JFK assassin/CIA (Ignore other board “conspiracies”—they are trolling me)

That was part of my point, but that image of them was carefully crafted for them to elude suspicion. They *wanted* to be underestimated. This is what covert operatives do, and why it took even me so long to see it.

And I’ve been studying this for 30+ years.

Check out Dark Legacy (2009)

Dont forget about the hanging gigachad.

You are desperate to make this an issue of standard party politics and ideology with your talking points, etc, but it’s really not. This is not about the election horse-races.

I’m an old school anti-woke Democrat, sure, but I would never touch anyone of either party with a ten-foot pollster who had anything to do with the Bushes. Like I said, I’m even throwing liberal darlings, Michael Moore and Oliver Stone under the bus. They are not authentic and may be CIA themselves. They report to Bush. The appointed president’s brother in 2000 was the governor of the State in question, and his campaign manager was the Secretary of State of Florida in charge of the election process. Any other historical situation, we would put the pieces together in short order and understand it as coup after coup by criminal masterminds. But we don’t want to believe it could happen here… to us… as victims to their callous whims of power.

Jews supposedly voted for antisemite, Pat Buchanan on the butterfly ballot in several counties. Even he was confused by this and dismissed his own votes. An accident, right? Sure. lmao

You need to look at who has the training, intellect and family heritage for corruption. No matter how folksy they appear, the 20th and early 21st Century saw the rise of one political dynasty in the Bushes, their goals in Cold War, Latin American and the Middle East were all fulfilled and obfuscated by dramatic theatrical events based on terrorism, their puppets took falls in scandals while they themselves maintained a carefully crafted, bumbling image all till this very day with Dubya painting landscapes while sitting in his bathtub.

Their political attack ads show a different side.

In another 1000 years or less when humans are studying this as history alongside Julius Caesar and the Roman Empire, they will have the necessary distance from the situation to understand. No longer will it sound like “lunacy” as it does to us who lived under the thumb of the Bush regime.

41 years old. Been on IMDb since 1998, so I was young when I made it. Two favorite Rush songs at the time, one famous, “YYZ” and one not-so-famous, “Anagram”

You provide a rather trivial reply for such a significant topic.

go sodomize yourself with a retractable baton, dumb fuck. why do you put 2 ambiguous statements in the same post ? you feel smart, dipshit ?

You ever ask yourself why we are inundated with humor and snipes casually referring to outlandish conspiracy theories?

Don’t you think maybe someone wants to create a culture of “laughing it off” and “looking the other way?”

Fight the trend!

I’m not saying this is related to Bush, too, necessarily. But it is a powerful form of control to get people to ridicule each other over legitimate questions about the nature of our society.

No people in significant numbers actually believe “flat-earth”, “fake moon landing” and that’s why they come up so much. Their existence, and the notion of a “tin foil hat” is really harming legitimate critical thinking skills.

You need to read some Orwell or something, or people of influence will roll all over you.

Don’t be so afraid to look stupid.

[deleted]

Actually, for years I believed the Warren Report and thought Oswald was a lone nut. I’ve argued that case far longer than any other. I don’t have habit of going the conspiracy route with most things.

It was only recently when I began examining for myself weird stuff like the altered medical reports and autopsy photos which lead me to pursue the truth elsewhere. It not only lends credence to the conspiracy angle, but to a very particular “inside job” scenario (not Mafia, not Soviets, not Cubans) which syncs up with the altered parade route, weak secret service presence, convenient fall guy placed in a job at the location by a CIA connection, George de Mohrenschildt.

It’s hard to fathom because in the world we live in now where everyone has cameras on mobile, email, internet and heightened and healthy skepticism of government, we don’t see it as doable. But in the world of the early ‘60s, this doesn’t seem like that complicated of a covert mission, and there was complacency anyhow since the last presidential figures to face this violence were Teddy Roosevelt & William McKinley at the turn of the century. It only requires a few key people with some administrative contacts (Bush) and plausible deniability. If it had went to trial with Oswald, the case may have fallen apart, but the supposed retribution hit by Jack Ruby took care of that and diverted the attention on organized crime.

bump

Too high profile LBJ is, and too concerned about his historical legacy to risk it. To pull the hit off in his own home state, too, seems reckless when there would be much better options.

Johnson also was already seen as a successful negotiator wheeler-dealer type, and wouldn’t want to cheapen himself with such theatrics after already using some shady means in his early political days. He was a man trying to turn a corner—that much is obvious. He has the prestige at this point in his career, so why revert back to a common thug image? He also tried leading a nation into an era with less regional divide, and had angered Southerners by pursuing civil rights and honoring Kennedy with a retention of most of his cabinet.

LBJ is a talker and full of bluster, whereas any hypothetical psychological profile of conspirators would likely point towards more introspective and meticulous individuals—covert intelligence types.

With the Vietnam War not going well in 1968, LBJ didn’t even push his luck and try for a second full term. This gives us further insight into his values, and he doesn’t appear to have any particular allegiance to a “military industrial complex” that Kennedy and Ike were also weary of, but that is certainly not the case with Republican power-players and war profiteers like Bush and his associates that dominated the power structure during Nixon’s terms and beyond.

Johnson, in ‘68, wisely realized that he presided over legislative successes that helped the working man, and was the most consequential post-Civil War president on racial issues. So, he quit while he was ahead. A figure composed of the power-hungry ambition to the level of killing for it would not have relinquished it so easily.

Plus a communist defector in Oswald would not be a Democrats ideal fall guy. Conservatives to this day love the lone nut presentation as it conforms to their worldview of liberals as violent, Marxist types who are maligned pariahs. So, we are looking at suspects that benefit from an Oswald-type.

Not LBJ. No way was he involved.