MovieChat Forums > Planet of the Apes (1968) Discussion > This is a prime example of why I hate pr...

This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs.


I ABSOLUTELY DESPISE when I haven't seen a film and someone spoils the ending for you and say: "oh, it's been out for (x) amount of years so it's your own fault". It's as if they want to show off that they saw the film and you didn't.

I saw this film for the first time today and was bothered that I knew the twist ending because of people who spoiled it for me. If you love the film so much, why not just shut up and allow someone who hasn't seen the film before enjoy it as much as you did?

It actually bothered me the entire time watching this film so I couldn't have an honest opinion on whether or not I saw the twist coming.

reply

This movie has been out for 50 years and the ending has been lampooned all over pop culture ever since. Knowing the ending is common sense like making a sandwich. Sorry you have been under a rock your whole life

reply

I get what this guy is saying. I remember how pissed off I was when someone told me that Adam and Eve did in fact eat the apple before I got to that part in the book.

reply

I think that once a movie has been out for several months, then spoilers are absolutely fair game.

reply

Before we ever get to the Statue of Liberty, we get plenty of other hints that I would rather say are even bigger tell signs – and I doubt those were spoiled. I saw it again (all 5) recently over just one week, and was surprised that anyone would ever think it was not Earth...

• he starts the movie by explaining how there is a theory on how time on earth would have speed up tremendously compared to the time in their space ship. And we are directly shown that by then 700 years on Earth had already passed... this is even before the crash.

• The mission was meant to arrive far into the future on Earth. In fact, several of thousands of years was planned - so it went according to plan.

• When they crash he see that Earth time is several of thousands of years ahead of them, and he makes a point of this (which is irrelevant with all due respect, unless of course it was Earth they were on)

• His mates are not too convinced they are on another Planet. In other words, they think this is Earth.

• The Apes speak perfect english and even writs perfect english. Yes. this is classic Hollywood but they make a point out of the fact that he writes perfect "English"... I mean, this is one amazing coincidence, no? Normally when the Nazis speak english with a broken accent we suspend our disbelieve and hear it as their original language... well, in this the Apes speaks and writes english. No two ways around it. The story have them speak English. And they do so perfectly.

• He visits an archaeological dig, where they find remains of advanced humans, with medical dentures, pacemaler etc... AND they also find a doll, which we can buy in any plain toy shop here on earth, together with curly hair and a white dress...(he should have looked for "Made in Taiwan") even including the "flip it" and it talks.... well, had it been me, this might have been it... to Taylor, he hardly cared.

The true twist is that it took the Statue of Liberty to convince him.

A side note; of all the signs that this is in fact Earth (the atmosphere, landscape, that the space computer was programmed to land on earth, the time future was according to plan, perfect english communication in both writing and speaking, humans and apes and horses, remains of a past human culture with medical known denture and pacemakers etc and a damn plastic doll) then the weathered down Statue of Liberty (big head with spikes and a torch) is the ONE HINT of all of those that would be the most likely to have been coincidentally recreated on another planet and in another culture, no?

It was a great twist back in the day. Not in this time and not to this audience. I dare say.

reply

Back in the day, the "twist" only worked to the extent that audiences were used to things like Star Trek and a good many movies to accept the ludicrous notion of humans evolving independently on other planets... Speaking English on other planets. So the "apes", corn, horses etc were not surprising.

Oh, and I do not think his mates believed they were on Earth. I remember a conversation in the raft about the sun being "...too white for Bellatrix. We don't know where we are." Of course Taylor had just rattled off some nonsense about their being 300 light years from Earth on an unnamed planet in orbit around a star in the constellation of Orion, and nobody raised an eyebrow.

reply

I see both sides.
If you haven't seen it...why read boards?
I avoid the boards when I am watching a series and do not want things spoiled.

reply

The Titanic sinks in the end.

Bonnie and Clyde get massacred in the end.

Dorothy goes home from Oz.

Rosebud is a sled.

Sue me.

reply

Gotta remind you. Dorothy only got back from Oz in the novel. In the film, she never actually went anywhere... Which kinda annoys me, but I love the film anyway.

reply

This is why I stopped watching most movie reviewers online like John Campea etc. Their tendency to assume their audience knows about twist endings and rumored plot reveals totally ruins the experience of watching a movie for the first time. Do yourself a favor. Unsubscribe to all of that and limit your movie news to trailer reveals, or a calendar of upcoming movies. You’ll enjoy old and new movies so much more this way. I’ve hardly gotten spoiled since then.

reply

It's been a while and I have no idea which "pretentious film buffs" are being referenced...

I saw this film first around about 1970-71, after having seen Beneath the Planet of the Apes and after collecting the gum cards and, it's possible that I read the novel by then too, being 12 or 13 years old. I wasn't bothered by knowing the twist, which had, in fact been explained to me in '68 by a kid at recess, who told me that the apes had CUT IN HALF the Statue of Liberty.

Anyway, by early in the 21st century, the ending of this film was referenced in so many places that pretentious film buffs were clearly not required, what with The Simpsons and all.

Overall, I do have sympathy for the notion that however old a piece of media is, in our environment with almost all older film and TV available, loads of people are going to be coming to it for the first time. And, it is sometimes sad that some interesting plot elements are now so widely "spoiled" in pop culture. I can't be too sad about this one as the technical and scientific background of the film is, and was on initial release, utter balderdash. Rod Serling cared not at all for any of that and the people who rewrote his screenplay cared even less. There is no way any grammar school graduate could take any of it seriously enough to be seriously offended by knowing the "twist".

reply