Who are you most disappointed in for signing the "Free Polanski" petition?

If the girls were the age that I listed, a crime was committed.

Some of these people who say Polanski did nothing wrong are part of the #metoo movement and condemn Weinstein for his rapes.

They know what rape is, but they clearly feel that some people (like themselves) are worthy of being protected by the law when they report a sexual assault. But a "nobody" like Polanski's youngest victim (as far as we know) is only worthy of their contempt.

There is a likely a group of the idiots that signed the letter that don't even know the details of the case. It wouldn't surprise me to find that lots of them were handed the letter at some friends house and asked to sign it and they did it without bothering to even try to learn what the full story was. A bit like when you see people signing petitions for something in a mall, a lot of the idiots that sign don't know what they are signing they simply do it because they see someone else doing it.

90 days doesn't suit the crime he committed to begin with. He deserved minimum 20 years. If he was really regretful for what he did, he would have accepted whichever new deal the judge decided on.

Once again you are completely wrong. The 90 days you are referring to was the time he was committed to in a psych hospital to undergo evaluation before he was sentenced. Standard practice at that time because in a crime like this the courts wanted to make sure that there was not some mental illness that was behind the illegal behavior. He only spent 45 days undergoing the psych evaluation and was release from the hospital. At that ime he was then scheduled for a return date to the court where he would be formally sentenced. Prior to his showing up for the sentencing he fled the country.

Now the internet loves to spout off bullshit about this case and you apparently have fallen for some of it. The simple fact is that when you enter a plea bargain which Polanski did, Polanski had an agreement that the prosecutor would recommend a specific sentence, BUT never ever ever does that recommendation actually mean that the judge has to follow it. In most instances a judge will follow a prosecutors' recommendation for sentencing but the judge have no obligation to and will sometime give more or less time than what the agreement was for. The judge will also tell the defendant when they are entering the guilty plea that they are under no obligation to follow the agreement between the defendant and the prosecutor.

Polanski's fans love to babble that he fled because the judge was going to go back on the agreement, but that is simply bullshit. The judge never handed down the sentence and so there is no evidence that he would or wouldn't have been sentenced to years in prison or let off with time served. That is just speculation. The only clear cut fact is he was never formally sentenced... and if he were to return no he would not only face the sentence for the original crime he pled guilty to but also be facing additional charges for his flight from justice.