MovieChat Forums > Joe Buck Discussion > Super Bowl TV: Is all the Joe Buck hate ...

Super Bowl TV: Is all the Joe Buck hate really fair?


https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/01/29/super-bowl-tv-is-all-the-joe-buck-hate-really-fair/

On Sunday, when millions of TV viewers hunker down to watch the 49ers battle the Chiefs in Super Bowl LIV, we can count on certain rituals to play out:

Obsessive football geeks will overdose on hours of pregame blather. … Most of the splashy, overpriced commercials will be judged to be “lame.” … Booties will shake and beer will be spilled as Jennifer Lopez and Shakira rock the halftime show.

And Twitter will be jam-packed with venomous barbs aimed at play-by-play man Joe Buck. How many venomous barbs? Add that to your list of prop bets.

The Super Bowl is an event that rotates among the major broadcast networks. And this year the arrow lands on Fox, which means we get Buck and his longtime sidekick Troy Aikman.

Buck is perhaps the most despised sportscaster in America. We know this because there are anti-Buck Facebook groups and numerous anti-Buck memes. Fans in Wisconsin once started a petition to ban Buck and Aikman from calling Green Bay Packers games. It was signed by nearly 30,000 people.

As for this title clash, the hostility began soon after the 49ers and Chiefs qualified for the Super Bowl. Some griped that their annual day of revelry and indulgence would be marred by the mere presence of Buck. And in one of the funniest Twitter posts of the young year, Buck was described as “27 jars of sentient mayonnaise in a suit.”

Flag that guy for roughing the announcer.

Among Bay Area folk, maybe the only person doing a happy dance over Buck’s Super Bowl gig is radio play-by-play guy Greg Papa. After all, you have to figure that a good chunk of the Faithful will mute Fox and turn on KNBR.

But why all this vitriol for Buck? And is it warranted?

With a baritone, often emotionless, delivery that features touches of dry humor and snark, he can come across like a smug frat boy to those who aren’t into that sort of thing. And he’s not really prone to the colorfully lyrical descriptions we get from some sportscasters. Nor does Buck exude the chummy kind of warmth radiated by a Jim Nantz or Al Michaels.

And though I’ve never bought into this one, many viewers simply believe he is biased against their team.


Of course, Buck has his supporters. They like how he doesn’t take himself too seriously. For example, he poked fun at all the criticism he gets in a lively “Funny or Die” video. Those who have Buck’s back also cite his seven Emmy awards and insist that his economical delivery allows big moments to speak for themselves.

Andy Nesbitt, a columnist for USA Today, argues that the hatred for Buck “makes absolutely zero sense,” adding that his voice alone “makes you know right away that you’re watching something important.”

And then there’s this sentimental bit of trivia: The last time the Chiefs were in the Super Bowl was 50 years ago — when Joe’s father, Jack, called the action for CBS. That’s kind of cool.

Still, it probably won’t soften the hearts of the haters, who believe Buck has all the televisual appeal of a fence post. So expect a barrage of mean-tweets.

reply

he is alot better than many others..... would anyone rather have the non stop talking heads ESPN have? at least buck takes breaks in the play calling.

NBC flirted with female commentators on their NHL games, is that better, high pitched screeching voices in men's sports?

if buck is bad, then his critics should name people that are better than him, and then we can discuss THEIR flaws, and compare.

NFL on FOX is a lot better than on CBS, alot better commentators do fox have.
voices a lot more calming.

compare Tracy Wolfson to Erin Andrews for an example !!






reply

I'm mostly for equality with the women, but I can't listen to a female announcer.

reply

no one can, if they are really being honest.

My own sister and mom can't stand it either.

it just feels so out of place, it's men playing, feel free to comment womens sports instead.



reply

Female sideline reporters are cool.

reply

how and why........ they have played NBA or NFL?

or are they just eye candy for male chauvinists or lesbians as yourself?

reply

No there are female sports reporters that know their business. Do you think Bob Costas played in the NBA or MLB or NFL? He's the best play-by-play in history. Where in the fuck did you get this idea that you had to have played in these professional leagues to be a reporter? It's an idiotic argument.

And the only male chauvinist here is you, obviously. I'm guessing a female in your life has hurt you. Maybe your mother. Maybe a gf(s). Maybe both. You're even attacking me and I'm just saying I like some female reporters. Obviously you are just looking for a fight.

reply

you are guessing a lot, huh?

then let me guess, you are a woman, or a low testosterone SJW...... or maybe all of the above.

That is very popular today, we all know that.

no you are a woman.

reply

"I can't stand listening to a woman's voice during a game". What a fucking snowflake bitch-made punk you must be.

reply

Doris Burke

reply

Ugh....... on the court okay.... not as a fucking commentator :-(

reply

Name a better male commentator for the NBA. They all suck.

reply

Don't worry with him. He's just a misogynist. He's the same type that thinks a woman's place is in the kitchen and bedroom. He's a fossil.

reply

you are a woman aren't you.... a very old woman.

Statistics facts from europe: Immigrants commit more crime and rapes than than the native citizens of X country:
buck swope: You are a racist to say that!

Sports fans: we can't stand to hear a woman's voice for 2 hours talking nonstop during a baseball/basketball game

buckswope: you nasty misogynists!

reply

Seek help.

reply

mike breen..... only on MSG with the knicks, not with ESPN and van gundy

reply

Joe Buck hates the Packers and we hate Joe Buck. That said, he amuses me. Him and Troy are butt heads but I don't mind. Listening to Troy shit talk the Cowboys never gets old.

reply

Speaking of which...Brett Favre’s worst playoff game was overshadowed by Randy Moss’ butt:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD3ncqjki60

reply

He can't stand the Raiders and has never tried to hide his bias. Fuck Buck. Plus he would never be where he is today without his fathers fame.

reply

Joe Buck is a POS, plain and simple.

reply

Nantz and Romo are the gold standard.

Michaels and Collinsworth are next.

Buck and Aikman next.

Tessitore and Booger bring up the rear. A real embarrassment to MNF.

None will ever be Madden and Summerall.

reply

That's a good list but I have to say the game itself overshadows commentators. I don't look at an upcoming game and think, "Who are the commentators?".

reply

https://awfulannouncing.com/fox/fox-super-bowl-liv-broadcast-buck-aikman-solid-but-1st-and-10-line-off.html

They’ve become this generation’s Pat Summerall and John Madden as the Voices of the NFC. Believe it or not, they’ve called the Super Bowl on Fox dating back to 2005 and Sunday was their sixth time calling the Super Bowl, the most of any current broadcast team.

Unlike last year when CBS’ Jim Nantz and Tony Romo had to wade their way through a dull quagmire of Super Bowl LIII, Buck and Aikman were blessed with a very good game which was in doubt until the very end when Damien Williams’ touchdown put an exclamation point on a Kansas City Chiefs victory.

The duo was mostly on top of trends and Aikman questioned San Francisco 49ers coach Kyle Shanahan for his decision not to call a time out late in the first half when the Chiefs had the ball allowing Kansas City to run the clock down which would have given San Francisco more time to drive for a potential score. Erin Andrews had an opportunity to address this with Shanahan during the after-halftime interview, but she didn’t do so.

When Jimmy Garoppolo seemingly completed a pass to tight end George Kittle, Aikman was quick to point out that there was offensive pass interference.

That was later confirmed by rules analyst Mike Pereira.

As San Francisco was up 20-10 on the Chiefs, Buck pointed out Kansas City’s postseason comebacks in the Divisional and Conference Championship games while Aikman was more cautious. Both pointed out how poorly Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes had played until late in the fourth quarter. And when the Chiefs were on their way to a win, Buck reviewed some of the players who had been with the franchise in between the team’s wins in Super Bowl IV and Super Bowl LIV.

reply

What a shameful article. No one can replace Madden and Summerall. For one thing, Buck never set foot on a football field like Summerall had. He got the job due to his famous daddy, end of discussion.

reply

[deleted]

He's even calling the US Open golf tournament now. There's just no way to get away from him. He's permeated nearly every sport. Connections served him well but he will never be his dad.

reply

I must not judge sports broadcasters very harshly. I hate anything "fox" on principle, but when I tune into a football game, I've always found Buck to sound very clear and I like his sense of humor. He has a nice tone of voice, which I wouldn't say of Aikman, who drones a bit. But considering they are a f-x product, I'm surprised I don't mind them at all.
The current ESPN guys are awful.

reply

http://kenlevine.blogspot.com/2020/02/super-bowl-liv-my-review.html

And haters, sorry, but Joe Buck does a remarkable job. He’s concise, accurate, knowledgeable, and resets the game situation after every play. He’s cool under pressure and can handle anything unexpected that comes his way. Not easy to do with 100 million people watching (although in truth, most people are at parties talking so maybe 300 people are actually listening). Troy Aikman is solid and astute but dull. I’m sure for Joe to goof around with him it’s got to be like playing tennis against a blanket.

reply