"You can't use a firearm to defend property"

At the least, she was clearly guilty of assault.

This is your one chance to show you can be a sincere poster and someone worth even responding to and if you can't do that, then it's the ignore list for you.

The legal definition of assault is when a person is in reasonable apprehension of a battery. Battery is the physical act.

So you tell me if this does not meet the criteria of assault - if a person is behind a locked heavy door and an unauthorized person is breaking down that door and breaking glass all to make entry, and where it is reasonable to assume for a person to make entry through that locked door and glass that some sort of weapon or tool (a tool that can be used as a weapon) is being used, then is it not reasonable to believe that the person behind that door may find him or herself in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery?

Or do you think the person breaking down the door and breaking the glass is just doing it to sell girl scout cookies or just say hello?

To further illustrate, now imagine that there is not one person doing this, but a huge crowd. Adding this most likely adds to the criminal offenses, which would also mean the inclusion of something like a "mob action" offense and those are typically felonies.

Either answer with a sincere and truthful reply because if you don't or can't, you are not even worth conversing with and are going on ignore.