cooper's claims, it also points out that the Anti-Defamation League investigated their analysis and dismissed it as "nonsense." The Times later published a response from Wesley Strick, the Batman Returns script doctor who dreamed up the Penguin's scheme to eliminate Gotham's firstborn. Strick, who is Jewish himself, expresses dismay in regard to Roiphe and Cooper's article, and likens their argument to a "Rorschach test," implying that the two critics identify anti-Semitic undertones where none actually exist.

https://screenrant.com/batman-returns-controversy-antisemitism-penguin-accusation-explained/

reply

You have to wonder about people who reach for this kind of nonsense--the fact that they see the horrific Penguin as Jewish only speaks to THEIR anti-Semitism.

reply

no.... art borrows from art. The best literature doesn't just create a brand new character out of scratch, its often a borrowing and reimagination of past events, people, gods etc.

for example Dumbledore was inspired by Merlin and Gandalf.


if this is all true that they say I dont call it anti Semitic, I think its a complex character based of archetypes and tropes. im sorry you dont understand art...

reply

Um, ok. Your comment had nothing to do with what I was saying. But you go ahead and get high off that unearned superiority complex of yours and someday I hope you seek professional help as you are obviously an attention-seeking narcissist.

reply

"omg he actually knows something I dont, superiority complex!!!!"

reply

LOL, ok, keep going off on your own rails there, Sparky. Nothing you say in response to me has anything to do with my own comments, so you go ahead and have the last word and that will be that.

reply

no ones off the rails. its a defence mechanism you used because you have nothing. move along thanks

reply

Yeah, it’s like when people claim Planet of the Apes or King Kong is racist towards black people. People see their own racism and blame other people for it.

reply

True. It's like they're telling on themselves.

reply

This was exactly what I thought. That really says a lot about what the paper's authors think about, but not much about the film. The Penguin satirizes politicians, extends the comic book character's "he's a man who's also a bird" gimmick into a disgusting, little monster, he provides a compare/contrast to Batman himself (wealthy family, orphaned, thought a freak, etc.), but I can't work my way around to figure out how anybody would look at Oswald Cobblepot and think he was Jewish.

They're either looking to be offended, they really harbour some pretty antisemitic thoughts themselves, or else their professor (or whoever they're presenting the paper to) loves reading pop culture deconstructions where people find offense where none was meant. My best guess? Mostly the first theory, some of the third, and maybe just a smidgeon of the second.

reply

its all very possible... I dont think this makes it bad they did this, I think its neat its such a complex and intricate borrowing from the past

reply

They’re a few decades late to be angry at this movie.

reply

So people are now going through all the movies desperately looking for stuff to be offended by. Ok

reply

Perfect example of really, really, really, reading into something. Look hard enough and you will see whatever you wanna see.

I wonder how many Jews have the name last name Cobblepot

reply

This is about as ridiculous as that one woman hating on Kindergarten Cop because she hates the idea of cops being in schools.

reply

his parents .. i hope he finds them.

reply